Normal view
- https://eutoday.net
- Mercedes Chief Warns EU Against Excluding Britain from ‘Made in Europe’ Industrial Rules
Mercedes Chief Warns EU Against Excluding Britain from ‘Made in Europe’ Industrial Rules
Mercedes-Benz chief executive Ola Källenius has warned that excluding British manufacturers from European industrial preference rules would damage automotive production on both sides of the Channel, increasing pressure on Brussels ahead of negotiations over its proposed Industrial Accelerator Act.
The head of Mercedes-Benz has warned that excluding British manufacturers from the European Union’s proposed industrial preference rules would damage the competitiveness of carmakers across Europe, challenging Brussels over legislation intended to protect European production from growing international competition.
Ola Källenius, chief executive of Mercedes-Benz and president of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), criticised the prospect of restricting British participation in the forthcoming “Made in Europe” framework during discussions in Brussels on Wednesday, 14 October.
His intervention comes as European governments negotiate the Industrial Accelerator Act, which would introduce European-content requirements affecting public procurement and certain forms of industrial support.
The proposed legislation is intended to strengthen manufacturing within the EU, but its treatment of production in neighbouring countries has become contentious, particularly in an automotive industry whose factories and suppliers operate across national borders.
European production extends beyond the EU
British manufacturing remains closely integrated with continental European automotive production despite the United Kingdom’s departure from the single market.
Components manufactured in Britain are incorporated into vehicles assembled in EU member states, while British factories depend on engines, batteries, electronics and other parts produced in continental Europe.
The value of this integrated manufacturing system depends on companies being able to source components across borders without unnecessary restrictions.
Källenius warned that excluding the UK from the proposed rules would weaken manufacturers operating on both sides of the Channel.
His position reflects industry concerns that a narrowly defined European-content regime could impose additional costs on companies already facing pressure from Chinese competition, slowing demand and substantial investment requirements.
As EU Today reported in September, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has been pressing Brussels to recognise the UK as a trusted industrial partner under the emerging framework.
Germany has also supported a broader approach that would allow selected trading partners to qualify under European-content rules where reciprocal conditions are met.
France has favoured stronger preferences for production within the EU itself, reflecting differences among member states over how far European industrial policy should extend beyond the Union’s borders.
A dispute over industrial sovereignty
The Industrial Accelerator Act proposed by the European Commission is intended to strengthen Europe’s manufacturing base and support production in strategically important sectors.
Its provisions address public procurement and industrial incentives affecting products including vehicles, steel, aluminium and clean technologies.
The Commission wants European public spending to support local industrial capacity rather than reinforce dependence on imports from major international competitors.
China has become the principal focus of those concerns because of its expanding manufacturing capacity, particularly in electric vehicles and batteries.
However, measures designed to counter Chinese industrial competition could also affect established trading partners whose manufacturers form part of European supply chains.
The United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey occupy different legal positions in their economic relations with the EU, but all maintain important industrial connections with member states.
An approach that treats their production as equivalent to imports from countries with substantially different market conditions could require European companies to reorganise existing supplier relationships.
For manufacturers, replacing a supplier may involve more than simply ordering components from another factory. Production standards, technical certification, logistics and long-term investment arrangements can make changes expensive and difficult.
Industry demands regulatory certainty
Following an ACEA board meeting on Wednesday, European manufacturers called for faster progress on the wider automotive legislative package.
In its 14 October statement, ACEA urged EU institutions to advance negotiations so that the package could be finalised early next year.
The association argues that manufacturers require a predictable regulatory framework to plan investments in electric vehicles, production facilities and new technologies.
Källenius linked the industry’s transition towards zero-emission mobility with the need to preserve employment and strengthen economic security.
European manufacturers are simultaneously investing heavily in electrification while competing against Chinese companies with established battery supply chains and significant production capacity.
The resulting financial pressures are particularly serious for manufacturers that must develop new vehicle platforms while maintaining existing factories and dealer networks.
Additional restrictions on component sourcing could complicate those decisions at a time when companies are seeking to reduce costs.
Britain refuses to follow EU tariffs automatically
The dispute has acquired a further dimension following remarks by British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.
Speaking on Wednesday, Reynolds indicated that Britain would not automatically follow the European Union in imposing tariffs on Chinese vehicles.
The UK government maintains that trade measures must be determined according to British economic interests rather than adopted simply to align with Brussels.
That position complicates London’s attempt to secure favourable treatment under European industrial rules.
EU policymakers have argued that closer alignment on trade defences could support Britain’s claim to be treated as a trusted partner.
British ministers, however, must consider whether restrictions on Chinese imports would benefit domestic manufacturers and consumers.
The disagreement will form part of the broader economic relationship being discussed ahead of the next UK–EU summit, scheduled for 20 November.
The wider implications for EU–UK relations
The automotive dispute follows earlier negotiations over British participation in European defence procurement and other industrial programmes.
In both cases, London wants access to initiatives designed to strengthen European production while remaining outside the EU’s institutional framework.
Brussels must determine how far preferential treatment can extend to non-member countries without undermining the objectives of its industrial policy.
The Commission’s proposals have already revealed disagreements between governments favouring a tightly defined European manufacturing base and those seeking to preserve wider commercial partnerships.
Källenius’s intervention strengthens the argument that industrial protection cannot be considered separately from the supply chains on which European manufacturers depend.
The final legislation will influence investment decisions, procurement arrangements and the position of British suppliers within the continental automotive industry.
The outcome will also provide an indication of how far the EU is prepared to accommodate its closest trading partners as it attempts to strengthen European manufacturing against growing competition from China.
Bulk Carrier Sinks Weeks After Deadly Strait of Hormuz Strike
Qatar Rewrites Its Gas Playbook With Old Tankers and New Tactics
Sofia Hoffmann apresenta Christmas Jazz em Lagoa
![]()
O Auditório Carlos do Carmo, em Lagoa, recebe no dia 12 de dezembro, pelas 19h00, o concerto Christmas Jazz by Sofia Hoffmann, cujos bilhetes já se encontram à venda nos locais habituais.
Após o lançamento do seu novo álbum de originais “[In]LOVE” no final de 2024, a reconhecida cantautora Sofia Hoffmann sobe aos palcos neste Natal com um espetáculo muito especial: Christmas Jazz.
Neste concerto intimista e sofisticado, Sofia Hoffmann interpreta alguns dos mais icónicos temas natalícios do Great American Songbook – o célebre reportório que reúne os grandes clássicos da música popular americana e standards de jazz do início do século XX. Canções que resistiram ao tempo e continuam a encantar gerações.

Acompanhada por um quinteto de excelência, composto por alguns dos melhores músicos de jazz em Portugal, Sofia recria a magia do Natal com temas como: White Christmas, The Christmas Song, Santa Claus is Coming to Town, Jingle Bells, entre outros clássicos, sem esquecer o seu tema original: Carta ao Pai Natal. Certamente vai ser um espetáculo envolvente, com arranjos elegantes e uma atmosfera calorosa, ideal para celebrar a quadra natalícia de uma forma especial.
Os bilhetes para este espetáculo custam 8,00€ (desconto disponível para portadores do Passaporte Cultural, disponível nas bilheteiras do Município de Lagoa) e estão à venda na Bilheteira Online, nas bilheteiras dos CTT, da Fnac, Worten, Auditório Carlos do Carmo, Centro Cultural Convento de S. José e Balcão Único da Câmara Municipal de Lagoa.
Containership Sinks as Hormuz Attacks Spiral Out of Control
Container Ship Sinks Near Hormuz After Being Hit by Projectile, Sources Say
Gasolio, il prezzo della geopolitica
Il costo del gasolio in Italia dipende oggi da vicende geograficamente lontane e da un decreto annunciato e non ancora arrivato. Finché l’Europa resta dipendente dalle importazioni, ogni crisi internazionale si traduce prima o poi in un rincaro alla pompa.
L'articolo Gasolio, il prezzo della geopolitica proviene da Lavoce.info.