❌

Reading view

Un Abascal de luto carga contra Pedro Sánchez y “Óscar Muerte” por el accidente ferroviario

“Setenta y cuatro compatriotas han muerto y otros tanto han sido heridos en un accidente ferroviario injusto y evitable”, ha comenzado su mitin en Ávila este jueves por la tarde el líder de Vox, Santiago Abascal. En el momento en que hablaba, la cifra oficial de fallecidos se mantenía en 69 y, a falta de determinar sus nacionalidades, se sabe que hay algún extranjero, pero Abascal se ha preguntado por qué no han dimitido todavía el presidente del Gobierno, Pedro Sánchez, y el ministro de Transportes, “Oscar Muerte”, como le ha llamado, después de que “120 españoles” hayan fallecido en accidentes ferroviarios este año.

Seguir leyendo

© Raúl Sanchidrián (EFE)

El presidente de Vox y candidato a la presidencia del Gobierno, Santiago Abascal, durante un acto público de la formación celebrado este jueves en Ávila.
  •  

Abascal, el único que mantiene su agenda tras el accidente ferroviario: "No vamos a utilizar el luto, vamos a denunciar la degradación insoportable"

El presidente de Vox, Santiago Abascal, participa en un acto público de su formación este martes en Zamora

El presidente de Vox, Santiago Abascal, volvió a cargar contra el Gobierno de coalición de PSOE y Sumar después de que este miércoles por la mañana un AVE y un tren Iryo –parado en la vía– hayan chocado en la línea Madrid-Andalucía a la altura de la población toledana de Urda, ello algo más de diez meses después de la tragedia de Adamuz (Córdoba) en la misma línea. "No vamos a utilizar el luto" sino que vamos a "denunciar la degradación de las infraestructuras". El dirigente de Vox considera que ya tras el accidente de Adamuz se utilizó "para acallar" esas críticas.

"Sin información" precisa sobre lo ocurrido, pero con datos que apuntan al menos a 46 fallecidos y múltiples heridos –se triplicaría según adelantan algunos medios locales–, Abascal recordó durante una entrevista en Antena 3 la crisis de mediados de enero de este año. "Precisamente cuando no sabemos exáctamente qué es lo que pasó en Adamuz, aunque lo podemos sospechar, yo me atrevo a afirmar que nunca los sabremos con este Gobierno porque las informaciones que se conocieron entonces señalaban precisamente muchas deficiencias que tenían que ver con la gestión pública, con la falta de renovación de las vías, incluso con que una parte del dinero de las contratas estaba empleado en mordidas o en señoritas de compañía", aseguró.

"Hemos denunciado durante mucho tiempo con frases muy duras que en España se estaba gastando en esas porquerías el dinero del mantenimiento de las vías y ahora nos encontramos con otro accidente sin saber qué ha pasado en el anterior". Ante lo ocurrido, precisó Abascal, su "departamento jurídico", pilotado por Jorge Buxadé y Marta Castro, "ya se ha personado para pedir que se protejan la spruebas proque también tuvimos que lamentar después del accidente de Adamuz la desaparición de pruebas o la desaparición de algunos objetos mucho antes de que fueran comprobados por quienes tenían que acceder a ellos".

No hay derecho a esto, qué horror. Otra vez. https://t.co/0g1ANnWMiD

— Pepa R. de Millán 🇪🇸 (@Pepa_Millan) October 28, 2026

El líder de Vox mandó "un abrazo a todas las personas que están preocupadas porque sus familiares viajaban en esos trenes y también a todos los españoles que están preocupados porque tienen que viajar en tren y porque ven esta degradación de las infraestructuras y de las instituciones en España que francamente es totalmente insoportable". Abascal tenían fijada la entrevista para abordar asuntos de precampaña, algo que ha quedado en segundo plano y no se ha tocado. Intervino en directo desde Santander, donde a las 12.00 horas tiene un acto de precampaña y de atención a medios en los Jardines Pereda. Por la tarde, celebrará un acto político en el pabellón 3 de la Feria de Valladolid. El partido mantiene igualmente todos los actos e intervenciones fijadas en agenda.

Contrasta la decisión con la del resto de partidos políticos. Aunque esto ya se produjo en los mismos términos cuando sucedió el accidente de Adamuz. Tanto PSOE, PP y los partidos de Frente Amplio han comunicado que suprimen todos los eventos de la jornada para seguir al minuto lo sucedido.

Garriga: "Que no haya ni un español con miedo a subir a los trenes"

Desde Murcia, el secretario general de Vox, Ignacio Garriga, aseguró que "hoy es un día triste para España" y trasladó apoyo tanto a los afectados y los familiares que intentan localizar a los suyos, como para los profesionales que trabajan en el rescate y la atención del siniestro. Insistió, como Abascal, en el compromiso de seguir denunciando los problemas que afectan a los españoles. "Vox va a trabajar sin descanso para seguir denunciando lo que sufren los españoles en todos los rincones de España". Se comprometen a "revertir la situación para que no haya un solo español que tenga miedo a subir un tren, para que no haya un solo español que tenga miedo a salir por sus calles". Consideró que "hoy no es un día para plantear ninguna otra cuestión" que no tenga que ver con la "seguridad" de los españoles.

  •  

Spain: VOX and People's Party Announce Senate Race Alliance to Defeat Socialists in November Snap Elections

Spain's anti-mass migration VOX party and the center-right People's Party (PP) on Monday announced a new electoral agreement to stop running against each other in several Senate races during the upcoming November 29 snap elections.

The post Spain: VOX and People’s Party Announce Senate Race Alliance to Defeat Socialists in November Snap Elections appeared first on Breitbart.

  •  

Sánchez’s Housing Gamble: Why Spain’s Snap Election Is Riskier Than It Looks

Pedro Sánchez has turned a parliamentary defeat over housing into a general election on 29th November.

The calculation is clear: force Spain’s political argument onto territory more favourable to the left before migration, corruption allegations and parliamentary paralysis return to the foreground. But the polls suggest that the gamble could still deliver power to the centre-right People’s Party and Vox.

Pedro Sánchez’s decision to dissolve Spain’s parliament nine months ahead of schedule is more than an admission that his minority government had reached the limits of what it could achieve in the Congress of Deputies. It is an attempt to choose the terms on which his government will be judged.

The immediate trigger was the defeat of two emergency housing decrees after the conservative People’s Party (PP), Vox and Catalan separatist Junts voted against them. Housing had already moved rapidly to the centre of Spanish politics following the eviction of 87-year-old Maricarmen Abascal from the Madrid flat where she had lived for 71 years, followed by large demonstrations across the country. EU Today has previously reported on both the housing protests across Spain and Sánchez’s subsequent decision to call the election.

The prime minister is now attempting to convert legislative weakness into electoral advantage.

In his announcement on 5 October, Sánchez presented the election as a choice between a broader progressive majority capable of advancing social legislation and an opposition that had obstructed measures on housing and other domestic priorities. The government reinforced that strategy a day later by approving revised versions of the two housing decrees, containing 21 measures including tax incentives, assistance for first-time buyers and measures intended to increase supply. They will require validation by the Diputación Permanente, the standing parliamentary body that remains after dissolution.

The political calculation is straightforward. Housing offers Sánchez an issue on which anger is directed not only at government but at landlords, property investors, regional authorities and political parties opposing stronger regulation. The eviction of Abascal gave that argument a human symbol and transformed a long-running affordability problem into an immediate political confrontation.

That does not mean the strategy will work.

Most polling continues to place the PSOE behind the PP. Surveys put the Socialists at roughly 28 per cent, while Vox has risen to around 18 per cent. A PP-Vox combination is currently the only bloc consistently projected to command an outright parliamentary majority. One Sigma Dos survey published after the election announcement projected the two parties winning 203 of the Congress’s 350 seats.

Sánchez therefore appears to be playing less for immediate dominance than for mobilisation.

His problem before the housing protests was not simply the strength of the right. The broader left had become fragmented, while the government was being damaged by disputes over migration, particularly following the crisis in Ceuta, as well as corruption investigations involving figures associated with the PSOE. At the same time, Junts had become an increasingly unreliable parliamentary partner, leaving the government unable to guarantee major legislation or a new budget.

Housing changes the subject.

It allows Sánchez to argue that the central question is not whether his coalition has governed smoothly, but whether voters want a parliament prepared to intervene more aggressively in the housing market. The PP, however, is contesting precisely that framing. Alberto Núñez Feijóo argues that the housing shortage is itself a product of Sánchez’s eight years in government and has promised to raise annual construction towards 200,000 homes while reducing taxes.

The election may therefore develop into a dispute over responsibility rather than diagnosis. Both sides accept that housing has become a major national problem; they differ sharply over whether regulation or additional supply should dominate the response.

There is also a wider European dimension. Housing affordability is increasingly politically disruptive across the EU, including in major cities where construction has failed to keep pace with household formation, migration and demand for short-term accommodation. EU Today has examined similar pressures in Berlin’s housing market. Spain could now provide a test of whether housing can become powerful enough as an electoral issue to reverse the wider European movement towards the right.

For Ukraine, however, the consequences are likely to be less dramatic than Spain’s domestic political contest might suggest.

Sánchez committed €1 billion in bilateral military support to Ukraine for 2026, with Spain putting its cumulative bilateral military assistance since Russia’s full-scale invasion at almost €4 billion. Madrid has also trained more than 9,000 Ukrainian military personnel.

Spain is also home to a considerably larger Ukrainian community than the roughly 300,000 figure frequently cited. Government data showed 353,009 Ukrainian nationals holding valid residence documentation at the end of June, including 262,782 under temporary protection.

A PP-led government would alter Madrid’s domestic priorities and potentially its approach to defence spending and migration, particularly if Vox were required to sustain a parliamentary majority. Yet there is little basis at present for assuming that a change of government would produce a reversal of Spain’s fundamental position on Russia’s invasion or membership of the European and Atlantic security structures supporting Ukraine.

The more immediate question is whether Sánchez can make housing important enough to overcome the electoral arithmetic confronting him.

Calling the election has allowed him to escape a parliament in which his legislative coalition was steadily disintegrating and to enter a campaign around an issue capable of mobilising his electorate. It has not changed the fact that the PP and Vox begin that campaign with the stronger numbers.

Sánchez has chosen the battlefield. On 29th November, Spain will decide whether that was enough.

  •  
❌