Collins says certain Canadian goods now tariff-exempt


Before I walked into Milwaukee County Stadium in 1982, I had never been to a professional sporting event. I was 9 years old, and I can vividly recall being overwhelmed by the lights and the number of people there. The first-place Milwaukee Brewers were playing the Oakland A’s, and Rickey Henderson tied the record for most stolen bases in a season. The Brewers would go on to play in the World Series that year, losing to the St. Louis Cardinals in an epic seven-game series, and even though we didn’t get to celebrate a championship, I imagined a full life of cheering on a winning team.
It was the last time the Brewers would make the playoffs for 26 years. During that time, I grew hardened, believing I would die before I ever saw the Brewers return to the World Series. Bad personnel moves and a payroll that couldn’t match the league’s top-tier teams made winning seem like mere folly. Fans showed up at the games to cheer on the racing sausages more than the actual players on the field.
Yet when the Brewers and Tampa Bay Rays open the World Series on Friday, both teams’ highest-paid players will earn salaries rivaling the price of the animatronic bird that Kelly Clarkson so desperately desired. Neither franchise spends like a superpower. Neither plays in a media capital. And neither got here by doing what most of baseball has decided is the only way to win.
It would be tempting to cast these two teams as rebels against the analytics nerds, a pair of stubborn traditionalists sticking it to the spreadsheet. It would also be wrong.
The Brewers won a franchise-record 103 games, then swept the two-time defending champion Los Angeles Dodgers — a hedge fund masquerading as a baseball team — in the National League Championship Series. Milwaukee is making its first World Series appearance since 1982. The Rays, meanwhile, went 98-64 for the best record in the American League. They did it on a payroll that ranks 25th in baseball and in what is arguably the sport’s toughest division.
It would be tempting to cast these two teams as rebels against the analytics nerds, a pair of stubborn traditionalists sticking it to the spreadsheet. It would also be wrong. The Rays are perhaps the most analytically obsessive organization in professional sports. They treat roster construction the way a quant treats arbitrage. The Brewers’ pitching staff finished second in baseball in strikeouts, because Milwaukee believes in velocity and spin rate as devoutly as anyone in Silicon Valley believes in disruption. Nobody here is burning copies of “Moneyball.”
What these teams have figured out is subtler and more interesting. Analytics is a tool, not a philosophy. And the data, read honestly, keeps pointing back to things your Little League coach told you for free.
Look at how they score. Milwaukee and Tampa Bay finished first and second in the league in batting average. Both were top five in stolen bases. Both were top seven in ERA. The Brewers were tied for second-to-last in home runs, yet they finished second in all of baseball in runs scored. That last fact should be impossible in the modern game, where the prevailing theory holds that you swing as hard as you can, accept the strikeouts and wait for the three-run homer. Milwaukee kept putting the ball in play, taking the extra base and making the defense prove it could make a throw.
This is the real lesson of “Moneyball,” which was never entirely about on-base percentage. It was about finding what the market undervalues. In 2002, that was walks. In 2026, after a generation of front offices poured money into training hitters to focus on exit velocity and launch angles, the undervalued asset turns out to be the player who makes contact. Or the one who can play three positions. Or who goes first-to-third on a single. When every team bids up the same skill, the bargain bin overflows with fundamentals.
Call it situational hitting, tight defense and multidimensional players. Not long ago, that was just called “baseball.” It is also, not incidentally, more fun to watch. A ball in play is a play. A strikeout, a walk or a solo homer is an event the other eight fielders watch like spectators.
Contrast this with the New York Yankees, who have spent roughly the GDP of Lithuania assembling a lineup of lumbering sluggers. Their approach is built on the assumption that baseball is a home run derby with occasional defensive interruptions. It produces impressive highlight reels and October collapses in roughly equal measure.
Call it situational hitting, tight defense and multidimensional players. Not long ago, that was just called “baseball.” It is also, not incidentally, more fun to watch.
A lesson here extends well beyond the diamond. American institutions have spent the last decade optimizing for the home run. In politics, the cable news haymaker, the floor speech engineered for clips, the fundraising email written in all caps are all big swings meant to circumvent the actual work of legislating. Both parties have come to treat governing as something staffers do between appearances: passing a budget on time, staffing an agency competently and filling the potholes are the sacrifice bunts of public life. Nobody makes a highlight package out of them, and so nobody gets paid to do them.
But the scoreboard does not care about the highlight package. Teams that strike out 1,600 times a year still lose in October to pitchers who can deliciously locate pitches on the corners. And governments that specialize in outrage still find, eventually, that outrage does not deliver the mail. Competence is unglamorous until it becomes the only thing that matters.
The Brewers and Rays have shown that you can use every modern tool available and still respect what the old tools were for. Data told them where the inefficiencies were. Discipline let them exploit those inefficiencies. That combination is rarer than it should be, in baseball and everywhere else.
So whichever team wins, the 2026 World Series will crown a franchise that refused to confuse flash with substance. In a culture that increasingly prefers entertainment to competence, that alone qualifies as a revolutionary act, even if it looks a lot like the game your grandfather used to watch.
The post Why the Brewers-Rays World Series matchup is a revolution for Major League Baseball appeared first on MS NOW.
On Wednesday, the documentary “Afternoon Echoes,” directed by Cuban filmmaker Lourdes de los Santos, was presented at the Yara Cinema in Havana as part of the activities organized during Cuban Culture Week.
RELATED:
Cuba Backs Writer María Elena Llana’s Candidacy for the 2026 Cervantes Prize
The film explores the history and significance of the ballet “Afternoon Echoes,” created by choreographer Alberto Mendez in 1973 and considered one of the most important pieces in the repertoire of the National Ballet of Cuba (BNC).
It shows the links between dance, painting, and cinema, taking as a reference point the influence attributed to the painting “The Noon,” by Cuban painter Guillermo Collazo, on the conception of the choreographic work.
According to its director, the documentary constitutes a tribute to generations of dancers, choreographers, and artists who contributed to the formation and consolidation of the Cuban School of Ballet.
El Ballet Contemporáneo de Camagüey, en el marco de la Jornada por la Cultura Cubana, presentó la Peña “Escape”, la cual es una ventana de creación donde los bailarines, reafirman que la entrega artística va más allá de cualquier obstáculo. #PorCamagüeyTodo#CubaEsCultura pic.twitter.com/XMm52u12xz
— Osva Beta (@OsvaBeta) October 17, 2026
The text reads, “The Camaguey Contemporary Ballet, within the framework of the Cuban Culture Week, presented the ‘Escape’ event, which is a window of creation where the dancers reaffirm that artistic dedication goes beyond any obstacle.”
The production also highlights the historic collaborative relationship between the BNC and the Cuban Institute of Cinematographic Art and Industry (ICAIC), reflected in numerous audiovisual works dedicated to dance.
Among the central elements of the narrative are the testimonies of prominent figures associated with ballet, including Maria Elena Llorente, one of the most renowned performers of “Afternoon Echoes,” to whose memory the documentary is dedicated.
ICAIC president Alexis Triana emphasized that this production inaugurates a new line of work within the institution’s Documentary Department, focused on exploring topics related to Cuban culture and history.
#FromTheSouth News Bits | In Cuba, over a million students return to school, marking an achievement for the nation's education system amid ongoing United States aggression. pic.twitter.com/oMCCt8jRPD
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) September 4, 2026
teleSUR: JP
Source: Prensa Latina

Getty Images
Similar to the US Senate, members of the House of Representatives do not need to be natural-born citizens in order to take office.
In fact, the only members of government who do are the president and vice president.
The House of Representatives, one of the two chambers of Congress alongside the Senate, has 435 voting members. They represent congressional districts allocated among the states based on population and serve two-year terms with no term limits.
To qualify as a US House representative, a person must be:
Many current House members were US citizens at birth despite being born in another country — for instance, because they were born to American parents working in government positions abroad.
Here are the 26 active House representatives born outside the US.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: Vermont
District: At Large
Place of birth: Germany
Balint has served in Congress since 2023. She was born in Germany while her father was serving in the US armed forces, making her a US citizen at birth.

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
State: Virginia
District: 08
Place of birth: Free Territory of Trieste (now Italy)
Beyer has served in Congress since 2015. He was born to a US Army officer, making him a citizen at birth.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
State: California
District: 24
Place of birth: Mexico
Carbajal has served in Congress since 2017. He emigrated from Mexico at age 5 and became a naturalized citizen in 1990.

Bloomberg/Getty Images
State: Illinois
District: 06
Place of birth: Ireland
Casten has served in Congress since 2019. He was born to American parents, making him a US citizen at birth.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images
State: Arizona
District: 06
Place of birth: Mexico
Ciscomani has served in Congress since 2023. He moved to Arizona when he was 11 and became a naturalized citizen in 2006.

Michael A. McCoy/Getty Images
State: Georgia
District: 09
Place of birth: Canada
Clyde has served in Congress since 2021. He was born to American parents, making him a US citizen at birth.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images
State: Texas
District: 02
Place of birth: Scotland
Crenshaw has served in Congress since 2019. He was born to American parents, making him a US citizen at birth.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
State: Kansas
District: 03
Place of birth: Germany
Davids has served in Congress since 2019. She was born in Germany to a mother who served 20 years in the US Army, making her a US citizen at birth.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images
State: Colorado
District: 01
Place of birth: Japan
DeGette has served in Congress since 1997. She was born in Japan while her father served in the US armed forces, making her a US citizen at birth.

Bloomberg/Getty Images
State: New York
District: 13
Place of birth: Dominican Republic
Espaillat has served in Congress since 2017. He came to the US as a child and became a naturalized US citizen in the early 1980s. Espaillat is the first formerly undocumented member of Congress.

Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
State: Illinois
District: 04
Place of birth: Mexico
García has served in Congress since 2019. He emigrated to Illinois in 1965 and became a US citizen in 1977.

Bloomberg/Getty Images
State: California
District: 42
Place of birth: Peru
Garcia has served in Congress since 2023. He emigrated to the US when he was a young child and became a naturalized citizen in his early 20s.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: Florida
District: 28
Place of birth: Cuba
Gimenez has served in Congress since 2021. His family emigrated to Miami in 1960, and he became a US citizen in 1976.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: Connecticut
District: 04
Place of birth: Peru
Himes has served in Congress since 2009. He was born to American parents, making him a US citizen at birth.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: Washington
District: 07
Place of birth: India
Jayapal has served in Congress since 2017. She emigrated from India at age 16 in 1982 and became a naturalized citizen in 2000.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: California
District: 40
Place of birth: South Korea
Kim has served in Congress since 2021. She emigrated to the US at age 12 and later became a naturalized US citizen.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images
State: Illinois
District: 08
Place of birth: India
Krishnamoorthi has served in Congress since 2017. The exact year of his naturalization is not in the public record, but he moved to the US with his family as a child.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images
State: California
District: 36
Place of birth: Taiwan
Lieu has served in Congress since 2015. The exact year of his naturalization is not in the public record, but he moved to the US with his family as a child.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images
State: Minnesota
District: 05
Place of birth: Somalia
Omar has served in Congress since 2019. She was naturalized in 2000, five years after arriving in the US from Kenya, where her family had lived in a refugee camp after fleeing Somalia.

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
State: North Carolina
District: 07
Place of birth: Germany
Rouzer has served in Congress since 2015. He was born at Landstuhl Army Medical Center in Germany, where his father was stationed, making him a US citizen at birth.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
State: California
District: 25
Place of birth: Mexico
Ruiz has served in Congress since 2013. He was born in Mexico and raised in Coachella, California, after his aunt and uncle adopted him as a baby. He is a naturalized US citizen.

Win McNamee/Getty Images
State: Indiana
District: 05
Place of birth: Ukraine
Spartz has served in Congress since 2021. She arrived in the US in 2000 and became a US citizen in 2006.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
State: Washington
District: 10
Place of birth: South Korea
Strickland has served in Congress since 2021. She was born to an American serviceman father and Korean mother, making her a US citizen at birth.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images
State: Michigan
District: 13
Place of birth: India
Thanedar has served in Congress since 2023. He was naturalized in 1988 after emigrating from India a decade earlier.

Will Lester/MediaNews Group/Inland Valley Daily Bulletin via Getty Images
State: California
District: 35
Place of birth: Guatemala
Torres has served in Congress since 2015. She emigrated to the US as a young child in the early 1970s and became a naturalized citizen in 1992.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
State: Virginia
District: 07
Place of birth: Ukraine
Vindman has served in Congress since 2025. The exact year of his naturalization is not in the public record, but he moved to the US with his family as a child.
Portugal is launching a new €35 million support scheme aimed at bringing 200 young farmers into the sector, Agriculture Minister José Manuel Fernandes has announced. Speaking at the first Young
The post €35 million fund aims to bring 200 young farmers into Portuguese agriculture appeared first on Portugal Resident.
Fjord is a movie about having your children taken by the state. The tone is calm, clinical, measured, and by the books. No violence is depicted on screen. People rarely even raise their voices. Everything unfolds in the distant and impersonal style of bureaucratic procedure.
But the movie, which won the Palme d'Or at this year's Cannes Film Festival, is utterly enraging, a fierce, ferocious, gut-punch of a film. It's a haunting portrait of the consequences of unchecked state power, especially the kind that purports to be for one's own good.
Much of the film's power comes from the fact that it simply depicts what happens when a person, or a family, comes under suspicion by the state. There's no commentary, no lecturing, no big speech at the end. Instead, writer-director Cristian Mungiu, a Romanian filmmaker whose sympathies are clearly with the family, simply shows us, unblinking, what it's like to lose one's rights and freedoms at the hands of a bureaucracy that respects no power and no authority but its own.
When the film begins, the Gheorghiu family—a mother (Renate Reinsve), father (Sebastian Stan), and their five children—moves from Romania to a small town in Norway. Soon, school authorities notice the children have bruises. We in the audience know the bruises weren't caused by the parents, but the children, who don't speak Norwegian, give conflicting statements. After being brought in for questioning by the police, the father admits to sometimes spanking or lightly slapping his children on the behind, for correction. In order to go free, he's required to sign a statement that contorts his words, making his admission of spanking sound like something more sinister and violent.
He's also a conservative Christian, which has caused some social tension: He's played Christian music, without singing the lyrics, on a piano at school, a no-no in a state that strictly curbs proselytizing. School officials are concerned that he requires his children to pray and study the Bible; the children aren't allowed to play video games or watch YouTube. One of his children spoke out against homosexuality in school during a session on gender. There's suspicion among the teachers and administrators that he might be indoctrinating his kids.
So the school authorities alert Child Protection, Norway's powerful family bureaucracy. They remove the kids, including a breastfeeding baby, from their parents' custody and place them in three separate foster homes. At first the parents are allowed no visitation, and they are not told where the children are located.
Then they go to court, initially for a civil trial, but with a criminal trial for child abuse looming in the background. As the legal process proceeds, they are told repeatedly that essentially anything they do to fight for their children will make the outcome worse. The state wants compliance and admission that they wrongly abused their kids. But if they admit to abusing their kids, doesn't that give the state evidence they are unfit to parent? Doesn't that make the criminal trial more likely to go against them? As their own, mostly sympathetic lawyer, informs the two parents, "Frankly unless you convince them that you understand and regret it, the risk of you going to prison is considerable."
Later, at the trial, a representative from Child Protection calmly says there's no reason to believe children might be better off with their biological parents, noting the family's restrictions on video games, internet, and YouTube. In their view, the state knows what's best for the kids; the culturally backward, religious conservative parents do not. It's not for nothing that one character, a conservative political figure from Romania who has come to help publicize the situation, analogizes the power of Child Protection to the power of the Soviet state.
Part of what makes Fjord so effective is its lack of sermonizing. You don't have to be a trad, a conservative, a family values evangelical, to see that what's happening to the Gheorghiu family is simply wrong. They are railroaded by an imperious bureaucratic state that distorts reality to turn them into villains, with the goal of separating children from their parents and each other. Who are the real child abusers here?
The story is fictionalized, but not hypothetical. Fjord is based on the true story of the Bodnariu family, conservative Romanian immigrants whose five children were taken from them by the Norwegian state in the 2010s on similarly flimsy justifications. The family eventually left Norway. After watching Fjord, it isn't hard to see why.
The post Family Separation Drama <i>Fjord</i> Is a Haunting Depiction of Unchecked State Power appeared first on Reason Magazine.
New World Orchestra’s musicians are shocked at French police targeting peaceful gathering with teargas
As riot police encircled Place de la République last week, lobbing teargas canisters to disperse demonstrators, the conductor Étienne Jarrier and his orchestra played on. They kept playing even after everyone else had disappeared and teargas was being fired into the central Paris square.
It was only when Jarrier noticed his musicians were being directly targeted that he ordered them to stop. “There were teargas canisters landing in the double bass and music stand cases, and starting fires the musicians had to stamp out,” he told the Guardian.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Sipa US/Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

© Photograph: Sipa US/Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

© Photograph: Sipa US/Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.
Show features live chat sessions with breeders, a podcast and updates on dogs’ progress from birth to weigh-ins
A 24-hour Finnish TV show dedicated entirely to the live progress of a dog and her six newborn puppies is drawing millions of viewers.
As well as a 24-hour webcam, Pentulive (Puppy Live) includes live evening chat sessions with the dogs’ breeder, a podcast and an instant notification service that updates followers on the puppies’ progress – from their birth to weigh-ins and first nail trims – for eight weeks.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Julia Kiiskinen/Yle - The Finnish Broadcasting Company/AP

© Photograph: Julia Kiiskinen/Yle - The Finnish Broadcasting Company/AP

© Photograph: Julia Kiiskinen/Yle - The Finnish Broadcasting Company/AP

JC Olivera/Getty Images
Something unusual is happening right now: a documentary is drawing crowds to theaters at a level rarely seen for the genre.
The Elizabeth Holmes documentary "You Can See Everything," directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, grossed $15.6 million in the US and Canada during its opening weekend in October.
That makes it the second-biggest theatrical docufilm debut ever, behind director Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," which saw a nearly $24 million opening in 2004. "You Can See Everything" was filmed in the month before Holmes reported to prison in May 2023 after she was convicted of defrauding investors in connection with her now-defunct blood-testing company, Theranos.
Theatrical documentary premieres have become rarer since the streaming era began, as the genre has found a major audience on streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu. Besides the new Holmes docufilm, only two others on the list were from this decade: "Melania" debuted to $7.1 million in January 2026, and "After Death," a documentary about near-death experiences, opened to $5 million in 2023.
Still, theatrical docufilms were once a cultural force, especially in the 2000s and 2010s, when a wave of nature-, political-, and celebrity-focused ones premiered in theaters to much fanfare.
Here are the 25 highest-grossing traditional documentary film openings at the box office, using data from Box Office Mojo. Several hit concert docufilms, like "Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour" and "Justin Bieber: Never Say Never," earned more but were omitted from this list to focus on traditional nonfiction documentaries.

Theo Wargo/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $1,265,572
Directed by Kevin Macdonald, "Whitney" chronicles the life and career of singer Whitney Houston.
The documentary uses archival footage and interviews with people close to Houston to explore her rise to fame, personal struggles, and her death in 2012.

Ron Galella, Ltd./Ron Galella Collection via Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $1,412,213
The documentary, directed by Andrew Solt, looks back on John Lennon’s life and career through archival footage, home movies, interviews, and recordings.
It covers Lennon's time with the Beatles, his solo work, and his relationship with Yoko Ono.

Vinnie Zuffante/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $1,506,802
Directed by Jack Haley Jr., "That's Dancing!" chronicles how dance evolved in Hollywood films through clips from musicals.
It features performances by Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Judy Garland, and more.

Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic
Opening weekend domestic gross: $1,574,787
David LaChapelle directed the documentary that focuses on the different dance styles across Los Angeles, including krumping and clowning.
It follows dancers who use dance as an outlet in South Central LA.

Jerritt Clark/WireImage
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,160,460
Directed by Thomas Balmès, the documentary follows four infants from birth through their first year in Namibia, Mongolia, Japan, and the US.

Roy Rochlin/Getty Images for Disney Studios
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,282,593
Directed by Alastair Fothergill and Jeff Wilson, the Disneynature documentary, narrated by Ed Helms, follows a penguin as he searches for a partner and starts a family in Antarctica.

Jon Kopaloff/FilmMagic
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,300,000
"The Real Cancun" follows 16 American college students on spring break in Mexico.
The documentary captures the students as they party, hook up, argue, and more during a 10-day stay in Cancún's Hotel Zone.

Greg Doherty/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,356,522
Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza co-directed "Death of a Nation" with Bruce Schooley.
The documentary uses reenactments and interviews to argue that Donald Trump is comparable to Abraham Lincoln and that the Democratic Party has historical ties to racism and fascism.

Photo by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,509,808
Produced by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the documentary follows six church members around the world, including the US, Costa Rica, and Nepal, to depict their daily lives and beliefs.

Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $2,970,848
Directed by Nathan Frankowski, "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" challenges the teaching of evolution and includes interviews with scientists, writers, and religious figures.

Eric Charbonneau/Getty Images for Briarcliff Entertainment
Opening weekend domestic gross: $3,008,563
Director Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 11/9," a follow-up to his 2004 documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11," examines the political climate surrounding Donald Trump's election and presidency.
The documentary ranges from the Flint water crisis to the Parkland school shooting and criticism of Democratic leaders.

Malcolm Taylor/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $3,409,643
Comedian Bill Maher travels the world questioning believers, clergy members, and religious institutions in "Religulous," directed by Larry Charles.
The documentary takes a comedic and confrontational look at Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and other religions.

Thomas McGovern/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $4,009,866
Directed by Andrew J. Kuehn, "Terror in the Aisles" dives into the history of horror cinema.
Actors Donald Pleasence and Nancy Allen introduce clips from films including "Psycho," "The Exorcist," "Halloween," and "The Shining," while discussing why audiences enjoy being scared.

Charley Gallay/Getty Images for Disney
Opening weekend domestic gross: $4,577,861
"Monkey Kingdom" follows Maya, a toque macaque, as she raises her son within the Sri Lankan jungle.
Mark Linfield and Alastair Fothergill directed the Disneynature documentary, narrated by Tina Fey.

Kevin Winter/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $4,632,847
Director Lauren Lazin's documentary examines the life of Tupac Shakur through archive footage, home videos, interviews, and Shakur's own voice recordings.
The documentary lets Shakur's recordings guide the audience through his childhood, music career, activism, legal troubles, and his death in 1996.

Monica Schipper/FilmMagic
Opening weekend domestic gross: $4,776,267
"Bears" follows a brown bear mother as she emerges from hibernation in Alaska with her two cubs.
Directed by Alastair Fothergill and Keith Scholey and narrated by John C. Reilly, the Disneynature documentary tracks the family's search for food and protection as they face wolves, rival bears, and the wilderness.

Nicholas Hunt/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $4,790,367
Director Lu Chuan takes viewers across China's mountains and forests in "Born in China," a Disneynature documentary narrated by John Krasinski.
It follows a giant panda mother and cub, a golden snub-nosed monkey family, and a snow leopard raising her young in the highlands.

Angel
Opening weekend domestic gross: $5,051,950
"After Death" interviews people who say they had near-death experiences and returned to life.
The documentary, co-directed by Stephen Gray and Chris Radtke, also includes interviews with doctors, scientists, and others about consciousness, death, and the possibility of an afterlife.

Jon Furniss/WireImage
Opening weekend domestic gross: $6,003,200
Set in Kenya, the Disneynature documentary, directed by Alastair Fothergill and Keith Scholey, focuses on a family of lions and a cheetah raising her cubs.
It was nominated for documentary awards by the Environmental Media Awards and the Phoenix Film Critics Society.

Mark Sullivan/Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $6,058,958
"Oceans," directed by Jacques Perrin and Jacques Cluzaud, is a portrait of marine life around the world.
The documentary is largely filmed underwater, showcasing whales, sharks, schools of fish, and more.

Alex WROBLEWSKI / AFP via Getty Images
Opening weekend domestic gross: $7,161,605
Directed by Brett Ratner, "Melania" follows first lady Melania Trump during the 20 days before Donald Trump’s second presidential inauguration in January 2025.
The film offers behind-the-scenes footage of her preparations to return to the White House, including meetings, travel, and intimate moments among family members.

Eric Charbonneau/Le Studio/Wireimage
Opening weekend domestic gross: $8,825,760
Disneynature directors Alastair Fothergill and Mark Linfield directed "Earth," which follows polar bears, elephants, and humpback whales across the different seasons.
The documentary was the first release from Disneynature in the US and was among the highest-grossing nature documentaries at the time.

Gerardo Mora/Getty Images for Disney
Opening weekend domestic gross: $10,673,748
"Chimpanzee" centers on a young chimp living in the forests of Ivory Coast who is orphaned after a rival troop attacks his group.
The Disneynature documentary was directed by Alastair Fothergill and Mark Linfield, with Tim Allen as the narrator.

Cindy Ord/Getty Images for FLC
Opening weekend domestic gross: $15,601,418
Directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, the documentary offers a revealing portrait of Elizabeth Holmes, who was convicted of fraud and conspiracy connected to her fallen company, Theranos.
Holmes allowed the directors into her life during the 34 days before she reported to federal prison to serve an 11-year sentence. It's receiving wide critical acclaim and sparking online debate about its portrayal of Holmes.

J. Countess/WireImage
Opening weekend domestic gross: $23,920,637
Director Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" takes a close look at President George W. Bush, the September 11 attacks, the war in Iraq, and the connections between American political and business leaders.
The documentary won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival and became the highest-grossing traditional documentary in US box-office history.
What if the hijab were mandatory for men? That is what happens to the male actors in Head to Head, the debut feature by Iranian director Ghasideh Golmakani.
The premise is not quite as straightforward as it sounds. Head to Head is a mockumentary about making a fictional film in which men must wear skirts and headscarves. It may have several layers, but Ghasideh is clear about what she wanted to achieve.
"I never wanted to make a conventional film. I wanted to make exactly what I made. It became just what I had imagined," Ghasideh tells The New Arab.
Although Head to Head doesn't necessarily fit the category of a documentary, the film was fully scripted, with every scene carefully planned. That said, the rehearsals allowed some flexibility.
"The structure and the dialogue were already written, but we rehearsed a lot with the actors beforehand. During those rehearsals, I gave them space to improvise a little," she explains.
This flexibility helped Ghasideh capture the film's central reactions. We see a woman directing a production on a male-dominated set, where the actors agree to wear women's clothes and headscarves but begin to complain when the experience becomes uncomfortable.
To capture their reactions, Ghasideh asked the actors to wear the clothing during rehearsals, even before they had fully familiarised themselves with the script.
"I didn’t give them the script at the beginning. They read it before each rehearsal session, so it was very fresh in their minds when they performed it," she explains.
"During the rehearsals, I asked them to wear headscarves and dress as women. They were obviously bothered by it. It was warm, and they reacted exactly as I had written."
In this sense, Head to Head works like a sociological experiment, with predictable results, at least for Ghasideh.
By exposing the discomfort of actors, whose profession involves stepping into other people's shoes, the film goes beyond challenging an oppressive law to reveal how deeply ingrained gender discrimination is in society.
As she puts it, "What I’m pointing to is our failure, as human beings, to put ourselves in other people’s shoes. Nowadays, we judge each other so easily because of religion, nationality, gender or whatever else. I find that increasingly frightening. For me, this film goes beyond Iran. I could have made it in another country, using something other than the veil, and I think it would have carried the same message."
In sharing this, she notes that the hijab, which has been at the centre of many demonstrations, serves as a symbol of the restrictions imposed on women.
For instance, there is a scene where the director shouts 'cut' because the men dressed as women are dancing in ways that women are not allowed to in Iran. But as Ghasideh points out, discrimination against women is hardly exclusive to Iran.
"Women in other countries may not have to wear a hijab, but they still generally face more restrictions than men and are subjected to much greater scrutiny," she says.
"I left Iran when I was 18 and went to France hoping to find liberté, fraternité, égalité," she says. "To my unpleasant surprise, I discovered that we were still very far from equality. In Iranian films and Iranian society, this is more obvious because the contrast is so stark. But it also exists in other societies."
The restrictions women face also raise questions about the limits of activism, another theme Head to Head explores. In one scene, the crew's van is about to be stopped by the morality police.
Bahar resists putting on a headscarf, seeing it as a humiliation that would also bring the film's role-playing to an abrupt halt.
She is torn between staying true to her principles and avoiding a direct confrontation with the authorities. The reversal of power relations made possible within the film suddenly clashes with the reality outside it.
For Ghasideh, confronting such inequalities has strengthened her determination to challenge them, even if she prefers to do so through her films rather than direct confrontation.
"Somehow, that feeling of injustice between men and women became even stronger in me. I’m not doing things on a large scale, but I always try to reduce inequality in my surroundings as much as I can, and a little through my films as well," she says.
"But I don’t shout too loudly. I’m afraid that shouting can sometimes frighten the listener or the audience. That is also why I chose comedy: it stays with you differently from slogans shouted at full volume."
But how much of Ghasideh is there in Bahar? The similarities between the fictional director and the filmmaker herself are hard to ignore.
"It took me a long time to find the actress because, for different reasons, none of the people I met convinced me. Someone said, ‘Why don’t you play the role yourself? It’s you!’ But I didn’t want to take on that responsibility," she notes.
"It was my first feature, and I needed to concentrate on directing. Luckily, I found her. I think Bahar is very much like me, although she is a little more exaggerated."
The parallels between the two help reinforce the film's approach to sexism. Rather than confronting entrenched discrimination through direct political denunciation, Head to Head relies on irony and comedy to make its point.
"For someone who responds to this kind of irony, I think it works better than a serious treatment of the subject," she explains.
Making a film in Iran can itself be an act of resistance. For Ghasideh, this was particularly apparent in her debut feature, which she wrote, directed, and produced herself despite the lack of financial support.
"I think writing, directing and producing my debut feature was the craziest thing I could have done. What was really difficult was the lack of financial support. It weighed on me so much that I couldn’t think about anything else. I live in Hamburg, so I bought a camera here, went to Iran and said, ‘I’m going to make a film. No matter what.’"
Despite censorship, conflict and countless other difficulties, Iranian cinema continues to produce a remarkable number of films, some of which circulate widely on the international festival circuit.
"I think we have a very strong culture of resistance. I saw a documentary about Iranian film history in which a producer described filming during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. When sirens warned of an Iraqi bombing raid, they would stop. After the bombing, they would continue shooting," she shares.
"For me, that was beautiful and sad at the same time. It is a form of resistance: art resisting war, conflict and our problems. I think this is deeply rooted in our culture.”
Ghasideh is now preparing her second fiction feature, about an Iranian-German couple in Hamburg. She describes it as "another black comedy, questioning cultural clashes." With another film in the works, we ask whether she believes art, and cinema in particular, can change the world.
She answers with conviction, saying, "I hope the film can make people pause, even briefly, and stop judging each other so easily" and that "this power game between men and women also has to stop at some point. Otherwise, we will never achieve a balanced society anywhere."
Her answer brings us back to the question at the heart of Head to Head: should all men wear a hijab, even for just one day, to better understand women’s experiences?
"No," she says. "They can do whatever they want," she adds, saying she would definitely recommend they at least watch her film.
After premiering at the Toronto International Film Festival and receiving a Best Screenplay nomination at the Asia Pacific Screen Awards, the film is now set to screen at the Chicago International Film Festival
Manuel Halpern is a journalist and film critic, founder and editor of Wild at Heart, and a member of FIPRESCI
Follow him on Instagram: @manuelhalpern_
New film Fatherland took Sandra Hüller back to a divided Germany. She talks about damaged dreams, Hollywood feelgood and - just maybe - appearing in the new Marvel movie
Sandra Hüller is crying, and it feels very strange. A wildly gifted actor, she can convey every human emotion there is. On screen, though, she is most often asked to embody deep self-possession. Even doing karaoke, Hüller is in control. And in real life, life is good. Her 2026 will end with four high-profile movies this year alone. Two (Fatherland and Rose) are black-and-white arthouse films that centre on her brilliance, and though one of the others (Digger) is already a Hollywood cautionary tale, a second (Project Hail Mary) was a giant $684m hit. (There may also be a fifth movie, bigger still. We will come back to that.)
And yet, dressed in film star black, she is in tears. “This is really hard for me,” she says.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Victoria Stevens

© Photograph: Victoria Stevens

© Photograph: Victoria Stevens
Vanessa and Nick Lachey like to reiterate the titular question at the center of their hit Netflix dating show by saying, whenever possible, “Let’s find out if love truly is blind.”
But over the past few seasons of the globally popular reality series, the question that has come to dominate the so-called experiment is not whether love is blind, but whether love is political.
Just two episodes into Season 11, set in Boston this time, one couple confronted two increasingly charged political issues in one scene: vaccines and abortion. Enter John Shannon, a 33-year-old account executive, and Sarah Williams, a 34-year-old healthcare program manager whom the internet collectively adores.
The question that has come to dominate the so-called experiment is not whether love is blind, but whether love is political.
Shannon says, “I feel capitalism is injected into healthcare in our country. I feel like Covid really showed the worst side of it to me.” Williams responds with, “I work in a hospital and I got my master’s in this too [and] I feel like recently medicine gets a bad rep when it shouldn’t.”
Minutes later, Shannon pivots the conversation to access to abortion. He says, “I don’t at all think abortion should be illegal, but it’s a very sad thing. People will be like, ‘Well, what about this girl who’s 11 and she’s pregnant by her uncle. She doesn’t deserve to have an abortion?’ And it’s like, OK, that’s horrible. But why does that justify having an abortion at six months because you just never got around to it?” Williams explains: “The six-month thing? That’s where, from a healthcare perspective, I do think there’s a little misinformation as well. The number of women who do it late term, just because it’s almost, like, nonexistently low […] I hate that that’s used as an argument.”
What really made this scene a talker, though, is that after this clear display of a difference of values and belief systems, the two opted to get engaged.
Their exchange has launched a viral conversation, including a proliferation of TikTok videos. And part of what makes the discussion between Sarah and John so remarkable is how commonplace it feels. I’ve heard variations of this very conversation from single friends over drinks, via texts and in lengthy voice notes.
What both “Love is Blind” and my highly eligible single female friends have underscored is that politics, and increasingly conservative politics, is a part of contemporary relationships and dating. For progressive-minded women who find themselves dating men whose politics may fundamentally conflict with their own, the choices are limited: compromise on their political ideology, take on the herculean effort to change their partner or opt out of marriage or long-term partnership altogether.
The premise of “Love is Blind” has become ubiquitous, or perhaps notorious. But if you have yet to experience the pods, the reveal walks and those God-awful opaque gold wine glasses, it goes like this: Single men and women from one city speed-date through a wall, propose, lay eyes on each other for the first time, test their “physical connection” at a resort in Mexico and in a production-provided apartment, and then get married.
Eleven seasons and one streaming record later, criticizing “Love is Blind” is tedious, obvious work: a flawed premise, lack of physical representation, manufactured and manipulated drama, regressive heteronormative ideology and, apparently, exploitation. All of this is to say nothing of the show’s disjointed view of marriage: at once glorified as the ultimate transformative goal and degraded with an artificial timeline and flippant uncertainty at the altar.
Indeed, political misalignment between male and female contestants has become a consistent plot driver on the past few seasons of “Love Is Blind.” If production has a shot list, and I’m certain they do, then a pointed conversation about racism or abortion or health misinformation must top it. Politics has become an increasingly common reason for contestants to end a relationship and opt out of the “experiment.” In Season 8, for example, two men were left at the altar over political issues that mattered to their fiancées. Neither man was fundamentally opposed to Black Lives Matter or LGBTQ+ rights, respectively, but there was an unwillingness to engage intellectually.
Since then, “Love Is Blind” has become increasingly more conservative, more “trad,” so to speak. There is much, much conversation through those glowing walls about “traditional gender roles” and “traditional values.” In Season 9, there was an acutely controversial exchange between two contestants regarding the possibility of having an LGBTQ+ child. “Do you feel like it’s a fad?” Nick asked; “One hundred percent,” Annie answered.
“Love Is Blind” has become increasingly more conservative, more “trad,” so to speak.
This shouldn’t be surprising. Much has been made, including by me, of how media so often mirrors what is happening in American culture. And today mainstream American culture has become increasingly conservative and increasingly natalist: Look at the Trump administration’s plan to use money to ply women into having more children or Project 2025’s plan for women or the realities of the manosphere.
And women are becoming more liberal, more progressive. According to a recent Gallup poll, American women age 18 to 29 are 15 percentage points more likely to identify as liberal than their male counterparts are — a difference five times larger than it was in 2000.
I’m no marriage counselor or relationship expert, but I do not believe politics need to wholly align for a romantic relationship to be happy or healthy or fulfilling. My husband and I disagree on many political issues. What we do share, though, is mutual respect, fundamental values and a willingness to learn from each other.
Williams reflected on her conversation with Shannon on the digital platform Elite Daily, saying, “People are entitled to also make their own choices, and then we have to decide where we as individuals want to draw the line. I think John’s and my communication in that regard was great and healthy and productive.”
Perhaps it was bad editing, or bad luck. Perhaps Shannon and Williams shared something that viewers cannot see yet. Maybe they will walk down the aisle and exchange meaningful vows and then happily hold hands during the reunion special. But for this viewer, especially after watching the latest two episodes last night? It feels doubtful.
So what happens when the person you’re falling in love with, or could potentially fall in love with, holds political views that affect your body, your family or your sense of self? We don’t need a new reality-show premise to answer that question. We can just ask our single friends.
The post Viral ‘Love Is Blind’ exchange highlights an all-too-common dating struggle appeared first on MS NOW.
Mexico will commemorate World Day for Audiovisual Heritage with a special program organized by cultural institutions, including film screenings, premieres, and activities to promote the preservation of the nation’s film heritage.
RELATED: Mexico Launches Film Educational Program for Elementary and Middle Schoolers
Between October 27 and November 3, seven films from the collection of the Mexican Film Institute (IMCINE) will be screened in eleven independent venues across nine states.
The selected productions will also screen on public television and the digital platform Nuestro Cine MX, expanding public access to materials considered part of Mexico’s audiovisual heritage.
One of the program’s main attractions will be the screening of the restored version of “Valle de Mexico” (1976), a short documentary by Ruben Gamez that portrays the region’s rapid urban growth during the 1970s.
Celebramos el Día Mundial del Patrimonio Audiovisual con una programación dedicada a la preservación de la memoria fílmica mexicana. 🎞️
— Cineteca Nacional (@CinetecaMexico) October 21, 2026
La función reunirá cortometrajes restaurados y materiales digitalizados que forman parte de nuestro acervo. Entre ellos, se proyectará por… pic.twitter.com/sh3TBUb206
The text reads, “We celebrate World Audiovisual Heritage Day with a program dedicated to the preservation of Mexican filmic memory. The screening will feature restored short films and digitized materials that are part of our collection.”
The restoration of this film was carried out by IMCINE in collaboration with Estudios Churubusco, using a positive print preserved in the archives of the National Film Archive (Cineteca Nacional).
The program also includes outstanding Mexican films such as “Un cuento de ciudad,” “Amada,” “El héroe,” “Hasta los huesos,” “El fantasma del convento,” and “Cronos,” works by renowned Mexican filmmakers.
Secretary of Culture Claudia Curiel said these activities reflect the institution’s commitment to preserving audiovisual heritage, as well as to encouraging new generations to learn about their history through Mexican cinema.
Crisis Unleashes Deadly Floods Across Latin America and Europe
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) October 21, 2026
Deadly floods strike three continents: at least 3,000 families are affected in Paraguay; 10 people have died in Mexico due to Cold Front 2; and six have been killed in Spain by Storm Adam, which has forced more than… pic.twitter.com/XMZ0nC3qo4
teleSUR: JP
Source: Prensa Latina
The missile landed between the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, a UNESCO World Heritage site, and the Holy Presentation (Sviato-Vvedenskyi) Monastery. Monastery buildings, homes, shops, cafés and other civilian infrastructure sustained damage in the surrounding area.
Zelenskyy disclosed that Russian forces had used three cluster-equipped ballistic missiles during the assault. Ukrainian authorities described weapons designed to explode in the air as they approach their targets, distributing explosive submunitions over an area approximately 400 metres in diameter.
After receiving reports from officials overseeing emergency operations across Ukraine, the president accused Moscow of deliberately choosing a weapon capable of inflicting extensive civilian casualties in a densely populated district.
“This was a deliberate choice of weapon and area of deployment,” Zelenskyy said.
He maintained that there were no military installations in the vicinity and that the attack had been intended to inflict maximum damage on civilians and their property.
Pecherskyi is one of Kyiv’s oldest districts, containing religious institutions and architectural monuments associated with centuries of Ukrainian history.
Among them is the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, established in the 11th century and subsequently developed into an important centre of Eastern Orthodox Christianity.
The complex includes historic churches, monasteries and an extensive system of underground caves. Together with Saint Sophia Cathedral and its related buildings, it forms part of a UNESCO World Heritage property that has appeared on the List of World Heritage in Danger since 2023.
Thursday’s explosion occurred in the area separating the Lavra from the Holy Presentation Monastery. Ukrainian authorities identified damage to buildings belonging to the latter, alongside neighbouring residential and commercial premises. Assessments of the destruction across the historic district were continuing.
This was not the first occasion in 2026 on which Russian weapons had damaged the area’s religious heritage.
On 15 June, a Russian drone struck the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra complex, causing severe damage to the Dormition Cathedral. Its roof and structural elements suffered extensive destruction, prompting UNESCO to undertake emergency stabilisation measures.
Ukraine’s Security Service subsequently published evidence identifying fragments of a Russian Geran-2 drone recovered from the site.
The October strike has again exposed the vulnerability of the capital’s historic religious buildings, as well as the civilian neighbourhoods surrounding them.
The reported choice of ammunition has particular implications for the investigation into the attack.
Whereas a conventional missile warhead delivers its explosive force around a principal impact point, cluster munitions release numerous smaller explosive devices capable of striking separate locations across a broad area.
In an urban environment, such weapons can cause casualties and destruction well beyond an intended target. Unexploded submunitions may remain dangerous after the initial attack, posing further risks to residents and emergency workers.
The International Committee of the Red Cross has warned that deploying cluster munitions in populated areas creates a high likelihood of indiscriminate effects.
Under international humanitarian law, military operations must distinguish between civilian persons and objects and legitimate military targets. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited.
The reported deployment of cluster warheads in central Kyiv therefore raises questions about whether those requirements were observed. Zelenskyy’s account of the three missiles had not, at the time of reporting, been independently established through publicly available forensic evidence.
The Pecherskyi explosion was one incident in a much larger attack on the Ukrainian capital.
According to Zelenskyy, Russia launched 21 ballistic missiles against Kyiv in three successive waves overnight. Ukrainian authorities reported at least two people killed and more than 30 wounded, with strikes damaging apartment buildings, commercial premises, transport infrastructure and energy facilities.
The bombardment took place shortly after Russian President Vladimir Putin met US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg on Wednesday, 21 October.
During their discussions, Putin indicated that Russia was prepared in principle to resume negotiations with Ukraine and the United States, potentially in November. However, no confirmed timetable emerged.
Witkoff’s visit followed consultations in Norway between American, Ukrainian and European representatives over possible arrangements to end the war.
The renewed diplomatic activity has done little to resolve the underlying disagreements. As EU Today has previously examined, Moscow continues to advance territorial demands while the parties remain divided over Ukraine’s future security guarantees.
Meanwhile, Kyiv faces an immediate requirement for additional air-defence ammunition.
Zelenskyy has repeatedly appealed for more Patriot interceptor missiles capable of engaging ballistic targets. Difficulties surrounding American military assistance and intelligence cooperation have increased tensions between Washington and Kyiv at a time when Russia is intensifying attacks against Ukrainian cities.
The latest strike also presents Ukrainian investigators with the task of establishing whether the reported use of cluster munitions against a historic civilian district constituted an unlawful attack.
For Zelenskyy, the bombardment following Putin’s latest diplomatic discussions demonstrates that Moscow’s military conduct remains unchanged. He has argued that Russia’s actions provide no evidence of a genuine intention to bring the war to an end.
The 9th edition of Drawing Room Lisboa, an international contemporary art fair dedicated to drawing, opens today and runs until Sunday at the Sociedade Nacional de Belas-Artes (SNBA), in Lisbon,
The post Drawing fest returns to Lisbon for 9th edition appeared first on Portugal Resident.
Inside a displacement tent in al-Mawasi, a crowded camp on Gaza’s southern coast, Yahya Abu Lahia sits on a plastic chair, holding a small brush and sweeping dust and sand off a piece of mosaic.
"We extracted this piece of mosaic from under the rubble of Youssef al-Astal’s house, which held dozens of valuable artefacts before the war on Gaza," Yahya told The New Arab, referring to a farmer who spent a lifetime gathering Byzantine and Islamic antiquities, including column capitals, tombstones and pottery.
Youssef fled his home in eastern Khan Yunis at the start of Israel's genocide in Gaza. Heavy bombardment later hit the area, and his house was partially destroyed by Israeli occupation forces' operations.
"During the search, I found pieces of mosaic, and I rescued them and put them together," said the 28-year-old. "It was one of the happiest moments of my life."
Yahya is a field technician with Guardians of Heritage, a volunteer team of about 20 men and women that digs for artefacts in bombed buildings across Gaza, then cleans, photographs and catalogues them.
The group launched in 2024 under the Mayasem Association for Culture and Arts, a Gaza-based nonprofit.
It won the 2026 PNT Heritage Award for Community Engagement and Social Inclusion, a regional prize run by the Petra National Trust — a Jordanian heritage group, with the European Union’s delegation to Jordan.
Volunteers recovered the pieces from Youssef's house in al-Qarara near Khan Younis — where he had collected antiquities since childhood and amassed about 74 historical pieces — by digging through the rubble and sifting sand by hand with basic tools.
"Our work under the rubble isn’t a traditional archaeological excavation," said Shaimaa al-Natour, assistant coordinator of Mayasem’s heritage protection programme.
"We work in exceptional conditions that demand extreme caution, because we may come across unstable stones, concrete blocks and fragile pieces that can be damaged simply by moving them."
She said items are bagged or boxed and taken to a storeroom, a corner of the tent, for cleaning, photographing, and archiving.
The team is building a digital archive of every rescued item, backed by the ALIPH Foundation, a fund for heritage in conflict zones, and The Palestinian Museum.
It has documented more than 1,000 pieces of movable heritage so far, Shaimaa said, and the work continues.
One mission was the destroyed al-Qarara Cultural Museum, which held 3,500 pieces before Israel's war on the besieged enclave.
Storing the finds is a challenge in itself.
The team faces a shortage of suitable packing and conservation materials, and struggles to provide a stable environment that protects the artefacts from humidity, dust and temperature fluctuations.
"My belief in the need to protect our cultural heritage is what drove me to volunteer and work with my own hands in the middle of this war," said Yahya.
"With every piece we find and restore, I feel I have saved part of my city’s memory."
The Gaza Strip, a narrow coastal territory on the ancient trade route between Egypt and the Levant, was home to about 130 archaeological sites and at least a dozen local museums before Israel's genocide began, spanning the Bronze Age to the Ottoman era, along with museums, mosques and churches that held centuries of Palestinian history.
As of March 2026, UNESCO had verified damage to 164 sites in Gaza since October 7, 2023, including 14 religious sites, 128 buildings of historical or artistic interest, three depositories of movable cultural property, nine monuments, two museums and eight archaeological sites.
It used satellite imagery analysed by UNOSAT, the UN’s satellite agency, and, since an October 2025 ceasefire, rapid on-site assessments where access allows.
Gaza’s Government Media Office said in February that Israeli occupation forces had destroyed 835 mosques completely, damaged 180 partly and destroyed 40 of the Strip's 60 cemeteries.
The office and the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities say 12 local and private museums have been destroyed and looted.
Itimad Abu Amra, 23, joined the Guardians of Heritage team at its launch, after working at the al-Qarara museum since 2018.
Her most recent mission was the Abu Salim Mosque in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza, which was built in 1951 and used for Quran memorisation circles and community activities. Israeli warplanes struck it on August 25, causing widespread destruction, she said.
"When conditions allowed, we went straight to the Abu Salim Mosque, and we found historic limestone blocks and a collection of important and valuable books," she said.
"The moment you find an artefact in the rubble, you feel you are facing a trust that must be handled responsibly."
Hamouda al-Dahdar, a cultural heritage expert, called the volunteers "the first and courageous line of defence of human heritage," but said such groups are "in dire and urgent need of institutional and international support."
He called on UNESCO and other UN bodies to go beyond statements and provide direct funding, technical help, damage assessments and missions of international experts.
Hamouda also described the destruction of Gaza’s heritage as "a clear attempt to erase the living material evidence of the identity and historical memory of the Palestinian people."
UNESCO says it is already working on the ground. Together with the Centre for Cultural Heritage Preservation, it has stabilised five heritage sites in Gaza’s Old City, has seven more underway, and has trained local professionals in damage assessment and emergency stabilisation.
The agency has also called on the international community to "increase support and investment" to scale up the work.
"The Gaza Strip is a unique historical bridge of civilisations," Hamouda said, pointing to Gaza’s Bronze and Iron Age, Hellenistic, Roman, Byzantine and Islamic layers.
"Heritage is the living memory of existence. The work continues from within the rubble to protect our identity and pass it on to future generations."
For the team, Shaimaa said, the tent is a symbol.
"It’s a message to the community that a museum isn’t just a building or exhibition hall,” she said, adding that its role can continue in the simplest spaces, as long as people protect its collections and pass their stories on.
"Gaza isn’t only the destruction we see today," she said.
"It’s thousands of years of history, civilisation and human memory, and protecting it is a collective responsibility."
Ismail Nofal is a Gaza-based journalist specialising in human interest stories
This article was published in collaboration with Egab
Author withdrawn from France’s Prix Goncourt last month has repeatedly denied using artificial intelligence to write novel
The publisher of top-selling Haitian Canadian writer Thélyson Orélien, who was removed from France’s most prestigious literary prize list last month, has confirmed the author used artificial intelligence to help write his novel C’était ça ou mourir (It Was Either That or Die).
Orélien has denied allegations that he used AI on his breakthrough novel and, last week, Canadian publisher Les Éditions du Boréal said it was standing by the 38-year-old writer.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images

© Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images

© Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images