US President Donald Trump said that Vice President JD Vance's outreach to Iran was about helping the country get medical supplies, after US media reported Vance had written to Tehran's top security official to revive peace talks.

Iran has received a letter from Vance but it has not responded to it yet, the country's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported on Thursday, while adding that Tehran wants the US to meet its conditions and "any position that contradicts this framework is unacceptable."

Also on Thursday, the US military's senior officer overseeing the Middle East, Admiral Brad Cooper, met Trump at the White House to outline military options in Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing US officials and other people with direct knowledge of the meeting.

Reuters could not immediately independently verify this report.

Vance sent the letter to Iranian Security Council chief Mohsen Rezaei in a bid to revive peace negotiations, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing US officials and people familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the reports.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Vance sent the letter at Trump's direction. When asked by reporters later on Wednesday if he directed Vance to reach out to Iran to restart peace negotiations, Trump said: "No."

"What that is is they need help with medical supplies and various things. He (Vance) asked me what I thought. I said, if you want to do that, that's okay. Basically, it's getting supplies in to help people that are not well," Trump told reporters.

Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter and Trump's remark. Vance's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tehran's conditions

Iran's parliament speaker said on Thursday that Tehran's conditions had been repeatedly and clearly communicated to mediators and that progress can only be achieved if Iran's seven conditions are met.

The "carrot-and-stick approach has no effect on Iran," Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf added.

Conditions Iran says must be met before it will reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz shipping route include, among other demands, lifting the US blockade on Iranian ports, lifting US sanctions on Iranian oil exports and ending hostilities on all regional fronts.

The United States and Israel launched a war against Iran at the end of February. The US has also since imposed a naval blockade on Iran to starve it of oil export revenue and escalated efforts to economically isolate Iran.

Iran has long blamed US sanctions for hindering civilian access to medical supplies.

In an August letter to the UN Security Council, Iran accused the US of intentionally depriving civilians "of access to food, medicines, medical equipment, energy and other necessities, with grave consequences for their rights to life, health, food and a decent standard of living."

Qatari mediators presented Iran with a new draft deal on Sunday to end the war, but a senior Iranian official said Doha had only put forward unacceptable ideas that did not amount to an offer.

The war's impact on global energy costs has also weighed on support for Republican candidates and hurt Trump's approval ratings ahead of the US midterm elections that decide control of Congress. Trump's Republican Party holds a narrow majority in both chambers of Congress.

(Reuters)

This live blog has now ended. Make sure to follow us for the latest news on Facebook, X, and Instagram.

Visit our previous live page to catch up on developments earlier today.

These were the top stories on Thursday:

•    Israel elections: Neither Prime Minister Netanyahu nor his main rival Gadi Eisenkot have won a majority in the Knesset following Tuesday's election. With almost all the votes counted, Netanyahu's bloc has 53 seats to Eisenkot's 48, setting the stage for fraught coalition negotiations and perhaps a new election.

•    Netanyahu and his far-right allies have moved to delegitimise the vote by claiming that Arab parties conducted widespread fraud, without providing evidence.

•    Qatar has rejected 'absurd' accusations that it interfered in the vote, while a senior elections official said the claims of voter fraud are baseless.

•    Iran war: Regional mediators are continuing to push for a deal between Iran and the US to prevent Trump from relaunching the war after next week's US midterm elections.

•    Strait of Hormuz: Three tankers have caught fire in the Strait of Hormuz after hitting mines.

•    Yemen war: Yemen's Houthis said 12 people were killed in Saudi strikes on residential areas in Taiz province.

At least four people, two of them children, have been killed after sustained heavy rainfall caused flash flooding in six provinces across Syria, local media and authorities reported on Thursday.

Heavy rain on Wednesday left at least three bridges out of service in the eastern province of Deir ez-Zor, while key roads have also been damaged.

The flooding has disrupted water supplies, while authorities shuttered schools in Deir ez-Zor, Raqqa, and Hasakeh on Thursday amid the storms.

Hundreds of families have been forced to leave their homes and the displacement camps where they reside in recent days.

Emergency teams have evacuated at least 375 families from three displacement camps in Raqqa province and have rescued 15 people who were trapped in their vehicles, the state-run SANA news agency reported.

Hospitals, schools, and bakeries have been affected by the flooding while disaster management teams have warned people about the risk of drowning.

Rescue teams were sent to the village of Kasrat Surour after a drainage crossing collapsed and left over 100 families surrounded by floodwater.

The flooding has caused major disruptions to traffic, including on the Aleppo-Raqqa highway.

Syrian army helicopters have been deployed across the country to help those who have been stranded.

The flooding has had far-reaching impacts, with telecommunications disrupted in Deir ez-Zor due to damage caused to fibre optic cables on the Homs-Deir ez-Zor and Aleppo- Deir ez-Zor routes.

The minister of emergencies and disaster management, Raed al-Saleh, has urged residents in eastern governorates to remain in their homes unless absolutely necessary, and to steer away from low-lying areas.

He has also called on people to refrain from trying to cross flooded roads, which comes as rescue teams grapple to deal with the situation.

Syria has been battling thunderstorms, hail, and strong winds in recent weeks, with the meteorological directorate warning that the storms and lightning are set to continue.

Syria was last hit with flooding in May, affecting scores of farmers during harvest season and destroying important wheat, barley, cotton, and vegetable crops.

The flooding in Aleppo and Idlib affected over 19,000 people and damaged over 3,400 shelters.

 

Palestinian rights groups have filed an urgent petition with Israel's Supreme Court demanding the return of hundreds of families forcibly displaced from their homes in Hebron, as Israeli forces continue their military siege of the occupied West Bank city for a seventh consecutive day.

The petition calls for Palestinians expelled from the Al-Jalda, Ein Deir Bahha and Khallat Al-Maghariba neighbourhoods to be allowed to return to their homes, many of which have been seized by Israeli forces and converted into military barracks.

Lawyer Bassam Al-Qawasmi, founder of the All-Palestinian Gathering, said the court was awaiting responses from the Israeli military prosecution and army before proceeding with the case.

He explained that the legal action was launched after obtaining authorisation from Hebron Municipality and families affected by the forced displacement, with support from the city's newly established Relief and Support Committee.

The petition seeks to end the forced displacement, alleviate residents' suffering and secure their return to their homes.

Israeli forces have expelled thousands of Palestinians from neighbourhoods across Hebron since launching a major military operation last Friday after two Israeli soldiers were killed in an attack, imposing severe restrictions on movement and blocking access to residential areas.

More than 4,000 Palestinians have been displaced, while dozens of homes have been seized and converted into military outposts. The Israeli army has also demolished dozens of Palestinian buildings across the city.

Siege enters seventh day

Israeli forces continued raids and closures around Hebron's Old City on Thursday, continuing to occupy Palestinian homes in Al-Jalda and Ein Deir Bahha.

Troops also closed several iron gates surrounding the Old City, further restricting movement across the area.

The military operation has severely disrupted education, with dozens of schools suspending in-person classes and thousands of pupils forced to rely on remote learning and educational assignments.

According to Palestinian news agency Wafa, Israeli forces injured two Palestinians and detained seven others on Thursday, while settlers attacked Palestinian residents and vehicles in the Ras Al-Joura area near the city's northern entrance.

The Palestinian Prisoner's Society said on Wednesday that at least 110 Palestinians had been detained across the Hebron governorate since the operation began, including three women and seven children.

Israeli forces have also isolated 12 villages and communities in Masafer Yatta, south of Hebron, preventing residents from accessing markets, hospitals and essential services.

The offensive began after two Israeli soldiers were killed in a shooting near the illegal Israeli settlement of Telem last week. The Palestinian gunmen involved were subsequently killed by Israeli forces.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the closure of Hebron and instructed security forces to prepare for a wider lockdown across the occupied West Bank.

Extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich subsequently called for a military campaign in the territory similar to Israel's assault on Gaza.

UN warns of collective punishment

The United Nations and human rights organisations have condemned the operation, warning that mass displacement and sweeping restrictions on civilians could constitute serious violations of international law.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk said collective punishment was a grave violation of international law, warning that threats to empty entire neighbourhoods raised serious concerns about ethnic cleansing.

Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem described the operation as an act of collective punishment rather than a security measure.

Palestinian rights group Al-Haq also accused Israel of violating international law through its military siege.

Roland Friedrich, director of UNRWA Affairs in the occupied West Bank, warned that the displacement echoed Israeli operations in the northern West Bank in early 2025, where more than 34,000 Palestinian refugees remain forcibly displaced.

Many Syrians have expressed anger at their government following its response to deadly Jordanian airstrikes in southern Syria, criticising it for its lack of action and appearing to accept Amman’s justification for an operation that killed civilians, including children.

Jordan’s military said Monday that its air force had struck what it described as terrorist sites in the southern Syrian province of Daraa, targeting groups it said were linked to a deadly shooting at a church in southern Jordan which killed nine people on 23 October, a rare incident in the kingdom. Jordanian authorities said they arrested three suspects behind the shooting.

The Islamic State (IS) group later claimed responsibility for the shooting. Jordanian officials subsequently claimed that the attack in southern Syria had killed more than 20 IS members and targeted a major weapons depot, while acknowledging unintended civilian casualties.

While Jordan has carried out repeated airstrikes in southern Syria in recent years, primarily against drug-smuggling networks operating near its border, Monday's operation has fuelled particular outrage because of the civilian toll and questions over whether Damascus had agreed to the strikes.

Amman said the operation was coordinated with the Syrian government, a claim Damascus rejected, saying the strikes were carried out without prior notification or coordination.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry condemned the attacks as a violation of the country’s sovereignty, said an investigation had been launched and called for coordination over security operations along the shared border.

However, criticism intensified after Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and his Jordanian counterpart, Ayman al-Safadi, issued a joint statement on Wednesday following a telephone call to discuss the consequences of the strikes.

The statement said Safadi had explained that the operation was based on field intelligence and aimed at "neutralising confirmed threats and imminent terrorist operations targeting Jordan's security." He also expressed regret over civilian deaths.

The two sides agreed to establish a joint security committee to examine the circumstances and repercussions of the strikes and strengthen coordination along the border.

Although Damascus had separately condemned the operation and summoned Jordan’s ambassador to deliver a formal protest, many Syrians have viewed the joint statement as accepting Jordan’s account.

Comments online, including under the Syrian Foreign Ministry’s statement on X, have reflected widespread anger over what users described as the government’s failure to defend Syrian sovereignty and adequately respond to the civilian deaths.

"Are these the ISIS members, Minister? And are these ISIS weapons depots, Your Excellency?" one user wrote, questioning Jordan’s account while referring to images showing the aftermath of the strikes and child victims.

Others argued that accepting Jordan’s justification for the operation could provide Israel with further excuses to widen its occupation in southern Syria under the pretext of fighting extremist groups.

After Assad’s fall, Israel invaded Syria’s Quneitra and Mount Hermon regions, claiming its military presence there was needed to prevent extremist militants from reaching its border.

"You are completely unfit for this position. How can you allow the Jordanian king to use you to push this narrative, while you repeat it so blindly?" one user wrote, addressing Syrian officials.

"Do not complain when Israeli forces invade Daraa under the pretext of rooting out ISIS. You are officially acknowledging that ISIS is present there, and you have now given Israel the green light," the user added.

Another comment accused the government of accepting Jordan’s account at the expense of the victims.

"A statement full of humiliation, submission and acceptance of the Jordanian narrative. It also betrays the blood of those killed by describing the massacre as a strike against terrorists. Were the children terrorists?" the user wrote.

The criticism reflects wider sensitivities and concerns in southern Syria, where residents have faced years of conflict, repeated Israeli incursions and security operations. Many remain under threat of foreign military action in Syria, which often kills civilians.

IS controlled large swathes of Syria before its territorial defeat in 2019, but the group continues to operate clandestine cells, particularly in desert areas, and has claimed attacks against security forces and civilians.

The group's continued activity has raised concerns about the future of counterterrorism operations as the US reduces its military presence in Syria.

Palestinian families in the occupied West Bank faced renewed threats of forced displacement on Thursday, as armed Israeli settlers raided homes in the Jordan Valley and allegedly assaulted journalists and activists in Masafer Yatta, days after Israel's parliamentary election.

UK-based charity Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) said masked, armed settlers entered the Palestinian community of Al-Shuneh, near Jiftlik, at around 2am, surrounding three homes and threatening to expel residents unless they left "voluntarily".

The settlers allegedly damaged a resident's car and stole a 1.5-cubic-metre water tank before returning to a nearby hill, where they appeared to have established an illegal outpost the previous day.

Aseel Baidoun, MAP's deputy director of advocacy and campaigns, told The New Arab that the outpost posed an immediate threat to the community's survival.

"For Palestinians in communities like Al-Shuneh, an outpost can spell the end of their community and displacement from their homes. What starts as a few caravans, tents or a settler farm can become a permanent settlement with full backing from the Israeli state," she said.

"Outposts can spread onto more land, link settlements and cut off Palestinian communities from basic services and healthcare. For families already facing attacks and threats, and unable to reach their grazing land for two years, every new development makes it harder to stay."

"That's why the speed of work on the hill overlooking Al-Shuneh is so alarming."

Around 80 families face uncertainty over whether they can remain in their homes, with residents already struggling to access basic services, according to MAP.

Settlers have reportedly spent several days clearing land and carrying out construction on the hill overlooking the community. More than three settler families have arrived at the site and begun installing what appear to be water pipes and electricity cables.

MAP also documented earlier threats against Al-Shuneh residents, including an August incident in which armed settlers allegedly assaulted a family and threatened to burn their homes and seize their livestock unless they left.

Baidoun warned that the outcome of Tuesday's Israeli election was unlikely to improve conditions for Palestinians.

"Whatever the outcome of Israel's election, there is little reason to expect a change in the policies driving settlement expansion and settler violence," she told The New Arab.

"All of Israel's major political parties support the settlement project, and Palestinian communities cannot rely on a new government to protect them from the violence and displacement it actively encourages and enables."

Journalists and activists assaulted in Masafer Yatta

In a separate incident, Russian activist Adele Shoko reported that Israeli settlers attacked her and two colleagues, US journalist Jasper Nathaniel and Israeli-Russian activist Andrey X, in the Palestinian village of Umm al-Khair, in Masafer Yatta.

Shoko said armed settlers beat the group, threatened them and stole equipment and personal belongings.

"Jasper and I were also beaten. Jasper was then pepper-sprayed and arrested," she wrote on social media, adding that Israeli forces had taken Nathaniel into custody.

"Andrey was severely beaten and lost consciousness several times in front of police. Despite this, he was denied hospital treatment. He was put in an ambulance – but instead of being taken to hospital, he was taken to a police station. He is still there, arrested and being denied medical care," she added.

Footage circulated online appeared to show several men, some armed, beating Nathaniel and Andrey X. Other footage showed Israeli authorities leading Nathaniel away as he shouted that he had been assaulted.

In later updates, Shoko said both men were "physically okay" and were "having their court hearing" following their detention.

Activists subsequently reported that Andrey X had been released after Thursday's court hearing. Nathaniel's status had not been publicly confirmed.

The attacks follow a warning on Monday from UN-mandated investigators, who accused Israel of committing "extermination" in the occupied West Bank.

Palestinians across the territory have faced escalating violence by Israeli settlers and soldiers, particularly since the start of Israel's genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023.

Palestinian families and independent journalists in the occupied West Bank reported attacks by Israeli settlers on Thursday, as Israel’s high-stakes election unfolds. 

UK-based Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) and Russian activist Adele Shoko reported separate incidents of violence as Israelis awaited the final election results. 

MAP said masked, armed settlers raided the Palestinian community of Al-Shuneh, near Jiftlik in the Jordan Valley, at around 2am on Thursday.  

The attackers surrounded three homes and threatened to force families out unless they left “voluntarily”. 

During the raid, settlers reportedly damaged one resident’s car and stole another resident’s 1.5-cubic-metre water tank.  

They later returned to a hill overlooking the community, where MAP said they appeared to have established an outpost the previous day. 

Aseel Baidoun, MAP’s Deputy Director of Advocacy and Campaigns, told The New Arab that the attack illustrates the grave risks facing Palestinian residents of Al-Shuneh if settlers continue to occupy the area overlooking the community, amid months of escalating intimidation and wider Israeli settler and military violence across the occupied West Bank.

"For Palestinians in communities like Al-Shuneh, an outpost can spell the end of their community and displacement from their homes. What starts as a few caravans, tents or a settler farm can become a permanent settlement with full backing from the Israeli state," she said.

Baidoun added: "Outposts can spread onto more land, link settlements and cut off Palestinian communities from basic services and healthcare. For families already facing attacks and threats, and unable to reach their grazing land for two years, every new development makes it harder to stay."

"That’s why the speed of work on the hill overlooking Al-Shuneh is so alarming."

MAP cited previous incidents, including reports earlier this month that settlers had repeatedly entered the community and threatened residents with expulsion following Israel’s election.  

The organisation also highlighted an attack in August, when armed settlers reportedly assaulted a family and threatened to burn their homes and seize their livestock if they refused to leave.

Around 80 families now face uncertainty over whether they will be able to remain in their homes, while residents have described difficulties accessing basic services, according to MAP. 

Settlers have reportedly spent days clearing land and carrying out construction on the hill overlooking the community.  

MAP said more than three settler families had arrived at the site and begun installing what appeared to be water pipes and electricity cables. 

Baidoun has since called for the urgent protection of Palestinian communities such as Al-Shuneh, arguing that a potential change in Israel’s leadership following Tuesday’s election will likely not change conditions for Palestinians on the ground.

“Whatever the outcome of Israel’s election, there is little reason to expect a change in the policies driving settlement expansion and settler violence," Baidoun told TNA.

"All of Israel’s major political parties support the settlement project, and Palestinian communities cannot rely on a new government to protect them from the violence and displacement it actively encourages and enables."

Activists and journalists report settler assault 

The latest reports of violence came as Russian activist Adele Shoko said she and two colleagues- US journalist Jasper Nathaniel and Israeli-Russian activist Andrey X - were attacked by Israeli settlers in the Palestinian village of Umm al-Khair, in the Masafer Yatta area of the occupied West Bank. 

In posts on social media, Shoko said the group had been beaten and threatened by armed settlers, who stole equipment and personal belongings. 

“Jasper and I were also beaten. Jasper was then pepper-sprayed and arrested,” Shoko wrote, adding that Nathaniel was taken away by Israeli forces. 

“Andrey was severely beaten and lost consciousness several times in front of police. Despite this, he was denied hospital treatment. He was put in an ambulance – but instead of being taken to hospital, he was taken to a police station. He is still there, arrested and being denied medical care,” she added. 

Video footage shared online showed several men, some of them armed, beating Nathaniel and Andrey X. Other footage appeared to show Israeli authorities leading Nathaniel away as he shouted that he had been beaten. 

In subsequent updates, Shoko said Nathaniel and Andrey X were “physically okay” and were “having their court hearing” following their detention. 

Activists have since reported that Andrey X was released from Israeli custody following Thursday’s court hearing, while Nathaniel’s status has yet to be publicly confirmed.

On Monday, United Nations-mandated investigators said Israel was committing “extermination” in the West Bank.  

Before the election, Palestinians in the West Bank were already facing record levels of violence by Israeli soldiers and settlers, which have intensified since the outbreak of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's bloc on Thursday piled pressure on Arab-Israeli leaders over unproven accusations of foreign funding, in a push to neuter parties that could hold the key to forming a government after an inconclusive election.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who holds a largely ceremonial role, called for an investigation into allegations but cautioned against stigmatising the entire Arab-Israeli community, who voted at unprecedented rates.

Israel was nearing the completion of ballot counting from Tuesday's election, the first since Hamas's 7 October 2023 attacks, with neither Netanyahu nor the opposition bloc led by former military chief Gadi Eisenkot appearing able to secure a majority.

The Netanyahu camp's accusations, denied by both Arab-majority lists, could bring new uncertainty into the electoral process at a time when the threat of a new Israeli and US attack on Iran looms over the region.

The election saw soaring participation by Arab-Israelis, descendants of Palestinians who stayed after the country's creation in 1948, as outrage boiled at calls by officials such as National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir to treat their community much as Israel has dealt with Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

Following Netanyahu's accusations, Ben-Gvir went so far as to encourage Israel to "immediately" order the arrests of Arab party leaders.

The Arab parties together have enough votes to take the opposition bloc over the finish line, but Eisenkot has baulked after relentless attacks by Netanyahu, who warned his right-wing Jewish base that voting for the opposition would put Arabs in power.

'Political earthquake'

Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg, a conservative who heads the Central Elections Committee, requested an investigation by the Shin Bet security service into allegations that the Arab grouping Ra'am received money from Qatar, the energy-rich Gulf powerbroker that has channels to Hamas.

"The Ra'amgate scandal is a political earthquake. Israel's elections have been stolen!" Netanyahu's Likud party said.

Ra'am chief Mansour Abbas said his party had "no connection whatsoever to the affair", and welcomed an investigation.

The Joint List, which unites three Arab-majority parties, accused Netanyahu and his allies of a "campaign of incitement" that "exposes their fear" of Arab citizens' political strength.

Government officials did not offer evidence to back the allegations, and left-wing candidate Yair Golan accused Netanyahu of attempting to stir controversy after failing to get a majority.

"He is trying to challenge the election results," Golan said.

Netanyahu himself has long been under the cloud of allegations related to Qatar after the arrests last year of two of his aides for allegedly receiving payments from the Gulf state.

Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al Ansari called the latest accusations "ridiculous and dangerous".

Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, for years tacitly supported Qatar funding for Hamas-ruled Gaza, hoping to preserve stability.

That paradigm collapsed on 7 October 2023.

Kingmakers under pressure

With nearly 93% of the vote counted, Netanyahu's bloc was at 53 seats and the opposition forces led by Eisenkot on 48 - both under the 61 needed to form a government.

The two Arab formations were on track for an unprecedented 19 seats between them.

Yousef Jabareen, head of the Joint List, had told AFP that he was willing to cooperate with the opposition to bring down Netanyahu but without joining it in a government.

Eisenkot called allegations of Qatari interference "profoundly serious" and backed an investigation, but warned that Netanyahu may be trying to delay election results.

Netanyahu had tried during the voting to raise allegations of fraud, saying that Arab parties were caught with envelopes of cash, and his Likud party peddled the accusations throughout Thursday.

Police said they arrested three suspects but the election commission called it an isolated local case.

Dean Livne, acting director-general of the central elections committee, rejected a call from a right-wing lawmaker to convene a meeting on fraud, saying that any suggestion of widespread issues was "entirely groundless".

Another factor that could play into the formation of a government is an attack on Iran.

Netanyahu has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran, with President Donald Trump signalling he was ready to attack after next Tuesday's US midterm elections.

Eisenkot has warned the military that Netanyahu has no mandate and that officers must put Israel's security over the premier's "political needs".

An attack could raise pressure on Eisenkot to join an emergency unity government or keep the clock running until Israel can call new elections.

(AFP and TNA staff)

 

Qatar categorically denied allegations that it interfered in Israel's parliamentary elections or financed efforts to influence the results, saying Israeli politicians were attempting to drag Doha into their domestic political disputes following Tuesday's inconclusive vote.

Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari on Thursday rejected accusations circulated by Israeli politicians and media outlets linked to them, saying the claims were part of a new disinformation campaign targeting Qatar.

The allegations emerged after Palestinian parties secured a record 19 seats in the 120-member Knesset, prompting far-right Israeli ministers to demand investigations into alleged "foreign funding" of Arab political parties.

In a statement, Al-Ansari highlighted contradictions in the accusations, which ranged from claims that Qatar had bought Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's loyalty to allegations that it had financed the Israeli left and influenced Palestinian voters.

He said the allegations appeared to suggest that Qatar controlled the entire Israeli political landscape, describing them as both absurd and dangerous.

Al-Ansari accused sections of Israel's political and media establishment of displaying an excessive obsession with Qatar that went beyond reason.

"Qatar is not a scapegoat for the political failures of some Israeli politicians," he said, adding that they should instead respond to voters' aspirations and address the consequences of their policies in the region.

He stressed that Qatar had no interest in Israel's domestic political or electoral competition and would not accept being drawn into disputes between rival parties.

Far-right ministers demand arrests

The Qatari response follows growing accusations from Israeli officials after the Joint List and the United Arab List (Ra'am) secured a combined 19 parliamentary seats, according to near-final election results.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called on Israel's domestic intelligence agency, Shin Bet, to arrest the leaders of Palestinian political parties over suspected links to Qatari funding.

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich also demanded that the party leaders be questioned, claiming that suspicions of electoral manipulation involving foreign Islamic funding represented a test for Israel.

Netanyahu's Likud party described the alleged scandal, which it dubbed "Ra'am-gate", as an earthquake, claiming that the elections had been stolen through foreign interference and financial incentives offered to voters in support of Palestinian parties.

Likud further alleged that the supposed interference amounted to an attack on Israeli democracy aimed at "Islamising Israel" and bringing down the government.

However, Israeli police said they had no investigative or intelligence information supporting the allegations.

Central Elections Committee chairman Judge Noam Sohlberg also said he had no evidence establishing the nature of the suspicions.

The accusations come as Netanyahu's coalition faces an uncertain political future after winning just 53 seats, eight short of the parliamentary majority required to form a government.

Opposition parties secured 48 seats, while the record gains made by Palestinian parties have placed them in a potentially decisive position in coalition negotiations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could remain in power for another two years before receiving a presidential pardon under a proposed unity government arrangement, according to Israeli media reports, as political deadlock following Tuesday's election threatens to prolong his rule.

Israel's Channel 14, which is close to Netanyahu, reported on Wednesday that President Isaac Herzog was considering promoting a rotation agreement under which Netanyahu would serve as prime minister for two more years before retiring from politics, with a pardon forming part of the arrangement.

However, Herzog's office strongly denied the report, describing it as "completely fake" and insisting that no such initiative existed.

The proposal is one of several arrangements being discussed in Israeli political circles after neither Netanyahu's right-wing bloc nor the opposition secured the 61 seats needed to form a government.

According to the Channel 14 report, Netanyahu would lead the first half of a coalition government's term before handing power to another leader, potentially allowing him to avoid further political and legal uncertainty.

The proposed pardon would address Netanyahu's ongoing corruption trial, in which he faces charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, allegations he denies.

Netanyahu is also wanted by the International Criminal Court over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during Israel's genocidal war on Gaza. An Israeli presidential pardon would not affect the ICC proceedings.

Trump-backed unity government

The reported initiative follows growing efforts among Netanyahu's allies to persuade opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot to join a unity government despite his repeated refusal to serve under the Israeli prime minister.

The Washington Post reported that Netanyahu's camp has been actively promoting such an arrangement, with sympathetic figures in US President Donald Trump's administration discussing the possibility before the election.

According to the report, Netanyahu privately told American and European officials that a partnership with Eisenkot could allow him to abandon far-right coalition partners, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Netanyahu has also presented himself to US officials as the preferred Israeli leader for renewed military operations against Iran.

Trump publicly endorsed Netanyahu ahead of the election and has repeatedly pressured Herzog to pardon the prime minister.

Israeli reports on Thursday said that figures close to Netanyahu were considering several coalition arrangements, including a rotation agreement under which Eisenkot would become prime minister after approximately two years.

Another proposal would instead offer Eisenkot a senior ministerial position without requiring Netanyahu to relinquish power.

Likud officials believe Eisenkot could face pressure to accept a deal rather than risk another election, although there is no indication that he has agreed to negotiations.

Three leaders and a presidential pardon?

A separate proposal published by Israeli news outlet Ynet envisages a three-way rotation involving Netanyahu, Eisenkot and former prime minister Naftali Bennett.

In an opinion article, researcher Kobby Barda suggested Trump could broker an agreement allowing Netanyahu to remain prime minister until July 2028, when Herzog's presidential term ends.

Under the proposed arrangement, Netanyahu would then become president and receive a pardon, with Eisenkot assuming the premiership until January 2030 and Bennett taking over afterwards.

Barda argued that Trump could use his influence to secure the arrangement as part of efforts to advance normalisation between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

A photo of an Israeli soldier smiling in front of the damaged Saint Joseph Church in the southern Lebanese village of Qaouzah has sparked widespread anger and calls to protect the 120-year-old religious site.

The image, circulated on social media on Wednesday, shows the soldier standing in front of the partially damaged church, surrounded by rubble and debris.

Much of the visible damage is to the church's roof and exterior, although the structure remains standing.

Qaouzah's mayor, Charbel Rizk, told local media that protecting the historic church would require safe access to the village, which has been cut off by Israeli military operations.

He also appealed to Pope Leo XIV and Lebanese authorities to "preserve this 120-year-old church".

"Our ancestors built the church through their hard work. The dome was already damaged during the conflict, and there is damage inside," he said, stressing the mainly Christian village's deep connection to the church.

Israel's occupation of parts of southern Lebanon has displaced civilians, while attacks on and the desecration of places of worship by Israeli soldiers have been documented across the region.

"We want to return to the village, even if we have to sleep under an olive tree or next to the church. We have had no access to the village since the beginning of the war in early March," Rizk said.

He added that the village's strategic location had left it repeatedly exposed to attacks during previous conflicts.

Vincent Gelot, director of a French Catholic organisation that has been providing supplies to isolated Christian villages in southern Lebanon, condemned attacks on religious sites following the circulation of the image.

"It is unacceptable to attack religious sanctuaries," he said, as concerns grew over the destruction of religious and cultural heritage.

However, Gelot stressed that the circumstances surrounding the damage to Saint Joseph Church remained unclear.

"We do not know when this destruction occurred or who committed it," he said, calling for an investigation to establish the facts.

He added that efforts to investigate the damage and identify those responsible had been hampered by Israeli forces preventing teams from entering the area.

Residents have also appealed to international officials to help protect their community following the circulation of the photograph.

Locals contacted Apostolic Nuncio Archbishop Paolo Borgia and US Ambassador Michael Issa, urging them to intervene to protect religious sites.

According to local media reports, around 54 families lived in Qaouzah before the latest displacement, with most forced to abandon their homes and belongings.

Parish priest Father Antonios Hanna told local media that the church held particular significance because generations of villagers had cut and carried stones to build it.

He said the building was central to the community's religious and cultural heritage.

This is not the first time photographs of Israeli soldiers at Christian religious sites in Lebanon have sparked outrage.

In May, the Israeli military launched an investigation after a photograph showing a soldier desecrating a statue of the Virgin Mary in southern Lebanon triggered international condemnation.

The image, taken in the village of Debel, showed the soldier placing a cigarette in the statue's mouth while smoking another himself.

Earlier this year, another Israeli soldier was photographed damaging a statue of Jesus in the same village. The incident followed reports that Israeli troops had bulldozed solar panels supplying electricity to the area.

 

 

​Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has donated $10 million from his personal funds to two of Damascus' most prominent religious sites, the Umayyad Mosque and the Sayyida Zainab shrine, in a symbolic gesture highlighting shared religious and historical ties as Baghdad and Damascus seek to strengthen relations.

Zaidi allocated $5 million to each site during his visit to the Syrian capital on Wednesday, according to a statement from his media office.

The visit marked the first by an Iraqi prime minister to Syria since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December 2024. Zaidi, a Shia Muslim, was accompanied by Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and other senior officials during visits to both sites.

The choice of destinations was largely symbolic. The Umayyad Mosque is one of the most important historic Sunni Muslim sites in the region, while the Sayyida Zainab shrine is among Syria’s most prominent Shia pilgrimage destinations.

Together, the visits offered a public display of religious coexistence and Arab solidarity at a time when the two countries are seeking to move beyond years of political tension.

Zaidi prayed at both the Umayyad Mosque and later did the same at Sayyida Zainab.

Beyond its religious importance, the Umayyad Mosque, which was built in the eighth century, is associated with the political power of the Umayyad Dynasty, which had its capital in Damascus and is often associated with Sunni Islam.

The mosque itself, however, is also part of a shared Islamic heritage and has significance for Muslims from different backgrounds. Its complex includes a site traditionally associated with the head of Hussein.

The Sayyida Zainab shrine, meanwhile, is widely believed by Shia Muslims to be the burial place of Zainab bint Ali, the granddaughter of Prophet Muhammad and sister of Hussein. It has become one of the region's most important destinations for Shia pilgrims.

The shrine also became a focal point of sectarian mobilisation during Syria’s civil war. Iran-backed Shia militias that fought alongside Assad’s forces justified their intervention in the conflict by saying it was necessary to protect it from extremist Sunni groups.

The two sites' historical and religious associations make Zaidi's visits notable amid efforts to ease sectarian tensions and strengthen ties between the neighbouring countries.

'One people in two countries'

The visits came after Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa said that Iraqi visitors would be welcome at the Sayyida Zainab shrine, provided appropriate security arrangements were in place.

In a recent interview with Iraqi broadcaster Dijlah TV, Sharaa said authorities had arrested people who attempted to exploit the issue to stir sectarian tensions.

He also stressed that Damascus did not view its relationship with Baghdad through a sectarian or ethnic lens, but instead sought to build on shared history, economic interests and longstanding social connections between the two populations.

Alongside the religious visits, Zaidi and Sharaa discussed economic cooperation, security coordination and regional developments.

A key issue was the proposed revival of the Iraq-Syria oil export corridor, which would allow Iraqi crude oil to reach Mediterranean markets through Syria’s port of Baniyas.

According to a statement from Zaidi’s office, the two sides discussed exporting Iraqi oil through the pipeline at a capacity of up to two million barrels per day.

Relations between the two countries have faced difficulties since Assad’s removal, particularly given the role of Iran-backed Iraqi and regional militias in supporting his government during the Syrian war.

Some Iran-aligned factions in Iraq have been wary of Syria’s new leadership. However, the government has sought to take a more pragmatic approach towards Damascus, focusing on border security, trade and regional cooperation.

During his meeting with Sharaa, al-Zaidi described Iraqis and Syrians as “one people in two countries,” stressing the need to deepen their partnership and expand bilateral cooperation.

The two leaders had previously met in September on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

 

Israel police have said there is no evidence to support claims by Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party that Arab parties "stole" the election, after parties representing Palestinian citizens of Israel secured 19 seats amid a high-stakes vote that left neither Netanyahu nor his main challenger Gadi Eisenkot with enough seats to form a majority in the 120-seat Knesset. 

On Thursday, police rejected repeated allegations by Likud that Arab parties had committed fraud.

Likud had called for an investigation by police and the Shin Bet domestic intelligence agency into claims of widespread voter fraud and intimidation. 

A police source, cited by several Israeli media outlets, said: “Election day passed with very few irregular incidents concerning the integrity of the election, even when compared to previous elections.” 

“It should be emphasised that there is no investigative- or intelligence-based supporting evidence for the claims,” the source added. 

The latest comments came a day after an official from Israel’s Central Elections Committee (CEC) also dismissed the allegations.

Speaking to Israeli radio station Reshet Bet, the CEC’s acting director general, Dean Livne, said the committee conducts a comprehensive review of complaints. 

In a statement, Likud claimed that “hundreds of testimonies” showed that Arab parties, including Ra’am, which participated in the 2021-2022 Israeli government, had bribed ballot committee members and multiple voters with envelopes of cash.  

Likud also alleged “double voting, discrepancies between the number of envelopes and the number of voters, use of illegal voter mobilization software, and more”. 

Following the election, Likud continued to insist that Arab parties had “stolen” the vote.  

Haaretz reported that the party had invested millions of shekels in a system designed to “supervise” polling stations in Arab communities. 

Likud’s allegations also came amid concerns over the spread of misinformation on social media.  

An image shared by Netanyahu purportedly showing voters queuing at a polling station in the Palestinian-majority city of Sakhnin on Tuesday was found to have been generated or manipulated using artificial intelligence (AI), according to BBC Verify. 

The image appeared to show Palestinian voters with Israeli citizenship queuing to vote after Netanyahu shared a Channel 14 report on X claiming there was “unusual congestion at polling stations in the Arab sector”.  

However, BBC Verify said its analysis detected signs that the image had been generated or manipulated using AI. 

Netanyahu and opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot have both claimed a path to victory, with Eisenkot’s coalition potentially depending on Arab parties, including Ra’am and the Joint List.  

The two groups are poised to secure a record number of seats and could hold the balance of power in the Knesset. 

The Joint List has previously criticised Netanyahu and Likud’s allegations against Arab parties and voters, accusing them of using fearmongering tactics, including exaggerating Arab turnout in the parliamentary election and circulating AI-generated content. 

The alliance has condemned the conduct, warning that it risked fuelling further hostility towards Arab communities in Israel. 

“Netanyahu is afraid of high turnout in our community because he knows it will bring down his government,” it said in a statement. 

 

Yemeni authorities in the country’s Taiz province accused the Houthis on Wednesday of using internationally prohibited toxic materials in their attacks, as fighting rages on between government forces and Houthi rebels.

A statement from local authorities in Taiz called for an urgent investigation into the materials used in the attacks.

It came after field reports indicating that the shelling carried out by the Houthis contained banned toxic substances.

The authorities added that similar incidents had previously been recorded, with several cases of civilians fainting and suffocating after attacks.

Meanwhile, a Houthi-run human rights group said on Thursday that a Saudi strike had hit a paint factory west of Taiz, saying that this could release toxins into the surrounding area. It added that the strike caused a fire to break out which could also contaminate nearby soil and groundwater, accusing Saudi Arabia of carrying out war crimes. 

The development comes as clashes have resumed between Yemeni government forces and the Houthis on several fronts.

Taiz, which is the country’s third-largest city, has been largely besieged since the start of the month, with the Houthis taking key towns and roads around it. As a result, the price of basic goods in the city has skyrocketed, while the UN warned last week that road closures had blocked vital supplies.

Earlier this week, local media reported, citing authorities in Taiz, that Houthi sniper fire had killed five civilians and wounded five others, including children, in the villages of Hamma, al-Damna, and other nearby communities.

The Yemeni army also said on Thursday that two ballistic missiles fired by the Houthis struck Aden International Airport, injuring civilians and causing some damage. Yahya Saree, the Houthi military spokesperson, also called for civilians to evacuate the airport ahead of a planned attack.

Authorities in Taiz have called for UN intervention, demanding that international bodies support investigations and hold those responsible for using potentially prohibited substances accountable.

The statement added that the Yemeni armed forces and security forces would take the necessary measures to deter attacks and protect civilians in accordance with international humanitarian law.

The siege on Taiz has prompted the internationally recognised government's Ministry of Public Health to issue a stark warning over an impending humanitarian disaster, which could kill thousands of people due to the collapse of basic medical services and a lack of vital supplies.

An official report from Taiz’s Health Office this month said that there is systematic destruction to the health infrastructure amid the conflict, noting that 256 out of 345 health facilities had been captured while 25 had sustained damage.

It also stated that at least 15 ambulances had been vandalised and looted, and that around 246,711 people lack access to basic healthcare services.

The recent spate of attacks has meant that many services have also come to a halt, including immunisation and children's health services, with 9,454 infants being affected.

The war in Yemen has flared up again last September, with pro-government forces initially launching a major offensive to retake territory in western Yemen controlled by the Houthis.

However the Houthis gained the upper hand and captured all of Yemen's west coast, near the strategic Bab al-Mandeb strait later that month.

They have also launched missiles and drones at energy facilities, airports, and military bases in Saudi Arabia.

Israel's inconclusive election results could allow Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to evade accountability for the failures surrounding the 7 October 2023 attacks, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

In an analysis published on Thursday, journalist Amos Harel argued that Tuesday's election had failed to produce a decisive outcome, potentially ushering in a prolonged period of political paralysis, with no clear path towards forming a new government.

The situation favours Netanyahu, who had feared electoral defeat, more than his opponents in the so-called "bloc of change", although the prime minister cannot claim an outright victory.

Netanyahu's coalition secured 53 seats, falling short of the 61 needed for a majority in the 120-seat Knesset. Opposition parties won 48 seats, while Palestinian parties secured 19, potentially giving Netanyahu's rivals enough parliamentary support to form a government.

If rival parties fail to form a coalition, Netanyahu could remain caretaker prime minister until another election is held, prolonging his time in office despite failing to secure a majority.

Such an outcome would be damaging for Israel but not necessarily for Netanyahu, particularly as his opponents may struggle to replicate their electoral performance in another vote, Harel argued.

The opposition entered the election under favourable conditions, with four parties crossing the electoral threshold, surplus-vote agreements and high turnout among overseas voters, yet failed to secure a decisive victory.

Netanyahu's political and military decisions in recent years have been driven primarily by his determination to remain in power and avoid imprisonment, according to the analysis.

Leaving office could expose him to a possible conviction in his ongoing corruption trial, while international arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court over war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza could further restrict his movements abroad.

The analysis also higlighted Netanyahu's campaign of exploiting anti-Arab sentiment to mobilise voters during the final hours before polling stations closed.

Likud's relative success was partly driven by identity politics, hostility towards traditional elites and fear of Palestinian citizens of Israel, attitudes Netanyahu has spent years reinforcing through the media.

However, Netanyahu's opponents also contributed to the political deadlock by refusing throughout the election campaign to recognise Palestinian parties as legitimate partners in a future governing coalition.

This rejection extended even to Mansour Abbas, leader of the United Arab List (Ra'am), who has advocated greater integration of Palestinian citizens into Israeli political life.

7 October inquiry in doubt

The election outcome has also thrown opposition plans to establish a state commission of inquiry into the 7 October attacks into uncertainty.

Opposition leaders had sought to establish an investigation into the security failures that preceded the attacks, alongside plans to reverse controversial judicial overhaul legislation and remove Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana.

Netanyahu has resisted calls for an independent state commission of inquiry into the attacks, which exposed major failures in Israel's security and intelligence establishment.

Harel warned that the election deadlock could allow Netanyahu to avoid a reckoning over those failures and his government's subsequent handling of the genocidal war on Gaza.

The analysis also raised concerns that Netanyahu could seek to renew military action against Iran to encourage opposition leaders to join a national unity government.

Netanyahu has reportedly urged US President Donald Trump to approve renewed joint strikes against Tehran, potentially aimed at overthrowing the Iranian government.

Such a confrontation could pressure opposition figures, including Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman, to reconsider their election pledges not to govern alongside Netanyahu.

US officials have told several Middle East countries and regional allies to be prepared for potential renewed military action against Iran after next week's midterm elections in the United States—as well as the possibility that Iran will attempt to retaliate against them, according to two diplomats briefed on the matter.

Both of the diplomats spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to comment about the sensitive warnings conveyed by US diplomats and defense officials.

President Donald Trump has not made a final decision on whether to carry out new strikes against Iran, the diplomats stressed. The president, however, has repeatedly said that he is weighing ordering new military action once the critical 3 November midterm elections in the United States are over.

Those threats and the fresh US urgings for allies to prepare for potential retaliation are putting the region on alert that a return to major operations could now be on the horizon.

The White House and US officials declined to comment.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Wednesday in a post on X that Tehran "continues to give diplomacy a chance to succeed" and is working with mediators to review ideas that Tehran included in a proposal floated last month—summarily rejected by Trump—that the Iranians still want to see used as the basis to return to a ceasefire.

Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates foreign ministry issued a statement urging the sides to "exercise wisdom and pursue political solutions to help contain tensions" and prevent a return to full-scale operations in the war that was launched by the US and Israel in late February.

The US has told regional allies that the new round of military action could last for several days, but regional officials are bracing for Iran and its proxy groups to retaliate—leading to a fight that could last even longer, the diplomats said.

The allies have also been urged by US officials to take precautionary measures in anticipation that Iran's response will include retaliatory strikes on energy facilities and other crucial infrastructure.

It's unclear how soon the US military would be ready

 

While the US has not carried out a strike against Iran since early September, the situation in the region has become more tense.

The conflict has spread, with Iran-backed Houthi rebels carrying out attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure and airports. A Saudi-led coalition has responded with its own deadly attacks on Houthi-held territory in Yemen.

Meanwhile, Israel continues to strike Gaza and southern Lebanon despite alleged ceasefire agreements. 

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier on Gulf nations being briefed to be prepared for potential fighting by the US.

It's unclear how soon after Election Day that the US military would be ready to potentially resume strikes.

The Pentagon late last month deployed the USS Theodore Roosevelt, along with a series of amphibious landing ships with Marines aboard—roughly 9,000 troops in all—from San Diego to the Gulf to bolster the US military in the region.

At the time, one US official said this deployment could lead to an unusually high naval presence of more than 20,000 sailors and Marines, as well as hundreds of aircraft, in the region, which has only occurred a handful of times in the last two decades. The Navy had three carrier strike groups in the Middle East in April for the first time since 2003.

Trump, who has focused in recent weeks on campaigning for Republicans ahead of the 3 Nov. elections, has been evasive about what he plans to do next with Iran.

The war has proved to be a heavy weight on Republican candidates as they make their case to voters who are fatigued by rising gasoline prices, a byproduct of the war that's driven up costs across nearly every sector in the global economy.

The cost of fighting the Iran war to American taxpayers has grown to $47.1 billion, according to the latest estimate the Pentagon has provided to Congress.

While campaigning for Republicans, Trump has consistently assured voters that the war’s end is near, while also threatening that a new round of bombing could be coming once the election passes.

During a campaign stop in Lubbock, Texas, on Tuesday, Trump said a conclusive end to the eight-month-old conflict could be coming "in a couple of weeks, if you don't mind."

"Somebody asked me before, when will the war in Iran end?" Trump said earlier in the same address. "I said, 'Whenever I want it to end.' It'll be very quick, but we have to have it end properly, with total and complete—a total statement, they will never have a nuclear weapon."

Trump may be looking at a postelection timeline for possible action, but the region is on edge that Tehran could do something provocative before then—especially if they feel US actions is imminent, said Jonathan Schanzer, executive director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a hawkish Washington think tank.

"Why would they wait until after the elections here ... if they could initiate it and potentially gain the upper hand?" he said.

Abu Raji al-Jaabari never imagined he would have to leave his home in Hebron, in the occupied southern West Bank, without knowing when he could return.

The 55-year-old father of four is among thousands of Palestinians displaced by the Israeli army's military attack on Hebron, launched on Friday following the deaths of two Israeli soldiers.

The military attack includes movement restrictions, raids and arrests across the governorate, disrupting daily life and forcing families to seek shelter elsewhere.

Al-Jaabari and his family are now staying at his brother's house in another town in Hebron governorate.

While his brother has provided them with temporary shelter, the family has had to leave behind their belongings and familiar surroundings, adjusting their daily lives to circumstances they had not anticipated.

"When we left our home, we thought of nothing but reaching a place where we could feel safe. We had no time to organise ourselves or consider everything we might need," al-Jaabari told The New Arab. "We left so much behind, not knowing whether we would return in two days, a week or even longer."

The family is managing immediate needs while awaiting a chance to return. Without a clear timeline, planning is difficult, especially as al-Jaabari worries about his property and belongings left behind.

"What worries us most is that we don't know how long this situation will last," he said. "When you leave without knowing when, or if, you will return, you cannot plan for anything. You keep thinking about your home and the things you left behind, wondering whether you will find everything as you left it."

Beyond the loss of his home, al-Jaabari said displacement has separated his family from the neighbours who were part of their everyday lives.

"Our neighbours aren't just people we happen to run into; they are part of our lives," he said. "We used to look out for one another and share the details of our daily lives. When we were forced to leave, we also lost those connections and the feeling of being among our own people."

Fatima al-Natsha has also been forced to leave her home and seek refuge with relatives in Hebron. Away from her familiar surroundings, she is trying to adapt to temporary accommodation while managing her family's daily needs.

For al-Natsha, the experience has meant reorganising family life around a temporary living arrangement while remaining unable to determine when they might return. The uncertainty surrounding their home has compounded the difficulties of adjusting to their new circumstances.

"When you are in your own home, everything is familiar. You know where you keep your belongings and how to organise your day. But when you are forced to leave, you find yourself facing an entirely different life," she told TNA.

"We manage day by day, unable to plan ahead because we don't know when we'll return home or what we'll find. We worry about where we're staying, our family's needs, and the home we left behind," she said.

Al-Natsha missed the familiar routines and faces of neighbourhood life, which she can no longer take for granted.

For al-Natsha and al-Jaabari, finding temporary shelter has offered an immediate reprieve, but it has not resolved the central question hanging over their lives: when they will be able to return home.

Thousands displaced as homes are seized

The experiences of al-Jaabari and al-Natsha reflect a broader displacement crisis across Hebron governorate.

Ola al-Qawasmi, a spokesperson for Hebron Municipality, told The New Arab that municipal records showed 780 families, comprising 4,969 people, had been displaced from their homes.

Those displaced include 336 infants under the age of two, 441 people aged 60 and above, 216 pregnant or breastfeeding women, 44 people with disabilities and 312 people with chronic illnesses, al-Qawasmi said.

She added that displaced families had sought shelter with relatives, while the municipality had opened temporary shelters in preparation for further displacement as the Israeli operation and siege continued.

Finding shelter, however, has not resolved their problems. Restrictions on movement and the closure of parts of the city have made it difficult for displaced residents to return to their homes to retrieve medicines, clothing and other essential belongings.

Fears have also grown over the seizure of residential properties and ongoing demolition and land-clearing operations.

Riyad Khamis, spokesperson for the Follow-up, Support and Relief Committee, noted that Israeli forces have taken over homes and buildings in several parts of Hebron.

"Among them is a house belonging to the al-Natsheh family in the al-Zaytoun suburb, south of the city, whose owner was arrested before the property was converted into a military barracks," he said.

The seizures raise concerns that displacement could outlast the military operation itself, particularly if homes remain in military use or sustain damage that prevents residents from returning.

The Palestinian Prisoners' Club said that the Israeli army arrested about 85 people, including a young woman, since the operation began in the governorate.

It added that more than 250 people have been detained and subjected to field interrogations.

For families with children, older people and sick relatives, displacement has created urgent needs for medicines, healthcare and basic necessities, alongside the uncertainty over when they might return.

Closures cripple Hebron's economy

The consequences of the Israeli military operation extend beyond displaced households to Hebron's economy, a major centre of Palestinian industry, commerce and production.

Movement restrictions have prevented workers from reaching their jobs and disrupted the transport of goods, deepening financial pressures on businesses and households.

Hebron Mayor Yousef al-Jabari told TNA that restrictions shut factories and other businesses. Damage to water and sewage networks worsened living conditions and hindered recovery.

Ramallah-based political analyst Ahmed Rafiq Awad told TNA that the operation risked imposing lasting changes on Hebron, pointing to the displacement of residents and the seizure of homes, some of which have been converted into military positions.

He said these measures threaten to fragment neighbourhoods by separating residents from their homes and the social networks on which they rely.

"The factory closures and disrupted trade in Hebron, a major centre of Palestinian economic activity, are adding to the economic pressures facing the wider Palestinian economy," he added.

For displaced Palestinian families, the immediate priority is meeting their daily needs, but the future remains uncertain, particular when or even if they'll return to their homes in Hebron.

Israel's election this week was indecisive and there is no clear winner poised to form a government.

Benjamin Netanyahu remains in office as caretaker prime minister, but faces a parliament stacked with an opposition majority vying to oust him.

Here are some scenarios that could follow:

Another election

After the formal final election results are published next week, Israel's President Isaac Herzog begins consultations with party representatives and then taps the candidate whom he deems to have the best chance to form a government.

If the candidate fails, another can try and if that candidate fails, the Knesset can nominate another. There is a deadline for the process of around 100 days. If no one succeeds, another election is held.

Herzog said on Wednesday that everything must be done to avoid another election and urged the parties to come with an open mind to the consultations with him.

Unity government

Netanyahu's Likud party, emerging as the largest in the Knesset, forms a coalition that would likely include centrist and right-wing opposition parties such as Gadi Eisenkot's Yashar, the second-largest party, Avigdor Lieberman's Israel Our Home and Naftali Bennett's Together faction.

That grouping would secure 66 seats, a majority in the 120-seat parliament.

However, this option appears remote at this point because it would mean Netanyahu would likely have to abandon his natural political allies, the far-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties. Further, the opposition parties would have to break their main election pledge to their voters: unseating Netanyahu.

Still, if neither camp is able to form a government at the end of weeks of protracted negotiations, a unity government may emerge as a last option.

Renewed fighting with Iran, or other players, could also push the sides together.

Eisenkot minority government 

If Herzog taps Eisenkot first, he could try to form a government with Yashar's natural allies—Together, The Democrats and Israel Our Home—propped up by Israel's two Arab parties, even if they are not members of this government: Ra'am and the Joint List.

Eisenkot's camp would number 48 seats, according to the latest vote tally, with the Arab parties numbering 19 seats that together reach a 67-seat majority.

But even if Eisenkot reverses his campaign pledge not to have Arab parties in government and accepts their support, it would be a hard sell to many Israelis who hold xenophobic and genocidal attitudes toward the Arab community. 

Netanyahu has focused his campaign on delegitimising support from Arab parties, who surged to record heights in Tuesday's election, and for now, only The Democrats, a centre-left party, has come out publicly calling for their inclusion.

Both Arab parties have signalled that they are prepared to cooperate with Eisenkot's camp.

Ra'am joined Bennett's government ​in 2021, the first time an independent Arab party entered an Israeli coalition. That government collapsed after 18 months.

Netanyahu finds a majority for a fundamentalist government

Netanyahu's coalition has fallen from its original 64 seats to 53, according to the latest election results. But Israel's longest-serving leader is viewed as one of its most skilled politicians and he could split the opposition by peeling away members of its parties and bringing them over to his side.

He has managed to do this before, including as opposition head in the run-up to the 2022 election, which he won. But the coalition he was battling at the time had a far narrower lead and he did not need too many defectors to destabilize his political rivals.