• The Education Department is facing another lawsuit over withholding student-debt relief for borrowers.
• The lawsuit said the department is not processing relief for borrowers whose schools shut down.
• It leaves borrowers who qualify stuck paying their balances and facing default, the lawsuit said.

Student-loan borrowers whose schools shut down are not getting the debt relief they're owed, a new lawsuit said.

On Wednesday, advocacy group Student Defense filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Kendrick Gaussoin, a borrower who took out student loans to attend the Brooks Institute. The visual arts college shut down in 2016 due to financial distress and new regulation on for-profit colleges; Gaussoin was left with student debt but no degree.

A mechanism called a "closed school discharge" allows borrowers whose schools shut down to receive debt relief. A January 2025 decision under the Biden administration expanded the timeframe for relief, allowing more borrowers to qualify.

The lawsuit said the department has not been adhering to the timeframe extension.

"The Department cannot make promises to students and then pretend that those promises do not exist," said Alexander Elson, vice president of Student Defense, in a statement. "Thousands of borrowers are entitled to discharges under the Department's 2025 Decision, and we are going to court to make sure they receive them."

The Education Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

The lawsuit said that despite qualifying for relief, Gaussoin and other affected borrowers have been required to keep paying down their balances. Those who do not or cannot repay face the consequences of default, including wage garnishment and the seizure of federal benefits, such as Social Security.

Beyond closed school discharges, the Trump administration has faced a range of lawsuits over stalled debt relief. For example, advocacy groups have been pushing for the department to process relief for defrauded borrowers, in addition to those who received lower payments under a Biden-era repayment plan.

The department has previously denied wrongdoing in the cases. Gaussoin, the plaintiff in the recent closed-school lawsuit, said he's struggling with "tens of thousands of dollars of debt and no degree."

"When the Department expanded relief for Brooks students, I was overjoyed. I qualify, but my application was denied anyway," Gaussoin said in the press release. "Now I am a father of two, struggling to get by and still carrying debt for a school that failed me."

Have a story to share about student loans? Contact this reporter at asheffey@businessinsider.com.

Student loan advocates see next week’s midterms as an opportunity for further oversight and potential reversals of policies from the Trump administration that have delayed or denied debt relief and increased monthly payments.   Democrats have the potential Tuesday to retake the House and Senate, possibly creating a friendlier environment for student loan borrowers after…

Student loan advocates see next week’s midterms as an opportunity for further oversight and potential reversals of policies from the Trump administration that have delayed or denied debt relief and increased monthly payments.   Democrats have the potential Tuesday to retake the House and Senate, possibly creating a friendlier environment for student loan borrowers after…

• Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent isn't rattled by the neocloud debt debate that has spooked investors.
• He said AI-related debt isn't "problematic at all" and just a small part of the AI ecosystem.
• Neocloud stocks have slumped amid concerns over mounting debt and uncertain AI investment returns.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent weighed in on the neocloud debt debate that recently rattled the AI trade, and he doesn't seem too concerned.

In a CNBC interview Wednesday, Bessent was asked about yields on some AI-related debt climbing into the double digits. The secretary replied, "We monitor all of this."

"I don't think it's problematic at all, because we're seeing that that's the neoclouds are a small component of the overall ecosystem," Bessent added.

He said financing was still getting done, as were deals, and pointed to companies like Meta choosing to finance with equity.

The neocloud industry, which includes players such as CoreWeave and Nebius, provides cloud computing services to AI customers. It's been one of the most talked-about topics in AI over the past week.

The companies have signed multibillion-dollar deals with hyperscalers. Nebius, for example, signed a deal worth over $17 billion with Microsoft last September. In March, it announced a five-year contract with Meta that could be valued at up to $27 billion.

But the industry has come under pressure over the past few weeks, as investors fret about mounting debt levels, rising borrowing costs, and whether AI spending will produce sufficient returns. CoreWeave shares fell by nearly 40% in October, but have recovered slightly from its October 23 low. The Roundhill Neocloud ETF, which invests in major neocloud players such as CoreWeave, Nebius, and IREN, has fallen 24% over the past month.

Elon Musk added to those concerns in an X post on Sunday. He wrote that many neoclouds will face "guppy-level death and consolidation," and that debt markets are hesitating to fund companies that rely almost entirely on AI data centers for revenue. He added that SpaceX would not be acquiring any neocloud companies.

But Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has backed several major neocloud providers, offered a more optimistic assessment last week. Earlier this month, he told CNBC that demand for them is "off the charts" and that they have "extraordinary" capabilities.

Italy’s government has approved a new budget combining tax reductions, household support and defence spending with higher contributions from banks and energy companies. With public debt approaching 140 per cent of GDP, Rome faces difficult decisions over the cost of its political and economic commitments.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government approved a €26 billion budget package on Wednesday, 28 October, seeking to ease pressure on households and businesses while maintaining the fiscal credibility of one of Europe’s most heavily indebted economies.

The measures, agreed by the cabinet ahead of next year’s general election, include changes to personal income taxation, support for younger workers and families, and the extension of existing relief programmes.

The government intends to finance part of the package through additional contributions from banks, insurance companies and energy businesses.

However, the budget also exposes the limits of Italy’s financial flexibility as Rome attempts to accommodate higher defence expenditure and energy-security requirements within the European Union’s fiscal framework.

The immediate political challenge is to demonstrate that tax reductions and spending commitments can coexist with efforts to contain public debt.

Banks and energy companies face additional demands

According to Reuters’ report on the cabinet decision, Meloni confirmed that approximately €5 billion would come from banks and insurance companies, while energy companies would contribute a further €700 million.

The measures form an important part of the government’s funding strategy.

Italy’s banking sector has benefited from the period of higher European interest rates, although profitability varies between institutions and has been affected by changing monetary conditions.

The government argues that companies with relatively stronger financial positions should contribute more during a period of economic difficulty.

Meloni said the budget was not directed against any particular sector, while acknowledging that an agreement with financial institutions had not been reached before its adoption.

The financial package also includes an increase in Italy’s financial transaction tax, commonly referred to as the Tobin tax.

Such measures provide the Treasury with additional resources without requiring broad increases in personal income taxation.

Nevertheless, their implications extend beyond immediate revenue collection.

Additional taxation of financial institutions can influence investment decisions, lending conditions and the sector’s willingness to finance domestic economic activity.

The extent of those effects will depend on the final provisions adopted by parliament.

Tax reductions target households and younger workers

A central element of the budget concerns Italy’s personal income tax system.

Meloni announced that the upper threshold of the second income-tax bracket would rise to €55,000 a year, extending preferential treatment to a wider group of taxpayers.

The government estimates that some taxpayers could save approximately €500 annually.

The package also includes employment-related incentives directed towards younger workers, alongside measures to support households and pensioners.

Another politically significant decision concerns vehicle taxation.

Meloni confirmed that an exemption for cars with engines rated up to 80 kilowatts and for motorcycles would become permanent.

According to the government’s estimates, approximately 70 per cent of vehicles currently in use would qualify.

These measures are intended to protect disposable income and encourage economic activity.

However, their overall economic impact will depend on the distribution of benefits, consumer confidence and whether households choose to spend or save the additional income.

Public debt remains the central constraint

Italy’s budget cannot be assessed independently of its debt position.

According to the Bank of Italy’s October economic bulletin, the government expects its public deficit to reach 2.9 per cent of GDP in 2026 before increasing to 3.4 per cent in 2027.

Public debt is projected to reach approximately 138.5 per cent of GDP next year.

Those figures leave Italy particularly exposed to changes in borrowing costs.

Higher yields on government bonds increase the cost of refinancing debt and reduce the resources available for other priorities.

The economic environment offers limited assistance.

The European Commission’s May forecast projected growth of just 0.5 per cent in 2026 and 0.6 per cent in 2027.

Although those figures predate the latest budget, they illustrate the underlying weakness of economic expansion.

Without stronger productivity growth and investment, reducing Italy’s debt burden remains difficult even when the government exercises spending restraint.

Defence spending complicates European fiscal rules

The increase in Italy’s projected deficit is partly connected to the use of flexibility available under the EU’s fiscal governance framework.

Rome has invoked the national escape clause to accommodate additional expenditure associated with defence and energy security.

This mechanism allows certain temporary deviations from agreed spending paths under specified conditions.

It does not, however, eliminate the government’s obligation to manage its finances or establish unlimited borrowing capacity.

Italy’s approach reflects a wider European problem.

Governments are being asked to strengthen military capabilities, protect energy supplies and maintain economic competitiveness while continuing to comply with fiscal constraints.

For highly indebted countries, the combination is particularly difficult.

The consequences could become more pronounced if financial markets demand higher returns on government debt.

Parliament faces the final decision

Cabinet approval marks the beginning of the budget’s final legislative phase rather than the completion of the process.

Parliament must consider the measures before they can enter into force.

Negotiations may still alter individual tax provisions, spending commitments and the distribution of financial contributions.

The budget also comes at a politically sensitive moment, with Meloni’s governing coalition approaching the next general election.

Its partners have previously disagreed over taxation, pensions and the appropriate distribution of public resources.

The final legislation will therefore provide an indication of the coalition’s ability to reconcile electoral priorities with economic constraints.

For Brussels, the question is whether Italy can preserve confidence in its public finances while using European fiscal flexibility to fund additional security expenditure.

For Rome, it is whether the immediate relief promised to households and businesses can be maintained without placing further pressure on borrowing costs.

Both questions will remain central to Italy’s economic outlook in 2027.