❌

Normal view

Could 2026 be the year that democracy fought back? | David Van Reybrouck

30 October 2026 at 05:00

Elections are never enough by themselves, but the stunning results from Serbia, Brazil and Hungary have given us hope in dark times

It is undoubtedly too early to declare victory, but the recent electoral defeats of Viktor Orbán, Aleksandar Vučić and Flávio Bolsonaro make me wonder: is 2026 turning out to be the year democracy slowly, but surely, fought back?

Even in Israel, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s reigning bloc lost its parliamentary majority and saw the spectacular rise of Arab parties. Though the opposition may not be able to form a government yet, it does have the larger parliamentary bloc.

David Van Reybrouck is a Belgian author and philosopher laureate for the Low Countries. He is the author of Against Elections: The Case for Democracy, and the initiator of Democracy27

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

Brasil, ‘tem que lutar’

30 October 2026 at 04:30

Ganó Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva en la segunda vuelta de las elecciones de Brasil cuando nadie lo esperaba, y la remontada tuvo tintes épicos. Consiguió lo más difícil, movilizar a los más perezosos y convencer a los indecisos para que le dieran su voto. En esa batalla tuvo una gran importancia la campaña por redes sociales, destinada a llegar a los más jóvenes y que estuvo en manos de un también joven “general”, tal como lo llamó Lula el domingo al valorar su victoria: André Janones, diputado y antiguo cobrador de autobús. Se dedicó a dirigir un ejército de colaboradores para inundar la esfera digital con un torrente de mensajes a favor de Lula hasta el punto de romper la burbuja de la izquierda y llegar a otra gente. También, y un poco a la vieja manera, colaboraron para que Lula ganara unos cuantos músicos. Caetano Veloso, Gilberto Gil, Chico Buarque y Geraldo Azevedo grabaron una canción que defendía las políticas sociales y ambientales del legendario político y que contenía el eslogan Bora, Lula. Con ese vamos, Lula, dale, Lula, respondían haciendo un juego de palabras al Fora Lula que abanderó su adversario, Flávio Bolsonaro. Y, por lo que se ve, fueron más convincentes.

Seguir leyendo

© Amanda Perobelli (REUTERS)

El presidente de Brasil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (a la derecha), celebra con el diputado André Janones su victoria, este domingo.

Milei vuelve a España después de sacudir la campaña con sus insultos a Pedro Sánchez

30 October 2026 at 01:17

Javier Milei volverá a España la semana que viene. Después de protagonizar una agitada visita a Madrid siete días atrás, cuando llamó “dictador” y “ladrón” al presidente del Gobierno español, Pedro Sánchez, el mandatario argentino volverá para participar de la XXX Cumbre Iberoamericana, los días 4 y 5 de noviembre.

Seguir leyendo

© Mariscal (EFE)

Javier Milei en Madrid (España). el 21 de octubre.

Lula wins, Bolsonaro flees: What’s next for Brazil?

29 October 2026 at 23:06

Lula’s comeback to victory in Brazil’s 2026 presidential election was no accident. After trailing far-right Flávio, son of imprisoned former president Jair Bolsonaro, by 2 million votes in the first round, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva won the runoff by more than twice that, powered by a movement that deployed mass street mobilizations and a “Lula’s Army” WhatsApp channel to turn the race around in just three weeks.

Now Flávio Bolsonaro has fled to Miami, defying a court order and claiming the vote was stolen. But lawyer and Movimento Brasil Popular organizer Ana Júlia Guedes credits a disciplined campaign that exposed the far right’s criminal ties. And she tells Zoe Alexandra and Rania Khalek the honeymoon will be short: Lula still faces a deeply conservative Congress, rising political violence against Indigenous and Afro-Brazilian communities, and right-wing governors already moving to block his pro-worker agenda.

Guedes explains what’s at stake in Lula’s final term, from social media regulation to a push for mineral sovereignty over Brazil’s lithium and rare earths – and why Brazilians celebrating Bolsonaro’s defeat are already preparing for a tough fight ahead.

Watch full episodes of BT Live, join breakthroughnews.org as a member today!

#breakthroughnews
******
Rough transcript follows:
[Speaker 1:] Part of his escape has to do with the fact that, because he was part of the Congress, part of the Senate, he still is until the end of the year. But because he will lose that, he will lose the privilege of being judged only at the superior and the Supreme Court. When he loses that privilege, he will be judged by a regular court, regular justices. So that will definitely increase the possibilities of him paying for the crimes.

On October 25th, Brazil’s three-time and current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, surprised the entire world by overcoming an electoral setback in the first round, in which he was defeated by far-right candidate Flávio Bolsonaro, and secured victory in the second round. The legendary union leader during the dictatorship secured 51.79%, equivalent to over 64 million votes, while Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of detained former president Jair Bolsonaro, received 48.21% of the votes, about 59 million.

What’s truly surprising about Bolsonaro’s defeat, because many pollsters had predicted that he would sweep through with this victory having won the first round, is the enormous number of votes that Lula managed to gain during the three weeks between the first and second rounds of voting. Flávio Bolsonaro had won this first round with 48.2% of the votes, more than 56 million votes, and Lula had come in second with 45% of the votes, just 54 million. So there was a significant increase in what he was able to win in the second round.

The key to Lula’s success seemed to lie in his, the PT’s, and the progressive camp’s ability to mobilize millions of people on the streets and on social media in response to Meta’s censorship. Lula supporters hit back with the famous “Lula’s Army,” a WhatsApp channel with over 10 million members, which was in constant mobilization to share, like, and comment on all of the posts for Lula’s campaign. The comeback was of historic proportions, but the struggle is not over yet.

This week, Flávio Bolsonaro left Brazil for Miami of all places and alleges that he is being persecuted and that he rightfully won the elections, though he retracted a declaration that he was the legitimate president of Brazil. If we remember anything from the 2022 Brazilian elections, it’s that the fraud allegations don’t stop with mere statements.

With us to discuss this historic victory, how it happened, and what comes next, we are once again joined by Ana Júlia Gess, lawyer and member of Momento Brasil Popular. Ana Júlia, welcome back to BT Live.

[Speaker 2:] Hi everyone. Hi girls. I’m really, really happy to be here today. This is absolutely, I think in our wildest dreams we couldn’t imagine having such an important victory at this point.

[Speaker 1:] Well, you do seem a lot more calm than last time.

[Speaker 2:] Oh yeah. Oh girl, we were ready to do whatever we needed to do, but oh my god. Yeah, we were ready to do whatever we needed to do, but we knew we had to do a lot. And I think it paid off. Definitely paid off.

[Speaker 1:] And I’m sure there was very little sleep and a lot of being on the streets, being on your phone. First off, we want to talk about this exciting news but just kind of start with the results. So, with what happened on Sunday, what do the results, the voting, which states voted, how many people voted, the abstention rates, what does this tell us about who came out to vote, who perhaps changed their vote, and whose vote was decisive in Lula’s second round victory?

[Speaker 2:] Yeah. So, I mean, just to give quick numbers, we came out of a 2 million votes less. We were behind two million votes to almost five million votes up front. We saw 10 million more people voting for Lula and a very big reduction not only in the number of absences, so we had more people voting, and those who went to vote, we also see them, less people not voting for anyone because in Brazil you can annul your vote at the ballot. So, we saw an increase in participation and that is a result of combining the forces.

We were experiencing exactly what we’ve heard throughout our lives as militants, as activists, that is a combination of the ways of struggle. We were on social media, we were on the streets, we were making discussions about politics like big politics, sovereignty, Brazil’s economy, but also talking about how the access to medication, the access to health, the access to scholarships, how that was also part of what we were deciding.

We saw the two extremes of ages participating. We saw an increase of young folks going to vote and being involved and engaged in all sorts of struggles on social media and on the streets. But we also saw our elderly who have seen dictatorship. We’re talking about people who are even older than Lula, who are 85, 90 years old, those who are 70, 75, who saw and lived through dictatorship coming out of their homes with difficulties. Some of them with disabilities, with mobility difficulties. They all went to vote and they went to vote with a little Lula sticker. Everyone was excited to demonstrate that they had a side.

It’s more than just this electoral victory. What we’re witnessing as people in Brazil right now is something that if you mobilize, if you organize, you can achieve something. And I think that will definitely change the course, the pathways of politics from now on because we’re going to have huge challenges. We’re already seeing the types of violence that we have overcome. We’re definitely changing the ways here and we’re all really glad. Those who have some contact with international media, international news, we’re also really glad to have become some sort of symbol of hope because this is what we talked about when we were on the streets. We talked to people. We said, “No, we’re not only just voting for now. We want to know. We want hope. We don’t want to repeat the same formulas from the past because we’ve seen these white-collar lawyers becoming presidents of Brazil.” And the story was always the same.

We were talking about people like, “Do you recognize this Lula? This Lula, this man is kind of your grandpa.” Many aspects of his life became highlighted, especially becoming a person with a disability due to a work accident. That caught everyone’s attention, this mass of voters’ attention, that we were not just talking about a candidate, we were talking about a country’s project, a sovereignty project. Coincidentally, Flávio escaped to Brazil, he ran away from Brazil on Lula’s birthday, so it became a double meme because here everyone started to make videos saying, “Oh, I proclaim myself the best podcaster, the best mother, the best actress.” It became a meme because this man fled the country with the support of allegedly the Argentinian government of Milei, of course with Trump’s support as well, and it is being investigated at this point that the jet that he flew on is part of a company that is part of a much bigger drug dealing scheme in South America that is once again repeating the trend of these far-rights to be involved with all sorts of organized crime.

He withdrew his declaration of being Brazil’s president, but at that point, people had already checked whether that was written in Brazil or not. He even mistook the Brazilian symbol, like the Brazil symbol for a shield of arms, and they had discovered that he had made that letter on ChatGPT. It’s a done joke, I mean, this guy, but we still have massive challenges at this point. We’ve seen an increase of political violence against local communities, the maroon communities, the indigenous communities, not just being threatened, but being shot, being run over. We saw police officers that ran over motorcycles that were making with Lula’s flag. We’re starting to see companies saying they will lay off all their employees that had supported Lula. We have a regulation that prevents all that. We’re seeing an increase in the reports of this kind of political discrimination. It’s just the beginning of a huge challenge. But somehow the sensation, the feeling that we’re having, the vibes of Brazil that we’re having is that we’re having a people that is much more connected, much with their eyes wide open to understand that it’s not just a victory. This is not just the beginning. This is just the beginning of everything, you know.

[Speaker 1:] Yeah. I mean, indeed it is. So, I want to ask you, all that aside, all the excitement and positivity aside, even though Lula won, he faces an extremely conservative Congress, right? What do you think is going to be the biggest challenge of Lula’s upcoming term? What is it that he’s seeking to accomplish in his final term as president? And then I would add to that, what obstacles do you think he’ll face? What role will the movements in Brazil play in this battle between a conservative Congress and Lula’s presidency?

[Speaker 2:] Well, he has been saying throughout this campaign that these four years were years to rebuild the country, rebuild the Brazilian state, Brazilian government because in reality Bolsonaro had really destroyed the health ministry, all the departments, education, everything was absolutely destroyed, dismantled. Even, for instance, our Brazilian ministry for foreign relations or current foreign affairs ministry. He had been, he’s a man with over 30 years of diplomacy, he had been allocated to the library of the building of foreign affairs. So, people like public servants that had dedicated their entire lives, all that was dismantled and now we would then start to rebuild it.

The Congress is absolutely conservative. The oldest wave of social media and participation and left-wing positioning, everyone like artists, everyone entrepreneurs started to say, “No, I am a left-wing person.” All that started between the first and the second round, but all the congresspeople, governors, state assemblies, all that had already been elected for the first round. So, this is a very conservative spectrum of what conservative can mean. We have women against women’s vote that had been elected as a representative. We have workers against labor rights.

To overcome that, of course, we’ll have to maintain ourselves engaged. I think with what we’re seeing right now, especially with the attacks against indigenous communities, somehow on social media, we’re still very active. So, this is a good rhythm. We’re trying to create muscle to these efforts, but we’ll have to keep on doing the experiencing and doing what we have seen that works. That is this grassroots engagement. This is something that we want to fight against this conservative Congress and we’re seeing more people wanting to be part of movements, wanting to be part of left-wing parties. This will be absolutely important and what we want is to build a really sovereign state project.

We’re talking about social media regulation already. That is an absolute priority for now. We’re talking about transforming many of these public policies into state policies so they can’t be varied throughout each government. We’re talking about the protection of these local and indigenous communities. We’re talking about mineral sovereignty because we just started talking about having a state-owned company that would organize the exploitation and marketing of our minerals, especially rare earths, lithium, and niobium. We have big reserves and we want to use that to make sure that our country will be developed for the people.

We’re already seeing governors, for instance, increasing taxes because here the taxation for fuel is state-defined. We’re already seeing conservative right-wing governors increasing the taxes of fuel to create obstacles for the reduction of food prices that would start. It’s a legal battle, but definitely a mobilization battle. At the same time, we’re seeing governors and mayors that had reduced the bus circulation during Sunday, the voting day, and they are now already suffering some sort of opposition or impeachment processes in the city halls and on the city councils.

It is to combine the presence of those who have got to the congresses and state assemblies and city councils to combine their action with social media presence but also talking to people. It is, I mean, it seems we’re experimenting a methodology that had been told to us by Russian revolutionaries, but here we are well 110 years later saying, well, who would have known if it worked on imperialist Russia, it can work in your country in 2026. But we’re just to give another really horrible fact that we’re seeing. We’ve seen congresspeople, state and federal congresspeople who were elected saying that, oh, we should start painting the stores and any places, the entrepreneurships painted with a red star so they can be identified as left-wing. And they said that, like even the Jewish community went and said, “Well, this is literally fascism.” So, it’s talking about history, talking and we’re seeing even these influencers like makeup, fashion influencers saying, “Hey, you should read Carol P to talk about feminism. You should read Helena that is a Japanese Brazilian feminist.” So, it’s the start of something new but it’s a much broader horizon than what we would have experienced if we had lost these elections.

[Speaker 1:] No, and I think that’s extremely important. I wanted to dig into this point which you’ve brought up a couple of times now, I think, with regards to this agitation and propaganda, this tool that had been very refined in this electoral victory. We’ve seen many reports now coming out over the past several days. Even the New York Times is very interested in this concept of Lula’s army and the WhatsApp channels. So, let’s talk about how this victory happened, how it was achieved. Again, when you were on this program before this second round, you spoke about these massive street mobilizations, the mobilization of people on social media. Let’s first talk about how people were activated and mobilized, what role that played, and what does it tell us about the possibility of defeating the right-wing in Latin America and across the world.

[Speaker 2:] Yeah. So, that was an initiative that one congressman called Jean Wyllys started. He’s been on social media, has been talking about that for quite a while now, but it kind of caught up. Everyone said, “Well, let’s do what we can do.” I think what that created, and I think that’s one of the biggest lessons learned, is that it created a possibility for you that cannot leave your house to go to a demonstration. Or you that is a bit more low profile on social media, everyone could do something to take the campaign a bit further. So, it is to invite one person. You don’t have to make a video, but if you can, you should. But if you can’t make a video, you can upload one of the videos that he would send there.

This was a big lesson learned that it is to create tools in which each person can individually contribute according to their possibilities because not everyone can or feels comfortable to go to a demonstration or even think that a demonstration is important. When the victory happened, I live in São Paulo, we went to Paulista, which is this huge avenue that usually appears on international reports, and the subways were already taken by people. On Saturday, we had a massive demonstration, and we had people from all over the place. I think that also kind of shifted. I think that when everyone saw that they could contribute by sending one text message, by uploading their WhatsApp status or putting on stories or sharing reels, that kind of brought people closer to this whole big purpose.

I think that was a very important element and it’s still happening, of course, not in the rhythm that we were, but we had daily tasks, literally daily tasks. We’re seeing already there is a militancy for the French elections that is coming up. It is a daily task thing, one thing you do, you can share this, you must comment that, you share that on your story, whatever. That created this idea that you were part of something. I think that’s another element that we talk about for a really long time on the left wing. It is how to promote collectivity, how to make people feel part of something. That stimulated and made the demonstrations become bigger and bigger. During that last week, we saw demonstrations here in São Paulo, a huge city, but we also saw in small cities, like cities with 4,000 inhabitants, they would have a demonstration there with 150, 200 people. So, this kind of simulation, this kind of thing already helps, but overall, I think this collectivity idea gave a pathway but also to talk about the future, to talk about hope, to talk about winning. It’s not only just, oh, we’ll overcome him, but we’ll also win.

Another element that was absolutely important, especially considering that we reversed the first round results in very important states, especially Minas Gerais, it is a very defining state. I know in the US you have those states that if you win in these states, you’ll win the elections. Here, it’s the same. We have it with Minas. What we saw is to spread out the information about these right-wing guys. So, Flávio Bolsonaro is just one of them that is involved in all sorts of crime. We started to say here that he saw the criminal code and thought it was a to-do list. I mean, he keeps on committing crimes. We started to talk about that and to talk about that he’s a person that is involved with what’s the worst for our society, that is what is happening in every country at this point. All of these right-wing people, they are involved with some sort of criminal network or drug trafficking or sex trafficking, people trafficking, gun, all that. They are always involved because this is who they are. To talk about that was also very important. We had tasks to talk about Lula, but also to report, to denounce, to say who these people really are.

I think that was, it’s so important that some of these congresspeople and governors and mayors who were involved somehow in trying to prevent people from getting to the ballot locations, they are already escaping as well. They are already fleeing the country. They left the cities. So, this combination of denouncing their crimes, they always have a vast list of crimes, denouncing that we are even joking here. We’re the ones who are the patriots. We’re the ones defending families. We’re the ones defending everything that our country has. This is a very important element too, that it is to give this national content to what we’re saying, the protection of the population. These combination of these messages were also very defining to get the results that we got and to open this horizon from now on because we’re the ones talking about family defense, about defending the country. As you know, this is the commitment we said that we would accomplish. So, here we are accomplishing those. This has been a very important experience in this wave.

[Speaker 1:] Well, lastly, we wanted to ask you about somebody who’s still making some headlines for his outrageous behavior, and that’s Flávio Bolsonaro, who’s now in Miami. He said to media that he is being persecuted, that his father is a political prisoner, and that he plans to return to Brazil, though notably he’s walked back the claim that he’s the legitimate president of Brazil, which he had initially said in a statement. But instead now he’s saying that he’s the leader. What do you think comes next? Is there fear of a struggle over the legitimacy of the elections? Will we see an attempted coup-like situation like in 2022 when these angry Bolsonaro voters attempted to overturn the results? How are social movements preparing for this right-wing response?

[Speaker 2:] This is another lesson that we had learned with our neighboring countries, but once again they’re right. It is for those who attend against the sovereignty of your country. Those must be judged and if needed imprisoned. Those who took part during those that took could attend in 2022. They have responded to criminal lawsuits and they are now either imprisoned or accomplishing their felons just like Jair Bolsonaro. It’s not very new that when the right wing loses an election, they say that it was fraud. They started doing that in 2014 when Dilma was elected in a very tight election as well, but she was elected once again. But again, it’s something that they do because they can’t accept any sort of democracy. Flávio keeps coming up and down. The thing is he is being investigated as being a key member of a very large financial scandal, financial crime against Brazilian and a lot of retirement funds in Brazil, and also being part of other more common illegal networks.

Part of his escape has to do with the fact that because he was part of the Congress, part of the Senate, he still is until the end of the year. But because he will lose that, he will lose the privilege of being judged only at the superior and the Supreme Court. When he loses that privilege, he will be judged by a regular court, regular justices. So that will definitely increase the possibilities of him paying for the crimes because that financial scandal that he was part of also included Marquez even allegedly. We do see the possibility of him literally running away just like his brother that still lives in the US that is being prosecuted here in Brazil for the coup attempts as well.

For the next four years, we do expect some attempts in trying to delegitimize this government, but we’re preparing ourselves. At this point right now, we’re living those known glory days, but we know that we have a very rough path ahead of us. By organizing, by creating all these possibilities to organize, to create all the possibilities for people to give their contribution in the smallest portions that they can. This is a lesson that we learned and that we’ll take on because we know that they will try to attempt against everything that we are, even because this is what they’ve been doing. His party, Flávio’s party, had recognized Lula’s victory, like all the right-wing parties recognized, the electoral court recognized. So here in Brazil, this claim of fraud is pacified. We do not have this claim being sustained here in any legal or even political substance.

But how will they use this narrative to, in the next few years, create a very hostile environment to Lula’s government? This is something that we know will happen. We still don’t know how, but we are going to prepare ourselves. We’ve seen hard days. This is not the first time we’ll see Congress trying to attempt a president, and we will learn from our difficulties. We’ll learn our lessons, but we’ll learn especially because somehow we want to make sure that this democracy is the frontier of democracy and to keep on sending out to the entire world that you can, no matter how big or how small your country is, you must dream and fight for democracy. This is an absolute, this is what we want to be, and this is the message that we want. We want to create a new era for all of those people’s strugglers and people’s fighters around the world because it will be worth it. Oh, the victory is wonderful.

[Speaker 1:] Well, we can feel the great vibes from here. Ana Júlia, thank you so much again for joining us today, explaining exactly how in three weeks this election was turned around. We’ll be sure to check back with you soon. Of course, Lula is inaugurated on January 1st and thus will begin a period of intense struggle on the streets, in Congress, and in all the other realms of society. So, we’ll be sure to bring you back then.

[Speaker 2:] Thank you so much for inviting me.

Base de Lula se divide sobre reforma do Judiciário

29 October 2026 at 21:10

A reforma do Poder Judiciário ganhou força no cenário político brasileiro, especialmente após os escândalos que atingiram o STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal). O tema pautou as eleições presidenciais deste ano e, agora, divide os próprios aliados do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT).

Segundo apuração do analista de Política Matheus Teixeira, o assunto emergiu com intensidade já no primeiro turno das eleições, impulsionado pelas denúncias contra Alexandre de Moraes.

“No segundo turno não foi diferente, os dois candidatos prometiam implementar uma reforma no Judiciário. Tanto Lula quanto Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) falaram diversas vezes em questões nesse sentido”, afirmou Teixeira durante o CNN 360º desta quinta-feira (29).

Teixeira lembrou que Lula, que saiu vitorioso, foi o candidato que mais se viu envolvido na crise que cercou o STF ao longo do período eleitoral, sobretudo em razão do caso do Banco Master.

Críticas ao CNJ e ao CNMP

Lula fez críticas ao Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) e ao Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público (CNMP), dois órgãos criados em 2004 durante seu próprio governo.

Na época, a proposta de criação partiu dele mesmo, com o objetivo de evitar corporativismos nos tribunais que julgavam os próprios magistrados.

Os conselhos foram estruturados com conselheiros de mandato e origem determinados, alguns oriundos da Justiça, outros do Ministério Público e outros da sociedade civil, indicados pelo Congresso Nacional.

Agora, Lula afirma que os dois órgãos não cumpriram as expectativas e precisam ser reformados.

Propostas para o STF ainda sem definição

No que diz respeito ao STF, muito se debateu sobre a criação de mandatos para os ministros e sobre mudanças no sistema de indicação. Atualmente, cabe ao presidente da República escolher sozinho o nome a ser indicado, que depois passa pelo crivo do Senado Federal.

Lula sinalizou em diversas ocasiões que poderia mudar esse modelo, mas nunca detalhou como seria feita a alteração, se pelo Congresso Nacional, por um colegiado ou por outro mecanismo.

Quanto aos mandatos, também não há nada definido: fala-se em 10, 12 ou 15 anos, ou ainda na imposição de uma idade mínima de ingresso que, combinada à aposentadoria compulsória aos 75 anos, criaria automaticamente um limite de permanência na Corte.

Divisão nos bastidores

A questão dos mandatos tem gerado questionamentos nos bastidores da base aliada.

Um dos pontos levantados é que, caso seja estabelecido um mandato de 12 anos aplicável apenas aos novos ministros, os dois indicados do ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro (Kassio Nunes Marques e André Mendonça) permaneceriam no cargo por mais tempo do que os futuros indicados de Lula.

“A gente cria um mandato, mas o mandato não atinge quem já está lá e as pessoas que a gente indicar vão acabar saindo antes mesmo dos dois indicados do nosso adversário”, ilustrou Teixeira ao resumir o raciocínio que circula entre os aliados do presidente.

Apesar das divergências, há vontade declarada de promover mudanças tanto no sistema de indicação quanto nos mandatos.

Os aliados de Lula, no entanto, têm calculado com cautela qual formato seria mais adequado, levando em conta tanto a saúde institucional do Judiciário quanto os próprios interesses políticos, especialmente diante do crescente peso do STF no jogo político brasileiro.

Os textos gerados por inteligência artificial na CNN Brasil são feitos com base nos cortes de vídeos dos jornais de sua programação. Todas as informações são apuradas e checadas por jornalistas. O texto final também passa pela revisão da equipe de jornalismo da CNN. Clique aqui para saber mais.

Lula cogita criar Ministério do Idoso em quarto governo

29 October 2026 at 17:10

O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) tem cogitado criar o Ministério do Idoso para um quarto mandato, segundo fontes no Palácio do Planalto. A discussão junto a auxiliares ainda está em nível preliminar.

A informação foi publicada nesta quinta-feira (29) pelo g1 e confirmada pela CNN.

Aliados do presidente têm especulado os nomes do médico e ex-deputado federal Alexandre Cardoso, de 74 anos, e do senador Paulo Paim (PT-RS), de 76 anos, para comandar a pasta, caso de fato seja criada.

Paim não concorreu às eleições em 2026 e não terá mandato no próximo ano, após mais de 40 anos atuando como parlamentar.

Leia Mais:

Lula prometeu ao longo de toda a campanha eleitoral estabelecer uma política nacional para o idoso. O presidente defende espaços para a prática de atividades físicas e convívio social dos mais velhos, a fim de garantir um envelhecimento saudável.

A CNN procurou a Presidência sobre a possibilidade, mas não houve resposta até a publicação da reportagem.

Caso Lula leve a ideia à frente e considerando a eventual criação do Ministério da Segurança Pública, a Esplanada passaria a contar com 40 pastas.

Na campanha eleitoral, o voto de pessoas com mais de 70 anos foi uma das apostas da equipe de Lula. Esse grupo de pessoas representa cerca de 10% de todos os eleitores do país e não é obrigado a comparecer às urnas.

Neste ano, o registro do voto serviu como comprovação de prova de vida no INSS (Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social). A medida mirou diminuir a abstenção de idosos.

 

'I Did Not Flee Brazil': Flavio Bolsonaro Compares Himself to Charles de Gaulle in Letter from Miami

29 October 2026 at 15:16

Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro published a letter on Wednesday night, deleted and edited twice thereafter, in which he addressed his departure from Brazil after losing Sunday's presidential election, declaring himself the victim of a "witch hunt" and insisting he had not abandoned his country.

The post ‘I Did Not Flee Brazil’: Flávio Bolsonaro Compares Himself to Charles de Gaulle in Letter from Miami appeared first on Breitbart.

Brazil’s victory for the planet and democracy: seven lessons from Lula’s win

29 October 2026 at 17:46

The trouncing of the far right provides a playbook for social and environmental movements in other countries facing elections, including the US, Spain and France

Thank you, Brazil, for demonstrating how the far right can be trounced while protection for the Amazon is strengthened. In a world where nature and democracy appeared to be bleeding out in tandem, voters and forest defenders in this global south powerhouse have shown it is possible to staunch the flow. This should provide much needed inspiration and, more practically, a playbook for social and environmental movements in other countries facing elections, including the US, Spain and France.

The astonishing comeback victory of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in Sunday’s presidential runoff against his extreme right challenger Flavío Bolsonaro has brought oceans of rapturous supporters on to the streets, while also thrilling conservationists, climate activists and social justice campaigners across the world.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

© Photograph: Andre Coelho/EPA

“Vou seguir o que Lula determinar”, diz Janones sobre vaga na Esplanada

29 October 2026 at 16:11

O deputado federal André Janones (Rede-MG) afirmou nesta quinta-feira (29) que irá seguir a vontade do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) sobre ocupar um eventual cargo na Esplanada dos Ministérios no novo governo.

“Eu estou de baixo da liderança do presidente Lula. Então, eu não poso tomar nem a decisão de aceitar e nem a de não aceitar sem falar com ele. Então, eu preciso ouvi-lo primeiro. E a gente vai entender onde que eu posso somar mais com o Lula 4”, disse ao chegar no Palácio da Alvorada, nesta quinta.

O parlamentar, criador do canal no WhatsApp “Exército do Lula“, desembarcou nesta manhã em Brasília. Ele foi chamado pelo presidente para um almoço no Palácio da Alvorada.

Leia Mais:

Para Janones, no entanto, ele pode contribuir mais para o governo se continuar na Câmara dos Deputados. Ele foi questionado por jornalistas se aceitaria o cargo de ministro na área de Comunicação do governo.

“Eu por vontade própria não entendo que um ministério é de onde eu possa ajudar mais o presidente Lula, mas como eu disse, eu estou de baixo da liderança dele”, respondeu. “Eu posso ajudar como deputado. O presidente vai precisar de muita força no Congresso, de muita força para aprovar projetos de interesse da população. A extrema direita tem uma maioria na Câmara e acho que eu ali eu poderia dar um peso pra tentar contrapor isso”, disse.

Janones também não descartou aceitar um eventual cargo de liderança no Legislativo. O parlamentar prometeu ainda trabalhar para um ambiente político “livre da extrema direita”, adotando ações também no exterior.

“Tenho desejo gigante de contribuir em todos os lugares que tiver voz no mundo pra ficar livre da extrema direita. A democracia não existe na hegemonia. Só não cabe no tabuleiro figuras extremistas, que atentam contra o Estado Democrático e querem silenciar”, afirmou.

“Exército do Lula”

André Janones garantiu ainda que não irá “desidratar” o canal de WhatsApp “Exército do Lula”. Ele declarou ter a missão de aumentar para 13 milhões o número de inscritos no grupo até o dia da posse de Lula, marcado para o dia 5 de janeiro.

Atingir a meta seria uma forma simbólica de homenagear o número “13” usado para identificar o Partido dos Trabalhadores nas urnas. Segundo o parlamentar, as ações no canal serão voltadas agora para ajudar na “governabilidade” do Palácio do Planalto em a nova composição eleita no Congresso.

“A gente quer ajudar com esse canal a compensar a minoria na Câmara e no Senado. Eu acho que a gente vai auxiliar ali e ajudar na governabilidade”, garantiu.

Claques protestam contra Lula da Silva, que proibiu bets?

29 October 2026 at 15:03
Pouco antes de ser reeleito, Lula da Silva proibiu as apostas desportivas no Brasil, o que terá provocado a ira de claques desportivas patrocinadas por estas empresas. As equipas emitiram comunicados.

Lula diz a aliados preferir político no comando do Ministério da Segurança

29 October 2026 at 13:55

O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) sinalizou a aliados a preferência por indicar um político para comandar o Ministério da Segurança Pública. O petista promete criar a pasta após a aprovação pelo Congresso Nacional da PEC (Proposta de Emenda à Constituição) que expande a atribuição federal na área e a integração entre os entes.

Segundo interlocutores do presidente, os nomes dos ex-ministros Camilo Santana (PT-CE) e Fernando Haddad (PT-SP) estão na mesa do mandatário como possibilidades para chefiar a pasta no próximo governo.

O nome de Haddad passou a ser cogitado, junto ao de Camilo, devido à sua atuação do Ministério da Fazenda no combate ao crime organizado “no andar de cima”. Lula elogia nos bastidores a ação da Receita Federal em operações como a “Carbono Oculto” – a maior da história do país nessa frente.

Leia Mais:

A avaliação é de que a chefia da pasta poderia dar protagonismo aos petistas, sem necessariamente soar como uma “unção” de um sucessor de Lula, apontam fontes próximas ao presidente.

O mandatário tem dito a interlocutores que a esquerda precisa ganhar espaço na discussão do tema – atualmente capitaneado pela direita – e que deseja ter o Ministério como carro-chefe de seu quarto mandato.

Com isso, perde força o nome do promotor de Justiça do MPSP (Ministério Público de São Paulo) Lincoln Gakiya. O técnico é tido como a personificação do combate ao PCC (Primeiro Comando da Capital) no estado e chegou a dizer publicamente que aceitaria chefiar a pasta caso fosse convidado.

Articuladores do governo preveem que a PEC da Segurança Pública seja votada no Congresso Nacional na segunda semana de novembro. Até lá, tentam costurar um acordo para que a redução da maioridade penal seja discutida em uma proposta de emenda à Constituição à parte.

Em 15 de outubro, a PEC foi retirada de pauta no plenário do Senado após impasse envolvendo emendas sobre a inclusão da mudança na maioridade.

Brazilians in Miami, torn over Flávio Bolsonaro’s presence: ‘I feel helpless’

29 October 2026 at 13:23

The news that Flávio Bolsonaro had arrived at Opa-Locka airport Wednesday morning left Luciana Ferri in shock for several reasons. First: “What kind of political figure does Bolsonaro want to be, even for his own voters, if he’s so cowardly as to skip the country and say: ‘I will not submit to the country’s judicial system, I was only a presidential candidate’?” And second: “Many immigrants here in the United States face fear and uncertainty because of aggressive law enforcement, and suddenly someone with political connections, an ally of President Trump, shows up and is welcomed with open arms.”

Seguir leyendo

© Marta Lavandier (AP Photo/Marta Lavandier)

Flávio Bolsonaro arriving in Miami on Wednesday.

Devemos esperar alguma mudança na política externa no próximo governo de Lula?

By: A A
29 October 2026 at 11:59

Por motivos geográficos inevitáveis e por uma diminuição da autonomia psicossocial, a política brasileira é extremamente dependente dos câmbios políticos que ocorrem de tempos em tempos nos EUA.

Junte-se a nós no Telegram , X e VK.

Escreva para nós: info@strategic-culture.su

Estando confirmada a vitória eleitoral de Lula (e apesar das controvérsias e da crise que perduram) agora é o momento de refletir sobre a possibilidade de mudanças significativas na política externa do presidente do Brasil em seu 4º mandato, que durará até 2030.

Uma pequena revisão das posições assumidas ao longo deste mandato que começou em 2023 se faz necessária.

Numa lista que não deve ser considerada exaustiva, Lula: 1) Reativou a participação brasileira em vários organismos internacionais para os quais Bolsonaro havia dado pouca atenção; 2) Ensaiou uma aproximação com a China no início de seu governo e aumentou laços comerciais após tarifas dos EUA, mas paralisou e recusou a participação na Iniciativa Cinturão & Rota; 3) Reativou a Cúpula da Amazônia, a organização do Tratado de Cooperação Amazônica e realizou na Amazônia a COP30, demonstrando um enfoque na Agenda Verde e na internacionalização (mediada por ONGs ocidentais) da região amazônica; 4) Condenou a operação militar especial russa na Ucrânia, mas se opôs a sanções ocidentais à Rússia, atribuindo responsabilidade pelo conflito tanto à OTAN quanto à Rússia, além de recusar enviar armas e munições para os ucranianos, por outro lado defendendo a retirada das tropas russas e a devolução de todos os territórios libertados/integrados à Ucrânia (incluindo a Crimeia); 5) Condenou a Operação Dilúvio Al-Aqsa do 7 de outubro de 2023 como um ataque terrorista, criticando também a reação israelense como desproporcional e, depois, como genocídio, gerando tensões com o governo de Netanyahu; 6) Pressionou por “eleições livres” na Venezuela, se recusou a reconhecer a reeleição de Maduro, vetou a entrada da Venezuela nos BRICS; 7) Presidiu os BRICS no ano de 2025, sem muitos avanços; 8) Acordo de livre-comércio com a União Europeia; 8) Condenou a Nicarágua e Daniel Ortega na ONU e em organizações de direitos humanos; 9) Criticou o recrudescimento dos embargos contra Cuba e deu seguimento à ajuda humanitária ao país; 10) Levou o caso das tarifas de Trump à OMC; 11) Ampliou parcerias de defesa com Suécia, Itália, Turquia e outros países da OTAN para a produção de equipamentos militares (aviões, veículos, etc.); 12) Se aliou ao Canadá e União Europeia na iniciativa “Parceiros pelo Multilateralismo”, que visa fortalecer a ONU contra ameaças de revisão da velha ordem internacional; 13) Fez publicamente frente comum com os EUA (quando ele era governado por Joe Biden) contra a ameaça das “autocracias” e da “extrema-direita internacional”.

A partir dessas posturas assumidas pelo governo Lula entre 2023 e 2026 podemos deduzir alguns padrões e tendências bem específicos:

1) Defesa do fortalecimento da ONU, dos organismos multilaterais e da “ordem mundial baseada em regras” do pós-Guerra Fria, contra o unilateralismo dos EUA e o revisionismo multipolarista defendido por potências contra-hegemônicas; 2) Inclinação para a União Europeia, enquanto durar o domínio trumpista nos EUA; 3) Máxima diversificação das relações comerciais; 3) Enfoque temático na Agenda Verde, na defesa da democracia liberal e na defesa dos “direitos humanos”.

Ao ignorarmos aos discursos de Lula e atentarmos exclusivamente para uma desconstrução das posições concretas e das ações efetivas do Brasil durante seu atual governo, adquirimos uma imagem que é bastante diferente daquela que é vista por uma grande parte dos analistas estrangeiros, que não raro possuem uma imagem mais “chavista” de Lula.

Em tese, não há motivo para que a postura internacional do Brasil mude nos próximos anos. Ela tende a permanecer aproximadamente a mesma, com as tendências já indicadas.

O único fator disruptivo na previsibilidade do governo brasileiro são os EUA.

Por motivos geográficos inevitáveis e por uma diminuição da autonomia psicossocial, a política brasileira é extremamente dependente dos câmbios políticos que ocorrem de tempos em tempos nos EUA.

Nesse sentido, portanto, diante da atual crise política brasileira, se o governo dos EUA deixar de reconhecer o resultado eleitoral e partir para tentativas diretas de desestabilização do Brasil através de sanções, o reconhecimento de um “governo no exílio”, etc, isso de fato pode forçar o Brasil a uma postura mais contra-hegemônica.

Não obstante, se Trump ignorar o lóbi bolsonarista e buscar algum modus vivendi com Lula, existe a forte tendência à manutenção daquelas tendências que já indicamos.

E finalmente, se os Democratas retornarem à Casa Branca após as eleições de 2028, então o governo do Brasil fará uma virada mais pró-EUA, buscando a reaproximação com Washington, tal como vinha acontecendo quando Joe Biden era presidente dos EUA.

“Vitória de Lula da Silva foi uma surpresa pessoal”. Veja “A Arte da Guerra”

29 October 2026 at 11:00

Ouça e acompanhe “A Arte da Guerra” também em formato podcast:

Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Anchor

Uma semana cheia de surpresas.

A primeira resultou da vitória de Lula da Silva na segunda volta das presidenciais brasileiras – o que levam o presidente para um quarto mandato, que terá dificuldades, mas que não são, por alguém com a sua enorme experiência acumulada, inultrapassáveis. Longe disso.

A segunda surge do facto de o primeiro-ministro Benjamin Netanyahu ter sobrevivido a mais um ato eleitoral – mas, neste caso, Francisco Seixas da Costa estava à espera exatamente disso.

A terceira emana de um telefonema dos chefes de Estado e de governo da Noruega e da Finlândia para o presidente russo, Vladimir Putin. É um risco político a adiante se verá qual é o resultado prático.

Tudo para ver no programa desta semana de A Arte da Guerra, com o embaixador Francisco Seixas da Costa e condução do jornalista António Freitas de Sousa.

Flávio Bolsonaro se refugia en EE. UU. y se autoproclama presidente de Brasil

29 October 2026 at 09:05
Tras su llegada a territorio norteamericano, el excandidato publicó un manifiesto en el que desconoce los resultados electorales, se autodeclara como "el verdadero presidente electo" de la nación e instiga a la movilización de sus seguidores.

Lula can’t decouple from China, whatever Trump may want

29 October 2026 at 07:54

Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s re-election on October 25 may have frustrated Donald Trump’s ambitions in Latin America, but the more consequential story lies beyond the ballot box on China. Brazil’s relationship with Beijing is now so deeply embedded in its economy that even a president more sympathetic to Washington would struggle to unwind it. […]

The post Lula can’t decouple from China, whatever Trump may want appeared first on Asia Times.

❌