Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

This is an eleven part in depth series looking into Flock cameras and other surveillance and data collection. Flock cameras are just a part of the big picture. In fact they seem to be a diversion psyop, the real surveillance is much more prevalent and intrusive.

Part 1 | HELP! I'm Being STALKED!

A deep dive into Flock cameras leads to unexpected places...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

Wherever you think this series will end up, I assure you, it’s not what you think, but before we can get to the twists and turns in the story, we have to cover the basics….

I hear so many people say when referring to their personal data being collected by tech companies, or, in this case, law enforcement, “I don’t care because I have done nothing wrong.” Some add comments like, “Only criminals care if their data is collected.” Yet these same people will not take me up on my offer to plant a listening device in their bedroom or give me permission to sit outside their son’s school and video record him. Further, they refuse to provide me with access to their Google Photos album. Why is that? They’re not doing anything wrong, and I have no ill intent. I’m just a writer, and unlike Big Tech, I have no use for their data; I just want to cruise through it to see what I can learn about them for entertainment purposes; nothing malicious, nothing profitable. So I guess it is ok for strangers to read all of our communications, GPS track us, eavesdrop on our families, monitor how fast we drive, and log every purchase we make only if we don’t know who the strangers are or what they are doing with our information, but once we can point to an individual, whether that be our next-door neighbor, Uncle Jim, or an ex-lover, we call it spying, harassment, and stalking. And even if we have done nothing wrong, we still don’t want the guys from the oil change place to have access to our medical data. In fact, should they obtain it, we see this as both a data breach and a massive invasion of privacy. Strange how we think, isn’t it? Now let’s get into this Flock thing.

To begin, an overview of Flock is as follows:

Flock Group Inc., DBA Flock Safety, was founded in 2017 allegedly by this trio of Georgia Tech nerds.

They started off by making automatic license plate readers (ALPR), which, as it turned out, read a lot more than license plates.

The cameras can also read and identify bumper stickers as well as damage to vehicles, which can be shared with insurance companies as well as thousands of other vehicle characteristics. All of the collected information, along with GPS coordinates, is then placed into a database where it is stored “ordinarily” for a month but can be kept “longer,” which means any amount of time.

This data is then instantly searchable by law enforcement.

Additionally, police can add suspicious license plates to the system. So, for example, you threw an awesome “Don’t Commit Crime, The Government Doesn’t Like Competition” bumper sticker that you got from Shadowbanned Library on your F-150, and a cop sees it and deems you to be a potential conspiracy theorist.

He can now type your plate into the network so everyone can be on the lookout for the guy who might believe 9/11 was an inside job or that this piece of shit didn’t actually go to the moon.

A police officer on Reddit posted, “And here’s what bothers me about Flock: if you drive around the same city every day like most people do, those reads start adding up. Go to the same gym every morning? Same grocery store every Sunday? Same girlfriend’s apartment every weekend? Same office Monday through Friday? Over time, that history can reveal a pretty detailed pattern of your life. You weren’t being investigated. You just happened to exist in public while the government collected data on where your car was seen.”

The ACLU added:

There’s no reason the technology should be used to create comprehensive records of everybody’s comings and goings—and that is precisely what ALPR databases like Flock’s are doing. In our country, the government should not be tracking us unless it has individualized suspicion that we’re engaged in wrongdoing.

I’m not always the biggest fan of the ACLU, but they nailed it. We are supposed to have the right to privacy and peace.

Now for the people like my mother who think this really isn’t that big of a deal—after all, they’re just some standalone poles with license plate readers that are being used to catch criminals; let me tell you, it is way deeper than that. For starters, anyone can purchase one of these cameras, and they are going up everywhere. Public and private businesses and school buses are equipped with them, as are public safety vehicles, garbage trucks, and now package delivery trucks.

This means not only is your route to and from your job being surveilled and uploaded to the cloud (including each GPS coordinate as well as a photo of the ding in your back bumper), but now all day, every day, vehicles equipped with ALPRs are crawling every street in America, tagging every license plate in every private driveway, and storing that data.

Think about it more: At 7am, the school bus scans you, your wife, and your daughter’s cars on your property. Your daughter then leaves for college, so when the garbage truck comes by at 8am, the two remaining vehicles get scanned a second time. FedEx deliveries begin at 9, and it’s your day off, so your wife has left, but your vehicle is scanned. When lunch rolls around, you decide to order Uber Eats, and that driver is scanned from the burger shop to your front door. Folks, you’ve only been awake for five hours, and strangers, including your government, know exactly how you spent your morning, that you eat meat, and that you don’t mind ordering fast food through delivery services. This information was gleaned from a single morning. Imagine the abundance of data that can be gathered with 24/7 surveillance for a month, or a year, or a decade, let alone a lifetime—and this is all from watching your residence.

Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania added, “Flock cameras now log approximately 20 BILLION vehicle scans every month. That’s not targeted policing of bad guys. That’s mass collection and surveillance - not safety.” To put this into perspective for you, there are roughly 270 million adults in America. Assuming every single adult owns a vehicle, that means every single American is having their vehicle scanned by Flock over 74 times per month. Did you ask to be scanned at least twice per day? I sure didn’t.

But if you think it’s just license plates and scanning is harmless if you’re not doing anything wrong, check out what this individual from Corona, California, said in a Substack post,

“I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that as somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I’ve served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I’ve designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I’m not speculating on how this technology works. I’ve read their patents and I know how it works.

Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They’re AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company’s servers.”

It continued on, “Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn’t add up.

The city council should also understand who they’re doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras.

Now consider who’s behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock’s primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir’s own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that’s the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into…”

The Substack post went on to say that the author looked into the Flock patents more and outlined “Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries. Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure.”

I’d like to point out the importance of Flock being a private company. I have addressed this repetitively in my articles. Because it is private, there is no way to FOIA information. This means what is being done with the information Flock gathers is a total blackout. The best we can do is FOIA what local police are doing with it when they have access to use it and hope to get a response. More interestingly, when a Texas woman had her vehicle broken into and $4,000 worth of items stolen, including a handgun, she asked if San Antonio police could use all the local Flock cameras throughout the neighborhood to track the burglars. They said they do not have access to them and cannot use them. If that is the case, people in San Antonio are being watched and logged by people other than the police.

So this is the point in my article where those who are in the “I don’t care, I’m not doing anything wrong” camp now justify it by saying, “Flock stops criminals, so in this case it’s a good thing.” - And this is precisely what the agenda wants you to think because the only way they can pull this shit off is through “greater good” reasoning. Once “the greater good” is removed from the equation, nobody wants mass surveillance, right? So, to play to “the greater good” people—real people who really do think us all surrendering every last ounce of privacy will stop all crime and we will all be safe—a mass psychological operation must be run on the populace. This psyop involves the mockingbird media broadcasting half-truths. Here’s how this works:

It starts with a black psyop in which the folks in on the scheme themselves put into the media (which they are partners with) that Flock cameras are reading text messages and photos. They claim they are making copies of your phone contents. Content creators on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter rush to share the information, so it becomes a popular topic; however, it is false. The media rush to debunk the rumor, which they themselves created. Through the debunking, they can accomplish several things.

First, they ease the public’s fears; no, Flock does not copy your phone. It doesn’t even read your texts. Phew!

Second, the media can then shift focus back to the license plate reading and stopping crime.

Third, they automatically diffuse future rumors. By debunking the current rumor, all of the people who were worried about their phones being copied now have been assured no such thing is happening; it’s tinfoil hat nonsense. So when people start screaming that the cameras are doing something else—something they really are doing—people automatically assume this is also false.

That said, what the media isn’t telling you is that the purpose of the black psyop was to use half-truths to manipulate public perception. Reality is, although the Flock license plate reading cameras are not reading your phone, there are Flock cameras everywhere that now have microphones to record audio. Flock claims the special audio is designed to record gunshots and screaming, but this is not the case.

Meet Isaac, a student who discovered his college was surrounded by Flock microphone cameras.

Transcript: “I’m Isaac; I’m just a student, and my school picked up, I think, 48 of these [Flock cameras] over the course of the last two years. I noticed on campus there were a bunch of these little devices with a Flock logo.

It turned out that they were microphones.

I looked into them, and I found a press release from Flock where they explicitly stated that they were only gunshot detectors and they would delete anything outside of a gunshot. I think about two months after I started looking into it, they sent a software update over the air, so now all of these microphones that are spread all over my college campus, they are just actively listening for voices now, which is very uncomfortable, and I’m not particularly happy about that.”

How creepy is that? If what you have heard so far isn’t bad enough, here is a Flock camera on an isolated hiking trail. Clearly the path isn’t large enough for a vehicle.

This person found one affixed to a tree.

This one is in a park, pointed directly at the slide.

As you could have guessed, this is because they are not reading license plates; they are reading us.

And here’s where the story gets even more disturbing. Remember how, at the very beginning of this publication, I asked why people who claim they don’t mind being surveilled because they are doing nothing wrong wouldn’t let me video their son at his school? Well, this situation has happened. Corporate Flock employees were caught watching live feeds of children at the Marcus Jewish Community Center. Although Flock now denies it, public records requests by resident Jason Hunyar proved that Flock employees viewed cameras labeled “Gym Mendel – 1” and “Main Pool Right.” Later, Vice President Bob Carter accessed the “Gymnastics” camera. But this didn’t happen only a couple of times. Hunyar claims Flock also remotely viewed his son’s daycare, and, in total, private cameras were accessed by Flock over 1,000 times—and this was what one dude from Georgia discovered. This is nowhere near the extent of what is going on. But it’s worse than that.

Back in 2025, Flock was in the process of developing a new product called Nova, which they referred to as a “public safety data platform” (Greater good! wink, wink). The purpose of Nova was to supplement all data collected during license plate scans with additional information. “What exactly is that additional info?” you ask. It turns out it’s everything—and I do mean everything. To be more specific about the types of information Nova compiles, think about your public internet searches, voting records, marriage records, home ownership details, current and past addresses, email addresses and phone numbers, roommates, children, relatives, social media accounts, and even your Strava bike rides. Basically, any data that is anywhere on the internet is instantly compiled into a nice big packet for whoever is running the query to thumb through, all without a warrant because Flock is a private company, and Flock does not need a warrant to compile your life’s story. Oh, and let me mention the supplemental data also included everything Nova could obtain from hacked websites and the dark web. So this would include your credit card information, passwords, social security number, health data, biometric and genetic data, financial records, and more. Nova was already in use by law enforcement in 2023 as part of an early access program. (*Flock claims they have ceased using hacked information, but since the company is private, there is no way to confirm this.) This means that when a police officer pulls you over because your white Honda Civic allegedly matches a vehicle used in a crime, before the officer even gets to your door, he knows you voted for Trump, you enjoy working out, you lease a small house, you are twice divorced, and you habitually search for gun videos on the internet because you are a massive advocate of the 2nd Amendment. Now the police officer can subconsciously form biases against you, not because your vehicle matches one allegedly used in a crime, but because his aunt was killed due to gun violence and he hates Trump. Do you see the problem here? And if you don’t, the city of Norfolk, Virginia, was concerned for the same. They pointed out that these cameras can be used “to create a suspect where one does not exist.” For example, a police officer casually flipping through camera footage suddenly realizes that you walk down a back alley every afternoon. Now the officer wonders why. He ponders if you could be getting narcotics. After all, police are aware that there is a dealer who has an apartment on that alley, and it’s not the best part of town, so there appears to be no legitimate reason for you to be frequenting the alley unless you are engaged in illegal activity.

Before you know it, you are being investigated for simply walking in a public place. Now that an investigation is open, police can begin subpoenaing your life. All of this is because of constant surveillance warrantless cameras. Little did the police know, there is an attractive woman that also lives in that alley. Every day at 3pm she leaves for work, so if you make it just in time, you can strike up a conversation with her in hopes of scoring a date.

Flock’s defining feature is its nationwide network in which cities, without the permission of their citizens, opt in to share the information their systems gather with all other users of the technology. This means because the camera at the Taco Bell by your house picked you up on it, police in New Mexico can now learn your identity and watch footage of you. Being that you have never been to New Mexico, there is no reason why your identity should have ever come across their radar. But all of this is really only the beginning of the story—just a little insight into what many in the public already know.

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/help-im-being-stalked

Part 2 | Flock’s Secret Warehouse & The Front Company

There are some really bizarre things going on here, and I think I found the real reason why... the reason everyone missed...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

In Part 1 of this series, we reviewed the basics of Flock cameras, which, as it turns out, are doing a heck of a lot more than scanning license plates. But that was just the introduction to the story…

This surveillance entity has their stupid cameras everywhere in America, yet they are hiding their office(s), warehouse(s), and who knows what else.

[The rest of part 2 is behind a paywall. It is the only part in the series that is. The rest are all published below. To access the paywall to read part 2 please visit Agent131711's site here: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/flocks-secret-warehouse-and-the-front] Or continue below to part 3 and all other parts.]

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/flocks-secret-warehouse-and-the-front

Part 3 | Epstein, Ring Doorbells & Axon: Israel Controls America’s National Security

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

This series began by looking into these Flock cameras, which are installed all over our nation without our permission, let alone knowledge (finding out a camera was installed because we drive past it and there it is does not count as knowing the camera would be installed.) This led to a very strange discovery: Flock’s secret warehouse and front companies. And this is quite odd because this surveillance entity has their stupid cameras everywhere in America, yet they are hiding their office(s), warehouse(s), and who knows what else. Something didn’t smell right. Now here we are, continuing on with the investigation.

Although this publication was supposed to be about Flock, we have to talk about, of all people, Jeffrey Epstein. It is unbelievable how many times I have written about this guy because his name keeps popping up. That said, let’s get into it...

One of Epstein’s many ventures was a geolocation software company called Carbyne, which he founded with a former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Barak. The company’s executive team consisted only of former members of different branches of Israeli intelligence. While accused pedophile artist Jeff Koons and his pals control our nation’s Amber Alert system and are the owners of the private Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Epstein’s Carbyne controls the 9-1-1 emergency system in the United States.

In case that didn’t sink in, let me repeat it: Jewish blackmailer and child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein founded a company with an ex-Mossad agent and an Israeli prime minister. They control our emergency call system through their company called Carbyne; meanwhile, an accused pedophile artist, Koons, is part of the entity that controls our Amber Alert system.

Carbyne’s platform, which is now the emergency response system in no less than 23 US states, integrates real-time video and texting and uses the location features on our smartphones. The Carbyne platform allegedly can pinpoint the location of a user within a radius of only 1 foot, and it appears they can turn on your cell phone’s camera. Yeah, they can turn on your cell phone’s camera.

As of 2025, a secondary system called “Prepared” was live in over one thousand centers across 49 states, and you can bet your bottom dollar that in a matter of years it will be factory installed onto all of our devices as one of these applications that doesn’t allow us to remove it. As of the time I released Pizzagate, they had already partnered with AT&T.

And AT&T is not Carbyne’s only partner. As you can see from the image below, they have a great many partners.

Carbyne is additionally partnered with Amazon Web Services, Google, Bosch, and more.

Suddenly, in November 2025, Carbyne unexpectedly sold the emergency platform to a company called Axon. Fun fact: an axon is a long projection on a neuron that conducts signals to other neurons, but in this instance, we are not talking about neurons. The company, Axon, started life in 1993 under the name Air Taser, and it jumped right into bed with NASA. The name was changed to Axon in 2017 (the same year the three college nerds founded Flock).

As soon as Axon came to be, it gave away a ton of body cams to cops. And, within a short time, it had secured business relationships with 17,000 out of 18,000 total law enforcement agencies in the US and controls 70 to 80 percent of the police body cam market. If that’s not a monopoly, I don’t know what is. And to ensure it is a monopoly, Axon bought out their biggest competitor, and our Federal Trade Commission, which is supposed to stop monopolies, along with our Supreme Court, both said, “okie dokie,” and then ordered a sandwich for lunch.

As you could have guessed, after the acquisition, the price of Axon’s body cams nearly doubled. Why? For no other reason than because they can.

Axon currently has over 15 billion dollars in future contract bookings. “How is such a thing possible?” you ponder. Answer: Because Axon, although still selling equipment, changed their business to a subscription model, so instead of just buying some body cameras, the customer now gets to purchase all of the additional services that come with a monthly bill, and, for reasons I cannot fathom, our governments have chosen to use our tax dollars to prepay for these subscriptions. More on this in a moment.

Axon not only provides our law enforcement with body-worn cameras, dashcams, and computer-aided dispatch software, but they also offer Evidence.com. What is Evidence.com? It’s a cloud-based digital evidence platform that allows law enforcement agencies to manage, review, and share digital evidence, especially video evidence captured with Axon-branded cameras. They offer this evidence platform free of charge for prosecutors (Gee, I wonder why? It couldn’t possibly be because it gives them access to all of the evidence of all crimes in America now, would it? No! Don’t be ridiculous!) Evidence.com has a special application just for citizens to upload their evidence to share with the government. This means if there is an incident, all of the witnesses can conveniently upload every trace of evidence they have. Now you might be thinking that this is nothing more than a quick and easy way for files to be transferred from a police officer to his superior or from a lawyer to a judge, but let me tell you this:

In 2017, a California criminal defense lawyer noted that the Evidence.com terms of service give the company a “non-exclusive, transferable, irrevocable, royalty-free, sub-licensable, worldwide license” to use photos and videos uploaded by its users, including juveniles. If the site is secure and they are unable to see the content, how might they be accessing it to transfer and sell it? Crime evidence, whether it is a child who reported his father for molesting him (such as in the case of accused pedophile artist Jeff Koons), or a woman who was caught embezzling, it certainly seems like fantastic material that could be used to bribe, threaten, or outright extort people. Imagine the opportunity a blackmailer would have if he obtained video evidence of a politician smacking around his wife. Try and wrap your mind around what is going on here.

Axon isn’t just a technology developer; they are a military weapons developer. [Israel’s] Axon platform hosts our troops’ live data and sensor networks, plus live video, including drone and camera device footage. All of this valuable data is merged into one easy-to-view screen so that anyone with access can monitor everything our military is doing, whether it be during training or war.

And consider this: once a police department begins using Evidence.com as their primary cloud, it is incredibly difficult to ever cancel the subscription because that is where all of the files they need are located. Yes, they can all be downloaded and re-uploaded elsewhere, but when you are talking about a hundred terabytes of files, this is no simple task. This is why our governments are prepaying, and many have also determined that no Axon competitor should bother because moving the data to a competitor is too large of a job.

The next question is, just how much does it cost our towns and states to access their own evidence that is stored in the Axon cloud? Well, in the case of Everett, Washington, a city with a population of 113,567 people, a five-year Axon deal cost taxpayers around $80,000 in hardware and $780,000 in subscription costs.

And it doesn’t end there. Axon has a partnership with Ring, the video doorbell company. This means your doorbell is a part of the Axon web. And even if you don’t have a Ring, your neighbor does. Did I tell you that Axon’s legal counsel is Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, the largest law firm in Israel? With that in mind, I think it’s pretty safe to say Axon is an Israeli company.

Why is this in a publication about Flock? Well, diving deeper into Axon, the company was partnered with Flock, but Axon just recently ended the business relationship.

Before you cheer for victory, think again. Axon itself is making the same products as Flock. Here is the new Axon license plate reader camera disguised as a digital speed sign.

Like Flock, Axon also has unmanned drones, but unlike Flock, Axon created un-crewed ground vehicles. These are wheeled robots engineered for reconnaissance (aka spying). They are equipped with multiple low-light cameras and infrared LEDs. Axon even makes smart tasers that are incorporated into its web of connected products. Yeah, smart tasers. And all of the data collected from all of these spy devices can be integrated and viewed onscreen in real time using Axon’s Fusus system.

Now we must ask, “WTF is Fusus?” Fusus is a company Axon bought in 2024. It is being touted as the “real-time crime center.”

According to the press release, Fusus aggregates live video, data, and sensor feeds from virtually any source or device. I repeat, live video, data, and sensor feeds from virtually any source or device. These centers integrate various data sources, such as cameras, sensors, social media feeds, and other information systems, to provide what they refer to as, quote, “a comprehensive and immediate view of ongoing criminal activities or emergencies.” (Greater good!)

If we cruise on over to Axon’s website and check out their partnership directory, we discover they currently have 65 entities they are networked with. Let me run down a few of note.

4SightLabs specializes in biometrics. But don’t worry, folks, they are only using this stuff on prisoners. They would never, ever be doing this as mass testing before they roll it out on us.

AirData is a drone fleet that features video streaming. Another partner, DroneSense, does the same as AirData. Their partner Paladin deploys autonomous drones for spying (“intelligence gathering”) and emergency response.

Altumint is a license plate reader company, but they’re more than just that. The Altumint cameras are basically Flock cameras that also act as law enforcement by printing tickets.

Avigilon specializes in 360-degree cameras and remote video monitoring.

And so much more.

Citizen is a company that claims to protect the world through their ability to compile videos from 15 million people.

“Where are all of these videos coming from?” you ask because you don’t recall any website ever asking for you to record and submit videos of incidents to them. I assume they come from social media and news feeds, but additionally, they have an app in the app store, and I guarantee we grant this thing permission to access our camera, microphone, and image gallery, just like Epstein’s company. So the short answer is we are likely recording the videos, whether we know it or not.

Their partner, Robotic Assistance Devices, is also known as RAD.

RAD combines facial recognition with license plate readers and God only knows what else to determine if we are threats.

If we are deemed a threat, all of the information gathered on us is made into a packet that is easy to use in prosecution, so next time you lock your keys in the house, you’d better think twice about using the credit card in the door trick because the optics are enough to set off the “bad guy alarm.”

Then there is Ubiquia. Their sneaky cameras are being mounted directly to our already-existing streetlights and running off the same power source as the street lights.

These stealthy cameras are wired directly to crime centers.

These cameras are also connected to autonomous drones. When the cameras get a hit, AI launches the drones into the sky. Once launched, the drone sends a live feed as it follows its target through the streets. And all of this can happen without the driver, biker, or pedestrian ever knowing they crossed the invisible line.

There are so many more partners, but let’s skip ahead to the most important.

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/epstein-ring-doorbells-and-axon-israel

Part 4 | Who the Fuck is Leonardo?

The truth begins to be revealed...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

This is incredibly important…

We just finished discussing Axon, but one thing I failed to mention is who is a massive stockholder in this insane, secretive spy tech that is being rapidly installed across our nation, and the answer to that is none other than the current president, Donald Trump. In fact, the sitting president got incredibly lucky because he invested as much as five million dollars into Axon only two weeks before ICE posted a notice seeking a five-year, $220 million Taser contract for about 17,800 devices, along with unlimited cartridges and training. Now onto Leonardo…

Leonardo is a lot more than an Axon [Israel] partner.

Leonardo specializes in something called “Elsag LPR.”We know LPR stands for “license plate reader,” but what is Elsag? I’ll give you a hint: an Elsag is not a bra for floppy tits.

Before I can tell you what it actually is, we have to discuss the linchpin of the whole surveillance network. What is the linchpin? You may be surprised to hear that it’s…

BLUETOOTH

By definition, Bluetooth is “a short-range wireless communication technology standard that allows devices to exchange data over radio waves without the need for cables or physical connections.” In layman’s terms, it is used to send and receive information without a cord. So, for example, if you have a computer and a printer, you would need to plug your printer into your computer to make it work, whereas with Bluetooth, you can wirelessly connect the two devices. When devices are linked together, they are referred to as “paired,” so you pair your printer with your computer one time, and you can wirelessly print all day, every day, without re-syncing it; it’s a one-and-done gig.

Regarding specifically what information is transmitted, it all depends on the device and the purpose of it. All smart appliances use Bluetooth. This means all cell phones, smart cars, fridges, video doorbells, watches, earbuds, the Amazon Echo and similar devices, televisions, gaming consoles, BBQ grills, and even coffee makers—all of these transmit data about us wirelessly. This data often consists of what is called “user profiling,” which can include a user’s past and present purchase records and daily routines, as well as GPS location data (think of Google Maps or AirTags). As the New York Times reported, many stores now use Bluetooth to track the location of individual shoppers down to the inch. That information is often sold or given to advertisers, who then use it to build data profiles on people who were just trying to buy a loaf of bread. How fucked up is it that our grocery stores are pimping us out? We never asked them to surveil us, let alone sell the data they harvested on us to a third party. It’s just so insane.

After the data is sold or given away, the companies that obtain it can then analyze it, share it, sell it, or provide it to the government entity of their choice, and all of this is 100% legal. Yes, it is 100% legal for the grocery store to spy on us and our children like private detectives and then sell every last stitch of evidence they gathered to some entity, which will then resell it, add it to databases, or do whatever their little greedy hearts desire with it.

Unless you’re into true crime like I am, you may not have known that the Bluetooth connections on Fitbits have been used to solve murders. In the Connie Dabate murder case (2015), Connie’s husband, Richard, claimed a masked intruder shot his wife, but Connie’s Fitbit data showed she was active and moving around a full hour after her husband claimed she was already dead. Because of the smartwatch, Richard was convicted of her murder and sentenced to 65 years in prison. This wasn’t a one-off. Fitbit data led to the arrest of a California man for the murder of his stepdaughter, Karen Navarra.

And even if you don’t have a Fitbit, your cell phone may have the same features as one. These features are sold to us as assorted health apps, which are often built into our devices. Some of these apps cannot be uninstalled. We are told these calculate our steps and provide other fitness data. What we are not told is this data can be examined and even used against us, such as in a criminal case in Germany involving a man named Hussein Khavari. Here, police accessed the suspect’s health app data and concluded that his phone showed “strenuous activity”, which investigators insisted was when he dragged the dead body and climbed stairs. So, without any real evidence, let alone eyewitnesses or a murder weapon, Mr. Khavari was sentenced to life in prison, all because of a health app.

But it’s not just smartwatches and health apps that are being used to track us; it’s also Wi-Fi router logs and geofencing. You see, when your phone connects to a Wi-Fi network, there is a record made of that connection because, of course there is a record. We can’t burp without there being a record of it somewhere. The wifi connection establishes that you were in the proximity of the Anderson’s house on Tuesday morning at 7 am. Geofencing is when a digital perimeter is created using GPS data. For example, a 600-foot perimeter around the Anderson’s house—that’s a geofence.

Law enforcement has utilized data from connected home and business routers, alongside device location information, to map out devices connected or active near a crime scene.

Google Database is a key player in the people-tracking industry, and it aids in geofencing. The tech giant stores location history in a database known as Sensorvault, and, according to the New York Times, these records span back at least a decade and include hundreds of millions of devices worldwide. If you think you can’t possibly be a part of this database, think again.

In 2018, the home of a couple in a small town in Minnesota was robbed. Google Database identified all devices that were active near the crime scene. Detectives then used the victims’ home Wi-Fi network to create a geofence. This information was used to identify people whose smartphones literally linked them to the area of the crime. Weeks later, three suspects were arrested in the burglary and charged.

Further, entities like MoocherHunter use unsecured wireless router signals to reverse trace the people using them. And even that isn’t the end of it. This next story will shock you. A man named Ross Compton said he was sleeping when his house in Middletown, Ohio, caught fire back in September 2016. He said he grabbed some possessions and jumped out a window. Investigators pulled data from, of all places, his pacemaker, which, according to a cardiologist, proved Compton was not asleep. Because of the pacemaker records, he was charged with aggravated arson and insurance fraud. As you can see, Bluetooth plays the key role in tracking us. Now let’s get back to Leonardo.

ELSAG

So, to get back to ELSAG, while America was worried about Flock cameras, Leonardo, a defense contractor, partnered with Axon and released their new system, ELSAG SignalTrace, which not only reads your license plate but also reads all of your Bluetooth devices and “other consumer electronics.”

This means that when we drive past a Signal Trace device, it doesn’t just photograph the car. It grabs the wireless signals leaking out of every device inside it: our phone, smartwatch, earbuds, fitness tracker, the car’s own Bluetooth, the key fob, and even the dog’s microchip. This data, combined with our license plates, vehicle makes, models, damages, and bumper stickers, is then referred to as a “fingerprint,” which is stored for later use.

The reason they refer to it as a fingerprint or signature is because the information your vehicle emits is custom. As Leonardo says on their site, “While 70 cars in 100 may contain iPhones, only one will have an iPhone 13rev2, an Audi radio, a pair of Bose headphones, a Garmin sports watch, a key finder, and the license plate ABC-1234. The collection of data represented by these specific things is an electronic signature.”

This means these cameras know more about your personal life than your own mother. They know how many ladies you met off Tinder and where the two of you went, including the trip to Walmart to grab some wine. Further, they know what your dates did before and after they left. Creepy, isn’t it?

Earlier I mentioned pairing; once the devices are paired together, they don’t have to keep being re-synced. This leads fellow researchers to claim that once linked through Bluetooth, we can be tracked anywhere without having to resync. It’s like having an ankle monitor that the government and strangers watch in real time. Can we agree that these spy cameras make Flock cams look like a joke? More on this later in this publication.

All of this leads us to ask, “Who exactly is this Leonardo company?” and here is where the story takes an even more nefarious turn…

Leonardo is an Italian multinational company that specializes in aerospace, defense, and security. The company is headquartered in the pope’s Rome, but it has 180 sites worldwide. Leonardo is the 12th largest defense contractor in the world based on 2020 revenues. An even greater cause for concern is that Leonardo is partially owned by the Italian government. Fellow researchers will tell you the government owns 30.2% of the company, but that is only a half-truth. The Italian government owns approximately 30.2% of Leonardo S.p.A., which in turn owns approximately 71.3% of Leonardo DRS.

The second largest shareholder is BlackRock, with only 1.9%, which, although it sounds microscopic, is actually equal to over five million shares because this is a massive company.

Here’s where the plot thickens. Although Italy holds such a large share in Leonardo, the company is not an outright Italian company—and this is why it is always so important to rewind the clock as far back as possible to understand the deeper story.

Leonardo DRS traces its origins to two American engineers: Leonard Newman and David Gross. They founded the company that became DRS Technologies, which is now Leonardo DRS. So when you hear the name “DRS,” it means Leonardo. Capisci?

Leonard Newman was an electrical engineer at Loral Corporation before founding DRS with David Gross. Loral Corporation was a US defense contractor. Loral was purchased by Jewish businessman Bernard L. Schwartz. Fun fact: Bernard celebrated his 71st birthday with Bill and Hillary Clinton at the White House—remember that name, Bill Clinton, because it will come up again.

While employed by Loral, Newman was working on technology for the US Navy. One patent, which his name is on, was for an integrated display system for antisubmarine-warfare missions. This is of interest because this display included information obtained through sensors that helped operators make decisions. This patent dates back to the 1970s.

Skipping ahead to 2008: DRS was acquired by Italy’s Finmeccanica (now known as Leonardo S.p.A.). Finmeccanica shelled out approximately 5.2 billion dollars for DRS, and after acquisition, the company was made private—you know what that means (no FOIA requests). So right about now you’re thinking that if Italy’s company Finmeccanica bought it, then obviously this is an Italian-owned company, but if we peek under the hood, we find some startling details about this acquisition.

This sale is incredibly interesting because two competitors both made higher offers, yet Finmeccanica was chosen to sell it to. How much higher were those bids? Are we talking about a couple thousand dollars? No, we are talking about roughly 181 million dollars. And being that this was a public company that had shareholders to answer to, it would have been most logical to accept the highest offer, right? Yet the company that bid four dollars more per share was never even given a fair chance; their $85 a share offer was scoffed at, then DRS chose to sell to Finmeccanica at only $81 a share. Why would any company choose the lesser offer? “Make it make sense!” you shout. To which I reply, “Try this on for size.”

Acquisition negotiations were overseen by The Cohen Group, which is a Washington-based consulting firm founded by former Defense Secretary William Cohen. Who is William Cohen? A Russian Jew who served in the US Senate then served as secretary of defense from 1997 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton—see, there’s that name again.

To make a long story short, the United States claimed that, because DRS was a US military contractor, our military secrets could fall into the wrong hands. It was allegedly because of this fear that Finmeccanica ultimately agreed to a very unique business structure. To summarize without boring you with details:

“Sensitive Operations” would be placed under proxy ownership. A proxy means someone who is acting on behalf of someone else. In this instance, because of the United States military’s tight-knit relationship with DRS, a “FOCI” agreement was deployed. FOCI means Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. The resulting FOCI arrangement left Leonardo with ownership of the company but transferred the voting rights attached to its majority stake to five US proxy holders. Additionally, 35% of DRS’s revenues were to become a part of the proxy agreement if the Department of Defense wanted them to.

More specifically, the 2025 amended proxy agreement requires five U.S.-approved proxy holders to vote the shares owned by Leonardo US Holdings. These individuals must have the same rights as the owners of the company. So you see, things are not as they seem by outward appearance. Even though the company is owned by Italy on paper and even though the Italian government has a massive stake in it, it is not fully controlled by Italy.

I have been unsuccessful at figuring out who the original 2008 proxies were, but I can introduce you to the five current individuals.

Reuben Jeffery III was a Goldman Sachs fellow who became the Under Secretary of State for Economic, Business, and Agricultural Affairs under George W. Bush, but now Reuben is the president, chief executive officer, and member of the board of Rockefeller & Co. and Rockefeller Financial Services, Inc. He is also a member of the International Advisory Committee of J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited. So this guy, aside from being a Rockefeller bro, is an investment firm fellow.

Louis R. Brothers served as Under Secretary for Science and Technology at the US Department of Homeland Security as well as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research at the Department of Defense under President Barack Obama. He now serves as an operating partner at AE Industrial Partners, a massive investment firm that is contracted by the DoD. Yep, his previous employer, the Department of Defense, is now his client. So this guy is also an investment firm fellow. It’s quite strange how these investment guys go from a high-up position in the US government to an investment company and now are in control of a surveillance system that is being quietly installed across our nation. Let’s continue on with the proxies:

Kenneth J. Kreig is the founder of Samford Global Strategies, which appears to be yet another investment firm, and Kreig is also the former undersecretary of the Department of Defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics.

Then there’s Frances F. Townsend, who was an analyst for CBS News prior to becoming senior counsel at Activision Blizzard (the American video game maker who has produced games like Call of Duty and Candy Crush Saga). Townsend spent 13 years at the US Department of Justice under the administrations of Presidents Skull and Bones George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Skull and Bones George W. Bush.

The last proxy is George W. Casey, who is a retired four-star general who was also the 36th Chief of Staff of the United States Army under US Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

So that gives you an idea of who is controlling a substantial part of Leonardo. As you can see, it is not necessarily the Italian government that is behind the Elsag SignalTrace that will be used to push America into the age of AI policing; it is our own government doing so by proxy—and the majority of these individuals with control are in the investments industry. I should also point out that it is not the (air quotes) “Italian company,” Leonardo, that is selling this stuff to our cities.

According to fellow researchers, the sale of the surveillance tech is being carried out by an American company called Vetted Security Solutions as well as its sister company, Odin Risk Solutions. Both are owned by Vetted Holdings, which is based in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Vetted Holdings is a new company. Their legal paperwork was filed in 2020. They operate out of this warehouse. These entities sure seem to be popping up like daisies.

They haven’t posted on Facebook since 2021 and have basically no following, yet they are a massive company—a massive, quiet company.

Despite not having a following, this US company is the one who is pushing the surveillance tech into our communities by propositioning our local governments under the guise of safety and crime fighting. And being that Vetted and Odin are American companies, it looks good on paper.

Now let me point this out to you: on the Vetted Security Solutions website, they use this fucky font that is difficult to read.

Not to harp on the site, but I don’t know who would ever select a boxy font like this for a website. Fucky really is the best word I can think of to describe it. Not only is it fucky, it’s also blue. It’s a horrific website that looks like a 5th grader made it on recess.

On Odin’s website, we see the same awful font. Instead of fucky and blue, Odin’s site is fucky and green.

Then I came across this site, ICU Technologies, which should be completely unrelated to the aforementioned companies, but…

Not only is this site using the same, or a very similar, fucky font and blue text, it is selling the same technology.

So it seems as if there are a plethora of small companies that appear to all be operated by the same bigger entity, but they give an illusion of a bunch of independent small businesses selling this tech. This really bothered me.

Ok, so, while we were all screaming about the Flock cameras, which we could see going up all over without our knowledge, let alone our permission, Leonardo, through its Florida-based entities, Odin and Vetted Security Solutions (both operating under Vetted Holdings), discreetly pushed its less obvious tech into our towns.

Then, once the tech was installed, something happened. It was kind of a bait-and-switch, per se. It was around a year ago that Leonardo applied for a new US patent. This patent is a software upgrade for their existing technology. This means what has been installed all over America doesn’t need to be replaced; it just needs the newest update, which can be done remotely. And by the way, the patent for the upgrade was expedited and granted in record time. Most inventors wait around two years for patent approval, but not Leonardo. Their patent was given the green light in about five months.

When the wireless system upgrade is (or was) performed on the already installed Leonardo poles with devices, the Bluetooth tracking system is live.

In addition to everything we have already discussed, in 2022, Leonardo acquired Israel’s radar maker, RADA.

Rada makes “hemispheric 3D perimeter surveillance” technology.

Their tech can track everything from small and slow aircraft to drones to vehicles, vessels, pedestrians, and more.

Under the terms of the acquisition, RADA became a wholly owned Israeli subsidiary of Leonardo and continued to operate its business unit within the company. So, once again, we have another Israeli company that oversees the mass surveillance of America. Now let’s put all of this on ice for a moment.

If you think what you have read thus far is scary, wait until you hear this…

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/who-the-fck-is-leonardo-flock-part

Part 5 | What is Cobwebs? The Shadow Entity You Need to Know About

What you do on Telegram might not be so secretive after all...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

While people are horrified of what Flock is doing because a Flock camera is a physical object that can be seen, what we can’t see is just as bad, perhaps worse.

For all of the people who keep saying they don’t care if strangers are harvesting their data because they have done nothing wrong, let me tell you what this next company does, and you tell me if anything on this list crosses your line…

PenLink is a software company that develops high-end commercial communications, surveillance, data collection, and analysis products for law enforcement. “Tell me more,” you say. In July 2023, PenLink merged with Israeli surveillance contractor Cobwebs Technologies. Cobwebs was founded in 2015 by former members of Israeli special forces and intelligence units. Do you guys remember the Pegasus spyware scandal? In the scandal, the NSO Group, an Israeli cyber-arms company, sold its cutting-edge surveillance software to governments. While the plan was supposed to be to use this tech to catch bad guys, that is not what happened. Governments instead used it to target journalists, human rights activists, politicians, and dissidents. Fellow journalists claim the same company that developed Pegasus is the same company that developed Cobwebs, so we are talking about some major technology here.

The three founders of Cobwebs Technologies have since taken over key executive roles at Penlink, so Penlink is a mashup of the two entities.

Through their technology, Cobwebs provides “web intelligence solutions,” which allow users of the tech to, quote, “pinpoint web relations, criminal activities, and terrorist threats with a click of a button.” According to Cobwebs, they work with clients from all over the world.

There is no better way to learn about a company than by looking at their products, and thanks to Citizen Lab’s outstanding research, we can do just that. Penlink / Cobwebs developed the following products:

Tangles, a web platform that scrapes data from the open web, deep web, and dark web. This allows for the tracking of mobile devices within a user-designated area (geofencing.) According to leaked training manuals, government and commercial customers can search for keywords and personal identifiers, which include name, email address, phone number, and usernames. Once the search is run, the government or commercial customer can then identify online accounts and analyze what they post, view their interactions, relationships, activities, likes, dislikes, and event attendances. Yes, these bastards know what events you attended in your leisure time. Additionally, users can monitor and profile individuals, create “target cards” and receive alerts when a target does something; analyze geolocation information extracted from posts and photos; and perform network analyses.

Now here’s why this is so important: Some of the data sources that we know Tangles is pulling data from include web forums, blogs, text storage sites (aka “pastebins”), Facebook, Facebook Marketplace, Instagram, Twitter/X, YouTube, LinkedIn, SnapChat, TikTok, Reddit, VK, Parler, Gab, and even the dating platform Tinder—but that’s not all. They also get your conversations from Telegram! Yes, they get your Telegram communications! Which is quite interesting because the government claims they can’t stop the crime running amok on the site because it’s encrypted. Clearly that’s not true.

Additional data is pulled from Truecaller, which is a caller ID smartphone app! This cell phone app has almost 30 million reviews, just in the Google Play Store. That means no less than 30 million people are having their call information harvested for Tangles, and I guarantee not a single person knows this.

We will circle back to cell phone apps later in this publication.

Those are just a few of the apps Citizen Labs was able to confirm Tangles is using for data gathering. I guarantee there are dozens, if not hundreds, more. So, anyone using Tangles can type nothing more than your phone number or email address into the database, and it will spit out a biography of your life, including your Telegram conversations, your caller ID records, what you are buying and selling on Facebook, and Lord only knows what else.

Who are Tangle’s clients? Who truly knows the extent of it, but we do know the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enjoys the software because it allows them to “compile dossiers” on protesters and other citizens that they don’t approve of. Although all of this is done under the guise of keeping you and me safe, DHS was caught red-handed engaging in social engineering, meaning the psychological manipulation of people to get them to perform actions or divulge confidential information. Obviously, DHS denies such claims.

Additional US-based clients include ICE, the U.S. military, Texas Department of Public Safety, DHS West Virginia, NYC district attorneys, and several police departments in Los Angeles, Dallas, Baltimore, Tucson, and Durham, as well as those in smaller cities and counties like the City of Elk Grove and Pinal County.

I should mention Tangles offers its users a convenient mobile app because you never know when you will need to spy on someone while on the go, and it too was developed by Israel.

The next piece of technology that Cobwebs developed is called Webloc, which is described by journalists as an “ad-based geolocation surveillance system reported to have processed data associated with up to 500 million mobile devices.” Webloc relies on data purchased from mobile apps and digital advertising. This includes GPS, Wi-Fi location data, IP addresses, and more. (We will cover this thoroughly in the next part of this publication).

Webloc’s technology (also developed by Israel) focuses on “large-scale tracking of location patterns, movement analysis, and inference of behavioral profiles.” This program is Google Maps on steroids. Check out these screenshots from it.

Tangles and Webloc are not the only programs being solicited by Cobwebs and Penlink. Lynx is another program that provides investigators with the capability to use social media platforms with fake identities and fake accounts. These fake accounts not only work on social media, but they also work in forums and even via email. All of this is run through a global proxy server infrastructure to mask the identity and location of the user.

Lynx does a lot more than offer users the opportunity to catfish and spy on people anonymously; the program itself also manages avatars and offers virtual agents, so it appears the fake accounts run themselves.

Clients include the Los Angeles Police Department as well as US federal agencies, including DHS and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Yeah, folks, the IRS purchased deception software that makes and runs fake accounts.

Another one of Cobwebs’ programs is Trapdoor, which Cobwebs promoted as an “active web intelligence” solution, but because it is so secretive, little is known about it or reported on it. Citizen Labs was able to obtain a technical specifications document that flat out refers to the program as a “social engineering platform.” While Lynx focuses on tricking people on social media as well as other methods of communication, Trapdoor is designed to create fake websites in a matter of seconds or minutes. These sites that Trapdoor creates are untraceable, professional-looking bogus websites, complete with a URL. It can then generate links, which, if clicked, will infect the victim’s device. Yeah, this program can throw together websites. This got me thinking about those fucky sites with the fucky font and fucky colors previously discussed. Were these instantly generated by a computer program? If so, that would explain a lot.

Additionally, Trapdoor sends targets phishing links. Phishing links are links that look like they are to one thing but are actually to something else. For example, you receive an email claiming it is from your bank that says you overdrafted your account. Although the link looks like it is from your bank, it is not. Unless you look closely, you won’t notice the name of the bank is spelled wrong in the URL because the link is fake. But, unlike traditional phishing links, Trapdoor has the ability to disguise a link as any website, so in this case, it will say the actual URL of your bank, and there will be no way to distinguish that it is a fake link.

Through the Trapdoor program, when the victim clicks on the link, malware will be installed onto their device. By definition, malware is “any software intentionally designed to cause disruption or destruction to a computer, server, client, or computer network; leak private information; gain unauthorized access to information or systems; deprive access to information; or interfere with the user’s computer security and privacy without their knowledge.”

Once the link is clicked, Trapdoor allows its customers to access a device’s camera and microphone, remotely open hidden tabs in the victim’s web browser, and deliver “payloads” to them. Additionally, information about the phone itself can be viewed, such as battery level, IP address, browser type, language, version and plugins, operating system and version, device type, CPU and GPU information, screen resolution, ISP information, estimated geolocation, user inputs, timezone, and even charging status. If available, it also provides “social media details” and “location network details.” Worse, the malware installs a keylogger, which means every key you type is logged—every text message, every email, every password to every website; it is all recorded as you type it.

Once the malware is installed, it begins to run, which includes performing actions on the target’s browser. It can close browser windows and open hidden tabs, all the while extracting media stored on your phone or computer.

Penlink claims they no longer sell Trapdoor, yet Citizen Labs was able to identify potential Trapdoor servers located in Kenya, Indonesia, Singapore, Hong Kong, the UAE, and Japan.

Next up is PLX, which, according to a commercial shown on Penlink’s YouTube channel, allows “investigators to uncover hidden connections, relationships, and patterns of activity between points of interest” (which means you and I). PLX helps to retrieve, organize, and analyze call records, search histories, login data, and other information from AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Comcast, Google, Facebook, and other companies.

In 2022, Penlink had contracts worth $20 million a year with US federal agencies, including ICE, the FBI, and the DEA, and many more with local and state police.

Then there’s WebEye. A leaked document described WebEye as a system for “investigations of web pages and browser session extraction.” This program is also secretive, so there isn’t much to learn about it without booking a consultation through Penlink.

Pen-Link 8 and LINCOLN2 are two more comprehensive electronic surveillance systems for intercepting and monitoring various forms of communication, including wireline, wireless, satellite, VoIP, and 3G networks. Yes, wiretapping. It’s literally wiretapping. They also own PenProxy and Xnet. I have not been able to dig up anything on these two programs.

QUADREAM, I-OTT & FALKOR

Cobwebs is linked to Quadream, an Israeli surveillance technology company that was founded in 2014 by a group including two former NSO Group employees (the Pegasus spyware people). Quadream is known for its spyware marketed under the name “Reign,” which, like Pegasus, reportedly utilizes zero-click exploits to hack into target devices. A zero-click exploit is a sophisticated cyberattack that compromises a device or system without requiring any interaction from the user.

Once this spyware is installed, the individual running it has full control of the device.

The Citizen Lab discovered that Quadream’s spyware was used to target civil society, journalists, and political opposition figures in North America, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, Europe, and the Middle East.

I-OTT

According to company registration documents from Israel, the investors in Cobwebs and Quadream also invest in a company called I-OTT. I-OTT advertises itself as providing “combat training” for “guerrilla warfare” and consultations on “covert operations.” Its website states that I-OTT offers “customized intelligence solutions for governmental and private agencies” and claims to have offices in Israel, Mexico, and Brazil.

The 2017 version of its website stated they provide users with the basic effective “toolbox” for anti-terror and guerrilla warfare along with “training and consulting about covert operations and units.” Their software’s capabilities included generating “targeted research reports concerning almost any topic,” including “social unrest.” They also claimed to be operating “tailor-made avatars for collecting sensitive information.”

FALKOR

Quadream is connected to a company called Falkor, which specializes in mass data analysis. Falkor’s program combines open-source intelligence (OSINT) with social media intelligence (SOCMINT).

Amongst a plethora of things the programs do, they can create detailed connection charts. These charts display everyone in your life, including your boss, your second cousin, or anyone else you communicate with or have ever communicated with, including their contact information and heat maps showing where you or your associates travel. They also display bank accounts with bank account numbers.

There are so many companies involved in this spy tech that I can’t possibly cover them all.

Uri Ashkenazi is an Israeli investor who not only has all of the aforementioned companies in his investment portfolio, but he is also the senior vice president of finance at Cobwebs. He is also the managing partner of Titan Ventures, a VC firm focused on Israeli cyber-intelligence investments, and a director of both I-OTT and Falkor Vision. Once again, everything is intertwined.

If what you have heard thus far doesn’t scare the absolute shit out of you, wait until you hear the next part….

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/what-is-cobwebs-the-shadow-entity

Part 6 | APP-BASED MASS SURVEILLANCE (and we thought Flock was bad…)

How Apps and Advertisements are SPYING

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

Although this series was originally intended to be a deep dive into Flock, the road took me elsewhere, and this road that few other researchers are traveling is incredibly important because it all ties together in the end. This may sound confusing for a moment, but trust me, it won’t be, so stick with it.

The advertising industry is collecting data on us. Data collected contains “Mobile Advertising IDs” (MAIDs), which identify a phone or other mobile device and the person using it. The 32-character hyphen-separated MAID assigned to your device is a special code that only your device has (e.g., 919F1D1F-F195-4C8B-AF47-58683FE11DB9).These codes enable us to be targeted with advertisements. This is why someone who loves to travel will see a lot of ads for places to travel no matter what website they are on, whereas someone who is a gamer will get lots of game-centered ads.

The advertising industry has ongoingly insisted that while people are being tracked, the MAID anonymizes them; therefore, their identity is wholly unknown to the advertiser. They further insist that, due to the anonymity, what they are doing is not actually surveillance. However, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently clarified that advertising IDs “offer no anonymity in the marketplace” because advertising businesses commonly link consumers’ MAIDs to other information about them, such as names, addresses, IP addresses, and phone numbers. Therefore, once a MAID has been assigned to your device, that device has been assigned to you as a person. It might as well be listed on your driver’s license because it is no secret.

SDKs

Recall how I said previously that Cobwebs Webloc technology “relies on data purchased from mobile apps and digital advertising.” This means Cobwebs is actively involved in the purchase of this data that is being harvested from us without our knowledge and typically without our understanding. Meaning, even if we do give an app consent to know our location, we assume this is for functionality and do not understand that they are then tracking and surveilling us.

The software used to capture this data is called “software development kits,” known as SDKs for short. These are programs / scripts that are embedded into the code of the application. So these aren’t something we can see unless we access the entire code for the application and then go through it, line by line, looking for an inserted SDK.

To recap, the MAID is the unique identifier assigned to our device. An SDK is embedded into the app to transmit data. It tells the data harvesting company what action we took and assigns that action to us via the MAID. Although the MAID is indeed a randomized set of numbers or letters, because businesses layer our MAID with other details, such as our name, address, or email address, it is no longer anonymous; therefore, these data harvesting entities know precisely who we are and what we are doing, which, despite their denial, is surveillance.

So what exactly is this scraped data being used for? An investigation by EFF uncovered that, amongst other things, it has been used for ICE investigations, global spy tools, outing a gay priest, tracking union organizers, and tracking US military personnel. Would you like to know where specifically this data is coming from? Meaning, what specifically has a data harvesting SDK in it? The answer is ordinary consumer apps, such as games or weather apps. In fact, the advertising (data harvesting) company Huawei claimed its Petal Ads SDK software is embedded in more than 85,000 apps worldwide—and this is just one company. Another company that sold the US military data collected through its SDK embeds, was pulling data from 400 apps, including Muslim prayer and family safety apps.

WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY CONSENTING TO

When you install an app, you will likely grant it permissions. We assume the purpose of these permissions is so that the app can function properly, but it is a double-edged sword. Let’s look at what different permissions allow for.

• The “Location” Permission — Location data isn’t limited to the application learning you are from Boise, Idaho, or that you live on First Street. Location permissions include the transmission of GPS coordinates, Wi-Fi networks, and even Bluetooth beacons. Now you’re thinking, “That doesn’t happen to me because I don’t ever grant these things permissions!” I hate to inform you, but an EFF investigation identified numerous advertising SDKs that collect and share users’ location by default. Further, they found that even if you declined to give the app permission to know your exact location, they bypassed location permission and tracked their precise locations through WiFi network data. Additionally, when Apple released its App Tracking Transparency initiative and Google made improvements in Android permissions, access to geolocation data was much more limited. To get around those restrictions, data harvesters created apps that require access to location data such as weather, navigation, fitness, and dating apps.
• “Access Contacts” — As you can assume, this means the application is able to access names, phone numbers, email addresses, and whatever else is stored in your phone as contacts. Even if you do not allow apps to access your contacts, everyone else in the world does on every app, so your family tree and little circle of life is known by thousands of assorted companies all over the world—companies which you never opted in to.
• “Access Photos”—This may sound self-explanatory, but it is deeper than the advertiser just looking at all the pics you took of your cat. Should the purpose of the app secretly be data harvesting, they can also analyze metadata associated with those files and potentially obtain GPS/location information. Worse, they can copy or upload the actual image or video to a remote server if the SDK is programmed to do so, potentially perform facial recognition on your images, or even use them to build out a new biometrics program. Once you give them permission to access your gallery, they have free rein to use every last image to build user profiles or, who really knows what, because the SDK has no obligation to tell us how specifically it uses our images. Now if you’re like me, you always photograph important documents because you know you will lose the paper within 48 hours. Should you grant an application permission to access photos and files, and should the purpose of the app be to scrape information, they will soon know that you just refinanced your home and you were invited to a wedding on January 8th. Equally, if the permission granted is for photos and files, the “and files” part is the kicker. This means every single file on your device, whether that be a document you downloaded from the IRS or a digital book you’ve been reading.
• “Access Microphone/Camera”—Arguably, the microphone / camera permission is more valuable than photos / files. Camera permission can allow for biometric scans, and I assume you already know what a microphone does.
• Read Device information — allows the SDK to obtain phone model, operating system, language, carrier, IP address, advertising ID and other technical identifiers. While this information may seem very insignificant, it can be used to build user profiles. As you can see, this is no longer a 32-digit randomized code assigned to a device because they now have your IP address and so much other info.
• Usage behavior (which may instead be called “Usage Data,“ “Product Interaction,” or something along the lines of “collect component usage statistics.”) This permission grants the app the ability to monitor what you click, search for, watch, and buy; how long you stay on a screen; and what features you use. Even if you don’t grant specific permission for the application to monitor your full device, just by installing the app, you are agreeing to have it monitor what you do within the app itself.
• Browsing/activity information—this permission allows everything you do online to be indexed. This is incredibly valuable data. Take a moment and view your browsing history by opening a web browser page and clicking the three dots menu icon in the upper right. Scroll down to “History” and start skimming. As you skim, know that companies, at this very moment, could have access to every single search you performed. As a researcher of the hidden hand, you would not believe how fucked up my web history is. I cringe at the thought of it being associated with me as a person.
• Transaction information — Here, your purchases, subscriptions, and interactions with the app are recorded.

Even at this point in the story, there will be people who say, “I don’t give a hoot if some company knows I go to church on Sundays,” so let me explain what is going on in more detail:

According to the FTC, a company called X-Mode installed its SDK into over 300 apps to collect precise location data, which included latitude/longitude, timestamps, and a mobile advertising identifier. These apps included games, fitness trackers, and even religious apps. After harvesting the data, X-Mode sold it to third parties, including advertisers, analytics companies, consulting firms, research organizations, and private government contractors. Because the location pinpoints were tied to MAIDS, all anonymity was lost, and everyone who downloaded the apps could be identified by name or email addresses obtained from other sources. You see, that is what they are doing, my friends. They obtain data from one source that tells them the exact routes someone takes, such as:

Device #847293Monday: medical facilityTuesday: pharmacyWednesday: homeThursday: specialty clinicFriday: pharmacySunday: Lutheran church

Device #769569Monday: office complexTuesday: office complexWednesday: office complex, elementary schoolThursday: office complexFriday: office complex, elementary schoolSaturday: Home improvements storeSunday: Home improvements store

Then they combine the information with other datasets, and they learn who people are, what medical conditions they have, where they work, what faith they practice, if they have children, where those kids go to school, and who their relatives are, and so much more. Perhaps that is why it is called the “World Wide Web”—it is a web around the world; we are caught in it. It’s not “internet,” it’s “enter net”; enter the World Wide Web.

This information isn’t only sold to advertisers; it is also sold to government contractors, police, private detectives—anyone who wants to purchase it. This includes people engaged in black market activity like identity theft, mortgage theft, credit card fraud, and more. Even human traffickers could buy it. It’s mind-blowing.

THE DATA HARVESTING INDUSTRY

“Once I started asking what happens to the information collected by surveillance systems, I discovered something much larger: an entire industry exists to collect, aggregate, match, analyze and monetize information about individuals.”

InMobi and BidMachine are companies that provide advertising SDKs (software development kits) that developers can embed inside an app. Once embedded, these scripts will begin scraping data. So let’s say I make an app for Shadowbanned Library. I then secretly incorporate their SDK into it. I offer the app for download; you download it. You grant it location permission under the belief that this will allow the app to appear in your language, meaning if you are in America, it will be in English, whereas if you are in Germany, it will be in German, and so on. All along you are none the wiser that the SDK could be pulling your precise location and sending it off to be sold in an advertising system where it will be layered with so much other scraped data that your entire existence is for sale to anyone who wants to purchase it. (FYI: No, Shadowbanned Library does not have an app, and no, we would never embed this scraping bullshit or sell your data because the practice is disgusting.)

BUSTING APPS

I wanted to find out the names of apps that have been busted harvesting and selling data. Remember that this is no simple task because, in order to find out if an SDK is actively transmitting data, someone has to access all of the code and really examine what specifically it is doing, and there are not many researchers who have the know-how or desire. That said, I was able to track down several, and many of these might surprise you.

A 2026 investigation by the Electronic Frontier Foundation examined advertising SDKs embedded in Android apps and found two specific apps that were transmitting precise location coordinates to an advertising SDK. The first is QR Scanner, which advertises itself as a “fast and easy QR code scanner, QR code reader, or barcode scanner for Android.” This app has over 50 million downloads.

Who the hell would have ever thought a barcode scanning app is a data harvesting app?

The next is GPS Speedometer, which targets bikers, runners, boaters, and drivers. It has more than 10 million downloads.

Family GPS Locator & Tracker, which has over 50,000 downloads. We cannot prove this is transmitting harvested data, but it says right here that it is linked to both InMobi and BidMachine networks, so you be the judge.

Next is Document Scanner - OCR & Smart, which has over 100,000 downloads.

Water Eject - Audio Lab Expert, which claims to instantly remove water from your cell phone, has 50,000 downloads.

As ChatGPT pointed out to me, this app also requests CAMERA and RECORD_AUDIO, according to the permission listing for the current version.

Prank Sound, Voice & Fake Call has over 100,000 downloads, and it too features SDKs for InMobi and BidMachine, and, unlike the others, it is confirmed that this app is indeed sharing harvested data.

Metal Detector, Ruler, Decibel is a very popular app, with over one million downloads. I bet exactly zero of the people who have this on their phone know what it is being used for.

Live Wallpapers & Screensavers also has over one million downloads, but unlike the others, if you read the fine print, it admits what it is doing.

Those are just a few of an ocean of apps that are engaged in data scraping. A company called Verve says its HyBid SDK reaches more than 1.5 billion users across 10,000+ apps worldwide. Another company, Huawei Petal Ads, has its SDK installed in more than 85,000 apps. And don’t think that an app you are downloading has only InMobi or only BidMachine SDKs on it.

WalkEarn: Make Money advertises itself as a way to earn money while getting healthy by walking. In fact, my spouse downloaded it for a friendly competition at work, but my sweetheart wasn’t the only one. WalkEarn has over five million downloads.

Shockingly, an investigation performed by Exodus revealed that this application featured 28 trackers, including InMobi, BidMachine, AppsFlyer, AppLovin, Facebook Ads, and more. [You will need to translate the site to read the investigation].

Exodus also found that the app Text Free, which has a whopping 50 million downloads, was loaded with 30 trackers!

Want your socks blown off? Remember how we discussed Truecaller earlier? This caller ID app has over one billion downloads.

Exodus discovered it has 31 trackers in version 26.2.5, including:

• BidMachine
• InMobi
• Criteo
• AppLovin
• AppsFlyer
• Facebook Ads
• Google AdMob
• Firebase Analytics
• CleverTap
• Huawei Mobile Services
• And dozens more!

Do you remember how I said previously that Penlink-Cobweb’s Tangles program was pulling information from Telegram, Facebook, Truecaller, and more? I am willing to bet that this is because all of these programs, including Telegram, have SDKs, and Penlink-Cobwebs has access to all of them. For all we know, these companies (meaning the government contractors) are the ones making these free cell phone apps just for the purpose of surveilling us. This got me wondering about a bigger company like…

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/app-based-mass-surveillance-and-we

Part 7 | Facebook: The Surveillance Machine You Voluntarily Installed

From DARPA to Meta: The World’s Biggest Data-Harvesting Experiment?

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

What is really going on behind the like button? Are “encrypted” messages actually secure? Learn the mind-blowing truth about the free social media platform…

Now remember what I told you previously in this publication: Facebook happened to be founded by nerd Mark Zuckerberg the exact day the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the US Department of Defense (DOD) (allegedly) closed down its project in which it aimed to catalog every activity and relationship a person engages in in its massive electronic database. Clearly, this is just a coincidence (LOL.) With that in mind, let’s take a peek at what specifically Facebook is doing when we use the platform and, shockingly, when we aren’t using the platform.

WHAT FACEBOOK LOGS WHEN WE USE THE SITE

• Contact information: This is important because, while this data may seem to be of little value, it becomes gold when it is overlaid with all of the following information.
• Profile information: This is also important for the aforementioned reason.
• Posts: Obviously, what we post is paramount for profiling us, and every last post is very valuable data, even the posts you made after too many margaritas.
• Photos: Not only can these be used to build out connection databases (you, your father, and your brother together), but they can also be used to create biometric databases. Photos also compile data on locations, likes/dislikes, voting tendencies, income level, and so much more. Metadata from photos can also be harvested.
• Videos: If a picture is worth a thousand words, how many words is a video worth? Videos contain faces, audio (including voice that can be used for analysis), logos and brands, buildings, license plates, children, food, music, even the text appearing on the screen; all of this is harvestable data. But that’s not where the data gathering ends. When you watched the video, did you stop after four seconds? Or did you continue until the end? Did you replay it? Did you share it?
• Stories and Reels: Allow for all the same harvesting as photos and videos, but with stories and reels there’s even more data. And, of course, who watched it, liked it, shared it, etc.—that is all great data to rake in.
• Comments: You may be shocked to discover how valuable comments are. Above and beyond linking together connections, each word has value. If someone responds, “I just bought these for my daughter,” the word “bought” triggers purchase data harvesting, while “daughter” triggers relationship data harvesting. If you take this a step further, the photo combined with the comments is used to create groups. For example, a photo of a wounded Army veteran and the outpouring of support in the comments section. The people in the comments section can be added to data sets for supporting military veterans.
• Messages: Facebook claims messages are end-to-end encrypted, but, upon investigating this further, “end-to-end encryption” does not mean the company can never see or read any of the information associated with the conversation. It specifically means the message content, while in transit, is not readable by the service provider. The keywords are “in transit.” This means that during the split second the message is in the delivery stage, nobody can see or listen to what’s sent or said. So the text leaving your phone and arriving at the recipient’s phone will be protected, but there is no protection for the text you type before it leaves your phone or after it arrives on the recipient’s phone. In fact, earlier this year Facebook announced it will be using AI to scan messages for spam. So, because there is no encryption until the message is sent, and then there is no encryption after it arrives, there really isn’t any privacy at all, and throughout the process, AI and SDKs can scrape every last detail. With that in mind, messages are a goldmine of information, even if the conversation seems dull. Something as simple as “Uncle Joe was diagnosed with cancer” not only signals a relationship but also a medical condition. Now imagine if the content is salacious, such as a politician flirting with a young social media influencer or a Ford Motor Company executive making a racist joke privately to his buddy.
• Likes and Reactions: Whether you click the like button on a Nike ad, a baby chinchilla, or a clean eating recipe, this information is being added to your secret user profile; Brenda Jones likes Nike sneakers and cute animals. She tends to avoid processed foods but has a serious sweet tooth—all very valuable information.
• Searches: As you can imagine, what or who you search for is even more valuable than the heart you clicked on the bowl of spaghetti. Think about it; you search for “Divorce lawyers in Minnesota”—not only are you currently married, considering a divorce, and living in Minnesota, but you are also looking for a mouthpiece to represent you in court. My goodness, those four words turned into a lot of data.
• Friends and Followers: This may seem obvious, but it’s deeper than that. If ten of your friends like the Denver Broncos, eight follow NFL players, and six of them belong to football groups, you don’t have to tell anyone that you like football because the people around you are a strong enough indicator. Through friends and followers, your profile can be built to include politics, religion, and so much more.
• Groups: This data is incredibly valuable too, especially from an advertising point of view. If you join a group for money-saving ideas, you can be spammed with ads about saving money, or you may be suffering financial hardship and be in need of a loan, refinancing, or debt consolidation. Equally, if you join a group for a very specific person, place, or thing (e.g., University of Michigan Alumni), you don’t need to log that you went to school there for Facebook to know.
• Marketplace Activity: Whether you are hunting for a one-time purchase, such as an affordable used chandelier, or an ongoing restock, like wood for your woodworking side hustle, what you buy, sell, and even what you view are all usable data.
• Purchases: I have covered this one previously in this publication.

Not only is Facebook (Meta) recording all of that information, but it is also scraping metadata surrounding all of that activity, including the time of day you post or like something, the frequency and duration of your activities, what device you were using, what links you followed afterward, and so much more. Meta’s privacy policy says it collects information from computers, phones, connected TVs, and other web-connected devices that integrate with its products. For fuck’s sake, the company’s name is Meta, which means “high-level analysis of something.” That high-level analysis is being performed on us.

After collection, Facebook layers that data with other data it has collected. Not only does this include location-related information, but it can also harvest information about nearby devices and networks, so it is basically creating a geofence.

“THAT’S WHY I DON’T USE FACEBOOK!”

I hate to inform you that even if you don’t use Facebook—perhaps you have never even made a Facebook account—you are still having your data harvested by Meta. This is because Meta has an expansive assortment of data scraping tools that businesses and individuals can install on their own websites and put into their apps. A few of Meta’s tools include Meta Pixel, Meta SDKs, Meta APIs, social plugins, and Conversions API. There is also server-to-server communication, and this one is important because there doesn’t have to be a tracking script running in your browser for a business to send Meta information about you or your actions.

For example, you visit an online store that sells sneakers. You browse the site for a while to compare products. You then purchase a pair that fits your needs. If the entity is connected to Facebook, the business’s server can send Meta details about the purchase, including when it happened, what you bought, how much you spent, where you are from, and more.

Now let me add in here, not all trackers are “bad.” Whether it is good or bad depends on who is obtaining the data and what their goal is. As an example, at Shadowbanned Library, my partner Medicine Girl and I have decided to collect as little information as possible while still being able to have a fully functional website. This choice has had repercussions. One of them being that without tracking, I have no idea how many people read the articles I post. This isn’t good because I have no way to judge growth. Our site also is not connected to Facebook or any other platform. But it’s a double-edged sword because we have no metrics aside from the very basics. That said, we generate enough money to pay the bills each month, so until that changes, we can keep flying blind. But as I said, whether trackers are good or bad depends on the end goal, and when that end goal becomes building databases for evil purposes, this is when we enter scary territory.

REAL-TIME BIDDING & DATA PACKETS

Without getting into the weeds, you know how there are ads all over the internet? Ads change every time a page is viewed, and the ads that you see will be different from the ads that I see. Businesses bid on their ads being shown (and hopefully clicked). These auctions take place in a fraction of a second because the ad, tailored to you, has to be in place when the page loads. This process is called Real-Time Bidding (RTB).

So basically, how it works is the business, say a clothing store, wants their ad for sweaters to appear on your browser screen, and because so much of your data has been scraped from you, the ad companies know you always buy a new sweater this time of year. The clothing store tells the advertiser, “We are willing to pay $2 if you get the sweater-lover to click our ad.” Then another clothing store says, “We will pay $2.50 because we know that lady is bound to buy one.” A third offers a whopping $3. Imagine this on a worldwide scale: all of these businesses competing for space on our screen, and it all takes place within a fraction of a second.

The data that is associated with real-time bidding has so much value that it too is bought and sold. A single data broker who obtained RTB data and sold that data to US federal government customers through defense contractors claimed to have data on more than one billion mobile devices. I said one billion mobile devices! Another collected real-time bidding data from thousands of apps.

So, as you can see, we now have two different methods that are being deployed to scrape every last piece of data about us: SDKs (Software Development Kits) and RTB (Real-Time Bidding). Now that we know how our data is being scraped, let’s move on to what is happening with it once it is obtained because this is what begins to bring the two worlds together (what we do online and what we do in real life)…

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/facebook-the-surveillance-machine

Part 8 | Your Credit Card is Spying: We are Being Tracked Like Deer

How your credit card is selling you out to the highest bidder. What exactly are they doing with all of this information? The secret world of data harvesting explored.

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

And right about now you’re thinking, “This is supposed to be about Flock cameras. This has literally nothing to do with the topic,” but here is where it all begins linking together—pay attention to this one because this is the intersection between what we do online and what we do in real life. Once we cross over the intersection, you will see how it is all connected…

WHERE THE DATA GOES AFTER IT IS COLLECTED

Assuming you have read the prior chapters in this series, once the data has been harvested, it goes to a company like LiveRamp. LiveRamp says it works with mobile app developers to obtain mobile device advertising IDs—Apple IDFAs and Android Advertising IDs. Those IDs are then added to its lists available in its Data Marketplace, which allows companies to buy and sell marketing data.

As you can see below, LiveRamp’s Data Marketplace sells data to a huge variety of industries. These industries can purchase location data, survey data, TV viewership records, demographic data, life-stage data, and data involving attitudes, values, interests, opinions, and lifestyle choices). But that’s not all, they can also buy records related to our purchases, friends and family, online registration information, and even offline data. Did you hear that? I just said “offline data.” More on this momentarily.

LiveRamp claims its marketplace currently has 200+ data sellers and 650+ partners, with audiences capable of being activated across hundreds of destinations.

When going through the LiveRamp partners page on their site, I found some of the partners to be of interest. For example, Edmunds.

Chances are, if you are in America and you have hunted for a new vehicle in the past decade, you have ended up on Edmunds’ site.

Who knew they were partnered with a company harvesting every last speck of information we provide in hopes of finding a new vehicle that fits our needs?

What about Fetch?

Fetch is a site that gives you points for every receipt you scan. You then convert those points into gift cards.

According to LiveRamp, Fetch currently has over 11 million receipts captured daily from over 12 million monthly active users, representing 179 billion dollars in annual sales data. And anyone can buy all of these records.

Our purchase data is so incredibly valuable that businesses, from the corner gas station to Amazon to a clothing retailer, all offer cash back or assorted loyalty programs if we just grant them access to track everything we purchase. It all becomes even more valuable when we give the retailer our phone number and email address to tie it to. Once they layer that information, they have a giant database on everything about us, including if we prefer T-bones or New York strips.

Ibotta, another app that does the same thing as Fetch, is also a LiveRamp partner.

And you can purchase all of their data too.

What about Duns & Bradstreet? Duns tries to push every business into claiming a free “D & B” number, which will act like a social security number for the business. In return, the business can build credit and apply for loans. Without a D & B number, the business cannot bid on government contracts and will be restricted from other opportunities.

In turn, all of the data harvested is being sold on LiveRamp. Just how much data is D & B producing? According to the listing, the Dun & Bradstreet Data Cloud is comprised of 455 million business records and 350 million cookies [installed trackers] and mobile device IDs.

Here’s a partner you might be familiar with: MasterCard.

The listing for MasterCard is tight-lipped about what data they are selling, but according to a quick internet search, there are 1.12 billion active MasterCard credit cards and 1.83 billion debit cards in circulation worldwide, totaling approximately 2.95 billion cards. Did you know your credit card records were being prostituted?

There are so many publicly named partners that I can’t possibly cover them all.

And right about now you’re thinking, “This is supposed to be about Flock cameras. This has literally nothing to do with the topic,” but very soon you will see how this all links together…

OFFLINE DATA

Even if you throw away every electronic in your possession, you still cannot dodge this mass harvesting of human activity. Aside from credit card purchases, offline data harvesting includes:

• Warranty registrations.
• Magazine subscriptions.
• Addresses and household information.
• Property ownership.
• Vehicle registrations.
• Public records.
• Our physical movements.
• Places we visit.
• Whether we live near a particular business.
• Demographic and household information.
• Sometimes information about health-related purchases or interests.

And let me point out, you don’t ever have to tell one of these entities you are pregnant. In fact, you and your spouse can believe you are keeping it a secret for the time being, but it’s only a secret to the people in your circle of life because your devices already know, and they are already selling that data on you. This is why these companies sell lists titled “Pregnancy” or “George Floyd Protests.” Yes, people who attended protests were turned into sellable audiences despite never checking a box agreeing to have their information whored out. Along those lines, the company, Gravy Analytics, was selling location data that pinned people to specific churches. This means the advertiser not only knows you are Protestant but also knows you worship at Willow Creek Community Church at 67 Algonquin Rd, South Barrington, Illinois. Gravy Analytics then sold this information to the US government (which means we, the taxpayer, purchased location data on our fellow man for our government to use however they pleased.)

Recall how I said earlier that the stores themselves were pimping us out. The major retailers also own advertising companies. Let me tell you about a few of them so you can try to grasp how expansive this truly is.

• Walmart owns Walmart Connect, which uses Walmart customer/transaction data to sell advertising and then measure the success of the advertising against purchases. The Walmart Connect partner directory is huge. Sam’s Club benefits from Walmart Connect.
• Target operates Roundel, which, like Walmart Connect, uses Target shopper data for advertising and measurements. Target’s pregnancy-prediction program analyzed customers’ purchasing behavior and developed a pregnancy prediction score based on combinations of seemingly ordinary purchases. I don’t know what the accuracy of this program is, but the fact that it exists is enough on its own to raise an eyebrow.
• Kroger owns Kroger Precision Marketing, built around Kroger’s shopper and transaction data.
• Albertsons has Albertsons Media Collective, which does the same.
• CVS operates CVS Media Exchange, also known as the CMX Network.
• Walgreens has Walgreens Advertising Group, which it describes as, “real people, real purchases.”
• Amazon combines enormous amounts of purchase, browsing, and behavioral data through Amazon Ads.
• Home Depot operates a retail-media business using customer/shopping data, Orange Apron Media.
• Lowe’s operates Lowe’s Media Network.
• Best Buy has Best Buy Ads.
• Dollar General operates DG Media Network.
• Instacart announced that its first-party retail-media data could be used directly within TikTok Ads Manager, including audience targeting based on purchase behavior and closed-loop measurement. But that’s not all. Pinterest advertisers can target Instacart audiences based on actual purchase behavior, and Instacart said in 2026 that retailers can use its off-platform advertising capabilities through partnerships with Meta and others to reach consumers beyond Instacart. What a web they have woven.

THE MIDDLEMAN

Not every big store owns its own media group. For those that need a middleman, companies like Catalina are available. Catalina is a data harvesting and advertising company that sits between retailers, brands, and advertisers.

Catalina says it has purchase data covering 130 million households, $600 billion in annual spending, 11 billion annual shopping trips, and more than 400 million shopper IDs.

This data is then aggregated with loyalty club card data, marketing data, and sales data to create audiences and target individual shoppers. Companies like Catalina have so much data that they can know what a customer needs to buy and can deliver personalized messages by text message or email before people enter a store.

Another major middleman is NielsenIQ. Neilson is networked with more than 8,900 retailers in 88 countries. Neilson combines purchase data, loyalty card data, offline activities, demographics, and media consumption and uses this data to create sellable consumer profiles. It also says it receives nearly four billion receipts annually from Fetch Rewards, which we already discussed. And guess who is a customer? The US government.

OFFLINE IDENTITY RESOLUTION

I guarantee that’s a three-word phrase you’ve never heard before; neither had I. So what exactly is “offline identity resolution”? It’s what turns a heap of seemingly unrelated records into a profile associated with one person or household. It’s taking all of the data we have discussed—both online and offline—and combining it into one file. This is what companies like Experian do. Experian owns what they call an “Offline Graph,” which is a massive database that pulls its data from public and state records, including

• property and tax records
• census data
• transactions
• online/mobile data
• location data
• consumer surveys
• published directories
• public and state records
• property and tax records
• census data
• transactions
• online/mobile data
• location data
• consumer surveys
• published directories
• and more

Experian’s Offline Graph contains data from more than 3,500 original public and proprietary sources. As unbelievable as this may sound, businesses send all of their records to Experian, and Experian matches those records against Experian’s existing Offline Graph.

Considering that Experian is already a provider of “credit scores,” which take our payment history, amounts owed, length of credit history, new credit, and more and combine them into a score that determines if we can buy a house, car, and so on, you can see how we are only a flip of a switch away from a full-blown social credit system. Quite horrifying.

Speaking of offline data harvesting, there is another thing we must discuss…

AMAZON ECHO, GOOGLE HOME, AND SIMILAR DEVICES

Unless you have been living under a rock, by this point you are very familiar with Amazon Echo devices, which use AI assistant technology called Alexa (now Alexa+).

These devices allow you to say voice commands for actions, such as booking a flight or an Uber, reordering your favorite olive oil, even getting the score of last night’s ballgame. All of this is indeed convenient, but it comes at a high price surveillance-wise.

When Alexa responds to a request, Amazon receives the voice interaction and creates a transcript, but we didn’t really know the full extent of what was going on with that data until an Federal Trade Commission case back in 2023. If you read this case, you will see that the FTC discovered that Alexa AI technology was (and is) collecting “vast amounts of data about consumers ranging from their geolocation data via the company’s Alexa app to their voice recordings collected by Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant service.” And, we also learn that Amazon gave 30,000 employees access to Alexa users’ voice recordings—even though many, if not most, of those staffers had no business need for the files because those files are allegedly not a part of Amazon’s business.

However, if we rewind a few more years, we learn that these voice files really were a part of Amazon’s business.

To quote from a Bloomberg article titled Silicon Valley is Listening to Your Most Intimate Moments, “Ruthy Hope Slatis couldn’t believe what she was hearing. She’d been hired by a temp agency outside Boston for a vague job: transcribing audio files for Amazon.com Inc. For $12 an hour, she and her fellow contractors, or “data associates,” listened to snippets of random conversations and jotted down every word on their laptops. Amazon would only say the work was critical to a top-secret speech-recognition product. The clips included recordings of intimate moments inside people’s homes…

The recordings she and her co-workers were listening to were often intense, awkward, or intensely awkward. Lonely sounding people confessing intimate secrets and fears: a boy expressing a desire to rape; men hitting on Alexa like a crude version of Joaquin Phoenix in Her. And as the transcription program grew along with Alexa’s popularity, so did the private information revealed in the recordings. Other contractors recall hearing kids share their home address and phone number, a man trying to order sex toys, a dinner party guest wondering aloud whether Amazon was snooping on them at that very instant. “There’s no frickin’ way they knew they were being listened to,” Slatis says. “These people didn’t agree to this.”

The whole issue has become so bad that there was a lawsuit filed in 2024 over Alexa illegally recording conversations without consent. The plaintiffs have pointed out that Amazon is collecting billions of conversations without the knowledge of the consumer. But let me tell you, this isn’t limited to Amazon products. Let me share with you the intel Bloomberg dug up on Apple:

“…At a GlobeTech office near an airport in Cork, Ireland, some say, they sat in silence at MacBooks wearing headphones, tasked with transcribing 1,300 clips a day, each of which could be a single sentence or an entire conversation… When a contractor clicked play on a voice recording, the computer filled a text box with the words it thought Siri “heard,” then prompted the worker to approve or correct the translation and move on. GlobeTech didn’t respond to requests for comment.

A program the workers used, called CrowdCollect, included buttons to skip recordings for a variety of reasons—accidental trigger, missing audio, wrong language—but contractors say there was no specific mechanism to report or delete offensive or inappropriate audio, such as drunk-sounding users slurring demands into the mics or people dictating sexts. Contractors who asked managers whether they could skip overly private clips were told no clips were too private. They were expected to transcribe anything that came in. Contractors often lasted only a couple of months, and training on privacy issues was minimal. One former contractor who had no qualms about the work says listening in on real-world users was “absolutely hilarious.”

Google and Facebook aren’t innocent either. Facebook has used human transcribers for its chat app Messenger—you know, the app you are supposed to believe is super duper safe.

And now that AI has officially rolled out, there is no need for human transcription because the software can do it all on its own. This brings us to the next question: being that all of these entities are desperate to obtain every trace of information about us…

HOW MUCH IS OUR DATA WORTH?

Researchers at Duke University investigated what data brokers would charge for data (“datasets”) about Americans. They found that one broker offered a dataset containing 435,780 individuals’ records for $0.06 per person. This means it would cost the company a little over $26,000 to purchase the whole load. Another broker quoted $275 per 1,000 people with a 5,000-record minimum. Pricing for mental health information varied: one data broker charged $275 for 5,000 Americans’ mental health records, while other firms work off a subscription model that rakes in $75,000 or $100,000 annually. And keep in mind, this is digital data that is not exclusive. The same dataset can be sold a dozen or more times in a single day. It could even be sold hundreds of times if needed.

NETWORK SHARING

Aside from selling data, data can be shared for free. And the kicker is that sites that say, “We don’t sell your data!” can say that with a straight face and then transfer the data out through an SDK to a company that does sell it. Again, this is all completely legal.

THE MOBILE HEALTH DATA HARVESTING INDUSTRY

Mobile health, known as “mHealth,” is a new industry that eliminates a trip to the doctor by allowing people to connect remotely. mHealth also refers to the use of mobile devices and technologies, such as smartphones, tablets, apps, and wearable devices, that are used to collect, monitor, or deliver health-related information and services. All of these mHealth entities offer apps, and, as one can assume, these apps collect highly sensitive data. What you may be surprised to learn is what is happening with that data after collection.

You see, most mHealth apps are not covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); therefore, they are not bound by the same laws. This means they are not legally obligated to keep their clients’ data confidential. This means all of these companies that are collecting customer data, whether that be through wearables, cell phone apps, websites, or social media platforms, can legally share, license, and sell users’ health data (in addition to other data) to third parties without users’ knowledge or consent, and data brokers love it.

To quote from an investigation by Duke University, “The 10 most engaged brokers advertised highly sensitive mental health data on Americans, including data on those with depression, attention disorder, insomnia, anxiety, ADHD, and bipolar disorder as well as data on ethnicity, age, gender, zip code, religion, children in the home, marital status, net worth, credit score, date of birth, and single parent status. Pricing for mental health information varied: one data broker charged $275 for five thousand aggregated counts of Americans’ mental health records, while other firms charged upwards of $75,000 to $100,000 a year for subscription/licensing access to data that included information on individuals’ mental health conditions.”

Check out this insane list showing what some of the collected information includes:

Now we must ask, “What exactly are these data buyers doing with this information?” Answer: In many cases, they are sending communications, such as letters that say things like:

“Dear [name], We are reaching out to you because someone at this residential address may have or has been formerly diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety. Please contact us if anyone in your household would be interested in being connected with community resources.”

Yes, these secretive data harvesting operations are the reason you keep receiving junk mail telling you the warranty on your car has expired or you need to contact the company ASAP about a problem with your loan, when in reality there are no problems with your loan. But it’s not just junk mail; it’s also emails, text messages (including political texts), and phone calls. If these businesses could send us smoke signals and carrier pigeons, they would. I should mention that many of these data brokers have partnerships with pharmaceutical companies or other entities, so the data brokers themselves are partners with Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and so on. This means a data broker can obtain your sister’s data from her loyalty club card for the local pharmacy. From this data, the broker discovers that she recently took your nephews to get a flu shot. Being that the kids got one shot, it is likely their mother can be sold another. The broker can solicit all of her information to the pharmaceutical company, and they can bombard her with fear propaganda until she returns to the pharmacy for more jabs.

WEAPONIZING HARVESTED DATA

But that’s not all. As Duke University pointed out, the collection of the data can be weaponized. Just how Flock cameras network with car insurance companies, these online data harvesters can do the same. As Duke said, “Health insurance providers—which already buy individuals’ race, education level, net worth, marital status, and other data without their knowledge or full consent to predict healthcare costs—could buy mental health data to discriminately charge individuals for care or discriminately target vulnerable populations with advertisements.” But it’s not just mental health. Equally, let’s say you throw your back out on the job and file for workers’ compensation. You have never complained about your back to your doctor, you have never had back surgery, and you have never filed for compensation before, but the insurance company, through data harvesting, discovers that you recently told someone on a dating app that you can’t meet up because your back is sore again. Now your compensation is denied on the grounds of your back being a pre-existing condition. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Here is the point in this publication where I will begin tying all of it together; Flock, Leonardo, MAIDs, Facebook, every last bit of it…

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/your-credit-card-is-spying-we-are

Part 9 | COVID, 5G, Microchips & Spam Calls

Believe it or not, all of these things go together...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

Continuing to uncover the stealthy mass surveillance system, which is rapidly being installed around us…

Rewind to Covid [scam] lockdowns. While our local parks were closed down, swings and slides were covered in caution tape, while grocery store entrances were guarded by security to check for face masks, and while we were trapped in our homes, something unexpected happened. It was so unexpected that we didn’t realize it until it was too late. But how could we have realized it when we were stuck at home, not even driving our normal route to work? What was that unexpected thing? 5G. These towers rapidly went up across the nation, exactly during the Covid hysteria and lockdown. Exactly when we were in a battle over if the so-called virus came from a bat or was made in a lab (because those were the only two options we were presented.) [In reality it was a renaming of flu symptoms]

Installation of these towers was done sneakily by men who were working overtime, around the clock, while the rest of us were financially panicking due to another week of no employment. The government had no fear that the tower installers would become ill and spread Covid. So, under the cover of lockdown and panic, 5G towers were affixed to schools, churches, and businesses and even hidden inside trees and cacti.

In the shocking images below, you will see 5G coverage before and after Covid. Here is Sprint’s 5G coverage before Covid. As you can see, Sprint only had four locations covered and had five more planned.

And here is Sprint after Covid (2021).

Here is Verizon before Covid.

Verizon after Covid.

Interestingly, back in 2018, the SEC published a heavily redacted document that said, “Accelerated 5G Deployment Will Help the United States Continue to Lead the World.” In this document, they assure that by installing 5G across the nation, we, the taxpayers, will pay less and get more. (How’s that working out for you? Have your internet bills gone down? Mine sure haven’t.)

What you will find eyebrow-raising is that in the 2018 document, 2021 was a key date in which all the major carriers will have greatly expanded 5G capacity, meaning the project will have been completed. 2021 was only 31 months after the publication of the redacted document. That’s a pretty tight schedule, isn’t it? Think about covering the entire nation with 5G towers in such a short timeframe. Seems unlikely, doesn’t it?

Not to mention that doing such a thing would lead to pushback and temporary injunctions in court, which would stop the process, but it just so happens that lockdowns occurred 21 months later, which was ten months before the expansion deadline. And it just so happens that during lockdowns the courts were mostly closed.

To make sure this happened as quickly as possible, weeks before the nationwide lockdowns hit (2020), the US government agreed to give $20.4 billion in grants (tax dollars) for 5G to be installed via the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF). And packed into the Coronavirus Relief Fund was even more money to expand broadband infrastructure.

The CARES Act allocated another $150 billion to state and local governments, which many jurisdictions used to expand internet infrastructure. In fact, a deadline was set, which was December 20th of 2020, which just so happened to be right before the master deadline, 2021, which was decided upon back in 2018.

Why does this matter? Because, if not for this mass expansion of 5G, the police state that is scheduled to go into effect by or in 2030 could not remain on schedule. The wireless internet upgrade, with more towers and no home left connectionless, is required for the AI mass surveillance system. And one of the many surveillance tools on this network is something you probably never even considered…

WI-FI MOTION DETECTION

Yes, this is a real thing.

To quote from the Forbes article, “Comcast is turning compatible Xfinity Gateways into motion sensors with a new feature called WiFi Motion, which uses changes in the Wi-Fi signals around your home to detect movement… the Xfinity Gateway monitors changes in the radio-frequency signals between the router itself and any Wi-Fi-connected devices around the home. When you move through the rooms, your body interferes with the signals.” This is in addition to all of the information your humble little router box is already collecting, which includes a precise household activity timeline:

• Phone X appeared at 7:32 AM.
• Phone X disappeared at 7:59 AM.
• TV connected at 8:40 AM.
• Phone Z appeared at 9:05 AM.
• TV disconnected at 12:00 PM.
• Laptop appeared at 1:18 PM.
• Phone X returned at 2:46 PM.
• A new device connected at 3:13 PM, the same time Phone X connected.

And so on.

This technology cannot operate on the majority of current routers. Everyone must be upgraded to the new routers, which are 5G routers.

As CyberHoot points out, once installed, all of your motions can be monitored by your internet provider. As I will add, your habits can then be monetized by selling them to the highest bidder. The router can work in tandem with our smart door locks because they know when people are coming and going. And if each person has their own unique PIN code or fingerprint to open the door, it’s even better for the overseers of society.

Speaking of being monitored by internet providers, have you heard of Starlink? Of course you have, but just in case you haven’t, Starlink is a worldwide “satellite” broadband internet service developed by SpaceX, designed to provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity to underserved, rural, and remote areas where traditional infrastructure is limited or unavailable, because it is exceptionally important that everyone can be surveilled. So you want to know what data Starlink collects? Obviously it collects all the basic stuff like name, address, phone number, browser type, and so on, but it also collects cookies, pixels, tags, device identifiers, and more. Do you know what it does with the collected data? Starlink’s privacy policy describes advertising and analytics partners that can track activity on its website and applications. It says this tracking can occur even when a visitor is not logged into a Starlink account. Additionally, Starlink says personal information may be shared with third-party partners to help develop and train AI.

Meanwhile, our smart thermostats log temperature, schedules, and whether we crank up the heat on chilly winter nights. Soon these will self-regulate, meaning to save the planet, your home will stay at 65 degrees during the winter and 79 during the summer. This has already rolled out in other countries. Eventually, paying for heat and AC will be a privilege, and it will only allow you to use these utilities if you have been a good citizen.

What you may not know is that they also have motion sensors and occupancy detection. Yeah, your thermostat knows if you are home alone or with a friend. Google says Nest sensor information is regularly sent to Google, where it can be shared with third parties. So, let’s say police want to bug your residence. Your thermostat, through third-party data sharing, could tell them when your house is empty.

Did I mention that robot vacuums are mapping your home? Did you know the fine print also involves image collection and human detection data?

Do you now wonder what happens with that data?

Just wait—it gets even more frightening—Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) is the technology new televisions use. The TV itself can analyze and interpret what is on the screen as well as the audio associated with it, and, like Leonardo, it too uses this information to create a “digital fingerprint.” The cartoons your kids watch on Sunday morning, Hollywood movies, documentaries, podcasts, a conspiracy video, games running on the PS4 that is connected to your TV, screencasts, even some late-night pornography—it will all be your fingerprint.

As of five years ago, this technology was used by 24 leading television makers, which includes Amazon Firestick and Roku, and I’d bet my bottom dollar this same tech is in our phones, tablets, computers, and anything with a screen.

But to get back to the topic we were discussing, 5G was an imperative step in creating the cage around us, so let’s discuss this more.

COVID

I wrote back in 2024 that being forced to wear face masks in public was not simply to humiliate us, nor was it to see if we would comply, nor was it to promote the virus hoax. Those were just bonuses. What I told you back then sounded so crazy that it was difficult to believe, but it makes perfect sense now, doesn’t it? Perhaps you didn’t read that article, so let me tell you what I wrote.

The original plan was for us to be monitored through digital ID, which would be tied to our fingerprints, which cell phone manufacturers have been testing for quite a while now by offering “password-free unlock” / fingerprint unlock.

The other idea was facial recognition. Then the overlords had a revelation, and it was a massive revelation. That revelation was that while facial scans and fingerprint scans were really great, there is something even better: retina scans. They claim that fingerprint scans and even facial recognition aren’t foolproof, but retina scans are, because retinas never change and can be scanned with a quick glance at a camera.

Despite being called “retina scans,” they’re not exactly scanning your retina, per se. What they’re scanning is blood vessel patterns in each eye, and, according to their documents, no two people have the same patterns. There are additional benefits, such as the ability to scan in low light and being able to scan even if someone is wearing glasses. But this presented a problem. The problem was that the AI cameras had been built for facial scans, not eye scans, but artificial intelligence is called “intelligence” because it can learn, so if there was a way the cameras could be trained to scan retinas, this would solve the problem. But how do you get existing cameras to learn to read eyes and ignore the rest of the face? Answer:

…you cover the rest of the face….

Now all that’s left is the eyes, so the cameras are forced to zero in on them. It’s diabolically brilliant, isn’t it? And now that you know, isn’t the reason for face masks so painfully obvious? Yet we all overlooked what was, quite literally, right in front of our noses this whole time…

Perhaps this explains why they didn’t care what kind of mask you wore; it could be cloth, a knit scarf, a surgeon’s mask, or anything you want, as long as the only thing showing is your eyes, therefore forcing the camera to scan only those.

MICRO-CHIPPING

So, the p[l]andemic happened, and a huge portion of the world rushed to get injected with vaccines [bioweapon injections]. Some people got numerous injections. It didn’t take long for the most bizarre thing we have ever witnessed to begin happening. That thing was that many people began emitting MAC addresses. By definition, a MAC address is “a unique 48-bit hardware identifier permanently assigned to a network interface controller by its manufacturer, serving as a device’s physical ‘name tag’ on a local network.” So it’s basically a MAID, and exactly like a MAID, a MAC address remains constant throughout the device’s life. (For more on this topic, watch the documentary Blue Truth:

Of course the media says this is just a hoax; nobody ever emitted a MAC address, all of the journalists and scientists are fools, and the vaccines are not causing this odd phenomenon, but what’s interesting is that all the way back before 9/11, Rockefeller wanted to RFID microchip everyone [see video: https://videos.sb-library.com/w/v8jpcFwiAGXJA3XovzVqCb or read The Secret History of Microchipping].

If you are finding this too hard to believe, please read Cell Towers & the NIH Contract You’ve Never Heard Of. Even if you believe it, you should still read that piece. It’s the true story of David Larson, who, in the early 1990s, discovered he was being experimented on by the NIH and that the technology was connecting to communication towers that surrounded his home. Through research, David came to learn that those towers happened to be controlled by individuals affiliated with the NIH. It sounded so crazy back in the 1990s that, for the most part, Mr. Larson was chalked up to being a rambling nutjob.

By or in 1995, which was right after Larson discovered the NIH was tracking people using communication towers, the Stingray surveillance device was being used by law enforcement in America. If you’re not familiar, the Stingray is a cell site simulator. In plain English, it’s a gadget that mimics a cell tower. Once a phone connects to it, the Stingray can track the user’s precise location (often within a few feet), collect metadata such as call logs and text messages, and intercept the content of calls and data transmissions.

The Stingray was originally developed for military and intelligence, but, like everything else, it was deployed against the American people. Of course, law enforcement says it’s just for catching bad guys, so it’s ok. But the thing is, it’s not just for catching the bad guys because, unlike traditional warrants that require carriers to hand over records, Stingrays allow officers to bypass the warrant process and bypass the carrier entirely. Not only is there no approval process for the collection of this data, but there is also no specific individual from whom data will be collected because the Stingray, just like Flock, Axon, and Leonardo, is a dragnet that collects data from all devices in the vicinity, including those of innocent bystanders. This has sparked Fourth Amendment legal challenges regarding privacy and the requirement for warrants, but the Constitution doesn’t matter when it comes to data collection.

Although law enforcement claims Stingrays are a great thing because they protect the populace, the FBI went to great lengths to prevent the public from having knowledge of cell site simulators. They went to such lengths that they even required state and local law enforcement agencies to sign nondisclosure agreements before purchasing the technology, which is probably why you have never heard of Stingrays. Yet this tech is so old that I was in high school when they began rolling it out! I’m now in my mid-40s with adult children!

In 1997, Google was founded and would soon offer a “free” search engine.

Then, in 1999, the Auto ID Center was established “as a not-for-profit consortium to develop a system for using the Internet to identify goods anywhere in the world.” They already knew exactly what was required to give humans an Electronic Product Code (EPC), a code that would link us to the internet. Let that sink in for a moment: human beings getting a product code…

This concept of chipping us is not some screwball idea that some 45-year-old tinfoil-hat idiot came up with while eating ramen noodles in his bedroom in his parents’ basement. This is instead a very real idea that some evil elites came up with while implementing their agenda to control the world and further enslave us.

On the 4th of February, 2004, Facebook came to be, but what I didn’t tell you is that two months later, Gmail was launched. Of course, Gmail provides us with free email for a reason, and that reason isn’t kindness.

The following year, on Valentines Day, YouTube, the company that lets us watch free videos, was founded. How sweet of them!

Then, at some point between 1990 and 2005, another thing came to light, literally. This thing was streetlights. More specifically, that the streetlights were spying. As I wrote many years ago, these streetlights (and parking lot lights too) are able to see, hear, and record, then transmit all of that data.

And nobody in the public would ever have any clue because they are cleverly designed to look like normal lights.

As I said back then, these streetlights are part of the smart cities technology collection.

Do you recall how I mentioned the 2018 redacted document that said 5G must be deployed across America and 2021 was the deadline? Well, these streetlights are more than just lights. They are also 5G stations.

So, while it looks like your city is installing new lights, what they are actually installing are 5G hotspots and continuous-record surveillance technology, and this system will be tied to digital ID, which will require retina scans (biometrics). Through a single event, a so-called pandemic, the hard part was accomplished, and the cameras were trained to scan eyes; meanwhile, the motion detector Wi-Fi routers are already going in homes to complement the occupancy monitoring thermostats and floor plan mapping vacuums. All of that has been checked off their list.

SPAM CALLS

Now let’s take it a step further. Governments worldwide are currently on a mission to stop spam calls, or so they claim, in unison. While you may hear this and think, “Praise God!” because we are all tired of these calls, what you might not realize is that all of these governments are claiming the solution is a phone registry, meaning just how you register your vehicle, you will register your phone’s SIM card.

And don’t think you can dodge this by taking the SIM out and popping in a new one because now all SIMs are turning into digital eSIMs, so there will be no physical SIM. The SIM will be a part of the phone itself. That said, the idea that this will stop spam calls makes no sense. If you have ever looked into the spammers, they operate out of call centers primarily located in India (check out Jim Browning’s YouTube channel. He hacks into their computer systems and exposes them). So forcing people in America, Mexico, Britain, Australia, and so on, to register phone numbers will have no impact on international call centers operating entirely, or almost entirely, out of India. Additionally, these call centers do not use cell phones. They use Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) computer calls, so there is no SIM card.

And it isn’t even India behind this scam. India is only being hired because it is cost-effective and there are few legal repercussions. So who is behind the scams? Well, when Trilogy Media investigated Indian scammers targeting Americans, they ended up at the lowest levels of the Chinese mafia. See, I told you the mafia runs everything, and all nationalities of the mafia work together (read Pizzagate.)

But to get back to spam calls: this phone registry is only the first part of the plan. To ensure terrorists are not getting phones, just like when you purchase a gun from an authorized dealer, the phone company will perform a background check by checking each applicant versus the database of so-called terrorists. Not only does this mean you can be rejected from owning a phone, but it also means once your phone is tied to your identity, you can be arrested for a text, a Twitter post, an article you wrote, or a meme. When all of this goes into effect, everything from our phones to our own eyes will be on file with the government and a variety of shadow entities, and it will all be tied to our ability to use the internet or a bank account. It will be tied to our ability to cash a paycheck or buy groceries. Tragically, this is only a part of what is coming down the pipe.

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/covid-5g-microchips-and-spam-calls

Part 10 | The KILL SWITCHES Have Arrived

Just when you think things can’t possibly get any worse...

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

Only one article in this series left to go, so it’s time to start showing everyone what is on deck. All of this technology will be unleashed upon us very, very soon…

Most of us have come to realize that our vehicles transmit data. Our cars, trucks, and SUVs collect speed, braking patterns, GPS, and more through “telematics,” and this data can be harvested remotely. For example, both General Motors and OnStar collected “driving behavior data,” which included all the aforementioned in addition to late-night driving and acceleration speed. But what nobody realizes is what is about to be unleashed upon us in the form of new vehicles. You see, the new Investment and Jobs Act secretly harbors a vehicle kill switch law within Section 24220, which is to go into effect by or on Nov 5th, 2027. This secret kill switch is disguised as “advanced impaired driving prevention systems,” and it must go into all new vehicles. This means all new vehicles will have the obligation to refuse to start if the vehicle, meaning computer AI, feels the driver is too impaired to drive. Now here’s what’s interesting: while you are thinking “impaired driving” means drunk driving and because you don’t drink, this won’t impact you; you are dead wrong. Many auto manufacturers are using the broadest definition of the word impaired which means “diminished, damaged, or weakened” and “functioning poorly or incompetently.”

How this will work is the computer in your vehicle uses AI, and that AI deems you impaired from a puff of pot, lack of sleep, or maybe you just found out your beloved grandfather was just rushed to the hospital and your adrenaline is pumping. Unfortunately for you, you are emotionally impaired, and you will not be driving today.

Ford has filed many patents involving biometric scans, facial recognition, emotional state reading, heart rate analysis, and even lip-reading systems. Yes, your F-150 will be able to read your lips. Did you just mouth, “Screw the IRS”? I hate to inform you that you will now have to catch an Uber to get to work.

This tech will be combined with cabin surveillance, and it will all be used to determine whether your vehicle will be allowed to start or not.

And this isn’t just a Ford thing. Every vehicle maker is filing these crazy patents because they have to install the kill switch, and it is probably easier to put in a multi-faceted kill switch up front than to file a patent for drunk driving, go through all the work of producing the tech, and then, in five years, have the government expand the law to include emotional instability. And let’s face it, these automakers are all government controlled because when someone pays you, they own you. These automotive producers are on bended knees for Uncle Sam because Uncle Sam holds the bailout purse strings and tax incentives.

I misplaced the link to it, but another new automotive patent discussed biometric scans, which will be linked to criminal databases, so before your vehicle can start, the AI program will check to see if you have any unpaid tickets, missed a court date, or, God forbid, are on the top-secret terrorist watch list for what you posted on Facebook. I know I failed by losing the link, but you don’t have to take my word for it because you will see this firsthand within the next couple of years. What will begin as blocking intoxicated people from starting their cars will turn into journalists like me being banned from driving.

Additionally, this automotive tech can cross-reference insurance company databases to make sure your policy is up-to-date before you hit the road. While we are in the patent stage here in America, this tech has already rolled out internationally.

And it’s trickling into the US. In Illinois, a new law just passed to prevent speeding. If you get two tickets in a year for excessive speeding, you will have to pay for a monitoring device. If your vehicle is too old to use the monitoring device, your license will be suspended for two years.

FYI: “too old” is 1996 and older because these do not have the port required to monitor you.

OUR SECRET SPY CARS

I came across this really interesting video, which I have transcribed for you with a few minor edits to make it easier to understand without the visuals of the video.

Transcription: “2024, Brian was driving his 2023 Toyota Corolla GR on the highway. He then noticed that something was wrong. Smoke started pouring into the interior.

Brian pulled over to take a look and see what was going on. And before he knew it, the front end of the car was completely in flames. Some of the damage was covered by insurance, but the remaining cost was to be covered in a warranty claim by Toyota.

After all, the car was only one year old and just caught fire for no apparent reason. But to his horror, Toyota denies his claim. Why? According to their reply, his car had sent data packets to headquarters indicating that he’d driven in excess of 85 miles per hour at some point during his ownership.

Among other excuses, they concluded that they couldn’t provide any assistance due to his irresponsible driving. This was despite the fire having nothing to do with how fast he’d driven the car at a completely separate time. For context, the GR Corolla is a rally car which can do zero to 60 miles an hour in under five seconds.

This scenario sounds like a comedic B-plot in a dystopian sci-fi movie, but this is very real and is happening today. In 2023, there was a review of the privacy standards of 25 major car brands by the Mozilla Foundation. The results were a complete disaster.

All 25 of the brands failed to meet consumer privacy standards. According to ABC Australia, the report revealed that murky and vague privacy policies allowed brands like BMW, Ford, Toyota, Tesla, Kia, and Subaru to collect highly sensitive and personal data. Shockingly, this includes information on activity, immigration status, race, facial expressions, weight, health, genetic information, and driving locations.

And unfortunately, these companies can potentially sell this data to third parties. The data is being collected by sensors, microphones, cameras, car apps, the phones and devices that drivers connect to their cars, and company websites. The report named Nissan as the worst offender, as they collected data on, quote, activity, health diagnosis data, and genetic data. But strangely, no one knows exactly how they got this information. Nissan (terms and conditions) say that they can share and sell consumers “preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behavior, attitudes, intelligence abilities, and aptitudes.” Nissan can give this information to data brokers, law enforcement, and other third parties.

The report also called out Toyota’s privacy policies as “a near incomprehensible galaxy.”

Mozilla asked the companies about encryption of the data, and only one of the brands, Mercedes, even responded. Jen Caltrider, a writer of Mozilla was stunned by the findings and would conclude, quote, “All new cars today are privacy nightmares on wheels that collect huge amounts of personal information,” end quote.

It’s pretty insane already, but it goes deeper. In March of 2024, the New York Times released a bombshell investigation of how car companies are selling driver data to insurance companies. Data such as where they’re driving, how fast they’re going, how hard they accelerate and step on the brakes—pretty much everything. The companies involved include General Motors/GM, Honda, Mitsubishi, Kia, Ford, Hyundai, and Subaru, all to varying degrees, as you’ll soon see. Car manufacturers will always try to hammer this point home. And at a stretch, if you squint your eyes, perhaps you could see it that way. But if we’re being real, it turns out that these car companies are making millions off selling your driver data to brokers and onto insurance companies. Your insurance premium could start skyrocketing, and you have no idea why. The last thing you’d expect is that your humble car was snitching on you to a large corporation.

The New York Times gave an example of Ken Dahl, a 65-year-old careful driver who had never been responsible for an accident. Suddenly, in 2022, he got a rude shock when his car insurance costs jumped by 21%. After shopping around, he realized something strange; other car insurance packages were suddenly unusually high for him too. Wondering what was going on, he asked an insurance agent, and he told him the real answer. He’d gotten a bad report from LexisNexis. Now who the heck is that? Well, they’re one of those third-party data brokers. And where did LexisNexis get the data from? From General Motors, who made Mr. Dahl’s Chevy Bolt. He dug a bit deeper and got his hands on the actual report from LexisNexis. It was over 130 pages long, detailing every move that he and his wife had made. 640 trips. It included when he was speeding, braking sharply, or accelerating sharply; the time they set off for a trip; and the time the trip concluded.

Mr. Dahl would tell the New York Times, quote, “It felt like a betrayal. They’re taking information that I didn’t realize was going to be shared and screwing with our insurance. The raw data from your car is collected, sold to data brokers who analyze it and then send it to your insurance company, all without you having a clue.”

Some car companies do sell the information directly, and some do have opt-in clauses, but many don’t and are on by default without the drivers knowing. Furthermore, these drivers aren’t aware that their data is being shared with third parties. Even for those drivers who opt in on data collection to improve their driving, they innocently think it’s going to help them become a better driver.

There’s still no obvious indication that this data is going to third parties. A lot of the time it’s hidden behind the fine print of legal jargon. For sports car enthusiasts, it’s a nightmare.

The same New York Times report shines a light on one Corvette owner. He took his car out for a spin on a professional racetrack. His car’s data was then filled with rapid acceleration events, potentially ruining his car insurance score.

Another Cadillac owner had had enough after he was denied car insurance by seven companies. And of course, his LexisNexis report was to blame. He finally did get car insurance, but for twice the price.

Kia, Subaru, and Mitsubishi also share data with LexisNexis, who has now collected data from over 10 million cars. Ford, Honda, and Hyundai are also selling driver data, but to another data broker called Verisk. Subaru states that it only shares odometer data, according to the New York Times, and Ford denies the claims, saying it was only partnering with LexisNexis to, quote, “explore ways to support consumers.” They go on to state that they send driver data directly to insurance companies only with explicit consent. Kia, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Honda, and Acura all have driving feedback apps where drivers can opt in to monitor how well they’re performing on the road. But what drivers may not know is that this data is getting passed on to, you guessed it, either LexisNexis or Verisk. So once again, insurance can potentially be affected as a result of their driving habits without them necessarily knowing.

Toyota is no angel in all of this. Rafi Alam from the Australian consumer advocacy group Choice states, “When we looked at Toyota’s privacy policy, we found that these connected service features will collect data such as fuel levels, odometer readings, vehicle location, and driving data, as well as personal information like phone numbers and email addresses,” end quote.

And all of this isn’t to mention the risks of data breaches. Unfortunately, it’s just a sign of the times. Data collecting technology is becoming ever more common in newer cars, and much of this can’t be opted out of.

Most new cars today will have some kind of location tracking technology included, but does it have to be this way? Critics argue that these data collection practices are non-transparent. Hidden clauses in massive, complicated contracts aren’t good enough. California’s privacy regulator, Senator Edward Markay, has called for investigations into these data practices. He questions whether this violates consumer protection laws.

Overall, the intersection of connected car technology and insurance rates poses important questions about transparency and consumer rights. Our cars can’t just be spying on us without our knowledge. And writing it all in the fine print, hidden within walls of legal jargon, isn’t good enough either…” (End transcription.)

When it comes to Ford Motor’s data collection, they not only track your location but also log what music you listen to, what apps you use, everything the microphone and cameras pick up, if and when you wear your seatbelt, your driving data, and more.

Why do they collect this information? This NYT article explains why. They sell your driving data to LexisNexis and insurance companies so that they can raise your rate if they see that you brake a little too abruptly or accelerate a little too harshly. They also sell it to social media companies and advertising agencies so they can sell you things. They also share it with law enforcement and other government agencies.

Pretty shocking, isn’t it? So our vehicles are and will collect this data; they then share or sell it to LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Verisk. Who exactly is LexisNexis? And more importantly, what exactly do they know, and what are they doing with the information?

LEXISNEXIS

LexisNexis is a mass data aggregate, and, quite frankly, it is terrifying. The company has as many as 145 billion records from more than 10,000 sources. They claim to add one million new records daily. Their database covers approximately 95% of the U.S. population and includes historical archives dating back decades.

Your LexisNexis credit report/file has a ton of information about you that you don’t know is out there, including your social security number, every alias you’ve ever had, every phone number and email address that you’ve ever used, whether you own your home or lease, who resides in your home with you, even the building materials of your residence, loss cost projections for your properties and vehicles (yes, they are analyzing how much our vehicles and property depreciate in value over time), every car you’ve ever owned, every VIN for those vehicles, every insurance policy you’ve had, every time you’ve been arrested for anything in your life, any license you have been issued or had revoked, marriages, divorces, and even birth records. This additionally includes your utility bills, payments, and utility usage records, LLC and business filings, workers’ compensation filing history and injury details, “fraud indicator scores and suspicious activity flags” (whatever that means), any legal demands you have ever been sent (whether justified or not), eHealth information, as well as all non-HIPAA protected medical data, social media records, and, of course, everything about your driving patterns, accident claims, traffic tickets, other details related to automotive insurance, and so much more. Lexis also pulls records from other companies, including private companies who have chosen to share or sell data, so there is no way to know all of the data they have on you. But, if you read this publication from the beginning, you already know this includes credit card companies, grocery stores, and eCommerce websites; it’s overwhelming yet all so secretive.

All of your records are then combined to a lengthy Lexus Nexus report. According to Lexis’s commercial, AI then analyzes all of this data and finds patterns, which are, quote, “invisible to the human eye.” This is all part of the LexisNexis Digital Identity Network.

As part of the digital ID network, Lexis’ AI links together associations between people, so it knows where you work, and because of this, they know who your boss is, who your friends are, your mom, your kids, your wife, her job, her boss, her friends, yada yada, and because it has profiles on all of those people too, our entire lives have been condensed into pages of data that are made available to, quite literally, anyone—and all along you and I thought the digital ID would be a virtual driver’s license, but the truth is far, far worse.

Behind the scenes, this company is influencing huge life decisions, without us even realizing it. For example, LexisNexis is feeding information to lenders and credit issuers. These entities can pull this data quietly and use it to make all kinds of decisions about you, including if you should be approved or denied financing, the rates and terms you should get, and how much money you should get approved for.

But this isn’t just related to financial decisions. The government buys data from LexisNexis, such as in the case of ICE. ICE gave Lexis over 22 million dollars’ worth of our tax money in exchange for records that would pinpoint people they could surveil, detain, and deport.

Regardless of where you stand on the topic of removing noncitizens from the nation, the point is that all of this is done without a warrant, and all of this is connected to Palantir—quite literally, it is all wired together.

I can’t get into the (Israeli) Palantir today, but despite being a massive company, their Wikipedia page is microscopic. This should be a huge red flag.

Disturbingly, LexisNexis is not only being used to stalk people, but it is also being used to select courtroom juries, and this is quite problematic because juries are supposed to be 12 randomly selected, nonbias peers.

Additionally, Lexis is used by employers to decide if you should be hired for a job. This means you could be denied a position you are plenty qualified for because of something that happened in your personal life back in 1996. Landlords can use it to make tenant decisions, government agencies can use Lexis to determine eligibility for a program or benefits or even to aid in prosecuting you. Debt collectors, utility and telecommunications companies, retailers, payment processors and buy-now-pay-later providers, and even casinos and gaming establishments all have access to this technology and essentially can wield it like a weapon, and nobody has any obligation to tell you they are thumbing through the most personal details of your entire existence, covertly.

While they claim they are only scraping public records, if this was the case, they would not have our social security numbers and such. All of this personal data is coming from the private sector businesses I mentioned previously.

A quick look at the LexisNexis website is exhausting and legitimately horrifying.

I’ll let you look at it more on your own. The point is that our vehicles are collecting all of this data without us knowing. The data is then being sold to or shared with LexisNexis, who is compiling vast amounts of public and personal data on us; then that data is being sold, which is why LexisNexis is estimated to be raking in over two billion dollars every year.

And this is where someone we already discussed pops back up…

WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE… CAMERAS

To understand this, we have to go back to Leonardo’s Elsag which, as we learned, is far from being a bra for floppy tits. It is instead a cutting-edge spy device that is not only reading license plates but is also capturing every last Bluetooth signal oozing out of our vehicles, our pockets, or, in some cases, our own arms. While the solution of a Faraday bag would likely stop this tech from grabbing our earbuds’ and cell phones’ Bluetooth, there is one thing we have pretty much no way to hide. That Bluetooth is in our TPMS. What is TPMS? It’s the tire-pressure monitoring system.

TPMS uses physical sensors mounted inside each tire, usually on the valve stem. These sensors each contain a small battery-powered transmitter that measures the air pressure (and often temperature) in real-time, then transmits the data wirelessly via radio frequency (RF) to the vehicle’s onboard computer.

Now here’s why this matters: like an IP address is exclusive to a computer, or like a MAID is exclusive to a device, a tire signal is exclusive to our vehicles, and it has been federally mandated on new vehicles in America since 2006. And these transmissions are unencrypted, so anyone with the means can grab them from inside or outside our vehicles.

A group of researchers got together to try to figure out just how valuable TPMS readings could be. Long story short, only a dozen readers, which cost the research team roughly $100 per piece, were linked together to form a small network. Through this tiny network, they were able to track vehicle locations 24/7 and learn drivers’ travel patterns, habits, daily routines, and more. As CyberNews.com points out, this data is a goldmine for hackers and other evil-doers. I would add that it seems like a jackpot for robbers and stalkers too. After all, if they know you’re single and leave for the gym every day at 3pm, there is nobody at your home.

Meanwhile, under the guise of safety, older vehicles are essentially being banned by making them too expensive to own. The government must abolish these vehicles so we can only drive smart cars. To keep the public from outrage, the bans are sneakily coming in the form of things like the Vehicle Modernization Act, new mandatory state inspections that dictate exactly which tires, brake pads, and so on must be on the vehicle, as well as increased insurance and making insurance unaffordable. Additionally, by-the-mile fees are rolling out, and insurance companies can increase or outright deny coverage on the grounds that your 2010 SUV is so old that it is too risky for them to cover. This financial squeeze is designed to be so pricy, annoying, and intrusive that buying a new vehicle is the only option.

Massachusetts has already banned the sales of gas-powered vehicles, which will force all new car buyers into smart electric vehicles or no vehicle at all. After this goes into effect universally, gas stations will begin to vanish, so even if you refuse to buy an EV, you will not be able to drive your gas-powered car.

To aid in the war on gas vehicles, California is leading the way with raising gas taxes.

Speaking of vehicles, have you purchased a newer vehicle lately? People are coming to the realization that new models are becoming equipped with interior cameras, such as Jeep’s “FamCAM” which is being sold as a way for parents to watch the children who are sitting, quite literally, right behind them.

What exactly your children are doing that requires surveillance cameras to monitor them? I haven’t the slightest clue, but I can tell you that, since the first automobile was released in 1908, children have survived without a camera recording their every action, and your kids will also survive without one. And let’s not forget all of the microphones inside the vehicles. After all, you need these for hand-free calls and such. And because you could need to shout an order to your new truck at any time, the mics are always listening.

Tesla even has microphones on the outside of the vehicle, because, yeah.

Other vehicle purchasers have come to discover that their new car features a face identification system, which identifies the driver.

Aside from the discovery of interior cameras, when you purchased your new ride, did they force you to download a cell phone app that you didn’t want? Not only are people being forced to have these unwanted cell phone apps (which are harvesting their data), but they are now discovering that features that came with the car at the time of purchase are being taken away and made available only through a subscription program, which is a part of the unwanted app. For example, if you want to remote start your vehicle or use Apple Car Play, those will now cost you five to ten dollars per month. And this insanity isn’t only going on with budget vehicles. A new Mercedes-Benz buyer who spent $65,000 on the luxury vehicle is not able to unlock her vehicle using her cell phone without a subscription. Mercedes is even charging owners who want to be able to increase acceleration.

In some Mercedes SUVs, if you want to be able to turn your tires as far as possible for making sharp turns, that will now cost you.

With new Toyotas, having the ability to use navigation on your cell phone now costs $15 a month. It’s another $15 a month to stream music to the vehicle’s screen, but you can bundle the two for $25 a month. In newer Camrys, you can’t even use the built-in navigation unless you hop on a subscription plan. Another individual said they have to pay $8 a month to see their oil level and tire pressure.

While you can say nobody truly needs remote start or Apple CarPlay, think of the bigger picture. What happens when your heated seats and heated steering wheel package you paid for will only activate if you are on a monthly subscription? Oh wait, BMW already did that.

What if the radio doesn’t work unless your credit card is billed monthly? What if the gas flap won’t unlock? You see, when we bought the car, we paid for these features; now they are being taken away and put behind a paywall. And the bigger question: where does it end?

Scarier is the fact that these automakers have the kill switches already in place to remotely turn off our ability to use features on our vehicle based on whether we have a subscription for it through a cell phone app. Do you now see why all physical buttons are being removed and the push button start has been installed in everything?

Even the door handles themselves are becoming push buttons.

It is so it all can be taken away! Holy shit. And guess what? Every modern vehicle has a TCU, meaning Telematics Control Unit. It has its own dedicated cellular connection that is always on, and every single sensor in our vehicles is hard-coded to it. Now here’s the part that will blow your mind. This is all connected to our vehicle’s VIN number. This means if you tamper with a sensor, change a fuse, or, God forbid, try to not use one of these subscriptions by instead using completely legal open-source software, the vehicle instantly generates a report and sends it directly to the manufacturer’s cloud. In fact, a man who purchased a brand new Bronco claims he had it remotely shut down because he was running behind on one payment. Want to know where specifically the car turned off? Right in the middle of traffic.

Even that is not where the craziness ends. As you know, planned obsolescence has taken over the world. If you have never heard the term, be sure to read my fantastic publication, Planned Obsolescence, Hedonism, & The Conspiracy to Forever Alter American Society.

Vehicles are no exception to the rule. Like everything else that was intentionally downgraded so it will not last, our cars, trucks, and SUVs are designed to break.

And if your brother knows how to wrench on cars, so you’re not too worried, automakers are now pushing politicians to make it illegal to DIY fix vehicles. Now, some automakers are rolling out a $50 a year subscription for people who want access to their vehicle’s diagnostic data so they can find the problem and correct it without the need for a pricy visit to the dealership mechanic. If you don’t pay, you will not have access to error data. Chrysler, Subaru, and Nissan have already implemented this, while Ford and others have confirmed they are not far behind.

While all of this is overwhelming information, the wildest part is just how long the spying has been going on without us knowing and just how far back this whole thing was planned. Let me show you…

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/the-kill-switches-have-arrived-flock?triedRedirect=true

Part 11 | Is Flock a PSYOP? The Final Chapter

Asking the question few are asking: Is Flock really the endgame? Or was it all a diversion from something much, much worse?

Agent131711 | chemtrails.substack.com

What if this entire thing was a ploy to get us to attack Flock cameras? Meanwhile, an entire web of surveillance is rapidly being installed around us—a web that doesn’t need or want Flock cameras? What if?

Flock Safety was founded back in 2017, but Google Trends reveals that there was pretty much no news about this company until 2026.

Then, all of a sudden, in 2026, Flock became mainstream.

And this coincides with their giant, tacky cameras affixed with giant, tacky solar panels being put up across our nation in the most conspicuous places imaginable.

Meanwhile, they were hiding 5G towers inside of trees because they didn’t want us to see those.

Simultaneously, numerous social media influencers have come forward and admitted that they were offered pay to post videos bashing Flock cameras.

What you may not know is that the Flock cameras were installed oddly. For example, YouTuber The Guardrail Guy has traveled the country proving that Flocks are installed illegally close to guardrails.

Can we agree that’s incredibly illogical? How would so many of these cameras end up with illegal placement? Obviously the installers know about placement because they install shit for a living, so this is a massive red flag to me.

The next red flag is that Flock cameras are being placed to harass people who question them. For example, this guy began researching if Flock cameras were constitutional and questioning it on YouTube. Next thing he knew, they had installed one directly in front of his house, pointing at his house.

He is not the only one to share a story like this. The point here is, all of these giant illegally placed cameras will have to be taken down, and surely the installers knew this from jump, so what is going on here? Let me run this hypothesis by you:

As outlined in the part of this publication about Flock’s secret warehouses and front companies, by all outward appearances, this looks like a black operation. By definition, a black operation (or black op) is a covert or clandestine mission conducted by a government agency, military unit, or paramilitary organization that is not officially acknowledged by the sponsoring entity. This operation could be secretly conducted under the guise of national security. National security is the ruse that is always used to justify government overreach, such as 9/11 leading to permanent airport harassment, in which we cannot board a plane without specific forms of identification, we are fondeled, X-rayed, our property is searched, and we can’t even bring a standard water bottle through security check (but we can pay $8 to buy the exact same thing on the other side of the gates). And now, biometric scans are rolling out across the United States. All of this to take a flight, but back to Flock…

A fellow researcher pointed out something he found to be strange, but it seems he failed to grasp the bigger picture. What he said was that nobody has ever been prosecuted for Flock vandalism.

And, as unbelievable as this sounds, the news is providing maps of where Flock cameras have been destroyed.

You are thinking to yourself, “But they sure didn’t provide maps of where people died after being vaccinated.” Nor are they providing maps of where Leonardo and Axon cameras are going up.

Note: I was able to locate a case in which a man was allegedly prosecuted and jailed over vandalizing a Flock camera. The story is Marcus Bee, 40, of Pismo Beach, traveled about 150 miles to Monterey County, where investigators said he vandalized at least three Flock Safety automated license plate readers.

This story is kind of hard to believe, and a close look at it leads to more questions than answers, but regardless of whether a person, or a few people, has been arrested for Flock vandalism or not, the low number of arrests is atypical for people intentionally destroying government property. And you and I both know that if the government wanted to nip the vandalism in the bud, prosecuting destructors would be a top priority, but for unexplained reasons, it isn’t.

To get back to what I was saying: while we are fighting tooth and nail to have these big, noticeable cameras on thin poles taken down, whether that be through protesting to our local city councils or through vandalism (because the cameras are quite easy to break)…

Town after town began getting rid of them because the people stood their ground. Yay!

But, in true psyop fashion, the victory is an illusion because these same towns, as soon as the relationship with Flock is terminated, sign lengthy contracts with Axon, and remember, Leonardo is Axon’s partner. This switch-a-roo is precisely the case of Douglas County, which replaced Flock with a 10-year Axon contract worth 23 million dollars.

It’s as if this were the plan from the start.

And recall that the patent for the upgraded technology with Bluetooth capturing was rushed through. This tech can be updated remotely.

And while this is going on, there isn’t a peep about it in the media. A search of Bitchute for “Leonardo Camera” turns up a single video, which isn’t even about the mass surveillance system; it is about Leonardo DiCaprio.

Meanwhile, a search for Flock brings up nearly 3,000 videos.

A search for Axon brings up 105 videos, most of which are the same video.

A search of Rumble for “Leonardo Camera” turns up zero videos. A search for Axon brings up roughly 90 videos, many of which are reposts of the same video. It would appear the psyop is working.

Now here’s the kicker: Do you recall the five proxies that have the same power in Leonardo as owners? Do you remember how most come from the financial investment industry and have also held high-up positions in our government, which makes no sense whatsoever because a financial guy would not be the most qualified man to oversee national security, right? So we must ask why. Why are these financial bros the proxies for this mass surveillance company that is supposed to be keeping us super duper safe? The answer can be found in a question…

“WHO CONTROLS THE DATA?”

To quote from DailyKos: “Perhaps the most underappreciated dimension of this technology is custodial. This is not a government database. The collection and storage of data is carried out by corporations, not law enforcement agencies. Leonardo US already holds contracts with U.S. Special Operations Command and the General Services Administration. Its parent company, Leonardo S.p.A., is an Italian defense conglomerate with a market capitalization exceeding $17 billion.” And that’s just one company in the sea of surveillance entities.

So you see, folks, these cameras and trackers aren’t about national security or stopping crime; they are a business venture. A business venture which, unlike police, do not need a warrant to record in public, log Bluetooth signals, or run biometric scans on us while we walk our dogs. And in this endeavor, the product isn't actually the cameras; the product is us and the data we produce is the currency. Like mining Bitcoin, we must be mined to produce this currency. Our eyes, our faces, our earbuds, our vehicles and tires, our doorbells, our computers, phones, and tablets, the article we read on lunch break, the type of milk in our refrigerator, the route we take to drive to work, if we completely stopped at the stop sign or exceeded the speed limit, the early morning phone call to the orthodontist, smart meter data, our receipt from the grocery store, every song we listen to, the text message we sent to our brother to ask if he wants to go to a football game, the AirTag on our keyring, whether we walked up the stairs briskly or slowly, what time we made coffee, what we said to our spouse during an argument, what medications we are on, what movie we watched on Friday night, if our vehicles are insured, and if our eyes lost contact with the road while we drove—it is all currency and it all must be harvested. They are the farmers, and we are their crop. And this currency has been in the works for a very long time. Recall what I told you previously: DARPA’s LifeLog database was to include credit card purchases, websites visited, the content of telephone calls and e-mails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, text messages sent and received, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, biomedical data captured through wearable sensors, and more. Our lives were to be logged; each action we take is to be accounted for, and the government, along with their contractors, are the accountants of this currency. And guess who is leading the way with facial recognition built into phones? None other than Facebook! This means as you stroll through the grocery store while on your cell phone, Facebook can log every person who walks by.

And here’s the huge thing that nobody has put together yet: the American court system just ruled that our vehicles are legally allowed to intercept and store our text messages and call logs if they are sent through the connected system. Simultaneously, the government has outlawed being able to use our phones when we are in our vehicles unless connected to a smart system. When a crew of researchers investigated where vehicle data was going after it was harvested from our autos, they found that the top recipients of the driver data were some of the country’s largest tech companies, including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Pinterest, Snap, Yahoo, and, of course, Facebook (Meta). These are the same entities harvesting our online actions, purchases, etc.

HOW IT ALL TIES TOGETHER

Our vehicles are spying on us. Numerous data breaches revealed that all anyone had to do was look up a license plate, and not only would they instantly receive everything about the owner of the car, but also the precise GPS location of the vehicle at that very second. This information can include records of interior and exterior cameras and microphone recordings, as well as text message and call logs. Mind you, this is before the roll out of the terrifying new technology discussed previously.

Automakers of new vehicles can now turn off and activate features remotely. We can be blocked from driving for non-compliance, and each action taken against us is recorded. Our cars can read our text messages and share and sell data.

This information, along with every record related to our existence (licenses, emails, phone numbers, addresses, marriage records, social media accounts, etc.), is obtained by companies like LexisNexis. Additional information is being pulled from SDKs embedded in cell phone apps. This includes precise GPS, contacts stored in our phone, photos, microphone, browser activity, even purchase history and transaction information. The data brokers then compile everything into dossiers. This information can then be shared and sold, used to build AI, or warrantlessly passed along to law enforcement or any other government entity. While they might not share our text messages with businesses who want to buy them, who knows what they are actually doing with this info?

Then, there are the surveillance cameras, such as Leonardo, Flock, and Axon, and the video doorbells that we use to surveil ourselves and each other that log our whereabouts. Ring Neighborhood Portal is bad enough…

But if you want a glimpse of the dystopian future ahead of us, all you have to do is watch Rings commercial for their Search Party technology.

Meanwhile, license-plate readers, including those now affixed to delivery vehicles and garbage trucks, establish our vehicle’s movements. If we are in our car, they grab every last signal that is emitting from us and our vehicles and assign them a fingerprint. They then identify who we are with. With the use of AI databases, a connections chart is instantly generated showing our friends, family, employer, bank, likes and dislikes, how we voted, our income bracket, and the last event we attended. All of this information comes from companies like LexisNexis.

Meanwhile, our cell phones provide a precise GPS log of where we have been, what direction we are headed, if we drove, biked, walked, or took a subway, and they record the designation’s address and duration of stay.

When we drive, our vehicles will soon record everything we say and do during the trip, including what music or podcast we listened to, if we waited out the commercials or changed the channel, and if we slouched in our seat or glanced at a lost dog on the side of the road, because this too is valuable data.

If we spend money while at the designation address, the store itself is also likely harvesting and selling its customer data so that it can be layered with the other already collected information.

The end result is, every breath we take, every move we make, every bond we break, every step we take, they’ll be logging us. Every single day, every word we say, every game we play, every night we stay—they’ll be logging us. I’m sure it’s coincidence that this song was originally by a band called, of all things, The Police. But defunding the police has been a top priority. Why? Because the new police are on deck: the AI police. And remember, Covid face masks, biometrics, and 5G infrastructure—it was all needed to get to this stage.

Now look where we are. Assorted data centers are rapidly going up, quite literally, everywhere.

Once it is all linked together, anything we say, do, think, write, or type that is not approved will be punishable. Any place we go that we are not allowed will be punishable. Any product we buy that we have not been permitted to purchase will be punishable. Any action we take that AI feels is a danger to the “safe” society that they claim they are creating will result in repercussions. My spell check program is already telling me words to remove and sentences to change, not because the sentence is wrong or the words are incorrect, but because they are “conspiracy theory.” Soon, we will not be able to type these things at all.

This publication began as looking into Flock cameras but turned into something much larger. It turned into an exposé of data and its value, the AI police state, and what digital ID really is. It turned into the realization that it really is the end of the world as we know it.

Original Article: https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/is-flock-a-psyop-the-final-chapter

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

The Deadliest Product in History: What Nicolas Hulscher Taught Me About mRNA Shots, Flu Vaccine Fraud, and Natural Cancer Cures

Mike Adams | NaturalNews.com

Introduction: A Truth-Teller in a Captured Field

I recently sat down with Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist with the McCullough Foundation, for a long-form interview on my Bright Videos broadcast. Over the course of that conversation, Hulscher laid out – with the calm precision of a man who has spent years buried in the data – a case that the COVID mRNA injections are the deadliest product ever administered to human beings. This is not some clickbait slinger, either. Hulscher has contributed to more than 40 scientific studies on vaccine harms, and he speaks the language of peer review fluently.

What struck me most was not any single statistic. It was the moral clarity. Here is a man operating inside an academic and public-health establishment that has decided, as a matter of institutional policy, that this question must never be asked. And yet he asks it anyway. The corporate media labels him a threat. The agencies pretend he does not exist. But the population-level data he walks through are not opinions – they are counts of human beings who were alive before the shots and are not alive now. That is why I believe him, and that is why the establishment fears him.

The Deadliest Product in History

Hulscher’s central claim is not speculation or hyperbole. It is an inference drawn from somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 population-based studies showing increased mortality after the COVID shots. These are not anecdotes from a comment section. They are all-cause mortality analyses from insurance claims databases, national statistical agencies, and academic cohorts – the kind of evidence that, when it points in the establishment’s preferred direction, gets splashed across every front page on Earth.

The largest global estimate comes from Denis Rancourt and colleagues, who put the death toll from the mRNA shots at roughly 17 million people as of September 2023. When Hulscher and I discussed the American numbers specifically, we were looking at CDC Wonder mortality records suggesting at least 900,000 excess deaths in the United States alone. I want you to sit with that comparison for a moment: more American deaths attributed to these injections than the total U.S. combat deaths in World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and Iraq combined. No foreign enemy in the history of this republic has ever done that kind of damage to our population.

Ed Dowd has spent years documenting this same catastrophe in real time, writing about “the COVID psyop, the experimental mRNA shots, the mandates that destroyed lives, the injuries, the excess deaths, and the relentless propaganda machine that tried to silence anyone who noticed the bodies piling up” ^[1]. That is the key phrase -- the bodies piling up. The epidemiological evidence was there the whole time. What was missing was any public-health agency willing to look at it. And that absence was not an accident. It was a decision, made at the highest levels, to protect a product rather than people.

The mRNA Flu Shot Scandal: Human Sacrifice by FDA Approval

The COVID shots were only the opening act. The FDA has now approved Moderna’s mRNA flu shot – a product sold under names like mFluceva – and Hulscher and his colleagues went back through the agency’s own briefing data and reanalyzed it for a peer-reviewed study. What they found should have stopped the approval cold. The manufacturers’ own numbers showed 2.5 times more unexplained deaths and six times more disabling grade-three adverse rnbspeactions than the conventional flu shot. And there was no placebo group at all – meaning nobody can even claim the product was tested against a neutral baseline which likely would have shown the intervention to be even more harmful.

The risk-benefit arithmetic is grotesque when you lay it out plainly. Theoretically, you might vaccinate 5,000 people to prevent a single flu hospitalization -- a hospitalization that, in most cases, would have resolved on its own. In the process, you generate roughly 4,000 adverse events, about 300 disabling reactions, and two unexplained deaths. This is not a public-health intervention. As Hulscher explains, tis is a human sacrifice ritual performed with a rubber stamp and a press release, and the people who signed off on it knew exactly what the data showed.

This is not an isolated act of bureaucratic negligence -- it is a pattern. The Children’s Health Defense Defender has reported that federal support for mRNA vaccine research remained in place even as officials publicly suggested otherwise, with an HHS spokesperson telling the outlet that “no mRNA vaccine funding has been canceled” ^[2]. The same pipeline that produced the COVID injections is now producing seasonal flu shots, cancer vaccines, and self-amplifying mRNA platforms, all under the same regulatory framework that looked at 2.5 times the death rate and shrugged. Everyone involved in this approval chain -- the FDA reviewers, the advisory committee members, the Moderna executives who submitted the data -- should be fired, stripped of their credentials, and investigated for criminal negligence.

Natural Cancer Cures They Want Buried

While the establishment is busy injecting people with experimental mRNA, the natural-medicine literature sits there like an unexploded arsenal of cures nobody is allowed to touch. Consider dandelion root extract. In vitro studies have shown it eliminates 95 percent of human cancer cells within 48 hours while leaving healthy cells completely alone – an outcome so selective that it would be front-page news if it came out of a pharmaceutical lab. In animal studies, dandelion root extract suppressed human colon tumor growth by over 90 percent with no observed toxicity. Health Canada approved human trials back in 2012, yet those trials were never conducted. A backyard weed cannot be patented, so the research simply evaporated.

The evidence extends far beyond one weed. Grape seed extract combined with vitamin C shrank tumors by 76 percent in published comparisons, versus 68 percent for doxorubicin – and unlike the chemo drug, it did not destroy the entire body in the process. Curcumin, resveratrol, mistletoe, turkey tail, cordyceps, reishi, and high-dose vitamin C all have published anti-cancer evidence behind them. Even something as simple and free as sunlight and vitamin D may cut cancer death risk by around 50 percent. Photoactivated nutrients – the carotenoids, chlorophyll, anthocyanins, and flavonoids that get more potent when activated by sunlight – work even better in combination. I have written extensively about this, and the pattern is always the same: the simpler and cheaper the intervention, the harder it is to find in a mainstream oncology journal.

The reason is not scientific. It is financial. The chemotherapy cartel cannot monetize a dandelion, cannot patent a grape seed, cannot charge $100,000 a year for sunlight. So the cures stay buried in academic footnotes while the industry keeps selling poison at a premium. This is not medicine. It is a protection racket, and the cancer patients who die every day while waiting for permission to try something natural are its victims.

Shedding, Sterility, and the Assault on Human Integrity

One of the most disturbing findings Hulscher walked me through is that vaccine mRNA and spike protein have been detected in exosomes more than three and a half years after booster shots. This is not a transient effect that clears in a few weeks. The modified genetic instructions appear to keep producing product long after the injection site has healed – and because this material has been found in breath and saliva, close contact with recently vaccinated individuals may represent a transmission pathway. I want to be clear, however: definitive transmission studies have never been done, which is itself damning, because the agencies had every incentive to run them and chose not tot.

The depopulation angle is not a conspiracy theory – it is a stated policy goal that the architects have discussed in public. Bill Gates has openly mused about reducing population through vaccines. Fertility rates have collapsed since 2021 across multiple countries, and the timing aligns with mass mRNA deployment in a way that demands explanation. Meanwhile, the Western establishment has made clear through its own think tanks and forums that it no longer values human labor or human cognition – as I have written before, this is a deliberate, engineered transition from a world that ran on human muscle and human minds to one that runs on machines and algorithms ^[3].

My practical advice here is simple. Avoid prolonged close contact with freshly vaccinated individuals, particularly in enclosed spaces. Sweat regularly – sauna, exercise, whatever gets the lymph moving. Consider nattokinase, which may help degrade circulating spike protein (although I haven’t seen definitive proof of that yet, its mechanism is plausible). And understand that we still do not have a complete natural answer for clearing modified mRNA from the human body. That is why prevention and robust baseline health remain absolutely essential. The best time to protect yourself was before the injection. The second-best time is now.

What I Believe We Must Do Now

First and most important: never take another mRNA booster or mRNA flu shot. The evidence of harm is overwhelming, the risk-benefit arithmetic is indefensible, and the only people who benefit are the executives and shareholders of Moderna, Pfizer, and BioNTech. The MAHA movement leaders who warned President Trump and RFK Jr. about inaction on mRNA vaccines were right to do so, and the pressure needs to keep building until every one of these products is pulled from the market ^[4].

Second, build your health like your life depends on it, because it does. Get real sunlight on your skin every day if you can. Move your body -- around 8,000 steps is a reasonable daily target. Eat real food, not the processed garbage engineered in a lab. And ensure nutrient sufficiency, especially magnesium, zinc, and vitamin C for DNA repair. Your body is the only environment you fully control, and it is the first line of defense against everything the system throws at you.

Third, support independent researchers like Nicolas Hulscher and share uncensored information through alternative platforms. The corrupt Western medical monopoly is crumbling -- not because activists defeated it, but because it no longer cures anyone and the public no longer trusts it. Natural medicine, liberty, and truth are the only way out of this manufactured disaster.

For independent news, visit NaturalNews.com. For free books on health and freedom, try BrightLearn.ai. For uncensored video, go to BrightVideos.com. For an honest AI engine, use BrightAnswers.ai. For free-speech social media, join Brighteon.social. The infrastructure of human liberation already exists. Use it. The knowledge you learn could very easily save your life.

References

1. The Covid Reckoning That Never Came. 2026-10-11T12:00:00.000Z. https://brownstone.org/articles/the-covid-reckoning-that-never-came/
2. ‘No mRNA Vaccine Funding Has Been Canceled,’ HHS Says. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/no-mrna-vaccine-funding-canceled-hhs/
3. The Final Chapter for Humanity is Now In Play: Why the Globalists Think They No Longer Need Us. 2026-09-23T06:00:00.000Z. https://www.naturalnews.com/2026-09-23-final-chapter-for-humanity-now-in-play.html
4. MAHA Leaders Warn Trump, RFK Jr. Over Inaction On mRNA Vaccines. 2026-09-22T18:25:00.000Z. https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/maha-leaders-warn-trump-rfk-jr-over-inaction-mrna-vaccines

Source: https://healthranger.substack.com/p/the-deadliest-product-in-history?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1225906&post_id=221493335&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=ucrhc&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Original Article: Truth Warrior Suggested

Former BlackRock insider warns AI cyberattack will be used to end cash, usher in new digital financial controls on all Americans.

U.S. military also preparing for 90-day grid down event. This has the earmarks of a false flag attack all over it.

Leo Hohmann | leohohmann.substack.com

Former BlackRock portfolio manager Ed Dowd predicts a rogue AI cyberattack will be used as a pretext to roll out some form of crypto-based digital currency to replace the paper dollar system. This would give globalist power elites unprecedented control over the financial transactions of every human being on the planet, including Americans.

Dowd warns that digitized currencies will ultimately enable governments to impose arbitrary limits on purchases, using AI to surveil programmable “money” that can be turned on or off, or programmed to apply only for the purchase of certain goods to the exclusion of others.

This has always been the dark side of digitalized money. Take PayPal, for example. This is a digital payment system that can be convenient to use, but it dictates the rules to its users. You cannot use PayPal to pay for certain goods it doesn’t like, such as entirely legal firearms and the bullets that make them viable weapons for hunting, sport shooting, or personal protection. During the Covid years, PayPal would not let you use its platform to buy NAC, Quercitin or other supplements that were effective in boosting one’s immune system against Covid.

Ultimately, the plan goes even further than monitoring and curtailing your spending habits. It’s the tokenization of all assets, including your home and any real property you may have, your car, your bank account. Patrick Wood has unpacked this strategic technocratic plan in his new book, Crucible of Tokens.

The end game was dribbled out seven years ago when the World Economic Forum introduced the mantra that “you will own nothing and be happy” after the digital reset has been completed. The timeline for completing what King Charles and other top globalists had promoted as the “Great Reset” has been 2030.

They’ve been planning this takeover for decades. But they didn’t have the proper technological tools to pull it off until now. Artificial intelligence being misused by an enemy nation will be the announced culprit. 

Iran? Russia? China? Take your pick.

Dowd referred to Covid restrictions, saying vaccine passports were planned to be linked to a digital ID and twice-a-year boosters, and that this was the first attempt to roll out a central bank digital currency or CBDC.

The current plan is behind schedule, which is why governments will try again during an economic meltdown, Dowd argued, adding that a rogue AI cyberattack, in which money disappears from banks, could be the triggering mechanism.

“Right now, we’re free to express ourselves economically with people, for the most part, either cash or credit. But they want an AI-surveilled third option to determine whether or not that transaction is allowed to happen,” Dowd said in an interview with Clayton Morris of the YouTube podcast channel Redacted. “And the only way you can do that is with the CBDC. So that’s the ultimate goal. It’s control freaks.”

U.S. military preparing for grid-down event

It was also reported over the weekend that the U.S. Pentagon is working on a plan to ensure military bases can keep running for at least 90 days, on their own, with no dependence on outside infrastructure. The effort is called Project FORTRESS, and it is built upon one overriding concern: that a major war could knock out power grids, break supply chains and threaten the viability of critical infrastructure on American soil.

Why is it that the leaders of European nations are encouraging their citizens to prepare for war on their soil by stocking up on food, water, batteries, flashlights and other supplies, while the U.S. is preparing its military bases for a grid-down event, and yet we have no official government warnings being provided to the American people? Do they want us to be blindsided by what’s coming? You have to wonder.

Of course, the possibility of an extended grid-down event is nothing we who are awake haven’t been aware of and preparing for. People like myself, Catherine Austin Fitts and others have been writing and speaking about it for years. 

Klaus Schwab, former director of the World Economic Forum, also warned more than five years ago that a major cyber attack would shut down global financial institutions, communications, etc.

Perhaps the biggest clue that we are in for such an attack came in 2023 when the blockbuster Hollywood movie Leave the World Behind hit theaters with backing from Barack and Michelle Obama. Hollywood always telegraphs major life-altering events.

And so now we have Ed Dowd, a former BlackRock trader, sharing his concerns with a major conservative podcast channel.

Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media Former BlackRock portfolio manager Ed Dowd predicts a rogue AI cyber attack will be used as a pretext to roll out CBDCs, granting authorities unprecedented control over financial transactions. He warns that these technologies will ultimately enable governments to impose … 2:12 PM · Oct 24, 2026 · 78.4K Views 90 Replies · 1.02K Reposts · 1.92K Likes

How the beast system will control your spending habits

Dowd offered a hypothetical example of how the planned beast system will control your financial choices, or lack thereof: Imagine a future government that decides to issue beef quotas, capping consumption at 10 grams a month per household. A shopper who has already hit the limit would find the transaction blocked at the cash register — automatically, by AI.

So you switch to chicken for your protein, until you reach whatever arbitrary limit they have set for chicken. Eventually, you will be reduced to eating bugs and lab-grown meat from 3D printers.

And you thought it was a joke when billionaires like Bill Gates started investing a few years ago in the construction of bug-processing factories in Canada and Illinois?

Speaking of Bill Gates, he’s been promoting dire warnings, as I reported last month. Only instead of infecting banks and ruining the economy, Gates sees AI becoming powerful enough in military or terroristic applications to cause a billion deaths, the very type of depopulation numbers that Gates has lobbied for years to achieve. How convenient, not to mention utterly coincidental, that the AI Gates helped to create is now the same AI he says could kill people off in accordance with his previous calls for a smaller global population.

I find it interesting that at the same time we have Dowd, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and so many others warning about a major cyber event that shuts down the financial system and causes economic meltdowns, we have Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel talking last week about how Israel needs to erect a shadow economy based on cryptocurrency, as a method of evading international economic sanctions.

Israel was a key player in the global Covid insanity that included mandatory Big Pharma injections for all. Israel is also the world leader in lab-grown fake meat and fish.

I also reported in an October 12 article about the Israel-based Weizmann Institute of Science’s involvement in AI-powered mind-reading technology.

The truth is always the opposite of the propaganda.

The globalist Epstein class will always accuse its enemies of the exact crimes they are committing.

We live in a twisted fallen world. War is peace. Slavery is freedom. Genocide is self-defense while true self-defense is terrorism. And above all, truth is thrown down to the ground. If you’re a follower of Jesus, it’s time to double down on your faith. I have a feeling we’re going to need supernatural help to get through what the evil ones have planned for us in the days, weeks and months ahead.

Source: https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/former-blackrock-insider-warns-ai?

Original Article: Truth Warrior Reader Suggested

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“We are going to see a great number of articles in the future from so-called experts and public officials. They will warn about more violence, more kidnappings, and more terrorists. Mass media, the armed forces, and intelligence agencies will saturate our lives with fascist scare tactics and ‘predictions’ that have already been planned to come true.”  ~ Mae Brussell, 1974

I saw this headline recently across several mainstream ‘news’ sites: “Iran in ‘Advanced Stages’ of Planning Attacks on Americans,”‘officials’ say. My very first thought was what type of attack on Americans will be perpetrated by the U.S. to blame on Iran? The U.S. and Zionist Israel are the two most prolific false flag operators in the world, and seemingly use these tactics on a constant basis in order to fool gullible American imbeciles into supporting more U.S. war and terror against an innocent ‘enemy’ nation and Americans alike. Consider Fort Sumpter, Pearl Harbor, the USS Liberty, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, 1993 World Trade Center bombing, Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, the ‘covid’ hoax; just to name a minuscule handful of the multitude of U.S. planned false flag events throughout history.

Forget for a moment the U.S. and Israel launched unprovoked, purely aggressive attacks and war against Iran this year, killing their political heads, bombing their infrastructure, and purposely murdering 120 plus elementary school children and at least 35 innocent adults at the Shaiare Tayyebeh Elementary School in  Minab. Forget if you can that the U.S. has been aggressively warring against Iran in one form or another for at least 73 years, and using unholy sanctions, tariffs, and other brutal means, including great financial harm, against Iranians, who by the way, have not aggressively attacked another country in hundreds of years. The evil U.S. empire however, has been aggressively warring against much of the world, murdering, or responsible for killing, tens (if not more) of millions of civilians, since its very inception.

The complicit U.S. media and the political class have been warning that Iran is going to attack the U.S. for decades, and yet, that has never happened. They have warned that Iran has and would use nuclear weapons. The same is true of the evil genocidal Netanyahu in Zionist Israel. In fact, the exact opposite is the case, as the U.S. has threatened and attacked Iran, either alone or by proxy, for seeming eons. The U.S. has violently interfered in Iranian affairs, elections, and was responsible for overthrowing its government, putting into power a brutal U.S. puppet regime, thereby effectively ruling over Iran and its people for 26 years, after the overthrow of Mosaddegh, the elected prime minister of Iran, by the U.S. and Britian in 1953.

Before any headline ‘readers’ (dolts) accuse me of being a supporter of Iranian politics, let me remind you that I feel the very same hatred and contempt for every government on earth. Politicians and governments, no matter where they happen to exist, are the worst, most evil and perverted of all mankind, including those rulers in Iran, but they have not once aggressively attacked the U.S. This is not an attempt to excuse rulers in Iran or anywhere else, it is simply to put the truth out there so those nationalist ignoramuses in the West who are too ignorant to figure this out on their own, will at least have been warned.

The ‘news’ whores are out in force, and daily headlines are constantly warning of an Iranian strike, whether by missiles, bombs, swarms of killer drones, or cyber-attack. There is absolutely no way to know exactly what is real or a deception, but assuming that most everything coming from any American media or political source is a lie is the only safe avenue to take. Given that you, all of you, have been lied to, cheated, stolen from, abused, surveilled, locked down, and given death shots, one would think that none would believe a single threat issued by this American government. If only that was the case?

There will be story after story setting up Iran as the attacker in any claimed incident against the U.S. These stories are meant to plant the seed of Iranian guilt into the indoctrinated brains of the masses, so they will support more and more war. These same stories are also meant to be telegraphed, so that when anything happens, immediate guilt of Iran will be assumed by the collective horde. In reality, the real enemy of the U.S. population is not Iran, but this abominable U.S. government and its controlling element. You are the real enemy, and you will face the most pain and suffering due to apathetic behavior and idiotic nationalist ‘pride.’

Most (if not all) country’s actual rulers are in on this scam. This even likely includes top Iranian leadership. They are all working together toward the same goals of total technocratic one world globalization, and neo-feudalist societies, as has been evidenced over and over again around the world. Remember the fake ‘covid’ pandemic where every country jumped on board. Since then, country after country are all doing the same things, including mass surveillance, data-center buildout, digital IDs, travel restrictions, biometrics, monetary digitization, poisonous injections, elimination of cash transactions, and on and on. All this totalitarian structuring is constantly going forward, while the sheep are getting fed ‘news’ garbage, and pretending it is real. This acquiescence to the narrative will be the downfall of man, as false fear consumes the herd, while the tyrannical technocratic slave system continues to be built around them. As I stated in my last article: 

“This is truly a one world system in the making, with near universal collusion certainly evident now. This is not being hidden, and anyone with eyes can see this real conspiracy. 

Beware and be totally skeptical of any and every reported story about Iran attacking the U.S. It will most likely be a ruse, a lie, and a false flag operation. At this point in time, anything could happen, especially given the unwarranted and aggressive U.S./Zionist Israeli attacks against Iran. This never had to happen, and was a premeditated war game being run by Trump and Netanyahu from minute one. Any false flag event could easily escalate more war, and more war means the politicians, bankers, and the entire military industrial complex greatly gain and enrich themselves, while the people get slaughtered. It was after all, a purposely structured democide and control plot that began 8 months ago. Consider what has happened since that time, consider the intentional destruction of oil flow, supply line devastation, gross inflationary prices, and control mechanisms put into place. All this was accomplished deliberately in order to enslave the world populations.

Paraphrasing Gordon Duff’s statement:

“The vast majority of terrorism and terrorist organizations in the world are ‘intelligence’ organizations.” (Government’s)

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”  ~ David Rockefeller

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/beware-the-u-s-false-flag-conspiracy-against-iran-trumped-up-threats/

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“Good’ students wait for a teacher to tell them what to do. This is the most important lesson of them all: we must wait for other people, better trained than ourselves, to make the meanings of our lives. The expert makes all the important choices; only I, the teacher, can determine what my kids must study, or rather, only the people who pay me can make those decisions, which I then enforce.” ~ John Taylor Gatto, Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling

I am often asked why ‘we’ are in this insane mess, why is everything breaking down, why is morality a lost cause, why is there so much division and hate, why is there so much violence and war, why is globalism imminent, why-why-why?

In order for rulers to rule, in order for the few to control the many, society as a whole must be made to feel subordinate to selected ‘leaders’ and experts as defined by those same so-called ‘leaders’ and experts; which includes the governing system of technocratic authoritarians posing as ‘gods’ among men. What is most important from the State’s perspective, is to keep a great separation between the common plebs and the ruling class ‘masters,’ so that the general population will act as one, bringing about a collective ignorance and indifference so steep as to be a major impediment to independent thought and action. This circumstance has to be instilled in the people almost from birth, and the method used generationally has been the ‘public’ (government) schooling system that abandoned education in favor of building universal sameness by dumbing-down the collective herd to such an extent as to breed a submissive, obedient, compliant, and dependent underclass of non-thinking drones.

The basis for this idea of ‘professional schooling’ via compulsory ‘education,’ from Socrates until today, was and is meant only to curb all intellectual growth of the common man, thereby creating a society of ignorant, dependent workers and slaves beholding to the corrupt and fraudulent governing system. Horace Mann brought the ideas of Prussian schooling back from Germany, and in the mid-nineteenth century, he established the first tax-supported government school in Massachusetts. From there it spread across the Northeast, and eventually throughout the country. This was the beginning of the end of real education in America.

To better understand the intent and scope of this horrendous system, one can look at the “Principles of Secondary Education” by Alexander James Inglis in 1918; an ‘educator’ who was instrumental in promoting the “new American” secondary ‘education’ system. In this book, Inglis outlined the “Six Purposes of Schooling.” They are, as noted in his book in Chapter X, pages 367, 375-384:

1) Adjustive or Adaptive Function, where schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority.

2) Integrating or Conformity Function, meant to develop like-mindedness, unity in thoughts and habits.

3) The Diagnostic and Directive Function, in order to label children to mark them in the class structure.

4) The Differentiating Function, to divide and conquer strategies to immobilize in social structure.

5) The Selective Function, to accomplish the preservation of the “favouried” races. (Darwyn and eugenics)

6) The Propaedeutic (introductory instruction) Function, to groom those in higher classes to manage the lower classes.

This is the essence of the American ‘schooling’ system, and has been in place since the 19th century. You see, this plan to dumb-down and destroy intellect, to manufacture an inferior working slave class, and to eliminate the individual in society in favor of a collective mass of weak-minded followers, cannot happen overnight, and must be a long-term and generational plan. Incremental decimation of critical thinking skills is mandatory if the few expect to control the many. The U.S. ‘schooling’ system is the linchpin of this effort to lay waste to human ingenuity, individuality, intellectual superiority, and those who would question any and all ‘authority.’ This revolting campaign has been tremendously successful for the ruling class and its controlled evil  politicians.

This exercise of domination by intentional societal intellectual injury,  has led to the doltishness and mass voluntary acceptance of false ‘authority’ by most all of this population. This is the basis of the conquest of the people at the hands of an evil, narcissistic, and controlling State. Without the bowing down to rule by the masses, none of what is going on today could ever have taken place, so accept blame and say no to government at every level.

As I have said over and over again, and for decades, no man has any right whatsoever to rule over any other man. Therefore, no one has any right to transfer power to any third party (politician) to delegate rule over any other. This is why all voting is reprehensible, and government, regardless of the nature of that government, is completely illegitimate, immoral, and absolutely wrong. Natural law is the only legitimate law of man, and natural law is inherent to humanity. It requires only that one do not harm another, harm or steal another’s property, trespass, or infringe or impede the liberty of any other man. It is just that simple.

All ‘authority’ can only exercise force and violence, and is therefore an unacceptable human atrocity. Freedom and authority cannot exist simultaneously, as they are polar opposites. This is why freedom has never once existed when any government is in place, regardless of any worthless government documents, constitutions, arbitrary laws outside natural law, erroneous legislation, commandments, regulations, or mandates. To claim to be free under any government rule is the epitome of ignorance and apathy, and clearly exposes the weakness and stupidity of the mind of the unaware slave.

Absolutely anyone who believes in any authority of one over another, is a lost soul, who has succumbed to a cancer of the mind. In simple terms, this would be described as retarded. Rule, all rule, is fully based on a master/slave relationship, where one is wielding forceful power and unholy violence over another, so to vote for rule to illegitimately transfer a right you do not have, a claim that your so-called ‘representative’ can use force to control another, is open and obvious evil. There is no excuse whatsoever for any to sink to this level of wickedness. If you find these words offensive, grow up, and understand that you are responsible for yourself, and have no right over any other on earth.

If you want real freedom, tear down all forms of government and authority, tear down any system of rule, and take appropriate measures to eliminate any threat of force of rule by any other human. Freedom is the nonexistence of force, violence, and rule, and has never existed in any environment based on governing. If this system survives, you will not!

“The following of authority is the denial of intelligence. [It] may help us temporarily to cover up our difficulties and problems; but to avoid a problem is only to intensify it, and in the process, self-knowledge and freedom are abandoned. ~ Jiddu Krishnamurti

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-stupidity-of-the-masses-and-voluntary-acceptance-of-illegitimate-authority/

Is AI Meant to Break You? “The Alice in Wonderland Technique”

GlobalResearch.ca | Eric Buesing

In 1963 the CIA wrote down a method for breaking a person without laying a hand on him.

They called it the Alice in Wonderland technique.

It doesn’t plant a lie.

It removes the stable ground from under your feet.

A research tool that can’t give you the same answer twice now does the same work, and the resemblance is too clean to treat as a coincidence.

The source isn’t a rumor. It’s the KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation manual, the agency’s own handbook, dated July 1963 and declassified in the 1990s.¹

KUBARK was the CIA’s code name for itself.

The aim of the technique is stated without embellishment. Confound the expectations and conditioned reactions of the person in the room. He’s used to a world that makes some sense, at least to him. A world of continuity and logic. A predictable world. He clings to that world to reinforce his identity and his powers of resistance.² The method is built not only to obliterate the familiar but to replace it with the strange.³

The procedure is simple. It can be run by one interrogator, but the manual says it’s better adapted to two or three.⁴ The first begins by asking a double-talk question, one that seems straightforward but is essentially nonsensical. Before an answer can form, the second interrogator follows with a wholly unrelated and equally illogical query. Sometimes two or more questions are asked at once. Pitch, tone, and volume are unrelated to the significance of the questions. No pattern of questions and answers is permitted to develop, nor do the questions relate logically to each other.⁵ In that atmosphere the subject finds that the pattern of speech and thought he’s learned to consider normal has been replaced by an eerie meaninglessness.⁶ He may laugh or refuse to take it seriously. As the process continues, day after day if necessary, the situation becomes mentally intolerable. He’s then likely to make significant admissions, or even to pour out his story, just to stop the flow of babble.⁷ The manual notes that this may be especially effective with the orderly, obstinate type.⁸

That is the whole trick.

Not pain. Not a planted fact. Continuity removed until the mind supplies its own surrender.

Run the same test on any modern AI engine and that interrogation room comes back.

Ask any advanced AI model to fact-check a topic. Close the chat. Open a new one. Ask again. The facts shift. A date moves. A citation contradicts the last reply. The emphasis lands somewhere else. The confident ending is a different ending. None of the facts hold still long enough to build a consensus on. This isn’t a small correction. Small corrections leave the structure standing and fix one thing. This destroys your foundation entirely.

Nobody is hiding the way this works. The AI doesn’t consult a fixed record. Unless memory is turned on, it doesn’t remember what it told you in your last session. Each time you open a new conversation and ask, it produces a new answer built from scratch out of patterns in language, and that answer has no obligation to match the one it gave you before. So, you get Answer A today and Answer B tomorrow, both sounding completely certain, completely at odds. The person at the keyboard does what the prisoner always did. He searches for something steady to stand on. The AI makes sure he never finds it.

Line them up and the steps are identical.

The manual stripped away a world that followed rules. The AI never offered one. The manual broke up any pattern before the prisoner could grab onto it. A new session or fact check request wipes out whatever the last one built. The manual turned familiar language into gibberish. The AI turns one confident answer into a different confident answer that says something else entirely. The manual waited until structure itself felt like a reward. The AI gives you that reward on the fourth try, and you take it, because the spinning has to stop.

The old method took two men and several days. This one takes a browser tab.

The standard excuse is that the inconsistency is a technical byproduct, not a feature. Fine. But a tool that can’t give you the same answer twice isn’t informing you. It’s breaking you down. Every time the facts shift, your confidence in finding solid ground drops a little more. The manual never needed the prisoner to adopt a false belief. It needed him to abandon the search for a true one. That’s the whole operation. Kill the belief that truth is findable, and whoever shows up next with a confident answer owns the room.

The AI doesn’t have to lie to you. It just has to wear you out. When you’ve checked three times and gotten three different answers, the fourth one doesn’t feel true because you verified it. It feels true because you’re done fighting.

Now the ground is moving under the word itself.

On September 29, 2026, the President signed Executive Order 14434, “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence.”⁹ It directs the executive branch to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI,” and states that the administration “will not acknowledge the usage of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ and ‘AI’ in any applicable setting.”¹⁰Leaders from Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia signed a “White House Accord on Super Intelligence.”¹¹ Jensen Huang slipped once, said “AI,” and corrected himself on the spot: “I am going to get good at this.”¹² Elon Musk caught himself mid-sentence and pivoted to “SI.”¹³

Read the order’s own definition. “Super Intelligence” means the same technologies already covered by the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence.¹⁴ Nothing about the AI systems changed. The same system that can’t give you the same answer twice is now, officially, super. And the order isn’t finished moving. It gives the President’s science adviser sixty days to propose a new federal definition, one that may “modify, expand upon, or otherwise supersede” the old one.¹⁵ The floor is renamed while you stand on it, and then it’s scheduled to be redrawn.

The reason given wasn’t accuracy. The President said the word “artificial” made the technology sound like a hoax.¹⁶The public didn’t ask for the change. A YouGov poll that same week found 53 percent of respondents preferred “artificial intelligence” and 9 percent preferred “super intelligence.”¹⁷ The word wasn’t chosen by the people who use it. It was issued to them.

This is the manual’s move carried into language. Confound the expectation. Take the familiar term away and hand back a new one that points at the same thing. Decline to acknowledge the old word. The person who still says “AI” is now out of step with the room, and the room has decided what is real.

The big money influencers are already in the room. In October 2025, ten major foundations controlling more than $50 billion, among them Ford, MacArthur, Mellon, Packard, and Omidyar Network, formed a coalition called Humanity AI and pledged $500 million over five years to shape the future of artificial intelligence. Its pooled fund is managed by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors.¹⁸ A year after that pledge, the coalition has publicly announced just $18 million in grants, and foundations face no disclosure requirements for their AI grantmaking like the ones new state laws now place on AI developers.¹⁹ The Packard Foundation sits both in that coalition and among the philanthropic backers of the AI Safety Fund run by the Frontier Model Forum, the industry body created by Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI.²⁰

This is not the first time these foundations have been caught with their hands on the levers of American thought. In 1954, a House committee led by Representative B. Carroll Reece launched a formal investigation into whether tax-exempt foundations were quietly steering American education and social policy. The committee’s majority concluded it was a coordinated operation. Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford were working in concert, using their grants to shape how Americans understood their own history. A professional class of foundation administrators had built a parallel power structure, accountable to no one, moving billions with no public oversight. René Wormser, the committee’s general counsel, later argued that tax exemption without accountability creates power without responsibility. The hearings were shut down within weeks. The final report was buried.²¹ The Ford Foundation has been running this playbook for seventy years. Now it’s a founding member of the coalition that gets to shape the machine that answers your questions.

Set that beside a confusion technique that needs no interrogator and a vocabulary that changes by decree, and one has to wonder whether any of this is accidental. The same kind of tax-exempt power a congressional committee once warned was quietly shaping how Americans think is now funding how a machine will answer them. The question is no longer whether the ground is moving. It’s who’s moving it, and why.

Perhaps the instability is only a side effect of commerce. Or perhaps a mind that can’t find a stable fact, a stable word, or a stable floor is simply easier to steer than one that can. A weakened mind doesn’t resist. A tired spirit takes whichever voice sounds like relief. The manual was written for one man in one room. The question now is whether someone has decided to run it on everyone.

Connect the dots. The picture isn’t complicated. A CIA interrogation technique, declassified and documented, built specifically to destroy a person’s grip on reality. Foundations with 70-plus years of practice and billions of untaxed dollars spent deciding what Americans believe and who they trust. A machine that gives every person who asks a different version of the truth, delivered with complete confidence, answering to no one, now rechristened by presidential order so the public can’t even agree on what to call the thing that’s reshaping their minds. This did not happen by accident. Accidents don’t get trillion-dollar investment. Accidents don’t get signed by executive order at a White House summit flanked by the most powerful men in the world. A population that can’t find the same fact twice doesn’t build anything. It doesn’t hold power accountable. It doesn’t resist. It fractures into millions of isolated people, each one clutching whatever answer finally made the noise stop, waiting to be told what is real. Whoever controls that answer controls the population. That is not speculation. That is the architecture. The only question left is whether enough people wake up to see it before the door closes.

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.globalresearch.ca/ai-meant-break-you/5942953

Telegram.com | Forbidden Truth

DO NOT TAKE THE mFLUSIVA mRNA FLU SHOT [or any bioweapon vaccine injection for that matter]

Moderna’s brand-new mRNA flu vaccine just got rushed FDA approval — and the trial data is full of red flags.

75%+ of participants suffered at least one adverse reaction within 7 days of injection.

Severe systemic reactions were 5% which is 1 in every 20 participants.

The “placebo” wasn’t saline — it was another flu vaccine (Fluarix).

Safety follow-up lasted only ~6 months.

102 Deaths occurred in the mRNA group (FDA officially labeled “unrelated” but no autopsies were done).

Same mRNA technology as COVID injections. Same pattern of high reactogenicity, injuries and deaths.

Protect yourself. Question everything. Say NO.

Original Article: https://t.me/c/3233625802/336

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

America is trapped in a left-right paradigm that is leading us into an anti-human totalitarian beast system run by psychopathic figures with a god complex

Leo Hohmann | substack.com/@leohohmann

The puppet masters running our politicians are apolitical; they care not whether their puppets come from the left or the right as long as they move the dial toward more and bigger centralized powers.

In my previous article I focused on a group of elitists, loosely referred to as neocons, who from my perspective are among the worst people advancing the worst solutions that America has to offer to the world.

They offer a view of the world based on coercion, greed, raw power, always threatening and using brute force to bully other countries into becoming, not sovereign and independent, but compliant, dependent and submissive to a one-world system based on total control. Their roots can be traced to the Enlightenment, the Illuminati, Freemasonry, the British Roundtable group, and all the way through to today’s World Economic Forum. I encourage you to read my previous article if you haven’t already.

Today, however, I would like to turn the tables and focus on the best America has to offer the world, which is a philosophy based on human freedom, respect for the sovereignty for all people and nations, non-violence and fair-mindedness. It is embodied in the leadership ideas of former Congressman Ron Paul.

Dr. Paul ran for president three times and was rejected each time. He was rejected by American voters in the 80s, the early 2000s and the 2010s. I don’t believe his ideas were rejected because they were found to be intellectually lacking or inferior to his political opponents. Rather, I believe his message was a few decades ahead of its time and he did not have the corporate titans and foreign-backed money bankrolling his campaigns.

At the age of 91, Dr. Paul is still actively putting himself out there, trying to educate younger Americans on the revolutionary ideas of individual liberty and the need to keep government power in check, or risk having it dominate every aspect of our lives.

In an interview with Mario Nawfal, Dr. Paul lays out his philosophy in a way that is easy to understand for every American who still has a working brain and is able to think independent of the dominant left-right talking points. Nawfal opened the interview by marveling at how an entire series of predictions Dr. Paul had made in the 1990s has since become a reality of life in America. We are spied on by thousands of AI cameras, our speech is censored, our ability to influence our elected officials is virtually gone, our national debt has exploded to the point where it can never be paid back and our currency has been inflated to the point where it’s become impossible for most young people to afford to buy homes or cars.

Dr. Paul brilliantly describes the inherent dangers of an America that has become systematically authoritarian and nihilistic. Freeing themselves from any accountability to a higher power, today’s authoritarians, which come at us from both the left and from the right, operate “without any guidelines” or guardrails. They are answerable only to themselves. President Trump admitted this in the wide open when he told the New York Times in January 2026 that the only check on his power is his “own morality” and his “own mind.”

Listening to Dr. Paul discuss his ideas about the proper role of government in society, one can’t help but think what a better country we would be today if we had listened to him in earlier decades.

But it’s not too late. He’s still putting himself out there, offering us a way forward, with a focus on educating our youth.

His ideas have aged as well as his mental capabilities.

Please watch and listen to the 26-minute interview below. If you have teenage children or grandchildren, or even an exceptionally bright preteen, you might offer them a chance to listen as well. You won’t be sorry you invested in this 26 minutes.

Wise men – men like Ron Paul – understand the crux of the matter when it comes to preserving and protecting our freedom: It’s not the “right” or the “left” that is our enemy; they are mere tools. The enemy is spiritual. The enemy is the spirit of authoritarianism and nihilism. The enemy is allowing too much power in human hands, unchecked by any guideposts outside of themselves. This is what makes them even worse than the authoritarian monarchs of old, many of which at least knew they would one day answer to God for how they used their power.

What we see today are humanistic, technocratic and above-all psychopathic authoritarians. Technocrats are politically agnostic. That’s right, they are apolitical, meaning they couldn’t care less whether their puppets in government come from the right or from the left, as long as they keep moving the ball downfield toward technocratic authoritarianism.

And if you look at American history since the two-party system has been in place, both parties have served the interests of their authoritarian masters. The endless foreign wars, funded by endless debt, keep rolling and heading toward an inevitable crash. And any country that becomes an empire ultimately becomes authoritarian at home, because it’s impossible for the empire to sustain itself as a free republic. It’s only so long before the citizens get tired of being fleeced in order to pay for the wars and they rise up, only to be cracked down upon by those who control the armies.

That’s why I get frustrated by my friends on the right who continuously fearmonger about the left, the left the left, “and if we allow the Democrats to get in we are going to have socialism,” while being all too willing to excuse the growing tyranny that comes from the right. These folks are unable to discern the times in which we live. This is not the 1980s, when you had Soviet Marxism warring against a mostly free American brand of capitalism. We live in a time in which both the right and the left have become indistinguishable in their desires for bigger government and endless increases in the use of state power. The new brand of “stakeholder capitalism” or “corporatism” is obsessed with surveillance and the establishment of a technocratic control grid, using public-private partnerships to get us there. This hybrid form of so-called capitalism is just as anti-human and anti-God as communism.

BOTTOM LINE: The biggest and most devastating mistake conservatives can make is assuming that tyranny can only arise from the left. They are too trusting of their leaders. The only seat of authority that can be trusted with absolute power resides in heaven above, but He will be returning one day to exact His judgment on humanity. And all those who have placed their faith in an earthly political figure or one political party over another are going to be found wanting. Don’t ever give to man what was reserved for God.

Original Article:

Brownstone Institute | Bert Olivier

In my reconstruction and discussion of Heidegger’s remark – in the course of the interview that he granted the German news magazine, Der Spiegel, in 1966 – that ‘Only a god can save us,’ it was shown that this issued from his conviction, that the ‘essence’ of modern technology (what he calls ‘technicity’) functions as a ‘framework’ within which every question and decision are formulated and made. He calls this ‘essence’ Gestell(‘posure,’ Enframing’), the fundamental organising power of which reduces everything in the world to a ‘standing-reserve,’ which means that its sole purpose is restricted to its usefulnessor calculative utility. 

So, for example, even human beings are approached as ‘resources,’ which is made visible in renaming what used to be called ‘Personnel Departments’ in companies (and other organisations) as ‘Human Resources.’ Hence, the essence of technology, or Enframing,’ brings about the stripping of entities of their intrinsic meaning, transforming them into mere resources for use, instead of allowing them to be what they are – and arguably should be – according to their own being. 

Norman Melchert (The Great Conversation. A Historical Introduction to Philosophy, Mayfield Publishing Company, 1991, p. 576) provides an apt characterisation of the world under the dominance of the essence of modern technology where he writes:

In the age of enframing, where everything is understood as standing-reserve, there is no ‘room’ for God. (Or perhaps even God is thought of as ‘standing-reserve’, a kind of public utility that can be used to gain the satisfaction of one’s desires; one often gets this impression from the television evangelists.

The most obvious question that would probably arise for most readers is why Heidegger talks about the essence of technicity or technology, which he names Gestell, instead of simply referring to concrete instances of technology in the guise of technical devices, such as electric drills, saws, and vacuum cleaners, all of which are embodiments of Enframing. The answer has to do with the fact that Heidegger thinks ontologically about technicity, and not ontically.

Ontology being the discipline that addresses questions concerning the distinctive (or essential) being of beings – what makes them into what they are, in contradistinction with other beings or entities – the essence of technicity is what makes technology into what it is distinctively, and technical devices embody this essence paradigmatically. Insofar as an electric drill manifests Enframing as its technological essence, it allows the handyman or -woman, by using it, to draw on the standing reserve of stored electricity in a manner which optimalises its usefulness. 

To think about electric drills in relation to other similar or dissimilar tools comparatively as part of a collection of ‘technologies’ is to focus on them ontically, and no longer ontologically. The following excerpt from Heidegger’s ‘The question concerning technology’ (In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Trans. William Lovitt, Garland Publishing Inc., New York, 1977, p. 14-15) clarifies what is at stake by contrasting an older way of benefiting technically from wind and water with its modern technological counterpart:

The revealing that rules in modern technology is a challenging [Herausfordern], which puts to nature the unreasonable demand that it supply energy that can be extracted and stored as such. But does this not hold true for the old windmill as well? No. Its sails do indeed turn in the wind; they are left entirely to the wind’s blowing. But the windmill does not unlock energy from the air currents in order to store it.

    In contrast, a tract of land is challenged into the putting out of coal and ore. The earth now reveals itself as a coal mining district, the soil as a mineral deposit. The field that the peasant formerly cultivated and set in order [bestellte] appears differently than it did when to set in order still meant to take care of and to maintain. The work of the peasant does not challenge the soil of the field. In the sowing of the grain it places the seed in the keeping of the forces of growth and watches over its increase. But meanwhile even the cultivation of the field has come under the grip of another kind of setting-in-order, which sets upon [stellt] nature. It sets upon it in the sense of challenging it.

Agriculture is now the mechanized food industry. Air is now set upon to yield nitrogen, the earth to yield ore, ore to yield uranium, for example; uranium is set upon to yield atomic energy, which can be released either for destruction or for peaceful use.

In the extract quoted above one finds an insightful summary on Heidegger’s part, of how the essence of modern technology ‘works itself through’ every aspect of the world within which human beings live, focusing particularly on the earth or land (soil) to demonstrate how the earlier relationship people had with these has been upended and transformed by modern technology. His emphasis is on how, in comparison with an earlier, premodern dispensation – when humans worked ‘with’ nature to survive, instead of harnessing or ‘challenging’ it – under the dominance of Gestell, everything is commandeered, forcing it to yield to human demands.

It is striking, from Heidegger’s evocative description, how the integrity of the earth (and air) is shattered in the process: coal, nitrogen, and uranium, for example, are extracted from the lived totality with which it comprises a unity – something that comes into view, in a compelling manner, in Heidegger’s essay, ‘Building, Dwelling, Thinking,’ where he elaborates on what he calls the unified ‘Fourfold’ of Earth, Sky, Mortals, and Divinities, as essential values for a truly human life. 

Not everyone (to put it mildly) likes Heidegger’s ‘essentialist’ approach to technology, however. As the Italian thinker, Agostino Cera (2020, ‘Beyond the Empirical Turn: Elements for an Ontology of Engineering,’ Információs Társadalom XX, no. 4: 74–89) has shown, since Heidegger’s time, philosophers have executed what he terms a significant ‘ontophobic turn,’ with most individuals writing about technology shifting their focus away from (that is, ‘replacing’) what was central for Heidegger, namely the essence of technology as such. Referring to the so-called ‘empirical turn’ in the philosophy of technology (which resonates with the ‘ontophobic turn,’ or ‘fear of ontology’), which amounts to philosophers of technology no longer contemplating ‘technology,’ but ‘technologies’ instead, Cera writes about this ‘replacement’ that (2020: 82):

I agree with the idea that such a replacement means much more than a lexical change, but in my view this semantic surplus corresponds to our increasing inability to acknowledge technology as something in itself/as such. In particular, I consider the main outcome of this replacement/inability to be what I call Mr Wolfe Syndrome. This formula is inspired by Harvey Keitel’s famous character in Quentin Tarantino’s movie Pulp Fiction (1994). This character presents himself as someone who ‘solves problems.’ By using this expression, I am therefore referring to the gradual transformation of the philosophy of technology into a problem-solving activity or, better, to the fact that philosophers of technologies are today becoming (or aspiring to become) ‘guys who solve problems.’ 

For Cera, this amounts to nothing less than ‘an epistemic metamorphosis of the philosophy of technology and, more generally, of philosophy itself’ (p. 82), insofar as it transforms it from an ontological discipline to an ontic or ‘positive’ science. Furthermore, reducing the philosophy of technology to such a positive, problem-solving science, the important distinction between ‘question’ and ‘problem’ is eradicated, he points out. A problem has a solution, while a question evokes several – sometimes many – possible answers, if not more questions.

A philosophical question is therefore by its very nature a fundamental question, or Grundfrage, which is the kind of ontological question I (not being an ontophobe) am posing here regarding what I perceive to be the present manifestation of a novel phase in the development – or ‘appearance’ in a phenomenological sense – of technology (technicity). This brings us back to Heidegger.

Heidegger calls the human attitude, which allows and promotes a ‘letting be’ of things according to their irreducible being, Gelassenheit (also translated as ‘releasement’), which contrasts starkly with the reduction carried out by Gestell, insofar as the latter transforms things into resources for use on demand, or a ‘standing-reserve.’ Sadly, there appears to be precious little of this attitude left in the world today, although one may encounter it on the part of exceptional individuals (such as the Norwegian philosopher, Arne Naess, founder of ‘deep ecology’).

Towards the end of Part 1 it was also suggested that, today, we are witnessing unmistakable signs that technicity has already moved beyond the stage of Gestell, which concerned Heidegger sufficiently to elicit his belief that humanity can only be saved by ‘a god.’ I called the emergent new stage by various names, all of which imply that, instead of ‘framing’ things in the world – animate and inanimate – as Gestell does, it is predicated on pervading or saturating everything (a process that has already been underway for some time).

These are: Pervasive Transhuman Agency, Transhuman Agentic Saturation, Optimal Digital Transformation, or Transformative Digital Protocol. Personally, I believe the first two are the most accurate, the reasons for which will become clear below. However, that the digital revolution we have been living through is central to this new phase of technicity is highlighted in the work of the late Bernard Stiegler. 

What is paradigmatic about this new phase of technicity? As philosophers of science (as well as some well-read individuals) would know, the popularisation of the term ‘paradigm’ (and ‘paradigmatic’) occurred in the wake of Thomas Kuhn’spublication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962), where he employed it to mean, broadly, the fundamental conception of, and beliefs concerning reality and knowledge underpinning a specific scientific or theoretical practice, as exemplified or manifested in a ‘concrete scientific achievement’ (p. 11), such as a boundary-shifting experiment.

In this foundational sense, there was a crucial difference between the paradigm on which Aristotelian-Ptolemaic science (or physics) was based (including the geocentric belief in the earth being stationary), and that which is behind Newtonian macro-mechanics (namely the heliocentric notion of the earth in motion). Moreover, such foundational paradigms are irreconcilable, or incommensurable, which is why Kuhn wrote that the transition from one scientific paradigm to another – that is, the switch of epistemic allegiance from one to the other by scientists – resembles a ‘conversion’ (p. 18-19) of sorts (a term that unmistakably resonates with a comparable religious phenomenon). 

Considering that the term, ‘paradigm’ is derived from the Late Latin paradigma (‘pattern, example,’ itself derived from Greek paradeigma – ‘pattern, model, example, precedent,’), it appears that the ‘concrete scientific achievement,’ for instance a crucial experiment which discloses the fundamental tenets of the theory or science in question, mentioned by Kuhn, functions as an ‘example’ setting the ‘pattern’ for scientific research in specific disciplines.

To ask the question concerning the paradigm in which the new phase of technicity is concretised – compared to Heidegger’s Gestell or Enframing, as model or paradigmatic example of which he adduces the hydroelectric power station on the river Rhine (in ‘The question concerning technology,’ referred to earlier) – is therefore precisely to ask what could legitimately be regarded as such an example or model. Keep in mind that, to be a model in this sense implies that the changed conception of ‘reality’ and knowledge should be demonstrably concretised in it. 

With these requirements in mind, two salient possibilities emerge as candidates for the paradigmatic embodiment of what is arguably a novel, transmogrified phase of technicity: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the vaccinated (human) body. How so? Both satisfy the descriptive criteria named earlier; to wit, Pervasive Transhuman Agency and Transhuman Agentic Saturation, insofar as all these descriptors apply to them, albeit not in the same manner. 

In the case of AI its transhuman character is obvious; it is beyond the human in terms of its inscrutable alterity (as I have argued at length before). It may justifiably be called agentic because it is increasingly apparent that it has agency, or can initiate events even where it is not built into constructions such as robotic skeletons or drones with the explicit purpose of carrying out certain ‘actions,’ whether these are pre-programmed or ‘autonomous.’ (I put ‘actions’ and ‘autonomous’ in scare quotes because these ‘performances’ are not the same as actions performed autonomously by humans, which arguably issue from certain volitional acts; that is, acts of free will.) 

Furthermore, although it may be claimed that AI has not attained saturation (yet), it demonstrably tends towards such saturation or pervasiveness, at least in what Manuel Castells calls the ‘space of flows,’ as shown by the fact that the internet is suffused by videos and texts that are of AI origin – sometimes acknowledged, and sometimes not. In the case of the latter it is becoming increasingly difficult to discern whether something is human- or AI-created.

The point is, however, that one can circumvent such AI-saturation, for example by avoiding the internet (using ‘dumb phones’ instead of smartphones, and by letting students write assignments or essays by hand, without access to the internet, for example), but paradoxically such evasions merely confirm the increasing ubiquity of AI in the current global communicational context. 

What about the ‘vaccinated human body’ – is it at all comparable to AI in terms of saturation or pervasiveness insofar as it is paradigmatic of the current phase of technology (or technicity)? I believe that it is. Obviously, as paradigm, this does not mean, as some people would perhaps think, that such a level of vaccinatedness is completely pervasive in a literal sense, although there is evidence that the target on the part of the agencies driving ‘universal’ vaccination against Covid-19 [flu renamed] was indeed the human population in its totality.

As paradigm, however, it represents not only the thing it literally names – the vaccinated human body – but far more than that, insofar as it functions as a kind of metonym, or ‘part for whole,’ where the ‘part’ gathers together in one figure all those diverse phenomena (the ‘whole’) that may be understood as tending towards a condition of technological, communicational, economic, financial, biotechnical, and chemical saturation, metonymically concretised in the ‘vaccinated human body’ (during the time of Covid). 

What makes ‘the vaccinated human body’ such an apposite candidate as paradigm of technology (technicity) in its current phase, namely ‘Pervasive Transhuman Agency?’ Perhaps a more detailed description of such paradigmatic biotechnical saturation, which is seldom (if ever) encountered in mainstream media – given the scrupulous censorship and criminalisation of dissent performed by the agencies promoting the further development of this technological stage – would illuminate its paradigmatic aptness. Referring to the brave whistleblower, bio-technical analyst Karen Kingston, Rhoda Wilson writes: 

Kingston is a biotech analyst with more than 20 years of experience. She has been reviewing research that has been conducted on Covid ‘vaccines’ over more than a decade. ‘I really want the truth to be understood and the evidence to be seen and evaluated,’ she told Adams.  So, during the interview, she discussed some of the patents she has found: in particular, quantum dots ‘because that’s the backbone technology and energy of this AI [artificial intelligence] bioweapon,’ she said. ‘It’s part biology and part technology…that’s always been the intention of Covid-19.’

Kingston’s work exposes the astonishing bio-technology that has gone into manufacturing the supposed coronavirus [not real] as well as the mRNA Covid ‘vaccines,’ which are no vaccines, but as she stresses, ‘bioweapons.’ Mike Adams, who conducted a revealing interview with Kingston, argues that what Kingston has brought to the attention of the public is anything but an unproven ‘conspiracy theory.’ On the contrary, all the elements of the ‘vaccines’ that she identified and discussed in the interview (including ‘magnetic hydrogels’ and ‘soft actuators’) are traceable in scientific literature.

More importantly, these have been assembled in the ‘vaccines,’ demonstrably with other than beneficial consequences. These elements are described in the scientific article reviews listed by Adams as having ‘properties of magnetic nanoparticles [which] enable their use as magnetomechanic remote actuators to control the behavior of the cells encapsulated within the hydrogels under the application of external magnetic fields,’ and ‘soft actuators with physical intelligence’ (respectively). 

Therefore, what Kingston has disclosed is that these ‘vaccine’-implanted ‘biosynthetic structures’ have the capacity to ‘transmit and receive digitized information, allowing such structures to “network” with each other, even as they reside inside host human bodies. Combined with external AI capabilities that are accelerated by 5G bandwidth speed and low latency, these networking structures can be weaponized against humanity.’ In the light of these disturbing revelations, Kingston has called for law enforcement to ‘seize all vaccine bioweapons in the USA,’ underscoring the seriousness of a situation caused by the development of nanoscale AI-‘bioweapons.’  

Nevertheless, despite her call, attempts to disseminate such bioweapons have continued, as she pointed out in a 2024 interview, where she commented on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ‘funding the creation of a highly debilitating immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that can be transmitted via an injection, or even via skin-to-skin contact during herpetic skin lesion breakouts.’ More importantly – and this bears directly on my claim regarding the present phase of technicity as ‘Pervasive Transhuman Agency,’ concretised in the paradigm of ‘the vaccinated human body’ – Kingston said that the aim of these NIH grants is to produce such a virus (as that mentioned above) ‘and aerosolise it, and also how can I make it make the entire immune system stand down so [the virus] can actually get into human cells.’

Needless to highlight, this marks another stage in the sustained effort to saturate or pervade spaces occupied by humans with optimally transmissible, aerosolisable biotechnical-chemical materials of highly suspicious and questionable nature.   

From the above it should be abundantly apparent that the ‘vaccines’ permeate the bodies of their unwitting and trusting ‘receivers’ (pun intended). This is not all, however; the pervasiveness is exacerbated by the following. While most people rejected allegations, sometime after the rollout of Covid ‘vaccinations,’ that the ‘vaccinated’ were ‘shedding’ the spike protein that the vax manufactured in their bodies on others, it has since been confirmed that this is indeed the case. Moreover, this process seems to be continuing, judging by environmental scientist and lab science director, Mike Adams’s claim, that the Moderna mRNA ‘flu shot,’ currently being promoted by the FDA, is no exception. He writes:

Calling mRNA shots ‘vaccines’ is a deliberate lie. My research tells me they are gene-based weapon delivery systems wrapped in lipid nanoparticles that trick your cells into accepting alien instructions. ‘Unlike traditional vaccines that deliver killed or weakened viruses, this new generation of shots contains synthetic genetic instructions that command the body’s own cells to become viral protein factories’.

This is straight out of the transhumanist playbook. As Elana Freeland documents in her book [Geoengineered Transhumanism], ‘The Registry of Standard Biological Parts is made up of Lego-like BioBricks, short pieces of synthetic DNA that send and receive signals, initiating the transcription of DNA into synthetic messenger RNA.’ Once inside, the mRNA hijacks your ribosomes, forcing them to churn out non-human spike proteins — toxins your body was never designed to produce.

Just how systematic and thoroughgoing this pervasive technological intervention regarding the human body has been may be gathered from the terrifying list of so-called side effects (which are really intended effects) of the Pfizer mRNA vax, supposedly against Covid-19. I have been able to trace two websites where these (which were supplied in response to a request under the ‘Freedom of Information Act’ in the US) were listed – ‘were,’ because the first one has since been removed, probably by the globalists. 

The second is still there, however, and is not a reassuring, albeit informative read. What it confirms is the fact that these effects are the outcome of the nanoscale components of the vax having the capacity to cause destructive effects, and could possibly even – in the light of Kingston’s disclosure concerning their ‘AI-bioweapon’ status – have ‘agency,’ insofar as these components are said to be able to ‘transmit and receive digitized information’ from an external source.   

Having succeeded in the ‘vaccination’ of billions of people worldwide – albeit fewer than had been aimed for – the process of saturation is continuing through the ‘shedding’ which occurs in the wake of every mRNA ‘vaccination.’ The sooner people realise this, the sooner this scourge can be defeated. Unless they can overcome the ‘cognitive dissonance’ evoked when anyone alerts them to the fact that millions of people have died of the vax, and millions will still die in the coming years, this relentless decimation of the population will continue. Yet, it is allowed to continue because of the reluctance on the part of most people to believe it. The consequences of gullible populations accepting the vax are there for everyone to see. 

To mention only one reliable source of information on the continuing mortality in question, consider the information emerging from insurance companies: 

Executives at the largest insurance companies in the United States say they are ‘alarmed’ at the ‘sudden surge’ in deaths among fully jabbed young people.

According to an Oct. 26 report in InsuranceNewsNet, U.S. insurance executives are worried about the crippling payouts they are being forced to make due to the unprecedented number of young, healthy adults dropping dead following the jab rollout…

Edward Dowd, the former BlackRock fund manager who oversaw $14 billion in assets on Wall Street for the largest asset manager in the world, exposed the excess-death crisis in insurance-industry data in his December 2022 book, “‘Cause Unknown:’ The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022”…

Dowd said he believes the COVID-19 vaccines are causing widespread, otherwise inexplicable, excess deaths. ‘We don’t have proof. It’s our thesis,’ he said. But ‘if you have a brain in your head,’ the data are persuasive, he said. ‘Obviously I think it’s the vaccines.’

I have elaborated somewhat on the correlation between the paradigmatic ‘vaccinated human body’ and observed, if not recorded mortality rates that can be ascribed to the widely administered (albeit not completely pervasive) vax, to emphasise that the current stage of technicity – Pervasive Transhuman Agency – is nothing inconsequential or innocuous. On the contrary; anyone who is sufficiently courageous to face the currently available evidence of the frightening toll that the vax has already exacted in the guise of destroyed human lives would have to confront scientific studies (published in reputable journals) such as the one where the following abstract is encountered:   

The CDC denies that COVID-19 injections from Pfizer, Moderna, or Novavax can cause magnetism, even at the site of the injection. The CDC claims that the three ferromagnetic metals consisting of iron, cobalt, and nickel, and the rare earth chemicals used in magnets cerium, hafnium, lanthanum, gadolinium, and erbium are not in the US approved injectables. However, a 2024 study using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), detected all these and many other undeclared elements in lots of Pfizer, Moderna, and five other brands of COVID-19 injectables. By contrast with the CDC denials, James Giordano, who has become Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), has argued since 2018 that the human brain is the battleground for DARPA’s ‘disruptive technologies’ of warfare using magnetic nanoparticles delivered ‘intranasally, intravenously, or intraorally’ all without surgery to achieve ‘mind-control’ by adjusting the frequencies, power, and directionality of the electromagnetic forces. The science of magnetofection is little known but has been under development for decades. We explain it here and ask, could militarized experimentation with magnetic nanoparticles be involved in causing the documented outcomes of proteinaceous clotting, cardio-vascular conditions, strokes, new autoimmune diseases, unprecedented rapidly developing ‘prion diseases,’ ‘turbo’ cancers, and sudden deaths many of these occurring in otherwise young and healthy recipients of the experimental COVID-19 injectables? The research discussed in this paper implies that an affirmative answer cannot be ruled out. 

Those people who are still in denial about the undeniable would find it extremely difficult to dismiss scientific findings such as the one quoted above, of which there are already a considerable number. (Perhaps it might help if they peruse the list of [side]effects of the Pfizer mRNA jab, referred to earlier.) One should not overlook the fact either, that these findings reinforce the argument in this article, that the new phase of technicity – which is aptly captured in the paradigms of ‘AI’ and particularly of ‘the vaccinated human body’ (which may be construed as subsuming ‘AI’ under its ambit) – is decisively characterised by the optimisation of Pervasive Transhuman Agency at several levels. This is graphically outlined in a disturbing article by Maryam Henein, where she writes:

The wireless future is here. The model ostensibly turns human beings, via nano-implants, into antennas that can transmit information. They’re turning human beings into quasi-machines. Under this transhumanist agenda, the idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies [so that] we can communicate in real-time with the Smart Grid powered by way of  5G…

It’s called the ‘internet of bodies’ (IoB) or the ‘nanotech of things,’ (NToT), and it connects with the Internet of Things (IOT). One way this is accomplished is to embed graphene-made sensors into fabrics. Another is to implant or ingest the nanotech matter into the body, creating an internal technology platform…

While globalists aim to vaccinate the world and watch as our fellow man turns into ‘Magneto Man,’ evidence indicates that Big Harma, aided and abetted by VERY sick Rockefeller hospitals, are injecting us with nanoparticles meant to respond to signals while – oops – changing our very nature and DNA…   

Henein’s article confirms what one learns from Karen Kingston, referred to earlier, and the information one gleans from her work further suggests that, far from being a ‘conspiracy theory,’ it contributes to the noticeably growing phenomenon of ‘conspiracy realism.’ Given the signs that a new, arguably more devastating kind of technology (technicity) than the kind he was familiar with is in the process of asserting itself pervasively today, it seems safe to say that, had Heidegger been alive today, he would undoubtedly have reiterated his portentous remark: ‘Only a god can save us.’  

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-vaccinated-human-body/

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“It is Inconceivable that those with power and wealth would not band together with a common bond, a common interest, and a long-range plan to decide and direct the future of the world.” ~ Milton William (Bill) Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse

It should be obvious by now that nations and countries worldwide are working together as one [always have been], even as they pretend to be enemies, which indicates that nefarious theatre is alive and present. If this could be known and accepted by large numbers of the sheep-like populace, attitudes would change, and physical defensive action would necessarily be forthcoming, but the near impossibility of convincing the herd of the truth is an enormous impediment to this knowledge becoming more universal. For truth to be accepted by the brainwashed ignoramuses, ego must first be expelled.

Those known as the ‘people,’ the lower classes of serfs who make up the bulk of societies, are kept busy watching the games, participating in the bread and circus environment, concentrating on the minutia and daily ‘news’ cycles, while avoiding entirely the big picture; looking at everything presented by the State without ever once looking behind the curtain of secrecy. This fact in and of itself, is reason to believe that true revolution, any real awakening, any legitimate negation of rule, will likely never take place by any competent large-scale minority, and certainly not by any majority made up of indoctrinated fools.

Discussions about a one world government, a new world order, a globalized ruling force, have for decades been ignored and written off as ‘conspiracy theory.’ Now, this is being openly and freely exposed by the entirety of the ruling class, so boldly presented, and professed to be the way to equality and prosperity, that it is nearly impossible not to see that this was the plan all along. Those who dismissed the warnings, and avoided what was happening over the past few decades, are now once again not accepting that they were wrong and lied to, but are also going along voluntarily with the plan to forever enslave them. This is very disheartening, because even though all those who predicted this outcome were correct, they are still being ignored as the proletariat hordes are willingly walking into their cages and closing the door behind them without so much as a whimper. Apparently, no lessons have been learned.

This brings us to the crux of the matter. The entirety of the real ruling element of this earth works together as one. This is not something that will happen; it has already happened. The final stages of this transformation of global (one world) rule are not complete, but certainly getting closer to fruition every day. Once the veil was lifted, once the agenda was admitted, once world ‘leaders’ openly promoted this system, the question of the existence of this global takeover plot became indisputable. When humanity has reached a position of near total ignorance, when logic and reasoning have failed to be evident, when dependence has become near universal, nothing has to be hidden any longer, as the lemmings have resigned themselves to their respective mental cages. These cages prohibit the ability to think critically, and therefore societies devolve into slave camps.

Before going further, it is important to grasp the reality of this discussion. One example of many is all that is necessary for any thinking human being to understand the scope of this conspiratorial one world system. That one example is the hoax called ‘covid.’ The fake ‘covid pandemic’ began a mere 7 years ago. What happened was astounding, but would have been impossible unless the controllers of most every country on earth were complicit, working together, and fully aware of the plot long in advance. Of the 200 or so countries in the world, most every single one introduced, implemented, and enforced some form of lockdown, restrictive measures of movement, forced testing, ‘vaccine’ mandates, among many other restrictions, and did so simultaneously. How could that have happened without total collusion among all countries at one level or another? I can tell you that it could not under any circumstances have happened organically, and would have been impossible. It was all a set-up, a global complicit conspiracy, all premeditated, and structured to force the installation of a universal, one world, technocratic prison for humanity. It was simply a test, and was completely successful for the few who run and control the entire world.

Even now as I write this, countries around the world are all on the same page and implementing the same restrictive measures and surveillance structures, whether in Russia, China, Asia, Europe, the U.K., Canada, Australia, South America, Mexico, Central America, Israel, the Middle East, of course the U.S., and many more. The buildout of bad AI (as opposed to good AI) biometrics, mass surveillance, travel restrictions, digitized currency, truth ministries and control of speech, monstrous data centers, destruction of food and energy sources, and on and on. When more lockdowns, ‘health’ mandates, forced ‘vaccines’, 24/7 monitoring, quarantines, and border restrictions surface, all countries will be on board as one. This is truly a one world system in the making, with near universal collusion certainly evident now. This is not being hidden, and anyone with eyes can see this real conspiracy.

There is an ‘elite’ ruling class made up of esoteric occultists who rule the world. They do not do this openly, but in the deep shadows, and they do not do it alone, as most all of humanity has succumbed to a top-down ruling structure. The hierarchy involves the big banking conglomerates, the major corporate players, the entirety of politicians and political systems, and all the enforcers in government and military. The political class in the country is but a conduit to the people, so when the masses support this government, they are actually supporting the ruling system that controls the government. That support is in essence nothing more than a road to serfdom, where the bulk of humanity will be enslaved physically, mentally, and psychologically.

In order to complete the plotted takeover of world governance, to build a fully technocratic ruling system, and to capture humanity so as to encourage them to act as one, and call for complete globalization, a master plan to bring mass cohesion about, will need a solidifying event. As I see it now, that event could be a staged (fake) attack by an outside alien force against the earth. Considering  the advanced stage of technology, the constant barrage of UFO and alien presence reporting, the release of so-called UFO files by Trump’s White House, this is no longer science fiction. While this may sound far-fetched, Trump recently stated: 

“I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant departments and agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOS), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important matters.”

Bill Cooper discussed this possibility 35 years ago, as a claimed attack from alien forces against the entire world, would immediately bring all the common masses together. No other single event I can think of, would have quite that effect. Of course, the threat of a worldwide plague, but that has already been done with the ‘covid’ scam. It could be a threat of an earth-destroying asteroid strike, but what would happen when it did not occur? A military-led fake alien attack could be used to actually kill people everywhere, thereby causing depopulation and a global clamoring for a unified world, both agenda fulfilling events.

No, I have not lost my mind or gone into any state of dementia, but considering this world today, anything is possible concerning the completion of a one world government and a new world order. Regardless, we are headed for hell if the common people do not wake up soon, and realize the threat they are under from the technocratic ruling whores looking down on them.

“There is coming a day, when freedom will just be a essence of the mind, an inner dwelling that was once physically attainable. They will tell you where you can live, and what you can wear and drive, what and how much you can eat and drink, and how to purchase those. They will strip you of your religion, race, gender, national origin, age, color, creed, views and power, and have control of the population. They will set in a new world order, and put you in the back of the line, marked and branded. Everything before will be erased, and the new will be manipulated. And what you believe most, can only be kept secret, for all must fall in line of their govern. Anything outside will be abolished. Even death, will be sought, but restrained. They will execute complete and total control over everything, and be sole owners of your soul. The light, that once guided will go dim, and liberty will be like an unwilled bird, suppressed in the cage of your ribs; wings cut off.” ~ Anthony Liccione

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-world-is-no-longer-made-up-of-independent-nations-as-globalization-is-sought/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Locals keep dancing, jogging and giving tours in BURNING Paris while Macron hits a Celine Dion concert

This Is Perhaps The Most Dystopian Thing Ever…

Steve Watson | modernity.news

France’s streets burned, shops were looted and stripped bare and a historic town hall collapsed under arson. Yet the most striking images from Saturday night were not the fires. They were the people who carried on as if nothing was happening.

One woman jogged straight through thick black smoke past a burning barricade, treating the chaos like an outdoor treadmill session.

Groups of French boomers kept dancing while buildings were torched around them, and a tour guide was filmed continuing her routine for visitors, smiling and pointing out landmarks while flames literally engulfed the city right in front of tourists.

Meanwhile, the so called leader of France President Emmanuel Macron was filmed at a Celine Dion concert.

This is the backdrop to the worst night of rioting and unrest in years. Authorities reported roughly 550,000 people on the streets (others claimed 800,000). The day produced between 1,200 and 1,800 arrests and more than 500 injured police, gendarmes and firefighters. One person died of cardiac arrest in Paris.

In Limoges the 143-year-old city hall was deliberately set alight; its spire and roof collapsed. Prefect Maurice Barate called the attackers “a wild horde.”

Mayor Guillaume Guérin said those who entered threatened staff, telling them they would be killed. The building had survived two world wars.

In Lyon the tourist office, described as a heritage building in the heart of the city, was set ablaze, with officials calling the loss a tragedy.

Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said the government would not be “intimidated” and blamed the “ultra-left” and criminals. Interior Minister Laurent Nunez pointed to “far-left” protesters joined by “criminals who looted and ransacked.”

Paris Deputy Mayor Emmanuel Gregoire stated that “whole streets have been devastated.” Macron, while still claiming there were legitimate protesters who should not be ignored, later said those who broke into buildings, attacked prefectures and looted town halls “will be prosecuted and punished.”

In Marseille, rioters forced their way into city hall, toppled a bust of Marianne and raised Palestinian flags.

Rolex, Hermès, Louis Vuitton and other stores were emptied in daylight.

Looters also broke into the Centre Bourse shopping mall and began taking everything they could carry.

Prefect Jacques Witkowski said the people involved “ne sont pas venus pour manifester, mais piller” — they did not come to demonstrate, they came to loot.

In Paris a woman who had joined the marches was filmed shouting “This isn’t the cause” as others began looting; she was pushed aside and told they had “urgent shopping” to do.

Restaurant owner Aline of La Barrique was beaten, her face bruised, her place sacked and burned.

A phone-shop owner sat among the shattered remains of his business.

In Nice a person connected to an attacked store was assaulted after confronting the rioters.

Groups also hijacked tourist train cars.

Another clip shows supposed student protesters pausing to loot a jewellery store.

Footage of the looting and street chaos has been widely shared as the direct outcome of left-wing policies and education that prioritised ideology over basic order.

Footage from multiple cities shows few French flags among the most violent crowds. Islamic and Palestinian flags dominate.

One clip shows men pausing the looting and violence in a Paris street to pray, then continuing.

A Spanish journalist was confronted by two men making throat-slitting gestures; reports described them as second- and third-generation migrants.

An image of a Joan of Arc figure in a hijab holding a Palestinian flag circulated widely.

A circulating account from journalist Paul Amar claimed groups arrived with addresses of town halls and Jewish-owned shops and that, on one Marseille street, businesses owned by Jews were burned while those run by Muslims were not.

Organised Networks, Not Spontaneous Students

This is not a spontaneous student protest that got out of hand.

A Fox News Digital investigation found that of roughly 50 organisations active around the unrest, only about one-third were actual student or youth groups. The rest included labour unions, communist and socialist organisations, the French Communist Party, La France Insoumise and a Palestinian advocacy group.

The same reporting traced funding and amplification to networks linked to Shanghai-based tycoon Neville Roy Singham, including outlets such as BreakThrough News.

The violence is being amplified by a red-green alliance of communists, socialists and Islamists using “student” grievances as cover for broader disruption.

A clip circulating on X shows pallets of bottles appearing on the street as if staged in advance, suggesting the chaos was organised and rioters were being equipped rather than acting spontaneously.

The original complaints about teacher shortages and ageing school buildings are now just a footnote.

France spends above the EU average on upper-secondary education. None of that explains why luxury stores were emptied, why a 19th-century town hall was torched, why people are being beaten in the streets or their own places of business, or why large sections of the crowds waved foreign flags and paused to pray in the street.

The media continues to centre “education reform” and cost-of-living framing. The videos show something else entirely: organised destruction enabled by decades of open borders, with first-, second- and third-generation migrants doing the smashing and burning.

While the country was being looted and set alight, people danced, jogged through the smoke, gave guided tours and the president attended a concert. That is the clearest picture of how detached the official story has become from what is actually happening on the ground.

Image: Source [Truth11.com Meme Ghibli Styled Using ChatGTP]

Original Article: https://modernity.news/2026/10/18/this-is-perhaps-the-most-dystopian-thing-ever/

Islamic supremacists are attacking those who threw their borders open to them.

n Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | RairFoundation.com

Revolution is spreading across Europe as communists and Muslim thugs get their violence on. Italy is now on fire just as France is as guerilla warfare explodes in the shadow of a Gothic Christian cathedral. The Arab Spring was the beginning – welcome to the second act.

As predicted, the violent Red/Green Alliance protests have spread from France to Belgium, Albania, Switzerland, Portugal, India, and now Italy. It will get worse as the chaos engulfs Europe. Outside Milan’s magnificent Duomo Cathedral, fire blazed under the spires as protesters waved Palestinian and Antifa flags and got their violence on. That cathedral was not chosen by accident… it is a symbol of Christianity and one of the world’s great Gothic cathedrals. If they get the chance, the godless communists and Islamic thugs will burn it to the ground.

Islamic Revolution in the Shadow of a Christian Cathedral

On Saturday, police clashed with the rioters dressed like Black Bloc and wearing keffiyehs as stores shut down and tourists ran for cover. Smoke filled the square. Onlookers were horrified as the destruction took place in one of the most historically rich places on Earth, which became a revolutionary battle zone.

Muslim migrants and Antifa rioters attacked the police, hurling paper bombs, stones, Molotov cocktails, and firecrackers. They trashed cars and threw smoke bombs at rooftop bars. British visitors were terrified and said they had never seen anything like it or felt less safe as they fled to nearby airports.

This revolt is just clearing its throat. Remember the Arab Spring? Welcome to the second act. Islamic supremacists are attacking those who threw their borders open to them. If you invite the vampire in, you can’t be surprised when he decides to dine on you. Demons are predictable like that.

The Associated Press reported 50 demonstrators, including minors, were detained and at least two police officers were hurt. Italy’s public news wire service Ansa reported police detained 197 people during the demonstration, while 28 were arrested, including 12 minors and six foreign nationals. The wire service noted that there was also a heavy contingent of “second-generation migrants” involved in the riots. Those are Muslims.

Police used water cannons to disperse the crowd as rioters looted stores and broke windows inside Milan’s Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II, one of Italy’s most famous 19th-century arcades.

Roughly 5,000 protesters took part in the demonstration in Milan. While some demonstrators literally chanted in French, the protest quickly devolved into “guerrilla warfare,” Ansa reported.

“Milan was reduced to a battlefield, with Piazza Duomo besieged by hundreds of young people dressed in black. They forced the police to retreat under the hurling of firecrackers, barriers, and bottles, until they occupied the city’s symbolic square,” the wire service said.

Naming the Enemy

As France exploded, Italy was set ablaze as well. Just as in France, Italian politicians blamed the extreme left for the lawlessness. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni took to social media to condemn the unrest and back law enforcement.

Which she should do – but again, if you can’t name your enemy, you can’t defeat them. They are avoiding saying that Muslims and communists are the instigators here, just as France is doing. The only difference is that Meloni didn’t pull a Macron and attend a Celine Dion concert while her country burned.

“Once again, the women and men of the Law Enforcement Forces have had to face the violence of criminals who, even through organized groups, exploit demonstrations to seek confrontation and sow chaos,” Meloni posted on X.

“Because they were there to safeguard the safety of citizens, workers, merchants and all the people who have the right to live [in] their city without fear and without seeing it laid to waste and set ablaze by gangs of thugs,” she added. “We stand with you.”

“Thugs who exploit demonstrations to sow chaos, attack those who ensure security and hold entire cities hostage… Demonstrating is a right. Setting our cities ablaze is not,” Meloni said Saturday night, according to Fox News.

“I renew my request to the opposition: do not be ambiguous about this. Unequivocally condemn these acts of violence and issue a clear appeal for every mobilization to be peaceful,” she said to her political opponents.

Guerrilla Warfare

The Il Giornale newspaper accused Milan Mayor Giuseppe Sala and his Green Party-led coalition of having “fomented” the riots: “Dear Sala, mayor of Youth and Islamists, apologize to the Milanese for the guerrilla war in the city,” the paper demanded.

“It is no longer tolerable that every time left-wing extremists take to the streets, scenes of organized destruction unfold. We are not dealing with mere demonstrators, but with organized groups that plan violence,” Francesco Filini, MP for Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia and national program coordinator, stated according to the Il Sole 24 news site.

The Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro, or CGIL, Italy’s oldest labor union with over 5 million members, organized Saturday’s violent festivities. That communist union is linked to Italian political parties on the left.

Weakness is Contagious

Meloni, just like Macron, is coming across as weak. She posted that she had “great respect for the thousands” who protested peacefully and called participation “the foundation of any healthy democracy… we cannot ignore what happened in other Italian squares.”

You can’t placate communists and Islamic thugs this way. They will tear Italy apart. See France. These politicos never, ever learn. None of these people know a thing about history or revolution, but they are about to find out the hard way.

Meloni went on to note that in Milan “stones were thrown at the Law Enforcement Forces, officers were injured, damage and violence occurred that forced the interruption of the procession. In Turin, people were stopped carrying cobblestones and window-breaking hammers. In Bologna, the disorders led to the precautionary closure of the railway station.”

“In the face of scenes like these, the rejection must be unanimous,” Meloni wrote. “Any hesitation becomes justification. Silence is not acceptable.”

Neither is weakness or bending the knee to Islam.

“The reasons for the protests were understandable. The violence against law enforcement and serious damage to the city are not justifiable,” Milan’s center-left mayor, Giuseppe Sala, told the Associated Press.

He’s got that exactly wrong. There is no justification for these protests – the excuse of economics and education is being used as a façade for revolution. That permissive equivocating attitude is the death knell of Europe.

Reuters reported that approximately 56 police officers were injured in the protest in Bologna, citing the police union. The interior ministry says about 100 officers were hurt and around 30 arrests were made in the demonstration in Turin.

This is just the opening act. The Red/Green Alliance in Europe smells weakness, and they are moving in for the kill. Looks like those who hoped the alligator would eat them last are about to become the main course.

Original Article: https://rairfoundation.com/european-revolution-spreads-muslim-migrants-antifa-rioters-set/

Related:

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“You see them on the street. You watch them on TV. You might even vote for one this fall. You think they’re people just like you. You’re wrong. Dead wrong.” — They Live

The spectacle of public executions. Deadly military strikes on foreign countries. Innocent civilian lives lost to war. Aggressive ICE raids. Government officials accused of using their powers to intimidate political opponents. Public office increasingly entangled with private financial interests.  Government leaders who glorify violence, spew hatred, stir up racial prejudice, provoke civil unrest, and stoke discontent.

This is what it looks like when a nation loses its way.

When cruelty is mistaken for courage, vengeance for justice, and the taking of human life for a demonstration of strength.

When government officials tell you not to believe your own eyes and ears about the state of the world around you, when they insist that the truth is a lie and the lie is truth, you’ve stumbled into a dystopian reality in which, as John Lennon rightly concluded, the government is “being run by maniacs for maniacal ends.”

When so-called Christians and self-professed defenders of morality insist that we must accept the lesser of two evils based on exaggerated fears of what might happen if their political opponents gain power, rather than confront the abuses unfolding before our eyes, remember this: the lesser of two evils is still evil.

This is not simply about Donald Trump.

The machinery of the American police state has been assembled over decades, under Republican and Democratic administrations alike. Presidents have expanded executive authority, waged undeclared wars, authorized drone killings, built surveillance networks, militarized domestic policing, and invoked national security to justify extraordinary powers.

What makes the present moment so troubling is the extent to which the public is encouraged to accept increasingly aggressive exercises of government power as necessary demonstrations of strength and resolve.

The Constitution was never intended to protect only the innocent, the popular, the patriotic, or the politically acceptable. Its restraints on government power matter most when the government is dealing with people whom society has already condemned.

Yet what happens when the public becomes so accustomed to government overreach, corruption and brutality that it no longer recognizes them as warning signs? What becomes of a constitutional republic when its leaders and citizens stop asking whether government actions are lawful, justified or necessary, and concern themselves only with whether those actions punish their enemies, advance their political interests or preserve their sense of security?

We are witnessing a political culture in which demanding due process for an accused criminal is treated as defending criminality, questioning a military strike is equated with sympathy for the enemy, and opposing government cruelty is portrayed as weakness.

The government doesn’t have to abolish the Constitution outright when it can persuade the public that certain people should no longer be entitled to its protections.

That is how constitutional rights cease to be rights at all and become privileges granted or withdrawn at the government’s discretion.

And that is how a population becomes conditioned to accept the unacceptable.

We’re living in two worlds.

There’s the world we see—or are made to see—and then there’s the one we sense and occasionally catch a glimpse of, which bears little resemblance to the propaganda-driven reality manufactured by those in power and amplified through an increasingly fragmented media landscape.

Indeed, what most Americans perceive as life in America—privileged, progressive and free—is a far cry from the reality of a nation where economic inequality persists, government power continues to expand, and freedom is increasingly subjected to the demands of surveillance, security and control.

All is not as it seems.

Monsters with human faces walk among us.

Some of them wield extraordinary government power.

This is the premise of John Carpenter’s film They Live, released in November 1988, which remains unnervingly, chillingly appropriate for our modern age.

Best known for his horror film Halloween, Carpenter’s larger body of work is infused with a strong anti-authoritarian, anti-establishment, laconic bent that speaks to the filmmaker’s concerns about the unraveling of our society, particularly our government.

Time and again, Carpenter portrays the government working against its own citizens, a populace out of touch with reality, technology run amok, and a future more horrific than any horror film.

In They Live, two migrant workers discover that the world is being subliminally controlled and exploited by aliens working in partnership with an oligarchic elite.

All the while, the populace—blissfully unaware of the real agenda at work in their lives—has been lulled into complacency, indoctrinated into compliance, bombarded with media distractions, and hypnotized by hidden messages beamed out of television and various electronic devices, billboards and the like.

Sound familiar?

It is only when homeless drifter John Nada, played by the late Roddy Piper, discovers a pair of special sunglasses that he sees what lies beneath the elite’s fabricated reality: control and bondage.

When viewed through Nada’s lenses, the wealthy and powerful who appear human are revealed as monsters exploiting the citizenry.

Likewise, seemingly mundane advertisements conceal subliminal, authoritarian messages. Magazine racks scream “CONSUME” and “OBEY.” Money proclaims “THIS IS YOUR GOD.” Other hidden messages reinforce the same demands: CONFORM. SUBMIT. STAY ASLEEP. WATCH TV. DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY. NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT.

This indoctrination campaign engineered by the elite in They Live is painfully familiar to anyone who has studied the workings of an authoritarian state.

A citizenry that does not think for themselves, obeys without question, is submissive, does not challenge authority, does not think outside the box, and is content to sit back and be entertained is a citizenry that can be easily controlled.

In this way, the message of They Live provides an apt analogy for the distorted vision of life in the American police state—what philosopher Slavoj Žižek has characterized as the invisible structures of domination that sustain the appearance of freedom.

Tune out the government’s attempts to distract, divert and befuddle us and tune into what’s really going on in this country, and you’ll run headlong into an uncomfortable truth: government corruption and power have expanded far beyond the restraints the Constitution was intended to impose.

And the corruption is not always hidden.

What happens when public office, private wealth and political influence become so intertwined that ordinary citizens can no longer distinguish whose interests their government is serving? What happens when those conflicts are repeatedly exposed, yet the public becomes too distracted, too divided or too politically invested to demand answers?

This is where the warning of They Live becomes especially relevant.

The danger is not simply that powerful interests might conceal what they’re doing. It’s that they can operate in plain sight, confident that enough people will refuse to see—or refuse to care.

We have allowed the government’s corruption, brutality, self-dealing and abuses go on for too long. While this has been true of both parties, it has become painfully evident under the Trump administration.

Desperate to hold onto power, the powers-that-be continue to advance a series of carefully contrived narratives, threats and emergencies to justify expanding their authority, encouraging the public to fear one another, distrust our own judgment, and accept increasingly invasive government powers as the price of safety.

Fear is the great enabler of authoritarianism.

Fear of terrorists. Fear of criminals. Fear of immigrants. Fear of foreign enemies. Fear of domestic extremists. Fear of one another.

Every new threat becomes another justification for expanding government authority, weakening constitutional safeguards, and demanding greater obedience from a frightened public.

This is how government power expands in plain sight. The targets are portrayed as threats. The government’s actions are defended as necessary. Those who question its methods are accused of defending criminals, undermining public safety or siding with the enemy.

And with every exception made to constitutional restraints, the public becomes a little more accustomed to powers it once would have considered intolerable. Surveillance becomes security. Censorship becomes protection. Militarized policing becomes public safety. Indefinite detention becomes national defense.

And killing becomes justice.

For too long, Americans have been persuaded to barter their freedoms for promises of security, rationalizing government wrongdoing because they are told the alternatives would be worse.

But no matter how you rationalize it, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

The greatest danger is not merely that government officials may abuse their power.

It is that ordinary people may become so accustomed to those abuses that they lose the ability—or the willingness—to recognize them for what they are.

This brings us back to They Live, in which the danger posed is not simply the alien conspiracy but the population’s willingness to remain asleep and controlled.

Again, not so different from our own.

As one of the characters points out, “The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society and we are their unwitting accomplices. Their intention to rule rests with the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance. They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused only on our own gain.”

We, too, are encouraged to focus on our own pleasures, prejudices and political victories, while remaining indifferent to the suffering of others. Our poor and underclasses are also growing. Injustice is growing. Inequality is growing. A concern for human rights is nearly nonexistent. We too have been lulled into a trance, indifferent to others.

The government doesn’t have to convince everyone that its actions are lawful, just or humane. It merely has to persuade enough people that those being targeted deserve whatever happens to them.

Nor does corruption have to be concealed when it can be rationalized, dismissed, or excused as the unavoidable cost of keeping one’s preferred political leaders in power.

This is perhaps the most disturbing parallel to They Live: a population that has been shown what is happening, yet remains unwilling to confront the implications.

The warning signs are no longer buried beneath elaborate disguises. They are unfolding in courtrooms, detention facilities, government offices, financial disclosures and daily news reports.

And still, too many people choose to look away.

We can convince ourselves that we are different from the victims of government abuse. That we are too law-abiding, too patriotic, too respectable, too insignificant to become targets ourselves.

We can tell ourselves that the government means well, that extraordinary measures are necessary, and that those caught in the machinery of state power must have done something to deserve their fate. But every exception made to someone else’s rights weakens the protections intended to safeguard our own.

That was the warning behind the Bill of Rights.

The founders understood that government officials could not be trusted to restrain themselves simply because they professed good intentions. The Constitution was intended to bind government power, not magnify it.

So where does that leave us?

The characters who populate Carpenter’s films provide some insight.

Underneath their machismo, they still believe in the ideals of liberty and equal opportunity. Their beliefs place them in constant opposition with the law and the establishment, but they are nonetheless freedom fighters.

When John Nada destroys the alien hypno-transmitter in They Live, he delivers a wake-up call for freedom. As Nada memorably declares, “I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I’m all out of bubblegum.”

In other words, it’s time to get active and take a stand for what’s really important.

Stop allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by political spectacles and manufactured fears. Stop treating constitutional rights as privileges reserved for people you agree with. Stop excusing government abuses merely because the victims are unpopular or the perpetrators share your political loyalties.

As we make clear in Battlefield America: The War on the American People and its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, all the trappings of the American police state are now in plain sight.

The greatest danger is not that the monsters have become so adept at hiding among us. It is that we have become so conditioned to their presence, so accustomed to their abuses, and so willing to excuse their corruption that we no longer recognize them for what they are.

Wake up, America.

If they live—the tyrants, the oppressors, the invaders, the overlords—it is only because “we the people” sleep.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_politics_of_denial

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“United States AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation.”—President Donald Trump, Executive Order 14365

The era of small government is over.

Anyone who tells you differently is selling you a lie.

Case in point: Donald Trump promised to shrink the federal government.

But what if Trump’s pledge to cut the federal work force wasn’t really about eliminating government bureaucracy but outsourcing it to the AI tech sector?

What if Trump, with the backing of a self-serving industry eager to automate government, is instead helping to build a government that no longer needs as many human beings to operate it?

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers are disappearing from the government payroll at the same time that Washington is racing to automate the work they once performed with artificial intelligence.

Since Trump returned to office, the federal workforce has shrunk by more than 270,000 employees, the result of hiring freezes, deferred resignations, early retirements and reductions in force.

At the same time, the Trump administration has embraced an aggressive campaign to automate government operations, with the General Services Administration instructing agencies to “eliminate, optimize and automate“ their work wherever possible.

This is not a return to smaller government.

It is a dangerous recalibration of government power.

What we are watching unfold is the construction of a government that requires fewer human beings to carry out its will, fewer human beings to question its orders, and fewer human beings to stand in the way when efficiency collides with legality, morality or constitutional restraint.

That is the real danger of automating government.

Human beings hesitate. Human beings question. Human beings object. Human beings refuse. Human beings blow the whistle.

Machines do not hesitate. They do not object. They do not blow the whistle.

For the most part, machines do what they are programmed to do. Until they don’t.

For an administration increasingly impatient with legal restraints, institutional resistance and anyone who says “no,” that is not merely a technological convenience.

It is an authoritarian temptation.

Anyone who believes smaller government means less government power needs to think again, because a government run by machines is still government.

Likewise, a government without bureaucrats is not necessarily a government without bureaucracy.

It may simply be bureaucracy without human beings.

And bureaucracy without human beings may prove far more powerful, pervasive and difficult to restrain than anything that came before it.

What is taking shape is a government that may employ fewer human beings while possessing exponentially greater power to surveil, process, classify, investigate and control the population.

Indeed, the administration has now launched America.gov, an AI-powered centralized digital gateway through which Americans will eventually interact with federal agencies and complete government transactions. The White House boasts that it will allow the federal government to “do its own paperwork.”

AI can certainly reduce backlogs, simplify forms, process information and free workers from tedious tasks.

Certainly, artificial intelligence can help eliminate repetitive paperwork, reduce backlogs, identify waste, simplify complicated forms, translate government jargon into plain English, process enormous amounts of information and free human workers from tedious tasks.

The concern is not whether AI can be useful.

It can.

The danger begins when AI stops assisting human beings and starts replacing them—not merely as clerks but as decision-makers, investigators, gatekeepers, analysts and enforcers of government power.

Thus, the concern is not the technology itself but what happens when government begins using it to eliminate the human restraints that constitutional government depends upon.

We are rapidly moving from a society ruled by laws and due process to one ruled increasingly by software.

In such a regime, the law is no longer merely interpreted. It is executed. Automatically. Mechanically. At machine speed.

The result is a system in which government no longer governs. It processes.

Your application. Your tax return. Your disability claim. Your immigration status. Your face. Your movements. Your associations. Your financial transactions. Your government records request. Your threat profile.

Perhaps eventually your guilt or innocence.

And, if some military planners have their way, whether you qualify as a target.

This is where the supposed efficiency of artificial intelligence collides head-on with the Constitution.

Government is not a private corporation. Its purpose is not merely to become faster, cheaper or more productive. Government possesses powers that no corporation possesses. It can tax you. Search you. Arrest you. Imprison you. Seize your property. Monitor you. Restrict your liberty. And in extreme circumstances, take your life.

And in extreme circumstances, take your life.

When government exercises those powers, efficiency cannot be the highest value. Liberty must be.

Due process is inefficient. Search warrants are inefficient. Trials are inefficient. Appeals are inefficient. Human review is inefficient. Checks and balances are spectacularly inefficient.

They are supposed to be.

The Constitution deliberately places obstacles between government power and the individual.

Before the police may search your home, they generally need a warrant. Before the government may imprison you, it must give you an opportunity to challenge the accusations. Government power is deliberately divided so that one branch can restrain another.

All of that takes time.

All of that requires human beings.

All of that frustrates officials who would prefer to simply get things done.

Yet those safeguards are among the things standing between a free people and a government that can act instantly, universally and without meaningful resistance.

Artificial intelligence promises to cut through the delays, obstacles and human steps that slow government down.

That is marvelous if you’re trying to schedule an appointment. It is terrifying when the government is making decisions about your liberty—or your life.

For generations, government power was also constrained by manpower. There were only so many investigators, analysts and bureaucrats—and only so many hours in a day.

AI changes that equation.

By doing what the police state has historically lacked the manpower and resources to do quickly, AI surveillance is already reorienting our world into one in which freedom is increasingly difficult to recognize: it can be everywhere, watch everyone and everything, monitor, identify, catalogue, cross-check, cross-reference and collate enormous quantities of information.

The surveillance state no longer needs enough people to watch everyone. It needs enough computing power.

That distinction matters.

A human investigator can follow only so many people. An algorithm can analyze millions. A bureaucrat can make only so many decisions in a day. A machine can make millions without sleeping, hesitating or developing a conscience.

That allows government power—and government abuse—to operate on a scale the Founders could scarcely have imagined.

It also creates an enormous accountability problem.

For decades, critics of the administrative state have warned about unelected bureaucrats wielding excessive government power.

Replacing the bureaucrat with an algorithm does not solve that problem. It may make it worse.

At least the bureaucrat has a name. A human being can be questioned. A supervisor can At least the bureaucrat has a name. A human being can be questioned. A supervisor can intervene. An employee can refuse an unlawful order. A whistleblower can expose misconduct. Someone can be held responsible.

But what happens when government responds, in effect, that the computer made the decision? Who do you cross-examine? Who explains the reasoning? Who takes responsibility for the mistake? Who possesses the authority to override the machine? And what happens when the algorithm itself belongs not to the government but to a private corporation whose code, training data and internal workings are shielded from public scrutiny?

The government’s dependence on private technology companies only compounds the problem.

Government power remains government power, but accountability becomes privatized.

We are already seeing glimpses of this future.

Federal agencies are already experimenting with AI to review Freedom of Information Act requests and recommend which portions of government records should be withheld from the public. Customs and Border Protection is testing AI-assisted redaction tools, while other agencies are developing similar systems. Human reviewers are still involved, but the trajectory is unmistakable: tasks requiring judgment about what the public may know are increasingly becoming candidates for automation.

The stakes become far greater once AI moves from paperwork to policing and warfare.

Earlier this year, the Pentagon clashed with Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI system, after Anthropic insisted on maintaining restrictions against two uses of its technology: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

Anthropic warned that present AI systems are not reliable enough to independently decide when weapons should fire and argued that AI-powered mass surveillance could allow government to piece together enormous quantities of otherwise scattered information about Americans at unprecedented scale.

The Pentagon responded by designating Anthropic a supply-chain risk, a decision that has since become the subject of litigation.

The dispute should concern anyone who cares about the limits of government power.

The issue was not whether artificial intelligence could assist military personnel.

It was whether there must always remain a human being responsible for certain decisions.

That question became even more urgent in September, when the United States and Russia opposed provisions under discussion at the United Nations that would have required human review of AI-generated military targets and imposed stronger requirements concerning the predictability and reliability of autonomous weapons systems.

The consequences of that rush toward machine-speed warfare are no longer hypothetical.

In February, U.S. missiles struck the Shajarah Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab, Iran, killing more than 150 people, including at least 120 children.

The school had once been part of a military compound, but it had been operating openly as a school for years. Yet outdated intelligence still classified the site as a military target.

According to reporting on the Pentagon’s internal investigation, the flawed target was fed into Maven, the military’s AI-assisted targeting system. Officials reportedly relied too heavily on the technology to identify stale or contradictory intelligence while an accelerated targeting process compressed work that once took hours into minutes. At the same time, civilian-harm mitigation teams had been dramatically reduced.

The machine did not simply wake up one morning and decide to bomb a school. Human beings built a system that placed a premium on speed, automation and scale—and then gave it priority over human judgment and careful vetting.

That distinction matters. It is also precisely the danger.

Think about the progression: First AI does the paperwork. Then AI recommends the decision. Then AI makes the decision.

Eventually AI decides who lives and who dies.

At each step, humans remain tempted to surrender a little more judgment to the machine because it is faster, cheaper, more efficient and supposedly more objective.

Yet technology does not eliminate human bias, political agendas or government misconduct.

It can automate them. It can amplify them. It can conceal them behind a technological black box. And it can reproduce them millions of times before anyone realizes what has happened.

This is why assurances that AI companies can largely police themselves should provide little comfort.

At a White House gathering with technology executives on September 29, Trump praised what he called “tremendous self-policing” by the AI industry and joined major technology companies in announcing a voluntary safety accord emphasizing internal controls, outside audits and corporate oversight.

In other words, Trump wants us to trust the government and the AI sector to police itself.

The Founders knew better than to trust power to police itself. That is one of the central premises of the Constitution.

As James Madison famously observed in Federalist No. 51, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”

The Founders did not assume that those entrusted with power would always restrain themselves. They divided power among competing branches because they understood that good intentions are not a safeguard against tyranny. Neither are voluntary promises. Neither are corporate ethics policies. Neither are algorithms.

Machines are not angels. The corporations building them are not angels. The politicians deploying them are not angels. And artificial intelligence does not repeal the oldest lesson in the history of government: power requires limits because power will always seek to expand.

This is where the campaign to shrink the federal workforce takes on an entirely different significance.

There is nothing inherently wrong with reducing unnecessary government employment, eliminating waste or using technology to make public services work better.

The danger lies in confusing fewer government employees with less government.

A government can have fewer workers and still become vastly more powerful. It can automate surveillance. Automate investigations. Automate eligibility decisions. Automate regulatory enforcement. Automate censorship. Automate watchlists. Automate targeting. Automate punishment.

Indeed, a government freed from the practical limits imposed by manpower could become more pervasive than anything an earlier generation of bureaucrats could have achieved.

That is the paradox confronting us.

We may be building a smaller federal workforce and a larger government machine.

Trump will not be president forever. Neither will the politicians who come after him.

But the AI infrastructure being erected now—the databases, automated systems, surveillance capabilities, digital gateways and government relationships with technology companies—will be inherited by every future administration.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, once those powers become embedded in the machinery of government, they will be exceedingly difficult to dismantle.

That is why the debate over artificial intelligence cannot be reduced to whether AI creates jobs, destroys jobs, saves taxpayer money or makes government more convenient.

The greater question is what happens when fewer and fewer human beings stand between government power and the people subjected to it.

What happens when there is no human face behind the decision? No human judgment. No human hesitation. No human mercy. No human conscience.

No human being willing—or able—to say: this is wrong.

The great danger is not that artificial intelligence will suddenly seize control of the government. It is that government officials will willingly surrender more and more control to artificial intelligence because machines are faster, cheaper, more obedient and easier to blame.

That is how bureaucracy without bureaucrats becomes authoritarianism without accountability.

The government may employ fewer people. It may operate fewer offices. It may eliminate paperwork and automate entire agencies. But if it can watch more people, investigate more people, process more people, target more people and exercise more power over more lives than ever before, that is not smaller government.

It is government without human limits.

The Founders built the Constitution around a simple truth: power cannot be trusted to restrain itself.

That truth does not become obsolete because the machinery of power now runs on artificial intelligence. If anything, it becomes more urgent.

Because once we remove the human beings who can question, resist, object and refuse, we may discover too late that we have not eliminated the bureaucracy at all.

We have eliminated the brakes.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/ai_authoritarianism_a_government_without_constitutional_brakes

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“If Trump can disappear them, he can disappear you.”—Robert Reich

America, you got fooled. Again.

For starters, the war on illegal immigration was never just about illegal immigration.

If you fell for that, chances are you’re still falling for the government’s oldest trick: manufacture a crisis, identify an enemy, frighten the public, declare an emergency, and then use the resulting fear to justify another expansion of government power.

Terrorism. Crime. Drugs. National security. Illegal immigration.

Different threats. Same playbook.

Take a legitimate problem—or inflate it into an existential menace—and suddenly constitutional safeguards become inconveniences, extraordinary powers become necessities, and anyone who questions the government’s methods can be accused of siding with the enemy.

Immigration is a perfect example.

A highly charged issue that pushes all of the knee-jerk, polarizing buttons when it comes to deep-seated fears and prejudices, immigration has been the perfect vehicle for the Trump administration’s political fearmongering and authoritarian power grabs.

Trump has repeatedly described illegal immigration in the language of invasion, criminality and national-security emergency.

Yet a closer look suggests a far more complicated reality.

A 2026 Cato Institute analysis of Census data found that undocumented immigrants were incarcerated at a rate of 674 per 100,000 people in 2024, compared with 1,195 per 100,000 native-born Americans. Legal immigrants had an even lower incarceration rate of 303 per 100,000. Cato concluded that both legal and undocumented immigrants are less crime-prone than native-born Americans.

So, what is the government’s end game?

We’ve been so fixated on the overt cruelty, unapologetic authoritarianism, thuggish brutality, and blatantly unconstitutional abuses of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown that we missed the larger menace taking shape behind it.

While the country fights over who should be allowed in, who should be kicked out, and who can participate in a pay-to-play scheme that benefits the oligarchy, the government continues building the infrastructure of a prison state.

This is the real power grab.

The government is using its so-called war on illegal immigration to normalize something far more dangerous: a system in which due process can be bypassed, people can be detained and moved beyond easy public scrutiny, government agents can wield extraordinary enforcement powers with minimal accountability, and constitutional protections can be treated as optional whenever the government invokes security.

Immigration is the testing ground.

The precedent being established and the tactics being trotted out and normalized are the real danger. Because once the government establishes that it can suspend the Constitution’s safeguards for one disfavored group, there is nothing magical that keeps those powers confined to that group.

We are all at risk.

Be warned: the literal and figurative walls being erected in the name of national security should concern the people already living inside them. The machinery being built to find, track, identify, seize, detain and disappear immigrants can just as easily be redirected toward the population at large.

That is how a police state becomes a prison state.

Immigration enforcement is the dress rehearsal in anticipation of the government’s ultimate muscle flex.

To round people up on the scale envisioned by the administration, the government first has to know who people are. Where they live. Where they work. Where they drive. Who they associate with. What they look like. What databases contain information about them. Where they were yesterday. Where they are today. And where they might be tomorrow.

That requires surveillance. Lots of it.

Biometric databases. Facial recognition. License-plate readers. Flock cameras. Data brokers. Location tracking. Artificial intelligence. Phone extraction tools. Government databases linked to still more government databases.

The Brennan Center for Justice reports that the Department of Homeland Security has committed more than $2.9 billion in recent years to surveillance, data collection and analytics technologies used in the interior of the United States, including more than $1 billion for biometrics. Those systems include tools capable of tracking phones and vehicles, collecting facial and other biometric data, purchasing commercial information and combining records from multiple databases to create detailed profiles on individuals.

Then comes enforcement, masked agents, raids, checkpoints, detention centers, private prisons, transfers, rendition—all wrapped in the reassuring language of public safety and national security.

For now, immigration is the convenient scapegoat to justify the crackdowns and loss of liberty, but the machinery of oppression being assembled does not know how to discriminate and differentiate.

A surveillance camera does not know whether or not you are a citizen. A license-plate reader does not know how you voted. A biometric database does not care why your face is being searched. A location-tracking system does not distinguish between following an undocumented immigrant and following a political protester.

Indeed, the Brennan Center notes that DHS technologies acquired for border security and criminal investigations have capabilities that can be directed at anyone—immigrants, protesters, travelers and other members of the public.

The machinery simply does what it was built to do: find, track, identify, classify, control and, when ordered, detain.

We are watching the infrastructure of a prison state being assembled in plain sight.

Surveillance, however, is only the beginning. The real power comes when the government takes everything it knows about you and acts on it.

Find you. Seize you. Detain you. Move you. Cut you off from the people who might intervene on your behalf. Eventually, make it difficult for anyone outside the system to determine where you are at all.

This is where ICE becomes particularly instructive.

Not because every American is about to be deported, but because ICE demonstrates what government looks like when surveillance, databases, aggressive enforcement, detention and secrecy are fused into a single system.

As historian Timothy Snyder warns, “If you accept that non-citizens have no right to due process, you are accepting that citizens have no right to due process. All the government has to do is claim that you are not a citizen; without due process you have no chance to prove the contrary.”

Once due process ceases to be a non-negotiable right for one disfavored group, it becomes an optional privilege for everyone.

This is the slippery slope that eventually allows the government to make everyone disappear—citizen and immigrant alike—whenever they become inconvenient, or disfavored, or no longer useful to the powers-that-be.

People are already disappearing inside the United States.

Seized without warning, denied due process, and locked up indefinitely in a sprawling network of immigration detention centers, county jails, private prisons, temporary holding facilities and federal facilities, these individuals are being transferred from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, moved hundreds or thousands of miles from family and lawyers, made increasingly difficult to locate—they are being made to disappear.

Their whereabouts are effectively being scrubbed from public view.

On September 15, 2026, ICE stopped publicly listing the locations of many detainees with final removal orders in its online detainee locator.

Immigration attorneys told the Associated Press that clients suddenly vanished from the public system, making it harder to determine whether they had been transferred, remained somewhere in federal custody or were being prepared for removal. ICE defended the change as part of its effort to prioritize deportations of people with final orders.

There can be no understating what is at stake when the government acquires the power to make people disappear from public view.

This is disappearance by bureaucracy.

People disappear first from public view. Then from the practical reach of their lawyers and families. Then, potentially, from the database. Public records no longer reveal where some detainees are. And sometimes the next stop is another country entirely.

For now, it’s immigrants—our fellow workers, friends, family members, members of our communities, people who pay taxes, contribute to the economy, and once helped make America and its economy the envy of the world—who are being rounded up, designated as “unhuman” in order to deny them basic human rights and made to disappear, but they are just the warm-up.

Watch and learn: once these tactics have been refined and mastered, we’ll be the next targets.

The government has been perfecting variations on this machinery for decades.

After 9/11, the United States transported terrorism suspects—some never convicted of crimes—to secret CIA detention facilities beyond the ordinary reach of American courts and public scrutiny. Extraordinary rendition allowed government to outsource detention and interrogation into legal gray zones.

Yet disappearing people has never required sending them overseas.

Consider Homan Square.

For years, the Chicago Police Department operated a facility on the city’s West Side where lawyers and former detainees alleged that people were taken for interrogation before appearing through normal booking channels. Records later obtained by the Guardian documented more than 7,000 arrests associated with Homan Square over roughly eleven years, while documented attorney access was extraordinarily rare.

That danger is becoming harder to dismiss.

In September 2026, Amnesty International released a report alleging extensive human-rights violations in U.S. immigration enforcement. Amnesty alleges that the current mass detention and deportation campaign has subjected migrants, refugees and asylum seekers to a broad range of abuses.

Amnesty has called for ICE to be abolished.

Whatever the remedy, no government agency should be empowered to act lawlessly and make people disappear.

The Trump administration’s latest tactic for discouraging migration into the U.S. and instilling terror in the hearts of immigrants already here is the use of “third-country removals”: sending certain deportees to countries where they are not citizens and may never have lived.

We saw this in the wake of 9/11 under the Bush administration with their use of extraordinary rendition and remote torture sites.

The rationale seemed to be that if you removed someone from the United States, the Constitution wouldn’t follow them.

Indeed, the Trump administration appears to be trying to move faster than the lawyers and courts in an effort to outrun judicial review and the Constitution.

Perhaps the destination is overseas. Perhaps it is another jail. Perhaps it is another prison right here in America. That distinction no longer matters: you do not have to leave the United States to disappear into the machinery of the prison state.

This is precisely why due process matters.

Due process is not a privilege. It is not a legal loophole. And it is not a technicality reserved for people the government considers deserving of special treatment.

Due process is what stands between accusation and punishment, between suspicion and imprisonment, and between government power and individual liberty.

At the heart of that protection is habeas corpus, which translates to “you should have the body.”

Dating back to the Magna Carta of 1215, habeas corpus allows someone imprisoned by the government to challenge that detention in court and demand that the government make the case for why they should be held.

The Founders considered habeas such a fundamental and necessary ingredient in guarding against government tyranny that they included it in Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution. As the Brennan Center explains, habeas “was conceived to guarantee protection from the king arbitrarily disappearing subjects to secret dungeons without just cause or due process.”

Despite what the Trump administration would have us believe, habeas applies equally to citizens and non-citizens alike within the United States.

The act of transporting someone outside the U.S. does not lessen that protection, but it does make it harder to enforce.

History has supplied enough warnings.

Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War resulted in arrests without ordinary judicial process. The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II demonstrated how quickly fear and prejudice can overwhelm constitutional safeguards. The post-9/11 rendition program demonstrated how easily government can try to place human beings beyond the effective reach of American courts.

Homan Square demonstrated that you do not have to leave American soil for that to happen.

And today’s immigration detention system demonstrates how these tactics can merge: masked arrests, county jails, private prisons, remote detention centers, repeated transfers, limited access to attorneys, disappearing locator records, expedited deportations and third-country removals.

Each scenario arose from different circumstances, but each also demonstrates what happens when government insists that extraordinary conditions justify extraordinary powers.

This is why the familiar refrain—if you are here legally, you have nothing to fear—misses the point. So does: if you are an American citizen, you have nothing to fear. And: If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

That is the oldest sales pitch in the police-state playbook: “Just trust us.” “We’re only going after the bad people.”

But inevitably, the definition of “bad people” changes.

In 1935, Sinclair Lewis published It Can’t Happen Here, imagining authoritarian government taking root not in some distant dictatorship but in America.

Those four words capture one of the most dangerous assumptions a free people can make.

It can’t happen here. Not in America. Not to citizens. Not to innocent people.

Not to me.

Perhaps not. Perhaps the government will never put you on a rendition flight to a country you’ve never visited. Perhaps you will never disappear into a detention center. Perhaps masked agents will never come to your door.

But there are other ways for a free people to disappear.

Privacy disappears. Anonymity disappears. The freedom to move about without being tracked disappears. The freedom to associate without creating a digital trail disappears. The freedom to protest without being identified, catalogued and entered into a database disappears. The presumption that government should leave you alone unless it has legitimate cause to investigate you disappears.

Bit by bit, the boundaries separating a free citizen from a prisoner begin to disappear, too.

You are watched. Tracked. Catalogued. Scanned. Recorded. Flagged. Followed.

Your movements become data. Your associations become data. Your face becomes data. Your life becomes searchable.

All that remains is for someone in government to decide what the data means.

This is how “We the People” disappear.

Not necessarily onto rendition flights.

Not necessarily into secret prisons.

We disappear when we cease to live as a people presumed free and begin living instead as inhabitants of a country-sized surveillance state—watched constantly, tracked everywhere, our movements and associations increasingly subject to monitoring, cataloguing and government scrutiny.

That is the larger danger concealed by the immigration debate.

ICE is showing us what the machinery can do.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, eventually the prison built for someone else can become the prison imprisoning all of us.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/first_them_then_us_americas_shift_from_police_state_to_prison_state

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.” ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca

There are certain tenets of thought that occupy the minds of men that are based solely on the idea of ‘authority;’ as in mastery, worship, dominance, and control. The most prevalent venues of these most asinine and absurd ideas are seen in the areas of religion (especially organized) and government, of which I believe to be one and the same. This comment I am sure will bring out emotional disdain from the crowd, but with little analysis, one should be able to connect the two, whether they act independently or as one matters not, as the concept of rule lies deep in the bowels of both.

I must make clear that I am not attempting to belittle anyone’s spiritual beliefs, regardless whether I would agree with them or not, (this same sentiment does not apply to government) as I, nor any other, can prove whether these ‘beliefs’ are valid or false. Attempting to claim such unknown knowledge as fact, is hypocritical to my way of thinking. My position in this matter is that I do not know for certain how or why this world and its inhabitants exist, other than to say that ‘creation’ of one sort or another is evident. As to exactly how that occurred, I simply have no idea, no supporting fact, so I will not attempt to assume to have the wisdom to claim otherwise.

What I do know, is that religion and government both assume to hold false authority over all participants; one to a ‘god’ (or representative figure) of their choosing, through church or sect, while the other to the ‘god’ of rule. Both are steeped in ‘worship’ of one form or another, and since ‘worship’ indicates an abandonment of self, a giving in to a stated ‘authority,’ or a bowing down to a master, whether assumed celestial, human, or both, I disregard it as weakness and a debilitation of independent cognitive function.

I find it most comical that I am writing this essay, as the most taboo subjects to discuss in open forums are religion and politics, and here I am discussing both at the same time, and as one. What horror you say.  This will likely be considered social blasphemy. This is easy for me because I have no skin in the game as it were, as I believe in no rule, no master, no ‘authority,’ no kings, and no bowing down or allegiance to false idols, whether religion or State. I do not consider myself above others, I do not consider myself a ‘god,’ I do not consider holding power over another, and I never consider harming anyone unless due to the need of actual physical self-defense. Therefore, I am not an enemy of man, or a threat to anyone, but just an observer of life and a seeker of knowledge.

At this point in time, fake religious fervor, as practiced by evil politicians, combined with tyrannical government policy, have joined forces in order to achieve the ultimate goal of a fully globalized one world ruling system and religion. This sought after universal rule is made up of regional technates combined into a worldwide technocratic control system, with the major players vying for the highest seats of power in this political wet dream of total controlling, arrogant, narcissistic superiority.

In other words, religion has again become government, and government has become religion, not that elements of this marriage made in hell have not been active at many levels for an eternity. There is little difference today in worship of religion or worship of the State, as can be evidenced by simple observation of behavior. Actually, I would tend to assess this situation as one in which the worship of State (nationalism) is more prevalent than ever, and that the fake political religious element being used is meant to build a more docile collective herd, so as to gain even more mass control over weak-minded populations.

Worshipers and followers you see, are much easier to eliminate, as they will walk off cliffs, walk into fire, sacrifice their lives in heinous wars, and claim ‘country’ as ‘god’ without so much as an even a thought, as they willingly become slaves of ‘masters’ and rule.

Populations here and around the world are accepting of the coming enslavement of mankind, as they acquiesce to AI, biometrics, all-encompassing surveillance, bogus emergency declarations, digitization of everything, hyper-inflation, job loss, and intentional food and energy depletion by the ruling whores. Do not be fooled by all those telling you that the ‘people’ are waking up, as this is pure propaganda and lies. Nothing has changed except the acceleration of totalitarian technocratic policy.

There is a huge difference between waking up and actively participating in the negation and elimination of State, and griping about how “you did not vote for this,’ which is ridiculous rhetorical nonsense. Sitting on your ass on your cell phone, voting for your master, and refusing to accept the truth and then do something about it, is not waking up. Everyone who votes, gets exactly what they deserve and what they voted for, as participation in this evil system, is implied consent to be ruled. That means an acceptance of your own voluntary slavery. The buck stops there, as all who believe in government as ‘god,’ who continue to vote and support these monsters in politics, all those who wave their blood-soaked flags, are the problem, not the solution.

The bottom line here is that showing allegiance, worship, and reverence for religion or government, or both, will only bring sorrow, helplessness, and a loss of self. Individuals solve problems and better themselves, while those around them clinging to collective hordes, (compliant followers) prevent intellect from blossoming, and therefore destroy the efforts of all those who actually desire to be responsible and free.

Religion and government have combined in order to better control all of you. Look around, notice all the relationships between these two major forces of evil, and understand that you are being played. How could anyone with an IQ above 80 think that the evil narcissist Trump, any and all of his cohorts in crime, or Netanyahu and all his genocidal followers, or the Pope and the Vatican, or any who seek rule, and all others in positions of power over the masses; all who work together against you, could ever have any empathy or thought whatsoever for any living thing? These vermin are the worst of mankind, so the elimination of their power and this entire system, are what is necessary in order to begin to gain even a chance of peace and harmony. 

“Those who believe religion and politics aren’t connected don’t understand either.” ~ Mahatma Gandhi

Image: Source [Manually edited meme, ghibli styled using ChatGTP]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/religion-is-government-government-is-religion/

Related:

modernity.news | Jon Fleetwood

U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is soliciting a 10-year pandemic vaccine [bioweapon injection] manufacturing program with a 660-million-dose national planning target, renewing a procurement system established before the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

HHS has also recently announced plans to suspend FOIA and pandemic oversight while continuing vaccine and biodefense contracts.

Which raises questions:

Who stands to profit from the next p[l]andemic?

What safeguards exist against its deliberate orchestration?

Who will investigate potential conflicts of interest and coordination when pandemic vaccine contracting continues while public records access and oversight are suspended?

You can contact HHS here.

Five Documented Findings

1. 2005: HHS established its National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile.

2. 2006–2007: HHS committed approximately $1.27 billion to vaccine manufacturing, adjuvants, and facility upgrades.

3. 2007: HHS established a 600-million-dose production target, with officials projecting that adjuvants could accelerate production capacity to 2008–2009.

4. 2009: H1N1 pandemic occurred, prompting HHS to activate preexisting vaccine contracts. Despite its 600-million-dose planning target, HHS ultimately purchased just over 190 million H1N1 vaccine doses, according to the Government Accountability Office’s 2011 investigation, GAO-11-632.

5. 2026: BARDA solicited contracts lasting up to 2036, specifying a 660-million-dose planning will “likely be required,” with provisions for emerging pathogens and Department of War participation.

6. 2026–20??: ???

SAM.gov lists HHS/BARDA’s 2026 pandemic influenza vaccine solicitation (75A50126R00001) as an active federal contract opportunity, seeking manufacturers for a program with a 660-million-dose national planning requirement and contracts lasting up to 10 years.

HHS/BARDA’s August 17, 2026, solicitation (75A50126R00001) seeks pandemic vaccine manufacturing contracts lasting up to 10 years, citing a national planning requirement of 660 million doses and including provisions for emerging pathogens and Department of War participation.

HHS/BARDA’s August 2026 pandemic vaccine solicitation, Section B.1, page 3, identifies a national planning requirement of 660 million doses and directs contractors to manufacture vaccines against influenza or other viruses with pandemic potential, as required by BARDA.

Forced Inference

Before the 2009 influenza pandemic, HHS planned for 600 million influenza vaccine doses, invested more than $1 billion in pandemic influenza vaccine infrastructure, and activated its contracts when H1N1 emerged.

Seventeen years later, HHS is again planning for an entire nation’s vaccination (660 million doses) before another p[l]andemic they’re confident will soon occur.

How did federal pandemic vaccine procurement become so closely aligned with the timing of a subsequent pandemic in 2009, and why is HHS preparing the same nationwide capacity again in 2026?

Original Article: https://modernity.news/2026/10/13/hhs-locks-in-660-million-pandemic-flu-doses-under-rfk-jr-reviving-pre-2009-system/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Related:

The dangerous UN declaration raises concerns that scientific censorship, lockdowns, and experimental vaccine mandates could be back on the table.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH | substack.com/@nichulscher

On October 12, 2026, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a new pandemic declaration, with 153 countries voting in favor, three against, and two abstaining. The United States, Israel, and Argentina voted against the declaration.

Buried within the nine-page document is a provision that should concern anyone who values scientific freedom, informed consent, and the right to question public-health authorities.

Paragraph 57 explicitly calls for governments to counter vaccine hesitancy as part of broader efforts against health-related “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

The declaration goes even further, explicitly endorsing “infodemic management” and a “whole-of-government, whole-of-society” pandemic response.

This sounds like more scientific censorship, lockdowns, and experimental vaccine mandates.

The sweeping declaration also promotes:

• VACCINES WITHIN 100 DAYS: Scaling up vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic availability within the first 100 days of a pandemic threat, raising concerns about another Operation Warp Speed disaster.
• EXPANDED GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE: Strengthening disease-monitoring networks, early-warning systems, laboratory capacity, and digital health infrastructure, raising concerns about privacy breaches and oversight.
• INTERNATIONAL PATHOGEN SHARING: Promoting rapid sharing of potentially dangerous pathogen materials and genetic sequences across borders, raising concerns about biosafety.
• BILLIONS IN PANDEMIC FUNDING: Highlighting a $15 billion annual preparedness financing gap while encouraging expanded international funding, public-private partnerships, and support for the WHO.
• SUPPORT FOR THE WHO PANDEMIC AGREEMENT: Endorsing further negotiations to finalize the agreement’s pathogen-sharing provisions and facilitate future signature and ratification.

The declaration is non-binding and does not itself authorize censorship, compulsory vaccination, or expanded WHO enforcement powers. However, it establishes a broad international policy agenda that seriously endangers health freedom.

Questioning a vaccine’s safety, effectiveness, necessity, or long-term consequences is not misinformation. It is an essential part of scientific inquiry and informed medical decision-making. The scientific community must remain free to investigate adverse events, challenge regulatory decisions, publish contradictory findings, and question public-health policies without fear of retaliation.

Vaccine hesitancy is NOT misinformation.

Scientific dissent is NOT disinformation.

Questioning public-health authorities is NOT a threat to public health.

No international pandemic framework should undermine those fundamental principles. The Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has already gotten away with the COVID [scam] disaster, and now they’re trying to lock in the same playbook for their next global health emergency.

Original Article: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-153-nations-adopt-un-pandemic

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Donald Jeffries | "I Protest" | donaldjeffries.substack.com

Sometimes I wish I’d never watched the movie The Truman Show. It really made me question the whole nature of our reality. 9/11. Sandy Hook. The Boston Bombing. So many events of the 21st century leave you shaking your head and searching for crisis actors. The narratives are childishly implausible, and nothing really gets resolved.

On September 30, an incident in the cockpit forced a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv to make an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia. Allegedly. I say allegedly because few people seem to believe it really happened. I certainly don’t. Of course, I’m jaded beyond description, having researched so many of these events, without finding the slightest trace of credibility anywhere. Sharp and snappy tweets on X declared that the incident was “faker than the moon landing,” which admittedly was pretty damn fake. We’re supposed to believe that an Israeli plumber was the hero of this story. A Yiddish Todd Beamer. I don’t know how you say “Let’s Roll!” in Hebrew, but that’s basically what he did. Online skeptics- certainly not professional “journalists”- pointed out the inconsistencies in the appearance of the plane’s cabin. Even mainstream outlets discovered that aftermath footage celebrating the non-Irish Flight 93 was actually of Israel’s men’s basketball team, taken in August 2025.

Flydubai Airlines claimed that an “altercation occurred in the flight deck” on FZ1073, forcing crew members to help secure the aircraft and divert it to Saudi Arabia. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reported that the co-pilot stabbed the Indian pilot for unclear reasons, in an attempt to bring the plane down. Presumably, the co-pilot was Indian, too, so an unlikely candidate to be working for Hamas. Which must have been behind this, what with Bibi Baby front and center. Online “conspiracy theorists” called the incident a false flag, and coined it Bibiwood. Bibi Baby was on hand, naturally, to greet courageous plumber Yaniv Hayoun, who had enough dramatic sense to remain in the bloody shirt he wore while grabbing control of the plane, much as stewardess Karen Black did back in one of those Airport films. I haven’t met any non-Irish plumbers in my life, but evidently they have the right stuff. If more of the Chosen chose plumbing as their occupation, it looks like we’d all be better off.

There was also a heroic dentist, in addition to the heroic plumber, who wrestled with the non-heroic co-pilot. I was once a lowly Material Handler back in my blue collar days. Why can’t it ever be a heroic Material Handler? Maybe a file clerk? Cashier? The Indian pilot was hailed as a hero, too, as he managed to open the cockpit door despite being stabbed, saving the lives of all 182 people aboard the flight. “Hollywood isn’t creative enough to come up with stories like this!” said Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, presumably with a straight face. A story in the Associated Press noted that “Although major questions remained unanswered on Thursday about the attacker and his motive, the story of ordinary passengers saving the Flydubai flight from disaster has quickly become the stuff of legend.” That sentence reads like an epitaph for our allegedly free press. Rest assured that those “major questions” will never be answered, by our corrupt government, or the state-controlled media.

Benjamin Netanyahu, taking a break from ordering the genocide of whatever non- non-Irish remain in Gaza, embraced the heroic plumber as only a non-goy can embrace another non-goy. Bibi Baby went so far as to promote the plumber’s business, tweeting, “He can help you too — I highly recommend him!” Bibi even left a 5 star review online. The heroic dentist, Dr. Shota Mutayev, treated the injured captain just like a medical doctor would. Well, if a plumber can land a plane, why can’t a dentist doctor an injured pilot? Musayev thoughtfully took the time to shoot a video of the pilot on the floor, complaining that his head hurt. That sounds just like something a heroic dentist would do, document the scene while letting the patient suffer a bit longer, before rendering aid. In perhaps the most touching scene of all, plumber Hayoun asked Bibi Baby to “Tell Trump that I love him.” It’s hard for Israeli plumbers not to like a guy who has ceded control of the U.S. government to Zionists.

This, of course, got Trumpenstein’s attention. “An Israeli plumber, never flew a plane, was rarely in planes, very rarely flew,” he told reporters. “And he saw what was going on and he heard the screaming…he ripped this guy out of the seat, threw him back, the crowd got him, the passengers got him.” It is unknown who was flying the plane during the time when the heroic plumber had the unidentified co-pilot, whom an Israeli official helpfully declared had “mused about killing Jews online,” in a headlock, before he grabbed the controls himself, drawing on his vast experience watching actors do it on television. To be fair, it’s certainly reasonable speculation that Hayoun is an actor himself, and thus just as qualified to fly a plane as anyone else in show business. The unidentified co-pilot’s “social media accounts [say] clearly that he has been radicalized into jihadist ideology,” the Israeli official told the Times of Israel. Bibi Baby stated that the co-pilot “underwent Islamist radical indoctrination.”

As if all this wasn’t exciting enough, news broke out of Russia that a new “pneumonic plague” was afoot, after attractive young lab worker Daria Shipilova died of undisclosed causes. While the WHO’s initial risk assessment was said to be low, the fear porn is kicking in nonetheless. Is it just me, or is it suspicious that “pneumonic” rhymes with “bubonic,” as in the “bubonic plague” that sounds so terrifying to the average man/woman/they/them. The CDC is said to be “monitoring the situation closely.” While they never produced the “Patient Zero” for the COVID psyop, here we already had the Patient Zero for the Russian Pneumonic Plague. And she just happens to be as attractive as most crisis actors are, if she was in fact a crisis actor. CNN has titled one fear mongering story on the subject, “What we know so far.” Watch out when they say that. Over 200 people are said to have been hospitalized in Russia following the death of the attractive Patient Zero. Well, maybe the hospitals in Russia don’t kill patients as often and easily as the ones in America do. The New York Post called it a “Black Plague,” and insinuated that Vladimir Putin was covering things up.

There was some frenzy online, with users comparing the situation to the early days of COVID. Ah, remember the good old early days of COVID? When they were lying relentlessly about the number and cause of deaths? When they pushed fantasies of Chinese dropping dead in the streets, and spitting on doorknobs to speed up the transmission of the deadly pandemic? An October 4 tweet from former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, best known for crying even more easily than most cucked White males, warned, “This is not a joke. The Russian biological war research should have us all concerned and stopping ALL flight from Russia, and all Russians from entry. The longer this goes on the more countries we will have to stop flight from. FYI: the Russians were working on a plague that is resistant to antibiotics.” Sounds pretty scary. We should go to war with them. Another Republican congressman, Don Bacon, tweeted, “I remember hearing from anti-Ukraine voices about their so-called bio labs. It was Russian disinformation ops at their best. But in reality it is Russia with the bio labs.” Wait a minute, I thought it was the evil Democrats who were pushing the Russia! Russia! Russia! nonsense. This whole Uniparty thing gets so confusing.

Biological warfare author Annie Jacobsen, who I’m going to guess isn’t Irish, warned, “I’ve now been in contact w/current, highest level mil/intel/diplo/homeland security officials in biological threat arena and report w/authority that USG has all eyes on the plague outbreak in Russia and is not letting up.” She closes with some shameless self- promotion, “Read BIOLOGICAL WAR: A SCENARIO. All of them have. Get informed. Stay informed.” Now I’m certainly not above shamelessly self-promoting my own books, but I’m not even close to being a Pulitzer Prize finalist, which Jacobsen informs us she was. In another tweet, the Pulitzer Prize finalist declares, “I suspect that soon the Russian Federation will begin denying this plague outbreak started as a BSL-3 lab accident, and come down hard on those reporting it as such.” Okay, I get it. The dirty Democrats denied that COVID was a lab leak, too. I would counter by pointing out all of you denied that “COVID-19” was a psyop which was never isolated.

Daily Caller reporter Emily Kopp, who “has expressed pride in her Jewish ancestry,” struck an identical tone, tweeting, “Local media in Irkutsk alleges that Russian TV deleted five stories about the pneumonia of unknown etiology case. Early censored reports out of Wuhan were important for investigating COVID's origins. Save everything you read.” The Sunday Times declared, “There are fears this could be another Wuhan.” Except there really wasn’t a “Wuhan” in the sense Republicucks think there was. There was a “Dark Winter” series of table-top exercises, and lots of dire warnings from Chief Eugenicist Bill Gates. Then a nasty strain of flu misrepresented as “COVID-19.” One “Mike (not a) Rothschild,” who is probably not a non-non-Irish, tweeted, “The ‘Putin is saving the world from Ukrainian biolabs’ dudes must be having a confusing day.” Brian Krassenstein (no comment necessary) tweeted, “2019 Trump President=COVID. 2026 Trump President= Plague outbreak.”

Remember the Hantavirus? I wrote about it not that long ago, right here on Substack. It supposedly killed actor Gene Hackman’s wife, and in effect killed him, too, since she died and was unable to care for him. This was the one that comes from having sex with rodents or something. Maybe it was French kissing rodents. Either way, not much of a threat to even the most depressed Incel. Officials warned about the potential dangers of that. Officials warn about the potential dangers of a lot of things. Except their own criminal misbehavior, that is. In 2020, our beloved leaders told us to “Prepare for a disease deadlier than COVID.” The disease was Marburg, a hemorrhagic fever that kills the majority of the people it infects. While no one in America has ever died from Marburg, in December 2020, HHS issued a “Notice of Declaration” in which they stated that “marburgviruses are a threat to the public health security of the American people. requiring vigilance and a continuing need for development of medical countermeasures.” Marburg was known as an African disease, transmitted by bats and monkeys. Is any real or fake “plague” not transmitted by bats and monkeys? And why is Africa the breeding ground for so many of them?

Recently, Russia and China held a cross border emergency simulation on the dangers of infectious diseases. They even specifically mentioned the plague. Think Event 201, which happened just prior to the COVID psyop, and just after Dr. Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, died so conveniently. They’re always holding drills and simulations. To prepare for things that reasonable people wouldn’t expect. That’s why they’re leaders, and we’re mere peasants. Thanks to the nonstop fear porn we’re subjected to, we are continuously anticipating a great calamity. World War III. An asteroid striking Earth. A deadly sun flare. Economic collapse. Shouldn’t we, at some point, look forward to something positive happening? Why can’t the AI we hear so much about work in the coal mines, for instance? Why can’t it do something to make life easier, instead of spying on us in expensive, unnecessary “data centers?” Why are we always on the brink of disaster? Why can’t we experience a new Enlightenment?

How many dubious incidents, widely reported by unquestioning talking heads, will the masses accept before they all start to question them, instead of just the “conspiracy theorists?” Why would anyone accept that there was a real assassination attempt at the last White House Correspondents Dinner? I covered that one in detail right here on Substack. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino assure us that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, but virtually no one in the heartland believes that. Well, maybe what’s left of the MAGA cult. The 25th anniversary of 9/11 showed that too many Americans still actually believe the fairy tale that gave us the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security department. We’ve gone from Jackie Kennedy wearing her blood stained pink suit during LBJ’s sadistic Air Force One swearing in ceremony, to a heroic Israeli plumber wearing his own blood stained shirt while being embraced by the real leader of this country. The Sheeple maintain their loyalty to the lies, no matter how obvious.

I don’t know whether the Flydubai incident occurred or not. However, using pattern recognition and critical thinking skills, and based upon their long history of lying about everything, I think it’s wise to doubt it. I researched some of these highly publicized events, like the Gabby Giffords shooting, the Sandy Hook incident, the Boston Bombing, among others. It doesn’t take long to find the anomalies. Lots of anomalies. Endless anomalies. Witnesses who all act the same uncharacteristic way. Who smile and laugh in the face of horrific tragedy. And who often start instantly pushing for gun control, instead of grieving. Drills that seem to be taking place in close proximity to the events. This goes back to 9/11. Yes, there were drills that took place on 9/11. As in plural. Global Guardian and Vigilant Guardian were only two of them. There was even a fire drill at Boston’s Logan International Airport, where the 19 crazed Arabs, armed with box cutters and plastic knives, hijacked those planes.

Generous helpings of fear porn come before anyone knows if this is going to be just another monkey pox/Ebola panic, or COVID 2.0. I have no idea. As most of you know, I don’t make predictions. I rarely get invited to neighborhood parties, let alone meetings of shadowy elitists. I do instinctively know, however, not to trust certain sources. All television networks. The CDC. The WHO. Bill Gates. Any elected official. Non-Irish posters on X with a history of warning about biological terrorism and the like. Why can’t they let us have a minute’s peace? Isn’t it enough that they are, as always, engaged in a nonsensical war in another far-flung country? Why must they toy with the fears of a stressed out population struggling to make ends meet? Moderna has patented a super new mRNA flu vaccine. What could go wrong? Ask your doctor. Tell your doctor. Don’t question anything except the questioners. They have your best interests at heart. Haven’t they demonstrated that? Sit back, and enjoy the show.

Image: Source [Edited using chatGTP]

Original Article: https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/hoaxes-r-us-flydubai-and-the-russian

Related: