A United passenger who forced a Newark-bound flight to return to Las Vegas over his "hijacking threat" has blamed the incident on alcohol, telling authorities his remarks were drunken banter.
Major U.S. and international airline groups are pushing back against a new Ebola-related travel requirement that will affect millions of people flying into the United States.
Beginning Nov. 3, all passengers on international flights to the U.S. will have to confirm that they have not been in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) during the previous 21 days, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The requirement applies to everyone flying into or connecting through the U.S. — including American citizens, green card holders and airline crew members, the CDC said.
Travelers will have to complete a paper or digital statement before boarding, even if they have never visited the DRC.
Airlines must collect the forms and keep them for at least 42 days after the flight arrives in the U.S., according to the CDC.
Airlines for America (A4A), which represents major carriers including American, Delta, Southwest, United and JetBlue, is asking the CDC to reconsider the requirement and give airlines more time to prepare, according to an Oct. 26 letter provided to Fox News Digital.
The group said it supports the CDC's public health goals but argued that the new requirement is too broad and is being introduced too quickly.
A4A asked the government for a "more proportionate and measured U.S. response" focused more closely on affected areas and travelers who have recently been there.
The group also asked for the Nov. 3 start date to be delayed.
"Changes to check-in systems, digital signatures, station procedures and training cannot readily be completed in the allotted time," A4A wrote.
Dr. Tyler Evans, a California-based infectious disease physician and CEO of Wellness Equity Alliance, told Fox News Digital, "This was a step in the right direction, given the fact that we really do have to take this seriously. We have to ensure that this does not cross borders."
He added, "This is the second-largest outbreak of Ebola in history. So this is very serious."
The International Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents more than 370 airlines around the world, has also asked the CDC to reconsider the requirement, Reuters reported.
"It is unreasonable for the U.S. government to require all airlines serving the U.S. market to modify their procedures to accommodate the collection of attestations from each individual (passenger and crew) flying to the United States in less than two weeks," IATA wrote in a letter, according to Reuters.
A4A is also asking the CDC to exempt airline crew members, arguing that existing aviation documents already contain information about crews and their travel.
The group has requested an exemption for U.S. military passenger charters as well, saying the military already tracks service members' health, safety and whereabouts.
The 21-day period reflects the maximum amount of time it can take for symptoms to appear after exposure.
Anyone who has been in the DRC during that period, including travelers who only passed through an airport there, will not be allowed to board a U.S.-bound flight unless they have a government exemption, the CDC said.
"Some of the initial symptoms would just be flu-like symptoms. You'll have a high-grade fever, you'll feel sort of fatigued," the doctor said.
"[For] people that ... are asymptomatic, being able to screen is a very effective modality to reduce, to prevent or mitigate further transmission," Evans said.
Evans worked on the Ebola response twice in the past, both in West Africa and in the DRC, the two largest outbreaks in history.
"The reality is Ebola is one of the most infectious and has one of the highest case fatality rates of infectious diseases," Evans said.
But Americans often don't view Ebola as being relevant to them, he said. "When it comes to infectious diseases ... microbes don't sort of respect boundaries."
A Azores Airlines vai reforçar as ligações aéreas entre os Açores e o Porto durante o inverno IATA 2026/2027, com aumentos na frequência dos voos e no número de lugares disponíveis, na sequência dos resultados positivos registados na época de verão de 2026.
A companhia aérea registou taxas médias de ocupação de 90% na rota entre Ponta Delgada e o Porto e de cerca de 80% na ligação entre a Terceira e a cidade do Porto, indicadores que demonstram uma procura consistente por estas ligações entre as ilhas e o continente português.
Na rota Ponta Delgada–Porto–Ponta Delgada, a operação passará de 13 para 15 frequências semanais a partir de 25 de outubro, data de início do período de inverno IATA. O aumento de 15,4% face ao inverno de 2025/2026 será acompanhado por um crescimento da capacidade disponibilizada, de 100.516 para 109.912 lugares, mais cerca de 10%.
Também a ligação entre a Terceira e o Porto será reforçada. A oferta aumentará de 23.392 para 29.400 lugares, o que representa um crescimento de 25,7% face ao período homólogo. A operação passará de três para quatro frequências semanais, correspondendo a um aumento de 33,3%.
O reforço da operação deverá prolongar-se para além do inverno. A programação da Azores Airlines para o verão IATA de 2027 prevê um aumento de 3% da capacidade face ao período homólogo de 2026, mantendo a aposta na conectividade entre os Açores e o Porto ao longo de todo o ano.
Segundo a companhia, estes resultados confirmam a importância das ligações ao Porto na sua rede e sustentam a estratégia de acompanhar a procura dos passageiros, reforçando a oferta e contribuindo para a mobilidade entre a Região Autónoma dos Açores e o continente português.
Com o aumento das frequências e dos lugares disponíveis, a Azores Airlines pretende consolidar a operação nas duas rotas e assegurar uma maior capacidade de resposta às necessidades de quem viaja entre os Açores e o Porto.
The era of the standard $99 airline credit card may be fading as American Airlines becomes the latest major carrier to adjust its price tag.
Beginning Jan. 24, 2027, the annual fee for both the Citi/AAdvantage Platinum Select MasterCard and the Citi/AAdvantage Business MasterCard will jump from $99 to $150, according to a company press release.
The adjustment marks the first price hike for the popular Platinum Select consumer card since 2018, signaling a shift in the travel rewards landscape.
To soften the blow of a nearly 52% fee increase, American Airlines, Citi and MasterCard are adding several new travel and lifestyle perks.
Whether those additions make up for the $51 increase will depend largely on how travelers use the card, Nick Ewen, editor-in-chief of The Points Guy, told Fox News Digital.
"You have to look at the real dollar value based on your own travel habits," said Ewen, who is based in Florida.
Cardholders will gain additional ways to earn AAdvantage miles on everyday spending, along with up to $120 toward Global Entry or TSA PreCheck application fees every four years, American Airlines confirmed.
Additionally, a new $100 annual statement credit for in-flight purchases will replace the previous 25% food and beverage discount.
This makes the card significantly more rewarding for travelers, as the credit can be applied toward broad in-flight expenses, including Wi-Fi, which was explicitly excluded under the old discount system.
For someone who regularly spends money aboard American flights or already pays for Global Entry or TSA PreCheck, Ewen said the new credits could help offset the higher annual fee.
"If the answer is yes, you're definitely going to come out ahead," he said of travelers who typically spend up to $100 on in-flight purchases each year.
"If you're only flying American once a year, you may not be able to stomach that additional increased annual fee," he said.
The changes also include adjustments to how cardholders can rack up rewards on everyday purchases, according to the press release.
The personal Platinum Select card will offer three miles per dollar on eligible AAdvantage Hotels and Cars bookings and two miles per dollar on gas and EV charging, select streaming services, and eligible Rides and Rails purchases.
Existing perks — including preferred boarding, no foreign transaction fees and a free first checked bag on domestic American itineraries for the cardholder and up to four companions — will remain intact.
Ewen said the higher fee follows a broader shift among airline rewards cards.
"American is far from the first airline that we've seen this increase in their annual fees," he said, pointing to similar changes from Delta, Southwest and United.
Entry-level airline cards that once hovered around $100 annually are increasingly moving closer to $150, Ewen said.
"This is definitely the norm, although it's not universal across the board," he added.
Over the past few years, the travel rewards market has seen steady fee inflation as issuers pack mid-tier and premium cards with statement credits and subscription services.
Financial institutions are betting consumers will accept higher upfront costs in exchange for tangible, use-it-or-lose-it perks, transforming traditional flight-focused credit cards into broader lifestyle products, according to reports.
The changes drew mixed reactions from cardholders online.
"These inflight credit[s] [are] annoying," the person wrote. "They don't even stock them except for longer flights."
Others were more receptive to the new benefits, with one commenter pointing to the Global Entry or TSA PreCheck credit as a reason the higher fee could be worthwhile.
A hidden problem is surfacing regarding certain pilots' behavior.
More than three in four pilots reported having at least one "microsleep" while operating an aircraft in recent weeks, according to a report by aviation consultancy Baines Simmons based on responses from 7,200 pilots across 32 European countries.
The findings were published by the European Cockpit Association (ECA), which represents over 44,000 pilots across Europe, according to a press release.
The concerns extend beyond brief episodes of sleep in the cockpit. Nearly 39% of pilots said they usually or always did not get enough rest to keep fatigue from building up, according to the report.
The findings also raised questions about whether pilots feel comfortable reporting when they are too tired to fly.
Only 37.2% said they typically report when they are too fatigued to fly, while 24.2% said they do not report it and fly anyway, according to the findings.
"When pilots fear career consequences, fatigue goes unreported, and the risk returns to the cockpit," Capt. Coen George, an ECA board director, said in the press release.
He warned that the reluctance to speak up could leave airlines unaware of how widespread fatigue is among their crews.
In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) implemented stricter pilot rest and duty requirements in 2012 to address fatigue and improve safety, the agency said in a statement to Fox News Digital.
Under the rules, pilots must receive at least 10 consecutive hours of rest before a flight duty period, including an opportunity for eight uninterrupted hours of sleep. Pilots who feel fatigued or unfit to fly must report it and be removed from duty by the airline, according to the FAA.
Pilot fatigue can be particularly challenging when crews work overnight or travel across multiple time zones.
Matthew "Whiz" Buckley, a former U.S. Navy F/A-18 Hornet fighter pilot who later flew for American Airlines and FedEx, previously told Fox News Digital that having scheduled time off does not necessarily mean a pilot gets enough sleep.
"It's just unnatural to sleep during off-hours," Buckley said.
Pilots may arrive at a hotel early in the morning and then have to sleep during the day, while long-haul flights can further disrupt normal sleep patterns, Buckley said.
"Where it really takes a toll on the body for pilots is east-west," he said. "When you're crossing multiple time zones, [that's] when your body can really get messed up."
Buckley also emphasized that pilots ultimately have to assess whether they're rested enough to safely operate an aircraft.
"At the end of the day ... you know who determines if a pilot is fit to fly? You," Buckley said.
Having nearly "77% of respondents [in the new survey] say that they reported micro-sleeping or dozing off while at work is definitely an alarming number, and the industry does need to take note of this," Bobby Laurie, a Pennsylvania-based travel expert and former flight attendant, told Fox News Digital.
"But it's not necessarily a warning sign that the flight that you've been on had a pilot or both pilots asleep."
He said that while there are things the industry can do to "rectify this problem," travelers, too, should take note of a few things.
"If you find yourself at the airport, and the departure board is saying you're delayed due to crew rest … you need to realize that the delay is posted for safety reasons. You might not have gotten to your destination in one piece if those crew members did not get the rest they needed," he said.
Fox News Digital previously reported that rest requirements for flight attendants have faced scrutiny in the U.S.
The FAA recently proposed a nationwide rule that would prevent state and local governments from setting separate meal and rest-break requirements for flight attendants and pilots.
Major flight attendant unions opposed the proposal, arguing that some crew members already work for hours without enough opportunities to eat, drink or use the restroom.
Fox News Digital reached out to Baines Simmons and Flight Safety Foundation for comment.
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby says that, besides flight schedules, Starlink is now the biggest factor for passengers choosing airlines.
Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images
United's CEO thinks Starlink is now the second-most important factor in customers' flight choices.
Scott Kirby said some passengers are flying on regional airlines to guarantee Starlink access.
United's speedy Starlink rollout is the airline's "biggest competitive advantage," Kirby said.
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby believes passengers are more interested in Starlink than ticket prices when picking which airline to fly with.
"I think Starlink, behind the schedule, is the most important thing for customers to choose an airline now," Kirby told the "Cheeky Pint" podcast on Tuesday's episode.
United is leading the way in the US in installing Starlink, the high-speed WiFi service from Elon Musk's SpaceX. The airline was one of the first to sign up in 2024 and has since equipped almost half of its planes with Starlink.
While Starlink is on all United's regional airplanes — those operated under the United Express brand — it is on less than 3% of its wide-body jets that fly long-haul routes, according to the airline's tracking tool.
Some travelers are choosing flights on these smaller regional airplanes to ensure they can access Starlink, Kirby told "Cheeky Pint."
Kirby said that when passengers told him this, his reaction was: "Holy cow!"
He also recalled booking a recent flight and ensuring he wouldn't be in the air when the Milwaukee Brewers were playing, so he could watch the game on TV. "Whereas if I had known for certain that my flight was going to have Starlink, I would have booked it during the game," he added.
American Airlines has also made a deal with Starlink, but it is not due to begin installing the terminals until early next year. Delta Air Lines has instead signed up for Amazon Leo, a similar service due to launch in 2028, which has attracted considerable criticism from Musk.
Although Musk has called for Delta CEO Ed Bastian to be fired, Kirby disagreed. "He's not going to lose his job over it," he said.
However, United is trying to win over Delta customers who might want Starlink. This month, it ran a promotion offering to match travelers' loyalty status on Delta or American, advertising "the fastest WiFi in the sky."
Thousands of customers signed up within two weeks, United said, and status match applications were up 275% compared to before the campaign.
"We're going to get customers that have been loyal to other airlines that try us for Starlink and stay because the technology is better," Kirby told the podcast.
While he called Starlink "the biggest competitive advantage," he also said it won't last forever.
"Everybody eventually is going to have high-speed, low Earth orbit. It's going to be a must-have."
Melissa Phillip/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
United CEO Scott Kirby says that so far he has found AI most useful for vibe coding.
"I can read my calendar. I don't need to summarize my day," he told the "Cheeky Pint" podcast.
Kirby said he had an "epiphany" after vibe-coding a sports-gambling tool.
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby loves gambling, and now he's using AI as an ace up his sleeve.
Speaking on the "Cheeky Pint" podcast, Kirby said that over the past eight months, he's had an "AI epiphany" about the tech's best uses, which was triggered by one of his favorite pastimes — sports betting.
"Summarizing documents and all that crap, I think it's ridiculous," Kirby said. "I can read my calendar. I don't need to summarize my day."
Kirby told "Cheeky Pint" host and Stripe cofounder John Collison that he hired a tutor for three hourlong sessions, then used AI to make a webpage for sports gambling.
"I've always been into gambling. For better or worse," Kirby said.
Between sets in a two-and-a-half-hour gym session, he typed prompts on his iPad to vibe-code a page with "four or five" drop-down menus for different sports, dates, and bets. Kirby said it links to four sportsbooks and pulls up the best odds; then he can enter a dollar amount, and it places the bet for him.
"I could do it with three hours of tutoring on my own, could write a program to do that, was an epiphany for me," Kirby said. "I think I called them on that Saturday, our team, and like, 'We're all in on this.'"
His appetite for risk has helped Kirby make bets on airline strategy that have paid off. For example, when carriers around the world retired their airplanes during the pandemic, United instead ordered hundreds of new jets — buoying the airline when travel demand boomed after lockdowns ended.
The United CEO previously spoke about his love for gambling in an April interview with The Wall Street Journal, where he described being kicked out of casinos for counting cards before he started in the airline industry.
He told "Cheeky Pint" that he went back to Las Vegas when the Super Bowl was held there in 2024.
After setting up a credit line to play poker, he had to hand over his ID.
"It was like 15 years ago that I got barred at the Bellagio last time," he said. "The manager comes over, and he's like, 'Mr. Kirby, you're welcome to play any game in the casino, but just so you know, still no blackjack.'"
I loved almost every minute of my 10-hour Delta One flight to Rome, but the food could be better.
Jamie Sanders
I upgraded my Delta flight from the US to Europe to business class for $900.
The fully-cocooned suite was private, and I loved the amenity kit and lie-flat bed.
I liked the breakfast, but the dinner left much to be desired.
I took my first trip to Italy this year and decided it was finally time to treat myself to international business class — something I've wanted to experience for years but my bank account wouldn't allow.
My roundtrip flight from Los Angeles to Rome cost 100,000 miles plus $75 in fees. It was going to be a long journey, though — three hours to Minneapolis, then another 10 to Rome — so I told myself I'd upgrade to Delta One if the opportunity came for less than $1,000.
Christmas came early: After checking Delta's website almost daily for months, I finally snagged a business-class seat on the second leg to Rome for $900. I squealed with glee and clicked "purchase" faster than you can say "buongiorno."
I have flown Delta One domestically before, but it was my first long-haul flight in Delta's highest-tier cabin, complete with a sliding door. This time, I wanted to find out whether the upgrade lived up to the hefty price tag attached to international premium.
I loved almost every minute — but the food left me wanting more. Here's why the upgrade was still worth the splurge.
I noticed the difference Delta One promised the moment I arrived at the airport.
The entrance to the Delta One lounge.
Jamie Sanders
Even though my first leg wasn't on Delta One, I was still able to access the exclusive check-in and Delta One lounge at Los Angeles International Airport.
It was exactly the luxury I was looking for. I didn't have to bring my own suitcase inside, as a dedicated handler took it out of my Uber and brought it to the counter for me.
After checking in, I was whisked to a private security line with only two people ahead of me. The entire experience took a grand total of two minutes.
The Delta One lounge was relaxing, but the Sky Club was crowded.
The Delta One lounge was impressive, but the Sky Club wasn't relaxing.
Jamie Sanders
The Delta One lounge is reserved exclusively for Delta One passengers, so it's less crowded than Delta's more accessible Sky Club. The Delta One lounge is only available in Los Angeles, New York-JFK, Boston, and Seattle.
The one in Los Angeles is equipped with a range of amenities to enjoy before a long flight, including a full bar, plenty of food, an outdoor lounge, showers, and massage chairs. The chairs are a cool perk, but I didn't find them very soothing in practice; the ones in New York I like better.
There isn't a Delta One lounge in Minneapolis, but I could access the Delta Sky Club. This lounge was quite different — it was so crowded that I could barely find a seat, very loud, and the food options were limited. It wasn't the luxury I experienced before, so I left early for my gate.
The pod was like a mini hotel room.
I loved the Champagne served before takeoff.
Jamie Sanders
The pod was very roomy, with the pièce de résistance being the lie-flat seat. Since I broke my ankle a decade ago, it's always better for me to be able to raise my legs on a long flight, and this was absolutely the way to go.
I appreciated that I could raise the lower portion of the seat while I was eating and then lower it fully into a bed when it was time to sleep.
The amenities mimicked a hotel, and the pre-flight service was top-tier: I enjoyed the small glass of Champagne served before takeoff, which was crisp, light, and refreshing.
The sliding door was game-changing.
Delta One added seats to its newer planes.
Jamie Sanders, Business Insider
After a full day of traveling, I was finally ready to experience the Delta One seat I'd meticulously scored — and it was nothing short of miraculous.
While this wasn't my first time in a Delta One seat, it was my first time in an individual pod with a door, thanks to the plane being one of Delta's newer Airbus A330-900neo aircraft (left photo). Its older Boeing 767s (right photo) and Boeing 757s I've flown on domestically don't have a door in Delta One.
The door was game-changing because it meant I could sleep without being bothered by the people around me. It just needs to be open for takeoff, landing, and meals, but otherwise, you can keep it closed.
The pod's amenities were top-tier.
The Missoni amenity kit.
Jamie Sanders
Inside the pod were multiple amenities to get me through the flight, including a full bottle of water, charging ports, over-ear headphones, and a Missoni-branded pouch packed with flight essentials like comfy socks, an eye mask, hand cream, lip balm, a toothbrush and miniature Marvis toothpaste, and a pack of eye patches.
There was also a pouch with a pillow, comforter, and mattress pad to attach to the seat when it was time to sleep.
Speaking of sleep, wow, did I sleep.
I liked the sleepware and linens provided.
Jamie Sanders
I am a famously bad sleeper, but once I lay down in my pod and shut the door, it was lights out. I slept for a solid seven hours and woke up very rested and ready to experience my first day in Rome, which I know I wouldn't have been able to do in economy class.
For me, the opportunity to truly get a full night's rest, especially with a 17-hour travel day and nine-hour time difference, was game-changing.
There were plenty of TV and movie options.
I liked the sleepware and linens provided.
Jamie Sanders
I wasn't expecting to use the in-flight entertainment system much, since I wanted to spend the majority of my 10 hours asleep. But since the meal took a while to arrive, I watched Dreamgirls to pass the time.
The TV was large, built into the seat, and could be controlled either directly from the TV or via a remote. There were hundreds of movies and TV shows to choose from.
The inflight meal left me wanting more.
The beef dish, salad, shrimp, and tomato bisque.
Jamie Sanders
While I appreciated the opportunity to select my inflight meal a few days before takeoff, I wasn't overly impressed by any of the options. I chose the salmon, but it was dry and overcooked.
I did like the shrimp appetizer and the tomato bisque, but I didn't feel like I had enough to eat overall since the main course wasn't appetizing. To be honest, it was actually worse than the meal I got in Delta Comfort on the way back, which was surprising.
Additionally, due to significant turbulence, the service was delayed. I had selected the coursed-out option rather than having everything brought out at once, but the flight attendants couldn't do that safely. There's not much you can do about the weather.
However, a choose-your-own-adventure ice cream cart was brought out right after the meal, and I loved that. I went for vanilla ice cream with nuts and cherry compote, which was delightful.
The breakfast was much better.
The breakfast was tasty and filling.
Jamie Sanders
Thankfully, the breakfast was much better and helped fill me up before I landed. I chose Belgian waffles, which came with a croissant and yogurt with granola and fruit, and gobbled up every single bite.
I landed and felt ready to go without needing any rest or recovery.
Despite the food, I loved the flight.
Jamie Sanders
Even though I had been traveling for close to 20 hours by the time I reached my hotel in Rome, this experience actually left me feeling revived and rejuvenated. This was the first transatlantic flight I've taken where I didn't need to take a nap as soon as I arrived.
Since I was only in Rome for a day and a half, I was able to go out and explore right after I dropped off my bags and took a quick shower, and make it to my reservation at one of the World's 50 Best bars that evening.
Was it worth the $900 upgrade?
I would book Delta One again if the price is right.
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images
For me, absolutely. I know $900 isn't cheap, but since I originally used miles and this was the full cost of my flights to and from Rome, it was well worth it.
I had a dedicated check-in counter and security line, access to two lounges, meals (albeit some better than others), and a lie-flat seat in a pod with a closing door for a 10-hour flight.
I will say, though, that while I love Delta One, I wouldn't have paid the full price for this experience, which was about $4,000 one way — my fare limit for an experience like this taps out around $1,500.
I guess that means I'll stick to my upgrade strategy: meticulously checking for offers and crossing my fingers that another affordable one comes along.
On Tulum airport’s runway there is only one plane: a Viva Aerobus Airbus A320. For several hours that is the only aircraft that will remain at the air terminal inaugurated in 2023. The aerodrome is nearly empty after Aeroméxico, Volaris, and American Airlines announced the cancellation of most of their routes to this destination on the Mexican Caribbean. The loneliness in the terminal is unsettling and, in the distance, all that can be heard is the echo of children playing. The crisis caused by the collapse in tourism, in what was once the jewel of the Riviera Maya, has deepened over the past year and has begun to touch various sectors that had set their sights on the booming future of this municipality in the state of Quintana Roo.
EasyJet's Starlink deal is a potential edge over Ryanair, Europe's dominant budget airline.
Horacio Villalobos#Corbis/Getty Images
EasyJet announced a deal with Starlink on Monday.
It means two of Europe's three major budget airlines have now signed up for Elon Musk's service.
The move puts pressure on budget titan Ryanair after its CEO feuded with Musk over Starlink.
Elon Musk's Starlink has won its latest customer, a budget airline that could put pressure on one of the WiFi service's biggest critics.
EasyJet announced on Monday that the high-speed WiFi service would be deployed on its airplanes from the first half of next year. The British airline, which carries 100 million passengers a year, hopes to have Starlink installed across its 300-strong fleet by early 2028.
Wizz Air, a Hungarian carrier that flies about 70 million passengers a year, signed up in June.
That leaves Ryanair, the continent's largest airline and the world's third-largest, as the only one of Europe's biggest budget carriers without the service.
Its CEO, Michael O'Leary, is well-known for being outspoken and took aim at Starlink earlier this year, leading to a spat with Musk.
"We don't think our passengers are willing to pay for WiFi for an average one-hour flight," O'Leary told Reuters in January.
While Starlink is typically offered free to passengers, O'Leary also complained about increased fuel costs due to the aerodynamic drag of a Starlink terminal, installed on the top of airplanes.
Musk responded in an X post, arguing that Ryanair — which carries over 200 million passengers a year — would lose customers to airlines that do have internet access.
Over the next week, the two CEOs called each other idiots while Musk called for O'Leary to be fired and joked about purchasing the airline.
But Ryanair appeared to have the last laugh, using the publicity to launch a "Big 'Idiot' Sale" with 100,000 tickets starting at £16.99, or about $23.
The situation has some parallels with the US's Big Three airlines. While United Airlines has Starlink on almost half of its fleet and American Airlines is starting installations early next year, Delta Air Lines has instead tapped Amazon Leo, beginning in 2028.
This has led Musk to insult Delta's CEO, Ed Bastian, and call for his firing.
But American passengers are wealthier and more interested in premium offerings than their European counterparts. That trend has also prompted US budget airlines to offer comfier seats and package deals.
Adding free amenities for passengers is at odds with the typical no-frills budget-airline business model that relies on extra charges to turn a profit.
However, easyJet and Wizz may see Starlink as a way to gain an edge over Ryanair.
That may not last forever, though. In a January earnings call, O'Leary said, "I think as the WiFi technology improves over the next four or five years, we'll all be offering free WiFi access."
By portraying Chinese characters as perpetrators of ruthless violence while casting Japanese Self-Defense Forces (SDF) intelligence operatives as defenders, the season 2 of the Japanese drama Vivant has recently drawn criticism from Chinese netizens, who argue that its depiction turns historical reality on its head while ignoring Japan’s wartime atrocities.
The TBS drama series – a spy suspense story in which an alleged unofficial intelligence unit of the SDF operates across the globe — has attracted a passionate fanbase. Its currently airing season 2 opened with a household rating of 18.8 percent, the highest for a TV drama this year, according toa commentary article by Japanese media Toyo Keizai.
What draws attention is the portrayal of the enemies in the series, the article noted. Scenes in which the Chinese organization subjects kidnapped members of the SDF unit to brutal torture are repeated with unrelenting intensity.
It is rare for Japanese TV dramas to explicitly portray a real-life country as the enemy, the article noted.
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi also made a reference to the drama, saying that she has been recording Vivant and hopes to binge-watch it over the year-end and New Year holidays, according to Japanese media outlets.
China’s CCTV News report on Sunday revealed that the drama features scenes in which Chinese personnel cut off the fingers of and stab Japanese intelligence operatives in the abdomen. Such acts bear striking similarities to the torture inflicted on Chinese nationals by invading Japanese troops during the World War II.
The drama distorts the truth by attributing these atrocities to modern Chinese characters. Beneath the surface, it subtly glorifies Japan’s cross-border overseas operations, blurs the functional boundaries of the SDF and implicitly promotes an expansionist narrative, per CCTV News.
Following the report, the topic “Japanese drama Vivant smears China” quickly became a trending topic on Chinese social media.
One Chinese netizen Luoxuchen noted that while previous content avoided sensitive topics by setting the story in a fictional country, this season directly names China, signaling that anti-China narratives in Japanese cultural entertainment have shed their disguise and become open.
Some netizens pointed out that Japan’s acts of distorting history are commonplace. “This is a familiar tactic of Japan, and vigilance must never be relaxed.”
The drama has even drawn criticism from some Japanese netizens. One netizen and history scholar @mas_yamazaki said that while the drama explicitly names “China,” it portrays Chinese people as “cruel,” “stupid” and “incompetent,” shows viewers weekly scenes of Japanese people being brutally tortured, and then coolly depicts SDF members slaughtering dozens of the “evil Chinese.”
“TBS broadcast this kind of drama in 2026, with major companies such as Japan Airlines as sponsors. The country is sick,” the netizen said.
“I’m quietly intrigued by the process of how content like this gets approved within the framework of commercial broadcasting,” another Japanese netizen @kyou_kore_mite wrote.
In the 2026 defense white paper released in August, Japan smeared and accused China, hyped up the “China threat,” while continuously accelerating its remilitarization.
China has already repeatedly urged Japan to reflect on its historical crimes, earnestly draw lessons from history, stop making excuses for its military buildup, and not go further down the wrong path, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian during a press conference.
In some first-class cabins, travelers can enjoy private suites with double beds and food by Michelin-starred chefs. Other airlines offer spacious pods with multiple seating options and headrests with built-in speakers.
Between September 2025 and August 2026, travelers from over 100 nationalities filled out an airline passenger satisfaction survey conducted by Skytrax, an aviation rating company, to determine the best airlines to fly first class.
Here are the winning first-class carriers in Skytrax's 2026 World Airline Awards.
10. Qatar Airways
Qatar Airways' Airbus A380 first class.
Bloomberg/Getty Images
Qatar Airways made the top 10 of Skytrax's ranking with amenities such as an à la carte menu, Diptyque amenity kits, and loungewear from The White Company.
9. Qantas Airways
Qantas
First-class travelers on Qantas can enjoy perks like armchair seating with in-seat massages and a self-service bar and lounge.
8. ANA (All Nippon Airways)
First class on ANA All Nippon Airways.
David Slotnick/Business Insider
First class on ANA includes sliding doors, lie-flat seats, and lavish meals featuring items such as sashimi, wagyu beef, and miso soup.
In a 2023 press release unveiling Lufthansa's new first-class suites, Lufthansa Airlines CEO Jens Ritter said that the design "conveys the feeling of privacy and individuality similar to a hotel room." Skytrax named Lufthansa the third-best airline to fly first-class.
2. Singapore Airlines
Singapore Airlines' Airbus A380 first-class.
ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP via Getty Images
Singapore Airlines' first-class suites are spacious enough for a bed plus a reclining chair, and two suites can be combined into a double for two people. It's the runner-up in Skytrax's ranking of the best first-class airlines.
1. Air France
Air France plans to unveil a new first-class cabin in late 2024.
STR/AFP via Getty Images
Skytrax named Air France, whose first-class cabins offer a nearly 38-square-foot La Première suite and food created by Michelin-starred chefs, the best airline for first-class travel.